Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary criticism of to kill a mockingbird
The importance of censorship
Critical appreciation of killing the mockingbird
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literary criticism of to kill a mockingbird
To Kill a Mocking Bird is one of the most iconic novels in American literature. The novelis well received and highly praised by many. Written in 1960, the novel quickly went into the school curriculum by the mid-1960s. This novel sparked controversy on both sides of the political spectrum. Many parents wanted the novel to be taken out of school libraries, due to certain topics addressed in the novel. Because of this, many people have advocated to censor the novel to make it more adequate for adolescents to read. However, there are people who think that the novel should not be censored. They say that censoring the novel will prevent children from understanding the tribulations that African Americans had to go through during the 1930s in the …show more content…
However, they soon revoked these ideals once they realized that they were wrong. One example of this is from the article in, “Defense of to Kill a Mocking Bird”. It said, “Typically, the Hanover County School Board in Virginia first ruled the book immoral, then withdrew their criticism and declared that the ruckus was all a mistake” (Jill May 303). The novel received more harsh criticism by liberals. “In Warren, Indiana, three black parents resigned from the township Human Relations Advisory Council when the Warren County school administration refused to remove the novel from Warren junior high school classes. They contended that the book "does psychological damage to the positive integration process and represents institutionalized racism" In Warren, Indiana, three black parents resigned from the township Human Relations Advisory Council when the Warren County school administration refused to remove the book from Warren junior high school classes. They contended that the book ‘does psychological damage to the positive integration process and represents institutionalized racism’”(Jill May 304). Parents in urban areas say the novel institutionalizes racism because of its harsh language and therefore wanted the novel to be removed from school …show more content…
There are many good reasons why the novel should be censored or taken out of school libraries. There are some really inflammatory situations that go on in the novel. The novel offends both blacks and whites in their respective ways. However, this helps adolescents understand the novel better. People need to look past the vulgar language and accept the cultural depiction for what is was. To Kill a Mocking Bird is a great American classic. For it to be censored and edited would ruin the novel. We should respect American Literature for what it is and the lessons it teaches instead of focusing on mere
Mark Twain once said, "Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it.” However, some of his books, such as Huckleberry Finn, were often banned for irrational reasons. Like Huckleberry Finn and many other books, To Kill a Mockingbird (TKaM) has also been unreasonably banned in many places. I firmly believe that TKaM, like any other book, should not be banned because it is a timeless classic that teaches positive morals and contains many important lessons. TKaM is a very skillful book that explores many significant themes.
To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee is a heartbreaking, timeless novel that examines stereotyping and its consequences. The novel shadows Atticus Finch, a small-town lawyer, as he defends a black man, Tom Robinson, who is accused of raping a white woman in racist Maycomb, Alabama. Frequently, To Kill a Mockingbird has been banned for use in many schools because of the racial content in it. In the novel, racial tension and slurs are used frequently. Although the novel does contain these things, To Kill a Mockingbird should definitely be taught in schools because it represents accurately what it was like before blacks received their civil right, it teaches valuable life lessons, and it shows how novels like To Kill a Mockingbird helped the civil rights movement.
Killing a mockingbird is a very memorable book, people who read the book years ago still remember it today. Some people think the book shouldn't be taught in school, however, the evidence shows the book should be taught in schools. How Harper Lee’s To Kill A Mockingbird should be taught in schools because it teaches racism from a kids perspective and how kids deal with the world's problems. Some people think that Harper Lee’s to kill a mockingbird should not be taught in schools, for example Malcolm Gladwell.
The decision to ban the novel Huckleberry Finn from classrooms and libraries has been an ongoing controversy. The presence of the 'n word' and the treatment towards Jim, and other blacks in general, has made many readers uncomfortable. Despite this fact, Huckleberry Finn has been and remains a classic read. I do not believe the novel should be banned or sanitized because it is a part of American history whether it is good or bad, also we have no right to change someone's writing simply because we do not like how it is written, Mark Twain's writing should not be penalized because of the ideals of today.
When a group of children known as the Little Rock Nine stepped onto the campus of Central High School of Arkansas on September 4th, 1957, they changed history forever. By being the first black students to attend a traditionally white high school, the nine students helped move America toward a more fair and constitutional attitude toward colored people. To Kill a Mockingbird was written during this time period and deals with many of the same cultural issues even though it’s story takes place a few decades earlier. If this were not the case and the novel’s characters had grown up during the same time as the Little Rock Nine, there is no doubt that Scout, Atticus, Bob Ewell, and many other characters would have had strong opinions about and may have even taken action for or against the Little Rock Nine or the Civil Rights movement as a whole.
