To What Extent Was Andrew Jackson A Good President

475 Words1 Page

Was Andrew Jackson a good president? Many people can argue that he was or was not. Serving as the seventh President of the United States from 1829 to 1837, Jackson made decision about the national debt, the issue of nullification, and Indian removal. Jackson was a complicated president because he did some really great things, but he also did bad things. Andrew Jackson represented himself in both good and bad ways.
Andrew Jackson made the right decision by paying off the national debt. He was the only president to do so. Jackson did not like the National Bank because he thought it was corrupt and he did not like the way they ran things. Andrew Jackson got rid of the bank in his second term. “He also thought that people should not be using paper money because many states did not value the money the same, but instead he should be using ‘hard money’ or silver and gold.” This was one of Jackson’s biggest accomplishments and …show more content…

Thousands of Indians were forced out of their own homes to find new land to live on. “Of some 11,500 Cherokees moved in 1838, about 4,000 died along the way.” “That any person or persons, whatsoever, who shall chose to emigrate to the Arkansas country and shall sell the improvements he or they shall be in possession of.” Everything that the Indians owned was either taken away or sold. Many people thought that the Indians were treated unfairly. He believed that the colonists and the Indians could not live together, peacefully. To many people this was not a good decision Andrew Jackson could have made. This action can help support the opinion of him being a bad president. Overall, one person must define the criteria of what makes a good leader or president. Andrew Jackson was a complicated president. He did not make the best decisions for the country, regarding the South and Native Americans, yet he did many great things, like pay off the country’s national

Open Document