To Control or to Not Control: The Government and Birth Control

776 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Birth control controversy essay

To Control or to Not Control: The Government and Birth Control Health care and what people are legally allowed to do with their bodies have created controversy galore throughout history. A particular point of debate is the topic of birth control and the government. A dangerous couple, it raises the question of who should have control over contraceptive laws and what controls involving them should be put in place? Currently, under the Obama Administration, the Affordable Care Act and “Obamacare” have been created. One of the sections of this new plan creates a mandate which requires private businesses to provide insurance that covers birth control costs. The government should not be able to force businesses, and therefore the American people, to pay for birth control via health insurance because it violates the First Amendment and would create a financial burden for an already struggling country. The Constitution states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” (U.S. Const, Amend I). While forcing businesses to provide birth control is not a direct violation of this part of the First Amendment, it is still a violation. Religious freedom is not limited to churches, mosques or other religious organizations, nor is it limited to acts of worship (Rivkin and Wheland). Therefore it seems fitting that corporations should be able to live out their beliefs on contraceptives. Another piece of legislation that this violates is the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The goal of this act was to protect against government actions that would target or burden religious activities or practices (Rivkin and Wheland). It is clear that forcing businesses to cover something tha... ... middle of paper ... ...0406555906>. Howell, Tom, Jr. "Supreme Court to Decide Obamacare Birth Control Mandate." The Washington Times. Washington Times, 26 Nov. 2013. Web. 1 Jan. 2014. . Matthews, Merrill. "The Government on Birth Control." Forbes. Forbes.com, 4 Aug. 2011. Web. 1 Jan. 2014. . Rivkin, David B., Jr., and Edward Whelan. "Birth-Control Mandate: Unconstitutional and Illegal." Wall Street Journal (2013): n. pag. Web. 1 Jan. 2014. . Weigel, George. "The Mandate War." National Review 21 May 2012: n. pag. Ethics and Public Policy Center. Web. 1 Jan. 2014. .

Show More
Related

  • Rhetorical Strategies Used in The Morality of Birth Control Speech by Margaret Sanger

    974 Words  | 2 Pages

    Sanger, Margaret. "The Morality of Birth Control." Gifts of Speech. Smith College, 2012. Web. 15 Dec. 2013.

    Read More

  • Griswold vs. Connecticut

    1819 Words  | 4 Pages

    On June 7th 1965, married couples in the State of Connecticut received the right to acquire and benefit from contraceptive devises. In a majority decision by the United States Supreme Court, seven out of the nine judges believed that sections 53-32 and 54-196 of the General Statues of Connecticut , violated the right of privacy guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. The case set precedence by establishing marital (and later constitutional) privacy, and had notable influence on three later controversial ruling=s in Roe v. Wade (1973), Bowers v. Hardwick (1986) and Planned Parenthood of S.E. Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992) . The issue at hand was, and is still, one that still causes debate, wether a state has the authority to restrict the use and sale of contraceptives. Though it is not contraceptives, anymore, that is at the heart of the abortion debate, this ruling was the first step to the expectation of constitutional privacy.

    Read More

  • Overview of Roe v. Wade

    1102 Words  | 3 Pages

    "Jane ROE, Et Al., Appellants, v. Henry WADE." LII. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Dec. 2013.

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography Of The Pill

    1605 Words  | 4 Pages

    Paradox Of The Pill. (Cover Story)." Time 175.17 (2010): 40-47. Military & Government Collection. Web. 9 Apr. 2014.

    Read More

  • We, the Corporations, of the United States of America

    1571 Words  | 4 Pages

    First, it is imperative to comprehend the implications of the case Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby. This court case is still in litigation and pertains to the Fourteenth Amendment, the Affordable Care Act (ACA), religious freedom, and woman’s access to contraceptives. The ACA requires all insurance companies to cover forms of female birth control. The ACA also requires l...

    Read More

  • Essay On Birth Control By Margaret Sanger

    575 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the whole of the 21st century, the subject of birth control has become a trending topic throughout various news reports. The debate on whether or not birth control should be required and distributed by all health plans has caused much controversy throughout the population. However, there was a time in our history when contraceptives, much less birth control, was available for the public. It was through the perseverance and determination of Margaret Sanger to make birth control legal for all women that it is accessible worldwide today. She was the leader of the birth control movement, which was conceived during the Progressive era of United States history.

