Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of the financial crisis on the global economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction
It was previously assumed that economic investors and regulators (agents) utilised all available information and thus market prices were a reflection of this information with assets representing their fundamental value, encouraging the position that agents’ actions were rational. The 2007-2008 Global Financial Crisis (GFC) is posited to have originated from the notion that all available information was utilised, causing agents to fail to thoroughly investigate and confirm “the true values of publicly traded securities,” leading to a failure to register the presence of an asset price bubble preceding the GFC (Ball 2009).
This essay will use the notions of EMH to determine the extent to which they can explain the Global Financial Crisis using the US as a case study.
Efficient Market Hypothesis
Fama propounded EMH, in 1965, stating that provided all available information is used, market prices will reflect reasonably accurate approximations of the inherent present value of securities; the employment of this information would render agents’ actions rational. Ball expands on this by suggesting that competitive markets lead to costs falling in line with the employment of information.
The question proposed by EMH is thus, why did the GFC occur if agents are using every piece of information available to them and how does relying on the notions of EMH contribute to market crashes? Ball highlights a significant argument by suggesting that the revelation of new information leads market prices to drop because of re-evaluated expectations. In the case of the 2007-2008 GFC subprime mortgages were permitted and this led to asset price bubbles: an ignored feature of the market, thought to be a prominent cause of financ...
... middle of paper ...
...cmillan, 2007. http://web.mit.edu/alo/www/Papers/EMH_Final.pdf (accessed April 7, 2014).
Mishkin, Frederic S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, "How Should We Respond to Asset Price Bubbles?." Last modified May 15, 2008. Accessed April 12, 2014. http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/mishkin20080515a.htm.
Muth, John F. "Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements." Econometrica. no. 3 (1961): 315-335. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1909635 (accessed April 6, 2014).
Trading Economics, "UNITED STATES GDP REVISED UP TO 2.6% IN Q4." Accessed April 10, 2014. http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gdp-growth.
United States Department of Labor: Bureau of Labor Statistics, "UNITED STATES GDP REVISED UP TO 2.6% IN Q4." Last modified April 11, 2014. Accessed April 11, 2014. Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey.
The financial crisis of 2007–2008 is considered by many economists the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s. This crisis resulted in the threat of total collapse of large financial institutions, the bailout of banks by national governments, and downturns in stock markets around the world. The crisis led to a series of events including: the 2008–2012 global recessions and the European sovereign-debt crisis. The reasons of this financial crisis are argued by economists. The performance of the Federal Reserve becomes a focal point in this argument.
After a generation of portfolio managers and investors profiting from decades of favorable returns on stocks, they believed the modern economy was impervious to major calamities (“Rethinking” 20). As inflation rates fell from record highs in the late 1970s and early 1980s to the record lows that they are today, interest rates followed, enabling Americans to borrow more money from lenders which, in turn, increased housing prices to all-time highs (“Rethinking” 21).
Many people today would consider the 2008, United States financial crisis a simple “malfunction” or “mistake”, but it was nothing close to that. Contrary to what many believe, renowned economists and financial advisors regarded the financial crisis of 2007 and 2008 to be the most devastating crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930’s. To make matters worse, the decline in the economy expanded nationwide, resulting in the recession of 2007 to 2009 (Brue). David Einhorn, CEO of GreenHorn Capital, even goes as far as to say "What strikes me the most about the recent credit market crisis is how fast the world is trying to go back to business as usual. In my view, the crisis wasn't an accident. We didn't get unlucky. The crisis came because there have been a lot of bad practices and a lot of bad ideas". The 2007 financial crisis was composed of the fall of many major financial institutions, an unknown increase in mortgage loan defaults, and the derived freezing up of credit availability (Brue). It was the result from risky mortgage loans and falling estate values (Brue) . Additionally, the financial crisis of 2007 was the result of underestimation of risk by faulty insurance securities made to protect holders of mortgage-back securities from risk of default and holders of mortgage-backed securities (Brue). Even to present day, America stills suffers from the aftermaths of the financial crisis.
It is often said that perception outweighs reality and that is often the view of the stock market. News that a certain stock may be on the rise can set off a buying spree, while a tip that one may be on decline might entice people to sell. The fact that no one really knows what is going to happen one way or the other is inconsequential. John Kenneth Galbraith uses the concept of speculation as a major theme in his book The Great Crash 1929. Galbraith’s portrayal of the market before the crash focuses largely on massive speculation of overvalued stocks which were inevitably going to topple and take the wealth of the shareholders down with it. After all, the prices could not continue to go up forever. Widespread speculation was no doubt a major player in the crash, but many other factors were in play as well. While the speculation argument has some merit, the reasons for the collapse and its lasting effects had many moving parts that cannot be explained so simply.
