Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of alcohol on human behaviour
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Throughout one’s life, one will most likely face many moral dilemmas. Often these moral dilemmas lead to the same consistent crossroad; does one do the right thing, or does one do what is beneficial to oneself? Giving in to selfish desires can be rewarding, but may also come with a price. In Tortilla Flat by John Steinbeck, the protagonist Danny and his ragtag group of friends discover this fact as they are forced to choose between what is morally right, and what is simply convenient for them. The paisanos aren’t the most upstanding of citizens in the small town of Tortilla Flat; therefore, the justification of their selfish actions, the temptation to choose the wrong path, and their fervent alcoholism impairing their judgement all affect their …show more content…
actions and ability to see right from wrong. The first and possibly most prominent motif in the novel is justification.
Throughout the novel, many excuses are made by the paisanos to validate their selfish actions. They are fully aware that what they are doing is wrong; however, in order to make themselves feel better, they often find loopholes to justify their wrongdoings. For example, early on in the novel Pilon finds himself in debt to Danny after neglecting to pay him money for rent. As Pilon is on his way to deliver the money to his friend, he has a realization. He knows that both he and Danny love wine, so instead of paying Danny the money directly, Pilon instead uses it to buy wine. Even though Pilon is most likely aware that this is not the right thing to do, he justifies his actions by insisting that hard money does not express his gratitude towards Danny. Therefore, Pilon’s selfish desire for wine is fulfilled, and he does not feel as guilty about what he has done (20). Another notable example of this is when Teresina and her family run out of food. After learning from Jesus Maria that a bad bean harvest had left the Cortez household without food, the paisanos rush to her aid. They began stealing chickens, goats, vegetables, and other foods without a second thought (151). To them, these actions were completely justified. After all, it was okay if they were helping out someone in need, wasn’t …show more content…
it? Temptation is another motif that plays a big part in how the characters in Tortilla Flat choose to act. Danny and his friends do not have a very high moral standing, making them very prone to temptation. In most cases, their weakness leads to conflict between themselves and other characters. An example of this includes Danny’s affair with Sweets Ramirez. She tempts him into getting involved with her. As a result, Danny feels compelled to give gifts to Sweets, and even ends up buying her a brand new vacuum cleaner. Sweets plans to take full advantage of Danny’s affections for her, and soon tells everybody that Danny is going to pay for her house to have electricity as well (103). Due to Sweets’ tempting nature, Danny is conflicted; he wants to continue buying things for her despite his fading attraction, while his friends tell him to snap out of it and end the relationship. This conflict could’ve easily been avoided if Danny had not been so easily swayed by Sweets. In addition, Big Joe Portagee also gives in to temptation later on in the novel. After Pirate joins the paisanos and begins living in Danny’s house, Big Joe and the other paisanos cannot help but notice the money bag that Pirate leaves out in the open. They often fantasize about how much wine could be bought with all of the money the bag contains. Eventually, Big Joe is the first one to give in to temptation, stealing from Pirate’s bag in order to buy wine. This causes outrage amongst the group, who attack Big Joe almost as soon as he enters the house (131). Even though Big Joe and Danny are both eventually forgiven by their friends, if they hadn’t given in to their impulses then they could have saved themselves a lot of trouble. The third motif, one that is without a doubt a trademark of Tortilla Flat, is the dependency on wine that Danny and his friends all share.
During the course of the story, wine plays a more important role than one might think. It is apparent that the paisanos are much too dependent on wine for happiness, as their shared goal is usually to obtain more of it. Although their alcoholism united them and allowed them to bond with one another, it led to far more selfish actions then noble ones. For example, there is an instance where Pilon debates whether or not to steal Big Joe Portagee’s clothes from his body as he slept in an attempt to trade them for wine. Thinking of only his own gain, Pilon decides to steal his friend’s pants, leave him laying on the beach fast asleep, and take the clothing to Torrelli’s to trade for a jug of wine. (Steinbeck 94). The paisanos’ addiction to alcohol not only impaired their moral judgement, but also caused them to take advantage of each other. For example, after Pilon and Big Joe find what seems to be buried treasure, they both agree to give it all to Danny as a token of their gratitude towards him. While they appear to make the right moral decision, they are actually planning on taking some of the wine that Danny would buy with the gold they were going to give him. Steinbeck even mentions how grateful Big Joe is that he has known Danny such a long time, because he “thought that it was possible that Danny might buy a great deal of wine”
(Steinbeck 84). Big Joe clearly only values their friendship for selfish reasons; he knows that he can take advantage of Danny and get access to the wine he is so dependent on. Just like the paisanos of Tortilla Flat, we are often prone to selfish actions. Danny’s group often sought instant gratification, or the easy way out of many predicaments. Making the right decision in response to a situation is not always the easiest thing to do. While choosing a certain path solely because it will benefit oneself can make sense short term, in the long run it is always best to do what is right. By refusing to justify immoral actions, standing strong against temptation, and not allowing addiction to lead us down the wrong path, we can strive to be better people than Danny and his friends were.
