The development and prosperity of 17th century expansion created a system that accumulated a vast amount of wealth at the expense of others. During the 17th century many nations started to participate in long distance trades, which introduced a great deal of new possibilities, exciting forms of transcultural exchange, and unprecedented circulation of goods and ideas. In Vermeer’s Hat, by Timothy Brook he explores the origins of world trade in the 17th century through the painting of Johannes Vermeer. By analyzing Vermeer’s painting, Brook illustrates the world of 17th century global trade and examines the phenomena of globalization. For instance, Brook states that, “The seventeenth century was not so much an era of first contacts as an age …show more content…
of second contacts, when sites of first encounter were turning into places of repeated meeting”(Brook 8). The 17th century was a time where global trade had just begun developing, explaining why “things were ending up in places other than where they were made”(Brook 8). The idea of long distance trade may sound like an impeccable idea, however it had many negative consequences as well. Through the participation of long distance trade, nations have encountered several negative impacts in aspects such as economical, social, and military. Participants in the long distance trade suffered various persistent problems, which eventually led to the decline of long distance trade. During the 17th century, several nations participated in long distance trade, which resulted in negative consequences economically. Due to the activities of long distance trade, many of the participants turned away from economic activities, such as agriculture and fishing. Furthermore, participants abandoned their traditional skills and crafts for the competition from new commodities. In Vermeer’s Hat, Brook asserts that, “The bulk of the silver, in other words, was the capital that the VOC used to buy its way into the Asian market, stimulating intraregional as well as global trade”(Brook 161). The cumulative value of silver was extraordinary, because it became the currency to buy new goods and commodities in China. However, the trade of silver consisted of many economical consequences that ultimately led to the decline of long distance trade. Brook explains, “The flowing river worked to the advantage of many Spaniards and many Chinese, but not all”(Brook 162). Spanish royals often complained that all of the wealth is being passed into the possession of China, but not Spain. The reason for this is because China possesses commodities that European nations desire, which can be traded for silver. For more or less geological reasons, China simply did not have access to precious metals, which increased the value of silver and other precious metals. However, during the end of the Ming Dynasty, the constant trading of silver across the Atlantic to Europe, Asia and the Americas caused inflation and the value of silver sharply fell as a result. Therefore, trade decreased and China’s economy collapsed because of the decrease in value of silver. The economic consequences were not the only negative impacts that long distance trade has accounted for.
The social set backs created a colonial society where power was concentrated in the hands of a select few: the elites. The elites gained power and wealth by owning and managing large plantations. During this era, the demand for tobacco rose immensely in Europe and Eastern Asia. In order to supply the demand of tobacco, the Europeans took over the plantations in America and started the Dutch West Indian Company. Brook asserts the Dutch WIC, “found that they (tobacco plantation owners) needed more labor than their own families could supply”(Brook 132). Thereby, introducing slaves to these tobacco plantations. Behind the trade operation of tobacco, there were inhumane slave trades being conducted. Many people lost their lives, mainly as a result of the slave raids in the weaker countries in Africa, for which they could not defend themselves. Many of which, were killed and abused during the long distances to the coast. Brook states that, ‘Together the three prime commodities of the age -silver, tobacco, and slaves to mine the first and harvest the second -set the foundation on which the long-term colonization of the Americas rested”(Brook132). Slaves were the main labor force of these long distance trade operations. Without the slaves, none of these foreign affairs and trades would have taken place. The idea of utilizing slaves for long distance trade may be effective for …show more content…
maximizing profits, however slavery is inhumane and socially unacceptable. Furthermore, military dominance was a severe consequence of long distance trades.
Long distance trade allowed nations without powerful military strength to buy firearms and other military forces. In Vermeer’s Hat, Brook asserts, “The development of the arquebus was impelled by the competition among European states, but it gave all Europeans an edge over peoples in other parts of the world”(Brook 39). With this technological superiority, the Spanish were able to enslave the Native Americans and force them to work for the silver mines. However, some European traders were not cautious and “sold arquebuses to anyone”(Brook 40). Politically many societies strengthened their military with the wealth they acquired from long distance trade. This resulted in some nations becoming military powerhouses, while the other smaller nations stayed powerless. Only the nations with wealth or high demanded commodities were able to sustain a powerful military. Although many nations were allowed to buy military resources, only a select few were able to manage and afford these
commodities. Conclusively, in the world of early modern global trade there is an indisputable cycle in the operation of long distance trades. The labor force, which consists of slaves, is forced to manage the tobacco plantations and mine silver. Meanwhile, the resources that the slaves obtained are collected by the Dutch WIC and then traded for other goods. As the vicious cycle of trading continues, the wealthy nations will eventually strengthen their military, which would eventually develop into a dominant military nation. The decline of long distance trade was inevitable, because subsequently the world would have molded into an imperialistic society. Incorporating slaves to secure resources “became the pattern that enabled Europe to dominate much of the globe for the next three centuries”(Brook 132). Early modern trade created a common human community based on economic, military, and social exchange. All of which include several negative consequences, therefore resulting in the decline of long distance trade.