According to Payne (2014), the U.S. economic growth will strengthen in this year with an average of 2.7 percent because of various factors including the strengthening of consumer and business confidence. The other factor that will contribute to the strengthening of the country’s economic growth is Europe’s emergence from its long slumber, a trend that will brighten the prospects of foreign sales. However, this economic growth will largely be limited by ongoing government deficit reduction. As compared to the first half of 2013, economic conditions are already better since growth increased with an average of 3.7 percent in the second half of 2013. Consequently, expectations of increased economic growth in the United States are rising as people believe that this will be the best year since the tribulations of 2008 global recession. Generally, America’s GDP growth will become stronger in 2014 averaging at least 2.7 percent becaus...
] This catastrophic event is caused by the accumulation of a large scale of speculation by not only investors but also banks and institutions in the stock market. Though the unemployment rate was climbing during the 1920s and economy was not looking good, people on Wall Street were not affected by the depressing news. The optimism spread from Wall Street to small investors and they were investing with the money they don’t have, which is investing on margin as high as 90%. When the speculative bubble burst, people lost everything including houses and pensions. The main reason ...
Cabral, R. (2013). A perspective on the symptoms and causes of the financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37, 103-117
The efficient market hypothesis has been one of the main topics of academic finance research. The efficient market hypotheses also know as the joint hypothesis problem, asserts that financial markets lack solid hard information in making decisions. Efficient market hypothesis claims it is impossible to beat the market because stock market efficiency causes existing share prices to always incorporate and reflect all relevant information . According to efficient market hypothesis stocks always trade at their fair value on stock exchanges, making it impossible for investors to either purchase undervalued stocks or sell stocks for inflated prices. As such, it should be impossible to outperform the overall market through expert stock selection or market timing, and that the only way an investor can possibly obtain higher returns is by purchasing riskier investments . In reality once cannot always achieve returns in excess of average market return on a risk-adjusted basis. They have been numerous arguments against the efficient market hypothesis. Some researches point out the fact financial theories are subjective, in other words they are ideas that try to explain how markets work and behave.
The "subprime crises" was one of the most significant financial events since the Great Depression and definitely left a mark upon the country as we remain upon a steady path towards recovering fully. The financial crisis of 2008, became a defining moment within the infrastructure of the US financial system and its need for restructuring. One of the main moments that alerted the global economy of our declining state was the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers on Sunday, September 14, 2008 and after this the economy began spreading as companies and individuals were struggling to find a way around this crisis. (Murphy, 2008) The US banking sector was first hit with a crisis amongst liquidity and declining world stock markets as well. The subprime mortgage crisis was characterized by a decrease within the housing market due to excessive individuals and corporate debt along with risky lending and borrowing practices. Over time, the market apparently began displaying more weaknesses as the global financial system was being affected. With this being said, this brings into question about who is actually to assume blame for this financial fiasco. It is extremely hard to just assign blame to one individual party as there were many different factors at work here. This paper will analyze how the stakeholders created a financial disaster and did nothing to prevent it as the credit rating agencies created an amount of turmoil due to their unethical decisions and costly mistakes.
During the 1920s, approximately 20 million Americans took advantage of post-war prosperity by purchasing shares of stock in various securities exchanges. When the stock market crashed in 1929, the fortunes of many investors were lost. In addition, banks lost great sums of money in the Crash because they had invested heavily in the markets. When people feared their banks might not be able to pay back the money that depositors had in their accounts, a “run” on the banking system caused many bank failures. After the crash, public confidence in the market and the economy fell sharply. In response, Congress held hearings to identify the problems and look for solutions; the answer was found in the new SEC. The Commission was established in 1934 to enforce new securities laws that were passed with the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The two new laws stated that “Companies publicly offering securities must tell the public the truth about their businesses, the securities they are selling and the risks involved in the investing.” Secondly, “People who sell and trade securities must treat investors fairly and honestly, putting investors’ interests first.”2
The efficient market hypothesis states that it is not possible to consistently outperform the market by using any information that the market already knows, except through luck. Information or news in the EMH is defined as anything that may affect prices that is unknowable in the present and thus appears randomly in the future.
Howells, Peter., Bain, Keith 2000, Financial Markets and Institutions, 3rd edn, Henry King Ltd., Great Britain.
The film the Big Short, a film adaption of a book by the same name, explains the events leading up to the subprime mortgage crisis of 2008. It presents the complex economic mechanisms behind the crisis in layman’s terms by using analogies and metaphors to explain to the audience what the big banks were doing to destroy the global economy. While the primary focus of the film is about how relatively few organizations could have such a profound effect on the global economy, I came to the realization that it was much more than that. By the end of the movie I had come to the conclusion that society as a whole had become apathetic, cynical, and firm adherents to the adage that ignorance is bliss.
Several financial statements have been prepared to describe the causes of this current financial failure. There are a variety of factors that has resulted in the explosion of this financial crisis. Downfall of the US housing market; highly benefited financial dealings and a low interest-rate promoting borrowings, have all contributed to the recession monetary market. Let us now consider these various reasons in a little detail.
Warwick J. McKibbin, and Andrew Stoeckel. “The Global Financial Crisis: Causes and Consequences.” Lowy Institute for International Policy 2.09 (2009): 1. PDF file.