Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis of "to build a fire
Importance of nature in literature
Literary analysis of "to build a fire
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literary analysis of "to build a fire
The interactions between the 2 main characters
In this short story (To Build a Fire) there are 3 characters which consist of 2 primary characters and 1 secondary character. It may seem unexpected but the companion of the man is the secondary character while the man and the environment he is in play the roles of the 2 main or primary characters. The man can be seen as very arrogant and ignorant to his surroundings. While the environment around him can be seen as an antagonist that eventually brings him down.
The Man’s fatal flaw was him thinking that he was more powerful than nature. This way of thinking can be seen many times and it is what causes him to fail. He thinks he is better and stronger, yet the environment still throws obstacles
…show more content…
The old man told him that whenever the weather is below -75 degrees Fahrenheit always travel with someone else. Yet the man did not do that, which he then got into a problem that almost killed him due to the lack of another human companion. But he survived, but instead of regretting not listening to the old man’s advice he mocked him saying “ Those old men were rather womanish” (p.72). Eventually, after many close calls, the man finally regretted not listening to the advice, yet it was too late for him, all because of his arrogance and ignorance.
But it was not entirely the man’s fault which leads to his demise. His surroundings i.e the environment around him played a large role in ending him. His environment played the role of the antagonist who kills him. Or even the Protagonist who kills the bad guy depending on your view of the man. In the story, there are many examples of how the environment played as the antagonistic character. The first thing that set the man to his spiraling path of demise was when he broke the snow and fell into the water. But it happened as if the environment intended for him to fall, with no warning of the danger, “ At a place where there were no signs, the man broke through” (p.71). When he fell into the water this forced him to make a fire. And through the process of starting a fire, the environment acted several times more as the antagonist. The author used the cold as part of the environment and personified it to show how it was
The immense power of a text is gained through the distinctive ideas portrayed within. John Foulcher, Australian poet and teacher, outlines his observations of the environment surrounding him and the conflict within it through his poetry. These poems include ideas such as the brutality in nature trumping its beauty, as represented in the poems For the Fire and Loch Ard Gorge. As well as how observing nature's savagery can give insight into human mortality, as is prominently expressed in Loch Ard Gorge, and lastly the mundanity and complexity of society compared to the simplistic divinity of the natural world as displayed in Summer Rain. The distinctive ideas portrayed in these texts create powerful meaning and affect those reading them, allowing
The character I have chosen for study from Edwidge Danticat’s written novel, “A Wall of Fire Rising” is Guy Sr. Guy is the father of a young son, Guy Jr. and husband to a woman named Lili. The relatively poor family lived in a small shack in a shanty town in Haiti near a sugar mill. Guy has a charming personality and genuinely loves his family; however, he does not have the financial means to provide for the family the way he would like. When Guy learned that his son was playing an important role in a play, his face lit up with joy and happiness. There are definitely positive characteristics of Guy’s personality such as; the love he shows for his family and his willingness to seek work at the sugar mill or wherever he could to provide a meal for his family.
A Wall of Fire Rising, written by Edwidge Danticat, is a story about a small, poor family of three that live in Haiti. The family is composed of Guy, the father, Lili, the mother, and Little Guy, their son. Throughout the entirety of the story, the story provides the reader with in-depth details about each one of the main characters. Lili and Little Guy can fully be understood early in the story and are static characters, but the same cannot be said for Guy. although the reader is giving information about Guy early on, he he quickly changes in this story. In A Wall of Fire Rising, Lili and Little Guy are static characters, while Guy is a dynamic character, and through his action the reader can see there is more in life that he wants for his family.
When the man is cautioned by knowledgeable men about taking note of traveling alone in severely cold temperatures, the man blatantly ignores them. He thinks to himself, “Any man who was a man could travel alone” (553). This shows not only his ignorance to the harsh realities of an extreme climate but him as a highly critical character because he assumes the old-timer is not a “real man” since he suggested not to travel alone. Not only that, but the man carries his ignorance over the course of his journey. After swiftly creating a fire in a desperate situation, he thinks boldly “...the cold of space was outwitted” (551). He believes he has successfully overcome nature’s harshness by building one fire on his lengthy journey to the next camp. His bold thinking reveals the man’s arrogant character, which prevents him from being prosperous in the harsh climate. It lulls the man into a false sense of security where he believes he is unstoppable. However, like any man, he is not as strong as he believes himself to be. As the environment does its work, the bitter cold becomes even more dangerous, and the man is faced with a choice- he can keep fighting or give in to the sleepiness of death. At this point “...he sat up and entertained in his mind the conception of meeting death with dignity...Well, he was bound to freeze anyway, and he might as well take it
A person's next move can affect them and someone in their life without them even realizing it. So why would they want to make the decision that could result in a sudden death in their family ? It is only right they be held accountable for the steps that lead up to or occurred after, they got entrapped in a life or death situation unless, it happens to be an accident.
Catching Fire: How Coooking Made us Human by Richard Wrangham is a fresh perspective on the evolution of humankind. Wrangham has made a concentrated effort to prove that humans have evolved particular adaptations, like bipedalism, due to the introduction of cooked foods into their diet. In his book, he is legitimately arguing that humans are the way they are because early on in human evolution, early man discovered fire, discovered the joys of cooked foods, and developed all sorts of fascinating traits still being utilized today.
