Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
To kill a mockingbird movie compared to the book
To kill a mockingbird movie compared to the book
To kill a mockingbird movie compared to the book
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: To kill a mockingbird movie compared to the book
TKM compare and contrast Robert Mulligan’s film To Kill a Mockingbird is not completely identical to its counterpart novel of the same name, by Harper Lee, but is rather a brief condensing of the book. Although, most of the time being accurate, no movies are ever exactly the same as the novels on which they are based. There are many similarities between the film and novel; however, the contrasts outnumber the two works. No reasonable person would expect the director to include every single detail into the film. To Kill a Mockingbird was, in fact, a large book. The film director did an excellent job with including all of the main points and scenes, enough to make it directly correspond with the novel in some representations. There are many …show more content…
similarities between To Kill a Mockingbird and the film. For example, the tale took place in the same setting of Maycomb, Alabama during the 1930s, post-depression. Also, Harper Lee made it clear that in the summer, Maycomb was extremely hot, even at night. The town was very small, but the fact that no one came or left meant that everyone knew each other. On average, the town was overall very friendly, but was racially divided from the looming effects of slavery and the Civil War from the 1860s. The tone and themes were also very similar between the book and the movie. At the beginning of the story, the tone was very innocent and humorous with the children. After the story continues, certain events show Scout that there are evil people in the world. As the trial to convict Tom Robinson continues, the tone becomes more serious. The themes are also very obvious in both the book and the movie. Racism was probably the biggest theme, Although Tom Robinson was clearly innocent of raping Mayella Ewell, the all-white jury found him guilty due to their own prejudice. Racism, creates not only the conflict in this story, but is also an obvious theme. Even courage is shown during the story. Atticus Finch exhibits tremendous bravery, despite the initial picture of him as a pacifist, as he represents and tries to protect Tom Robinson. As well, in the scene where he protects his family from a rabid dog, his children are allowed a glimpse of his hidden courage. Characters in the novel and movie, To Kill a Mockingbird, were both similar and different. In the novel, Scout’s and Jem’s friend Dill was short for his age, and in the screenplay the director made sure to include that feature. Although Dill’s features were the same, his Aunt was a different person in the movie, Stephanie Crawford instead of Miss Rachel. Dill’s aunt from the novel was completely left out in the movie. The attitudes of the characters were also very similar, for example, Atticus Finch. He is the town's most respected lawyer; he is not wealthy, but he is well off in the community and kind to everyone. Many characters were also left out from the movie that were in the book. One of the most crucial characters left out from the movie was Aunt Alexandra; her role was rather long and important in the novel. When Aunt Alexandra said, “Calpurnia put my cases in the front bedroom”, before even greeting any of her family, showed how much she thought of servants as worthless. However, towards the end of the novel Aunt Alexandra seems to have a change of heart, and the author shows that even the most stubborn of all characters can change. This was an important aspect of the plot, and it would have made a great improvement to the film. Also some scenes and events were worthy of discussion.
Starting off, anyone watching the movie can tell that the plot moves extremely fast compared to the original novel. The plot skips a lot of extra detail which gave the book it’s one of a kind aspect. Many scenes were skipped, such as when Jem trampled Ms. Debose’s flowers. Another scene that was absent was when the Finches spent time at fiches landing with other family members. The courtroom scene was virtually unchanged, in fact even giving the exact same speeches. At the end of the trial, the colored men stood for Atticus to show their respect and gratitude towards him, which was also included in the book. Many quotes were given in remembrance of the novel. One quote would include a rather famous saying by Atticus, “You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view... Until you climb inside of his skin and walk around in it.” For the most part, the novel and film have many things in common; after all, the film did use the same plot as the novel. However, like most film re-makes, To Kill a Mockingbird film counterpart is not subject to having identical storylines. The contrasts of the film are many, but tolerable as to not destroy the whole plot. These similarities and contrasts are not the downfall of either novel or film, rather the characteristics are what define and give each their own unique
aspects.
What really shocked me about a part that was left out in the movie was when Jem was punished to go help and understand Mrs. Dubose as a punishment. After Mrs. Dubose harassed Jem and Scout, he got tired of it and took out his anger on her most precious thing, her garden. I thought this was very important to the book and would be essential to the movie as well. This was one of the scenes that showed us that Jem was indeed “growing up.” It also introduced us to Dubose’s addiction to morphine and her attempt to stop and be, courageous, as Atticus said. I actually, after all the differences, believe this is the most important scene that was not in the movie.