Some of the items included porcelain and silk, which is more of a want than a need. Charles D’Avenant also mentions that along with receiving luxury good, Europeans were only sending silver and gold back to Asia, which would become buried and never returned. The global flow of silver’s influence on trade between European nations can be seen in D’Avenant’s account of the English being “supplanted in the spice- trade by the Dutch”, in his reference to importing from the East Indies commodities that can then be sold elsewhere across Europe, in his disappointment that gold and silver gets buried permanently in Asia. To the people of Europe, Asian silks and dyed cloth is pleasing to everyone and useful to wear at home. That meant that it should not be recommended to quit the trade between Europe and China because it benefited both countries. In his essay, Xu Dunqiu Ming wrote about how before, buyers would give vegetables and animals in order to purchase a product from a merchant (Doc. 4). But, silver allowed trading and bartering to be simpler because instead of having to trade item for other goods and services, a person can just give a certain amount of silver coins. The historical context of this essay
During the period 1550-1800, the colonization of the Americas by European civilizations led to massive shifts in economic power from the West to East and vice-versa. An increase in global competition among western civilizations and against their asian counterparts drove Europeans to search for wealth elsewhere, and thus colonizing the Americas. One of the easiest ways to generate a profit, increase a civilizations wealth, and ultimately their military power was through the silver trade. In monopolizing said trade, Europe was able to establish a somewhat steady economic connection to the very wealthy Asian civilizations. However, european nations were struggling to keep control of the silver trade out of Asian hands, which caused major shifts
Moreover, he concurs with Roberts principles that attain to a replacement of weapons, army sizes, tactics and the implication of warfare on society. However in Parker’s book, The Military Revolution he contributes three revised principles towards Roberts conclusion. First, Parker argues that the innovations of gunpowder weapons forced European states to innovate their fortifications, thereby changing warfare from being fought on land to sieges and being fought for decisive purposes. Second, he asserts that warfare in the early modern period prompted European states to monopolize on the supply effort to recruit soldiers and feed their new armies. Parker’s third principle indicated that naval power; size of fleets, design of ship's, gun weapons and tactics played a pivotal role in the military revolution that allowed Europeans to conquer “35” percent of the world during the early modern
The use of labor came in two forms; indenture servitude and Slavery used on plantations in the south particularly in Virginia. The southern colonies such as Virginia were based on a plantation economy due to factors such as fertile soil and arable land that can be used to grow important crops, the plantations in the south demanded rigorous amounts of labor and required large amounts of time, the plantation owners had to employ laborers in order to grow crops and sell them to make a profit. Labor had become needed on the plantation system and in order to extract cheap labor slaves were brought to the south in order to work on the plantations. The shift from indentured servitude to slavery was an important time as well as the factors that contributed to that shift, this shift affected the future generations of African American descent. The history of colonial settlements involved altercations and many compromises, such as Bacons Rebellion, and slavery one of the most debated topics in the history of the United States of America. The different problems that occurred in the past has molded into what is the United States of America, the reflection in the past provides the vast amount of effort made by the settlers to make a place that was worth living on and worth exploring.
As new ideas traveled main trade routes, such as the Silk Road and the Mediterranean, the effects of such were felt through an influx of contact between countries due to increased desire for new information and countries gaining a larger presence on the world stage. This phenomenon can also be seen through the lens of cultural exchange that took place during this same time period in Eurasia. A major component of the Eurasian trade networks, such as the Silk Road and Indian Ocean, was that they fostered interregional contacts that had ceased to previously exist. When a country had a desire for study or technology, they earned more respect on the global stage. This can be further examined by looking at Marco Polo’s voyage into Asia.
Morgan ably describes how the weed saved the new colony of Virginia and gave rise to servitude and eventually led to racial slavery. The first colonists who planted tobacco exported their crop to England. As this practice became more and more profitable, the crop became the only thing Virginians wanted to plant. Even after the English government tried to control and limit the planting of tobacco to raise the price, wealthy Virginians continued to export the plant. However, these Virginians could not farm tobacco alone. Labor was required.