In the case, “Facing a Fire” prepared by Ann Buchholtz, there are several problems and issues to identify in determining if Herman Singer should rebuild the factory due to a fire or retire on his insurance proceeds. I believe that this case is about social reform and self-interest. I think that Singer needs to ask himself, what is in the firm’s best economic interests. There are several things to question within this case, what should Herman Singer do and why, should he rebuild the factory or begin retirement, if he rebuilds, should he relocate the firm to an area where wages are lower and what provisions, if any, should Singer make for his employees as well as for the community?
In "To Build a Fire," Jack London expresses his perspective of the multitude of greenhorns who flocked to the yukon in a rush for gold. It is evident that he believed that these newcomers were too inexperienced and blinded by gold fever to survive the trip. Like many of them, "the Man" is driven by his own foolish ego to act irrationally and to not follow wise advice. Though his consience continually nags at him, his ego-driven way of thought keeps pushing him blindly forward. The Man is not only representative of other fortune hunters like himself, but he also repersents every person on this planet. All of us, at some point in time, pushed our own consience aside and followed our own selfish ego.
One instance in which ice and snow reveals deeper meaning can be found within the struggle between nature and the protagonist of “Hunters in the Snow.” Tub this particular type of conflict is commonly known as “man versus nature,” and characterizes Tub’s experience
...h. This causes him immense mental suffering because he confronts the constant reminder of death even in the mist of protection. If he remained integrated within society he would have had the ability to live life without a constant hourly reminder of death.
As characters in the poem are literally snow bound, they find that the natural occurrence actually serves a relaxing and warming purpose, one that brings together family. This effect is further achieved through the use of meter throughout the work as a whole. In its simplistic yet conversational tone, the author uses meter to depict the result that nature has forced upon these humans, who are but a small sample size that actually is representative of society that that time. Due to nature, the characters can talk, represented by the conversational meter, and thus, they can bond within the family. A larger representation of this more specific example can be applied to a more general perspective of human’s relationship with the natural world. Although “Snowbound” captures what humans do as a result of nature, it can also represent a larger picture, where nature appears at the most opportune times to enhance relationships from human to human. In “snowbound,” this is symbolized by the fire, “Our warm hearth seemed blazing free” (Whittier 135). This image relays a spirited, warm, mood full of security, which is expertly used by the author to show how fire, a natural phenomena, can provide such beneficial effects on humans. This very occurrence exemplifies how such a miniscule aspect of nature can have such a profound effect on a family, leaving the reader wondering what nature and its entirety could accomplish if used as a
Altho somewhat similar the two stories are very different in many ways. The first story is called “Mystery of Heroism” by Stephen Crane and the other one is “To Build a Fire” by Jack London. Both of the books are part of the short story genre and realism stories. The author's purpose for writing the “Mystery of Heroism” is to tell a story about a brave man who went to get water for a dying man. The purpose for writing “To Build a Fire” is to tell about a man and his dog and how he tried to fight the below freezing temperatures to stay alive. Both authors use realism because they want to tell real stories about people and how they had to overcome struggles in their lifetime. These two stories have similarities but they are way more different than anything else. One of the stories is about a man who has to overcome fear to get water for a man.
Foremost, the theme of this story is that ignorance can lead to poor decisions because the man ignores his surroundings. An example of this is when the man ignored the advice and warnings given by the old-timer from Sulphur Creek. It stated on page 4 in the 3rd paragraph “It certainly was cold, was his thought. That man from Sulphur Creek had spoken the truth when telling how cold it sometimes gets in the country. And he laughed at him at the time.
When the narrator introduced the main character of the story, the man, he made it clear that the man was in a perilous situation involving the elements. The man was faced with weather that was 75 degrees below zero and he was not physically or mentally prepared for survival. London wrote that the cold "did not lead him to meditate upon his frailty as a creature of temperature, and upon man's frailty in general, able only to live within certain narrow limits of heat and cold."(p.1745) At first when the man started his journey to the camp, he felt certain that he could make it back to camp before dinner. As the trip progressed, the man made mistake after mistake that sealed his fate. The man's first mistake was to step into a pool of water and soak his legs to the knees. This blunder forced the man to build a fire to dry his wet socks and shoes so his feet would not freeze and become frostbitten. When the man began to build a fire he failed to notice that he was doing so under a large, snow laden spruce tree where he was getting his firewood. When the man had a small fire that was beginning to smolder the disturbance to the tree caused the snow to tumble to the ground and extinguish the fire. "It was his own fault or, rather, his mistake. He should not have built the fire under the spruce tree. He should have built it in the open."(1750).
Naturalism is a form of realism usually posed as an alternative to reality. Naturalists wrote about human life, shaped by forces beyond human control. Characters were introduced from all levels of society, not just those of the middle class. People whose lives were out of control, as described in this movement, saw “their fates seen to be the outcome of degenerate heredity, a sordid environment, and the bad luck that can often seems to control the lives of people without money or influence” (Baym & Levine, 2013, p. 10). Human life was no longer being dictated by those who were living, but by nature.