Papi had lost both his house and land in Mexico after Abuela Evila had taken “ill and frail” (p.239) and Tia Emperatriz had managed to get Abuela’s signature on the deed of the property, which included both the land and Papi’s dream house. According to Tia Emperatriz, Papi did not need the house as he already was living in a “beautiful country” (p.239) and as he already had too much. Papi had wanted to speak better English and had wanted to move his family into a better neighborhood and had decided to enroll into adult school for evening class in order to reach his goal, however, after the incident with Tia Emperatriz, Papi stated “I’ve never felt
morals are acquired, and conformity to a standard of right is attained. In the novel The
In chapter two we notice how Rey observes the food table, how it has been divided into two sections. On one side of the table there are the soft drinks and food, while on the other side there are alcoholic beverages and that's where the men of the family are standing and drinking. "Rey, come and sit over here with the men."(14) The reader can sense that Tio Santos manhood has to deal with drinking liquor that is strong and only a strong man is capable of handling. Tio Santos also starts to question Apa's manhood since Apa refused to take a drink of Vodka. The emotional atmosphere in this chapter starts to build up when Tio Santos insults Apa and Apa just shakes his head and does not respond.
It is difficult to make life decisions when knowing that it is all up to you to make the right choice not knowing what the outcome is. In “Gregory” by Panos Ionannides, the soldier has to decide whether to follow the headquarters or his own instincts. Furthermore, in “Just Lather, That’s All” the barber also has to make a choice in a small amount of time, to either kill Torres or not. Moreover, he has no orders to kill Torres it was his own decision to kill someone. The protagonists in “Gregory” and “Just Lather, That’s All” both face moral dilemmas throughout the stories. In the short story “Gregory” by Panos Ionannides, the soldier decides to follow his ethics. In the story “Just Lather That’s All” by Hernando Tellez, the barber has chosen to go towards his morals. Both the soldier and the barber portray that they both need to make decisions that are wise.
The gain of Indulgence has no time or limit to its capaciousness. Tom Walker has a first hand experience with the price of voracity. A tight situation happens in order to warn readers not to let greed or hurdles blind them, for it can have a disastrous consequences. Washington Irving’s short story , “The Devil and Tom Walker” focuses on greed and its negative effects; this presents how self- indulgence is something that can lead to suffering in an individual’s life.
Sally’s prescriptive moral theory combines two separate and unrelated principles to create an all-encompassing moral theory to be followed by moral agents at all times. The first is rooted in consequentialism and is as follows: 1. Moral agents should cause moral pain or suffering only when the pain or suffering is justified by a moral consideration that is more important than the pain or suffering caused. The second is an autonomous theory, where other’s autonomy must be respected, it is 2. Moral agents should respect the autonomy of moral agents. This requires always taking into account the rational goals of moral agents when making decisions that may affect them. The more important the goals are to the agents, the greater the importance of not obstructing them. Since Sally’s theory has two separate principles, she accounts for the possibility that they will overlap. To do so, she includes an option on how to resolve the conflicts. According to the theory, if the principles lead to conflicting actions, then moral agents should resolve the conflict on a case-by-case basis by deciding which principle should be followed given the proposed actions and circumstances.