Since it was easier to grow grain and livestock in the Mid-Atlantic region, there was a diverse group of farmers, fishermen, and merchants who worked in those colonies. The environmental conditions were ideal for farms of various sizes and the Middle colonists could trade in market areas where the colonial regions met. Although a lot of money could be made by growing tobacco (in Maryland especially) and other cash crops, they were bad for the soil and people needed more land. However, this resulted in a newfound lack of labor, which was an issue. For instance, families procreated too slowly, there was a high infant mortality rate, African slaves cost too much, and, according to the colonists, Native Americans didn’t make good slaves. Eventually white indentured servants from Europe were recruited to work on plantations, but it was a difficult life for them- even after they were freed they continued to earn low wages. This high demand of cash crops in Maryland and other Middle colonies led to an overall decline in the wellness of the
I first read Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs, and Steel in the Fall 2003 based on a recommendation from a friend. Many chapters of the book are truly fascinating, but I had criticisms of the book back then and hold even more now. Chief among these is the preponderance of analysis devoted to Papua New Guinea, as opposed to, say, an explanation of the greatly disparate levels of wealth and development among Eurasian nations. I will therefore attempt to confine this review on the "meat and potatoes" of his book: the dramatic Spanish conquest of the Incas; the impact of continental geography on food production; and finally, the origins of the Eurasian development of guns, germs, and steel. In terms of structure, I will first summarize the book's arguments, then critically assess the book's evidentiary base, and conclude with an analysis of how Guns, Germs, and Steel ultimately helps to address the wealth question.
During American colonization, the economy of the south became predominantly dependent on the tobacco plant. As the south continued to develop, they shifted their focus to cotton. Indentured servants as well as African slaves were used for these labor-intensive crops because their labor was decent and cheap (Shi and Tindall 39). Young British men were promised a life of freedom in America if they agreed to an exchange between a free voyage and labor for a fixed number of years. Many willing, able-bodied, and young men signed up with the hopes of establishing a bright future for themselves in America. Unbeknownst to them, indentured servitude was not as easy as it was made out to be. Many servants endured far worse experiences than they had ever imagined. The physical and emotional conditions they faced were horrible, their masters overworked them, and many had to do unprofessional work instead of work that enabled them to use their own personal skills. Young British men felt that because they faced such horrible circumstances, the exchange between a free voyage to America in exchange for servitude was not a proper trade.
J.D. Salinger’s Catcher in the Rye tells an unforgettable story of teenage angst by highlighting the life of Holden Caulfield, a young boy who commences a journey of self-discovery after being expelled from his private boarding school. Throughout the novel, Holden struggles with issues such as self-identity, loss, and a wavering sense of belonging. Holden’s red hunting hat is consistently used throughout the story as a symbol of his independence and his attachment to his childhood.
John Rolfe played a major role in history in 1614 when he found a way to harvest tobacco. The tobacco crop is what restored Jamestown, Virginia and it would not exist today without this cash crop. Restoring Jamestown is not the only significance the tobacco crop holds; it is also responsible for the early stages of slavery. Since tobacco became the cash crop of Virginia, it was more in demand. There was a shortage of laborers to plant and harvest the tobacco crop and as a result settlers were unable to meet the European quota for tobacco. Since it was increasing in demand more laborers were needed to maintain these large plantations ; therefore more indentured servants were needed. The higher the demand for tobacco, the higher demand for laborers. Company agents advertised a few years of labor bondage and exchange would receive a new and better life in America. In 1619, the first Africans came to Jamestown. They came...
Slavery was a practice in many countries in the 17th and 18th centuries, but its effects in human history was unique to the United States. Many factors played a part in the existence of slavery in colonial America; the most noticeable was the effect that it had on the personal and financial growth of the people and the nation. Capitalism, individualism and racism were the utmost noticeable factors during this most controversial period in American history. Other factors, although less discussed throughout history, also contributed to the economic rise of early American economy, such as, plantationism and urbanization. Individually, these factors led to an enormous economic growth for the early American colonies, but collectively, it left a social gap that we are still trying to bridge today.
When America was first founded the colonists believed that they could do one of two things. They could either ask for entire families and groups of people to come over from England to start family farms and businesses to help the colony prosper. The other option was to take advantage of the lower class people and promise them land and freedom for a couple of years of servitude (Charles Johnson et al, Africans in America 34). Obviously the second option was used and this was the start of indentured servitude in colonial America. The indentured servants that came from England were given plenty of accommodations in exchange for their servitude. They were also promised that after their time of service was complete that they would receive crops, land, and clothing to start their new found lives in America. Men, children, and even most criminals, rushed to the ports hoping to be able to find work in America and soon start their new life. However, a large quantity of them either died on the voyage over, died from diseases, or died from the intensity of their work, before their servitude was complete (Johnson et al, Africans, 34). America finally began to show signs of prosperity due to the crop, tobacco. The only problem now was that the majorit...
Slavery was the main resource used in the Chesapeake tobacco plantations. The conditions in the Chesapeake region were difficult, which lead to malnutrition, disease, and even death. Slaves were a cheap and an abundant resource, which could be easily replaced at any time. The Chesapeake region’s tobacco industries grew and flourished on the intolerable and inhumane acts of slavery.
Slave trade grew gradually when it began in 1600's. As the demand for labor in the colonies increased, a number of plantation owners resorted to slave labor. These plantation owners used s...