Tim O Brien's The Things They Carried

1628 Words4 Pages

The portrayal of war in media presents stories that match the common interests of the beholder. Intense battles, bold heroism, and fights for glory litter television screens, therefore promoting an incorrect image of war and erasing its long-lasting impact on the people involved. Tim O’Brien’s “The Lives of the Dead”, a short story from his novel “The Things They Carried”, portrays a stark contrast from conventional storytelling regarding the burdens of war. Rather than highlighting glory and heroics, he illustrates the actual human experience, focusing on the psychological burdens faced by soldiers before and after the war. When comparing conventional war stories with Tim O’Brien’s “The Lives of the Dead”, O’Brien’s portrayal conveys the lasting …show more content…

Famous actors and singers train daily to get their bodies to inhumane standards to “accurately” represent navy seals, cadets, soldiers, and S.W.A.T. members. The. With a Hollywood twist, these movies specifically focus on triumph, bravery, and victory in adversity. They rarely show defeat. Inaccurate representations of soldiers as consistently selfless, stone-cold, and with unwavering courage are more common than not. Narratives also fail to acknowledge the psychological toll of the war on soldiers and how it affects them during and after their service. By adhering to these Hollywood portrayals and standards, war stories become romanticized and fail to truly capture the complexity behind the realities of …show more content…

In her journal “The Soldierly Code: War Trauma and Coping in Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried”, Jenna Campbell Field perfectly describes this point, stating that he “forces the narrative’s perspective on the way his characters are dealing with the war by stripping away any romantic notion the soldier ‘hero’ once carried. Instead, O’Brien focuses on the soldier not as a hero or idol, but as a human who, because of war, is damaged irreparably”. This is an incredibly meaningful difference in portrayals because the truth behind war is that it is not pretty. It is not something that is meant to be glorified. It is a bloody, scary, heartbreakingly malicious event that hurts more than it helps. By stating this and focusing on the separation of the term “hero”, Field can explain in an easier sense how these hero-oriented films do nothing but hurt those whose lives are forever changed as a result of what they went through. Vernon writes later on page 7, “we must read The Things They Carried not as a war story, but as a post-war story, the story of the writer at his desk, not the soldier in the jungle, his childhood wand a pencil now, on an entirely different kind of journey”. This simple, short explanation is the simplest way to describe what is wrong with

Open Document