In fact, Dunstan is the main reason why greed is an issue. He steals Silas’s life earnings from weaving so that he can run away. “Do we not wile away moments of inanity or fatigued waiting by repeating some trivial movement or sound, until the repetition has bred a want, which is incipient habit? That will help us to understand how the love of accumulating money grows an absorbing passion in men whose imaginations, even in the very beginning of their hoard, showed them no purpose beyond it” (Eliot 24). This quote explains that one’s desire for money is not obtained from the want to pursue a rich life, rather from obtaining wealth and wanting more. This fits Dunstan because he comes from an upper class family, but he finds the greed in his heart to want more. Molly is another character that is filled with this sin. She makes efforts to put herself and her baby in danger just so that she can confront Godfrey in order to obtain money. Similarly, both of these characters end up dying which is a consequence for their greed. Another very prominent deadly sin in this novel is envy which is portrayed by Godfrey and Nancy. They both are in despair that Silas is raising Eppie after all of these years of Godfrey knowing she is his child. At this point, they make an attempt to reconcile with Silas in order to take Eppie back. They become envious of the parenting Silas got to do and wish to have her back as their
In order for the insistence that equity and impartiality to hold true to Mill's Utility, we must find a foundation from within his argumentation that will support it. Thus we turn to Mill's sanctions, or incentives that he proposes to drive one towards the path of Utility. Mill's first sanction, the internal sanction, leads one to act ethically because of the fear of displeasure that might arise from other people if one does not act in this manner. Mill justifies that individuals desire the warmness of others as an incentive to acting unselfishly in the attempt to acquire the greatest good, and fear the dissatisfaction of others. Mill's second sanction, the internal sanction, is in essence an individual's inner conscience. With the assumption that the conscience is pure and free from corruption, Mill implies that satisfaction is brought forth to the conscience when one successfully and ethically commits to one's duties, the duty of Utility. What is undesired is the feeling of dissatisfaction that spawns when one does not act dutifully. In order for this rationale to make sense, one must do what is almost unavoid...
Principally, Vega portrays the commodification of the peasant women of Fuenteovejuna. Throughout the playa, the Commander treats the peasant women as his property. During their first conversation in the play, the Commander forcefully asks Pascuala “don’t you belong to me?” after she rejects his sexual advances (Vega 37). Within the same conversation, he takes verbal possession of her by calling her “my wild beauty” (Vega 37). The possessive pronoun “my” demonstrates how the Commander perceives Pascuala as his property rather than as a person. He continues to equate the peasant women with property by declaring to Pascuala and Laurencia “you’re also here as presents/just like the rest!” (Vega 39). By paralleling the women to the food he takes from the villagers, the Commander objectifies them, portraying them as property. In a Marxist staging of the play, this equation would be enriched by the important role property plays in the conflict between the Commander and the peasants. The Commander’s objectification of the peasant women is not only insulting; it represents his further exploitation of the property of the working class. Indeed, Vega parallels the women with food, the property the Commander exploits from the villagers. When Laurencia asks the Commander’s
In life, situations arrive that force us to make tough choices. Sometimes those choices are not what we feel are compassionate or morally right. We make these decisions to save ourselves. These are decisions of self-preservation, and they override compassion. Tadeusz Borowski depicts these choices in his book This Way for the Gas, Ladies and Gentlemen. He shows that when people are put in the choice of doing what’s right or preserving their life, one is preferred over the other. Would they rather save their selves or just watch others be sent to their death. In the novel, the narrator wrestles with his decisions and like Borowski suffers from them.
Stocker highlights the constraints that motives impose on both ethical theory and the ethical life in order to show that only when justifications and motives are in harmony can people lead the good life. Stocker believes that mainstream ethical theories, like consequentialism and deontology, make it impossible for people to reconcile their reasons and motives because these theories demand that people perform acts for the sake of duty or for the good, as opposed to because they care about the people who are affected by their actions.
At times in a person’s life, they might come across a few situations that leave them with a major decision between two or more options that challenge what they believe or what they might think is wrong or right. These are known as ethical dilemmas. Be it seeing a friend steal something and choosing between being honest and speaking up or letting it go. It can also be getting paid more than you earned and deciding if you’re going to be greedy and keep the money or return it. We run into these situations in our lives, some bigger and more influential on our destiny’s while others are small with no real consequences.
Throughout life, one will use ethics to make decisions, solve dilemmas and determine right from wrong, without consciously knowing. During this semester in my Ethics course, I have closely studied the four “Steps of Ethical Analysis” created by Ruggeiro and Lonergan’s system of “Operations of Consciousness”. These similar concepts merge into one framework because both focus on the way humans make choices throughout their lives. In this essay, I will go more in-depth about the ethical frameworks Ruggerio and Lonergan created and show how they closely relate in solving an ethical dilemma.
Bonevac, Daniel A. Today's Moral Issues: Classic and Contemporary Perspectives. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Pub., 1992. Print.
We all know there is right and wrong, and that we should focus on doing what is right. However, in many cases such as these two provided to us for this assignment, choosing good has some serious consequences. Unfortunately, life gives us difficult situations, and some cannot always avoid the negative outcomes or side effects that come with the positive action. As individuals, we should strive to avoid evil, and seek good. Although the situations had some negative consequences, in these cases, the good actions were taken according to the principle of double