To Kill a Mockingbird is a novel written by Harper lee in 1960. The novel tells the story of Atticus Finch, a white lawyer, and Tom Robinson, a black servant, accused of raping a white female. Finch defends Robinson in court arguing lack of evidence as his main point. However, the judge and jury still believe the woman’s testimony and orders Robinson to be killed. The novel has been praised for its outstanding literature since its publication. However, it remains a banned book by the American Library Association for its use of racial slurs and profanity. Due to it being banned, many high schools have reconsidered the notion of teaching it to their students. Two prominent authors wrote articles pertaining to this piece of literature: Angela Shaw-Thornburg wrote an article on her re-reading of the novel and her opinions on it; while Malcom Gladwell wrote an article comparing Atticus Finch to a state governor liberalist, James Folsom, and the restraints of liberalism in the south. In addition, Rebecca Best contributes her thought on how the novel should be taught by introducing the idea of “the other.” Regardless of the modern day political arguments surrounding this piece of literature, this novel contains a large insight into the time period of the 1960s which is an influential topic that should be taught to young high school students.
To Kill a Mockingbird demonstrates modern society. In the book, Boo Radley is represented as a criminal. Who has spent all of his life on his dad’s house. Thus no one really knows he is only hiding away from people, in which create the discriminating society of today. To kill a mockingbird was viewed as one on of the most controversial novels of its time and is still considered that today, decades after it was published. It was controversial by demonstrating discrimination based on old stories,looks and social status. The people that were known as the mockingbirds were Boo Radley, Tom Robinson and one may also say Mayella Ewell.
In my opinion, I agree that To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee should be taught in schools. It should be taught for a variety of reasons, some in which the article we read covered and some it did not. I think it should be taught in schools because it tells us real life examples of what our history used to be like and the book could also teach all of us a lesson in life. Some points in the article we read that I will be talking about is what the book is about, how it is important for American history, and finally why I disagree with the statement of only adults should be able to read this.
Why should this novel be banned from use in schools? Students should be able to hear these words and talk about them and not use them offensively. Racial content, tension, and slurs are used in people’s everyday lives. If people can use these words outside of school why would they not be allowed to be talked about in school? It is important for everyone to be informed about these racial tensions. This book also shows the reader what is was like to be growing up in this time period. Although this book uses the n-word, it uses it in a historical way. Using these racist words explains the way of thinking of the south in the 1930s. To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee is appropriate to use and read in school.
An important reason why To Kill a Mockingbird is relevant today is the ever growing resurgence of racism throughout the country. Events such as the ones in Jena, Louisiana, seem to become more common each day. Recently, a black professor at Columbia University had a noose placed on her door. The novel, which was an attempt to spread knowledge of the racism in the south, was trying to stop the very things that happen everyday now. As racism becomes more and more prevalent, this novel will be a good tool to help teach the next generation about racism, and about how it is wrong.
Think of it like this, a book is like a piece of art, without certain details how will the art be portrayed? If the author did not include things such as racial slurs how will you be able to understand important parts of the book such as when the character Dill was crying during the court case on page 226. A specific piece of evidence showing this detail would be when Dill said: “I know all that Scout. It was the way he said it made me sick, plain sick.” From using details explained above you are able to fully understand why this character would have felt that certain way. Also included in the article To Kill A Mockingbird removed from Virginia schools for racist language It states in the text that, “ The NCAC slammed the action in a post on its Kids Right To Read website, writing: “By avoiding discussion of controversial issues such as racism, schools do a great disservice to their students.” This is able to prove my point that it would be depriving the students of learning about our history of racism not to allow them to read this
To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee has been challenged/banned countless times since it’s original publication in 1960. The reasoning people could have behind banning it is that they feel that the racism, language and subject matter in the book is offensive, inappropriate, immoral and that it encourages and condones such things. To Kill a Mockingbird takes place in Maycomb, a small town in Alabama, during the depression from 1935-1937, and is told from the perspective of a little girl named Scout. In the book Scout’s father Atticus teaches her and her brother Jem many valuable lessons. The things Atticus teaches Scout and Jem are things we all need to know. To Kill a Mockingbird is an inspirational book that teaches valuable moral values, and should not be banned.
To Kill a Mockingbird demonstrates modern society. In the book, Boo Radley is represented as a criminal.Who has spent all of his life on his dad’s house.Thus no one really knows he is only hiding away from people, in which create the discriminating society of today .To kill a mockingbird was viewed as one on of the most controversial novels of its time and is still considered that today, decades after it was published. It was controversial by demonstrating discrimination based on old stories,looks and social status .The people that were known as the mockingbirds were Boo Radley, Tom Robinson and one may also say Mayella Ewell.
Harper Lee used this novel to show how injustice occurred at the time of writing her book with racism being a common thing and African American people being treated as worse than white people. This led to the book being banned in public school systems because it portrayed the south in an unfavorable way leading to it being outlawed. This book is an important piece of history as it tells the story of injustice faced by black people in the 1930s and how someone such as Scout or Atticus could try to overcome
There has been many great debates about how the classic fiction books over the popular fiction and be taught in the school curriculum. Christopher Bantick had an opinion about how classic fiction should always be taught in the school curriculum. In his opinion he states that “Reading literary fiction leads people to perform better on tests that measure empathy”. And that if you read popular fiction it can get you nowhere. But others have argued that popular fiction books are better and are relevant to today’s kids. The novel To Kill A Mockingbird is a classic fiction book and it has been read and taught in many schools. In this essay I will be arguing about how the novel to kill a mocking bird by Harper Lee should be read in school rather than popular books such as “The fault in our Stars”.