The differences in the movie and the book might have been intentional. If audiences were to read the book, watch the movie, and reach conclusions, I think they would have great understanding of what’s inside them both. For example, a scene in the movie in which Atticus tells his children why it is a sin to kill a mockingbird was not in the book; from that scene, I inferred on how that became the initial title of the book. By using both resources, I was able to gather information and grasp its contents tighter.
Shaw-Thornburg, Angela. “On Reading To Kill a Mockingbird: Fifty Years Later.” Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird: New Essays. Meyer, Michael J. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press, 2010. 113-127. Print.
In this essay I will discuss three overarching topics and the differences and similarities they show between the film "A Time to Kill" which stars Samuel L. Jackson and Matthew McConaughey and the novel To Kill a Mockingbird which is written by Harper Lee. These overarching topics will be racial prejudice, justice, and morality. I will discuss racial prejudice's role in the court proceedings as well as state what would have occured had Carl Lee and Tom Robinson been white. In the section about justice I will discuss how the outcomes would have occured in real life had both men been judged based on crimes they actually commited and been judged by the law with no extenuating circumstances or racial prejudices affecting the verdict. I will discuss these themes using examples that have Nathan Radley and Tom Robinson from To Kill a Mockingbird and Carl Lee Hailey from "A Time to Kill".
Walt Whitman’s 1859 poem “Out of the Cradle Rocking Endlessly” depicts the mockingbird as a symbol of innocence that chants or sings of fond memories from the past. By contrast, Harper Lee’s famous novel To Kill a Mockingbird, published in 1960, written almost a century after Whitman’s poem, portrays the mockingbird as innocent but as a fragile creature with horrific memories – memories of discrimination, isolation, and violence. Harper Lee wrote her novel, which is rooted in the fictional town of Maycomb, Alabama, in the Deep South, during a time of segregation and discrimination, social issues which can be seen not only in the novel but were witnessed by Harper Lee in her own life. While Lee does insert bits and pieces of her own life into the novel, this fictional story is told by the character Jean Louise Finch, better known as “Scout.” She tells a horrific yet heroic story about a time in the 1930’s from a childhood perspective. The title of Lee’s book is not at first as apparent as it would seem. In fact, the only literal reference to the mockingbird appears only once in the novel. The reader, then, must probe deeply into the characters and events of the book to uncover the significance of the mockingbird. After seeing the treatment and the unyielding courage of Tom Robinson, Boo Radley, and Atticus Finch, the reader can easily identify these three as mockingbirds.
To Kill A Mockingbird is a heroic tale of leadership and courage during racial times. In the novel To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee. Atticus, To, Jem and Scout are unfortunately exposed to a really racist and prejudiced society and town. Which ends up causing them to lose a case and really confuse Jem and Scout when they are young. In Harper Lee’s novel To Kill A Mockingbird, it uses characterization to help show a theme of loss of innocence when people are exposed to surprising and unfair situations.
To Kill A Mockingbird is a courageous tale of leadership and bravery to others. From Atticus helping Tom, to Boo trying to communicate with the kids. Harper Lee used real-life events as inspirations for her novel To Kill A Mockingbird. There are connections to Jim Crow Laws, mob mentality, and issues of racism in that time period.
As most everyone knows, there are differences between a book and it’s movie adaptation. This is applicable to the book and it’s movie counterpart To Kill a Mockingbird, as well. But aside from the differences, there are also similarities between these two.
Harper Lee’s only book, To Kill a Mockingbird, is the stereotypical tale of childhood and innocence, yet it successfully incorporates mature themes, like the racism in the South at the time, to create a masterpiece of a work that has enraptured people’s minds and hearts for generations. According to esteemed novelist Wally Lamb, “It was the first time in my life that a book had sort of captured me. That was exciting; I didn’t realize that literature could do that” (111). Scout’s witty narration and brash actions make her the kind of heroine you can’t help but root for, and the events that take place in Maycomb County are small-scale versions of the dilemmas that face our world today. Mockingbird is a fantastically written novel that belongs on the shelves of classic literature that everyone should take the time to read and appreciate for its execution of style and the importance of its content.
A Time to Kill and To Kill a Mockingbird both have a number of similarities to be compared and contrasted. Both stories can be compared in their themes about justice and racial prejudice. However, this is where the similarities end. The themes and ideas in both novels are vastly different in shape and scope. In A Time to Kill justice is the main theme and most of the ideas are focused on justice and the gray in between the lines of black and white set by the law, racial prejudice is also touched upon very frequently in the comparisons between Jake Brigance and Carl Lee Hailey and how he wouldn't even have had to face trial if he was a white man. In To Kill a Mockingbird justice is a theme which is not expanded upon or explained in nearly as much detail as it is in A Time to Kill. To Kill a Mockingbird also has a much larger variety in it's themes, ranging from the themes of justice to the exploration of a child's way of perceiving right and wrong as well as the idea of coming of age. These stories are honestly and objectively far more different than they are alike.