    Read More

  • Essay On Birth Control Pills

    1264 Words  | 3 Pages

    Watkins, E. (2012). How the pill became a lifestyle drug: the pharmaceutical industry and birth

    Read More

  • The Reproductive Right Debate

    2552 Words  | 6 Pages

    No other element of the Women’s Rights Movement has generated as much controversy as the debate over reproductive rights. As the movement gained momentum so did the demand for birth control, sex education, family planning and the repeal of all abortion laws. On January 22, 1973 the Supreme Court handed down the Roe v. Wade decision which declared abortion "fundamental right.” The ruling recognized the right of the individual “to be free from unwanted governmental intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person as the right of a woman to decide whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.” (US Supreme Court, 1973) This federal-level ruling took effect, legalizing abortion for all women nationwide.

    Read More

  • Hobby Lobby Pros And Cons

    269 Words  | 1 Pages

    The “Obama Administrations Mandate” that employers provide tending coverage in employee health insurance provoked a lawsuit form Hobby Lobby, whose owners objected on religious grounds and prevailed in the supreme court. Applying the first amendment guarantee of freedom of religion to an ever changing world is a job that will never be fully done but on the equal protection

    Read More

  • Why Do We Continue to Debate the Use of Contraception

    1569 Words  | 4 Pages

    Why Are We Debating Birth Control … Again? | Boston Magazine. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.bostonmagazine.com/2012/05/politics-and-birth-control-debate/2/

    Read More

  • Contraception Coverage

    1259 Words  | 3 Pages

    Robert Creamer. "Protecting Access to Birth Control Does Not Violate Religious Freedom." Current Controversies: Politics and Religion. Ed. Debra A. Miller. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2013. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Lee’s Summit High School. 31 Oct. 2013

    Read More

  • Abortion is Woman’s Right to Choose

    1524 Words  | 4 Pages

    With so many women choosing to have abortions, it would be expected that it would not be so greatly frowned up, yet society is still having problems with its acceptance. Every woman has the fundamental right to decide for herself, free from government interference, whether or not to have an abortion. Today, more than ever, American families do not want the government to trample on their right to privacy by mandating how they must decide on the most intimate, personal matters. That is why, even though Americans may differ on what circumstances for terminating a crisis pregnancy are consistent with their own personal moral views, on the fundamental question of who should make this personal decision, the majority of Americans agree that each woman must have the right to make this private choice for herself. Anti-choice proposals to ban abortions for “sex-selection” or “birth-control” are smokescreens designed to shift the focus of the debate away from this issue and trivialize the seriousness with which millions of women make this highly personal decision. Any government restriction on the reasons for which women may obtain legal abortions violates the core of this right and could force all women to publicly justify their reasons for seeking abortion.

    Read More

  • Planned Parenthood Argumentative Analysis

    967 Words  | 2 Pages

    Planned Parenthood has been targeted by conservative due to controversy over abortion. I am pro-choice. I believe that it is the woman’s choice and only her choice whether or not she carry’s out a pregnancy or not. I personally would not be able to get one myself, but that is why it would be my choice. Pro-choice is not pro-abortion. It simply supports that your body is your body and no one should tell you what you can or can’t do to it. America was built on the base idea that church and state should be separate, but a lot of conservative reasoning for their pro-life arguments tends to be linked to religious reasons. I consider myself to be a very religious person, but I understand that my religion should not have a seat at the table when discussing governmental matters. Planned Parenthood gave women, who otherwise would not have been able to afford it, reliable healthcare. Not to mention that majority of patients from Planned Parenthood are minorities and lower class citizens. The people who are against federal funded health care facilities seem to only be upper class groups who either have great insurance or are so rich it doesn’t even matter. Planned Parenthood services includes cancer screenings, STD checks, and other general healthcare options. Abortions make up an extremely small percent of Planned Parenthood’s services, and the small percent that goes to abortions is not under federal aid. The argument that tax payers were paying for women to get abortions was/is completely

    Read More

  • Affordable Care Benefits

    359 Words  | 1 Pages

    “The Affordable Care Act’s Birth Control Benefit: Too Important to Lose” is an online resource written in May of 2017 featured on the National Women’s Law Center (NWLC) website. The authors are a group of health care experts who advocate for women and girls, especially from low-income backgrounds. Everybody cannot afford medicines that they may need throughout their lives. These health care experts are trying to make sure that our president, Trump, does not try and take away this act.

    Read More

  • Birth Control On College Campuses

    678 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the society we live in now men still tend to think that women must still obey and cater to their every need as if women have no voice over their rights. One of the most controversial subjects that has been around for a long time is women’s access to birth control. The topic of birth control is extensive is includes whether women have the right to have an abortion in their home states, regardless of the situation in which they happen to get pregnant. Women shouldn’t have to be integrated when they choose to have an abortion. In the government the men in power feel that they have the right to choose for women. The point to this paper is to address the lack of access to birth control on college campuses. Most college students pay little to

    Read More

More about To Control or to Not Control: The Government and Birth Control

Open Document