To begin with, there are many similarities between the book and movie To Kill A Mockingbird. For example, Tom Robinson died in an attempt to escape from prison in both the book and the movie. In my opinion Tom's death was crucial to the original story, and I believe the movie would have been seen as over-sentimental if the scriptwriters had let him live. Another important similarity between the book and movie, is the mutual fascination between Arthur Radley and the children. Arthur, or Boo as the children called him, left them gifts such as dolls, a watch, and chewing gum in the hollow of a tree in his yard. The children made expeditions to the Radley house to look in the window just so they could catch a glimpse of Boo Radley. I believe this captivation was important to the story line because it was the main foundation of the children's imagination. A big part of the story was imagining Boo to be some kind of freak that came out at night to eat cats and squirrels. An additional similarity between the book and movie is the respect showed to Atticus by the African American community of Maycomb. They respected him for his courage, which by his definition meant, "It's when you know you're licked before you begin, but you begin anyway and you see it through no matter what. You rarely win, but sometimes you do."(112). I think the mutual respect between the African Americans and Atticus was important not only to Atticus, but also to his children. Their father and the sad story and memories of Tom Robinson taught them the wrongs of racism. I think if the movie producers had taken out the good relationship between Atticus and the African Americans, it would be taking away one of the most important themes of the story. There are many other significant similarities between the book and the movie.
It also introduces the way in which the story will be told, and five of the most important characters. For eight paragraphs, there is nothing but a description of the Finch family. It is here that childhood really starts to be introduced. The language used is almost entirely superfluous, very descriptive uses many effective, if childish, techniques such as "There was no hurry, for there was nowhere to go, nothing to buy and no money to buy it with" (repetition) and very descriptive phrases such as "A day was twenty-four hours long but seemed longer". Description of characters is done in two highly differing ways in 'To Kill A Mocking Bird', the first being the adult and formal manner: "Jem and I found our Father satisfactory: he played with us, read to us, and treated us with courteous detachment."
For this assignment, I decided to do my film review on To Kill a Mockingbird (Mulligan, R., & Pakula, A. (Directors). (1962). To Kill a Mockingbird[Motion picture on VHS]. United States of America.) I have a personal connection to this film because it is one of my most beloved novels by Harper Lee. I have never watched the film so it was a nice experience to see the characters I have loved for years come to life just before my eyes. The film particularly focuses on a white family living in the South of the United States in the 1930s. The two siblings, Jem and Scout Finch, undergo major changes while experiencing evil and injustice in their small town of Maycomb. Jem and Scout’s father is named Atticus and he is a well-respected man in the town as well as being a lawyer.
The movie focuses more on Tom Robinson’s case itself, than the social caste issues with the citizens of Maycomb (Dave). The movie was made in hollywood during the the civil rights movement, which proves that the lack of racial issues addressed is intentional. When the trial begins in the novel, the White people enter the courtroom first, followed by the blacks in a different section. The movie shows the people entering together and separating into sections (Overview: To Kill a Mockingbird). The movie leaves out scenes that show the Finch children not seeing characters differently because of race. The movie leaves out Jem and Scout going to Calpurnia 's black church with her, while Atticus is away (Smykowski). Horton Foote’s screenplay adaption loosely shows the reluctance of scout’s character when dealing with the unwillingness of society to seek to know a person before judging them. The movie fails to show little details of prejudice. In the movie, African Americans are not seen doing the hard, manual labor, which was their only opportunity for employment (Overview: To Kill a Mockingbird). In the book, Reverend Sykes tells the children about how Tom Robinson 's damaged his left arm as a boy in a cotton gin. In the movie, Tom tells the court himself. Even though movies are not entitled to follow the book directly, the focus of To Kill A Mockingbird as the movie is
In the past, I have done reviews on John Adams, Rudy, Grease, and The Butler. For my fourth quarter movie review, I decided to watch To Kill A Mockingbird because I have already read the book and wanted to see the film adaptation of it. This movie focuses on the Finch family in the fictional town of Maycomb, Alabama around the time of the Great Depression. It is based off of the book of the same name by Harper Lee. Both focus on Scout and Jem Finch growing up in the deep South and struggling to figure out how to act in the world around them.