Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reason why same sex marriage should not be legalized
Gay rights argument
Gay rights argument
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reason why same sex marriage should not be legalized
As a predominately conservative nation, it is ideal that we as a group do not redefine the term marriage under the Constitution of the United States. It is not a question of equality, simply because men and woman will never be equivalent—both parties have different complex qualities from their hormones, genitals, brain functioning, and to their overall genetic make-up. Homosexuality holds about 5% of the population, meaning that the majority would be forced to conform to the minority. It is imperative that we recognize the consequences of gay marriage which include: health risks, redefining sexual morality, reduction of the population, many being affected spiritually, and forcing the government to change laws to accommodate the minority.
First of all, gender and race are completely different. One might say that the same principle should be applied between interracial couples, which would be an invalid argument. While race is defined by culture, gender is defined by sex. People view this as an argument because of the relationship of inequality between the two parties, and how the Blacks use to be unequal in the eyes of America. The gender of an individual is important to presume because it’s a strong factor in a relationship. Two persons that withhold the same genitalia cannot experience the full potential, while race does not hold this factor. You might compare it to giving someone a gift that someone already has—the gift loses its value (John-Mark Miravalle). “Racial discrimination was eventually deemed irrational because one's physical appearance is irrelevant to one's behavior and moral character. However, sexual orientation, or sexuality, by definition has everything to do with one's behavior — and that we do have a right to ...
... middle of paper ...
...use men and women are as different as night and day and nothing can change that biological standard.
Works Cited
Betterthanwell. "John Corvino - John-Mark Miravalle Same-Sex Marriage Debate" Youtube. Youtube, 13 Oct. 2012. Web. 25 Mar. 2014.
Guroian, Vigen. "Same-Sex Marriage Violates the Sacrament of Marriage."Homosexuality. Ed. David Haugen and Susan Musser. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2013. Opposing Viewpoints. Rpt. from "Let No Man Join Together." Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity 24.1 (2011). Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 26 Mar. 2014.
Hengler, Greg. "Dennis Prager Debates Perez Hilton On Same-Sex Marriage." YouTube. YouTube, 21 Apr. 2009. Web. 25 Mar. 2014.
Ray, Michael. "Don't Compare Civil Rights to Gay Rights." Sun Sentinel. 10 Dec. 2010. Web.
25 Mar. 2014.
Slick, Mark. "How Could Gay Marriage Harm Anyone?" CARM. Web. 26 Mar. 2014.
In today's society, relationships of all different kinds become more and more accepted each day. However, when it comes to interracial relationships, people still hold opposing viewpoints on the matter. For the most part, peoples' viewpoints all boil down to two beliefs; the traditional belief and the popular culture belief. People who follow the traditional belief are seen as more proud of and loyal to their culture/heritage and tend to be more segregated than others. They feel that when someone of their own culture dates someone outside of their own culture, he or she is "wanting to escape" from his or her cultural identity. On the other hand, popular culture belief sees people not by the color of their skin nor by their culture, but rather
Abstract On June 26, 2015 a divided Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case Obergefell v. Hodges that same-sex couples could now marry nationwide. At the time of the split ruling there were 9 supreme court justices, 5 of the justices were Republicans, and the remaining 4 were Democrats. In high profile cases it is except that the justices will vote along party lines. When the 5-4 ruling was reveled by the following statement. “It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right (Corn,2015).” written by
It was not that long ago that interracial marriage was prohibited in the United States. In fact, in 1967 the U.S. Supreme Court decision established that anti-miscegenation laws were unconstitutional. Laws against interracial marriage were unfair and unconstitutional according to the 14th amendment, which granted citizens the right to equal protection of the law and due process. The famous case that granted the right to marry interracially was Loving vs. Virginia. In June 1958, two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter, an African American woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, were married in the District of Columbia where it was legal. When returning back home the Lovings were charged with violating Virginia's ban on interracial marriages. The couple...
The U.S. has recognized marriage as a basic human right by many court cases including Loving v Virginia. Since protecting the marriage of a black-Cherokee woman and a white man, the case has also helped support the legalization of same-sex marriage in all 50 states. This is important because it creates a more united America by knocking down social constraints that disallowed the 5-10% of America identified as homosexual from being married. In the same way as blacks were not allowed to vote, gay couples were not allowed to marry. The legalization of same-sex marriage is helping bridge the split in social order of America by not outlawing same-sex couples for being “immoral” and implying the couples are less-deserving of marriage than a heterosexual relationship. The change of expanding the 14th amendment’s meaning of equal protection of rights for all citizens, in this case for marriage, is helping people treat each other as equivalent and allowing the country to take another step towards liberty and justice for
AFTER GAY MARRIAGE, what will become of marriage itself? Will same-sex matrimony extend marriage's stabilizing effects to homosexuals? Will gay marriage undermine family life? A lot is riding on the answers to these questions. But the media's reflexive labeling of doubts about gay marriage as homophobia has made it almost impossible to debate the social effects of this reform. Now with the Supreme Court's ringing affirmation of sexual liberty in Lawrence v. Texas, that debate is unavoidable.
... if? The legal consequences of marriage and the legal needs of lesbian and gay male couples. Michigan Law review. Nov.1996. Pg. 447-491. http://www.jstor.org.remote.baruch.cuny.edu/stable/1290119?seq=1&uid=3739664&uid=2134&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21103079482127
Within America’s society today, 3.8 percent of the population is gay, lesbian, or bisexual. With only 17 of the 50 states legalizing and recognizing this type of relationship (“History…”), it puts a stronghold on same-sex couples to publicly declare their love with the promise of marriage. Same-sex marriages should be legalized because everyone has equal rights of freedom and liberty.
In reality, gender is not based on one’s genetic make-up or their reproductive organs. Expanding on this, an individual does not have any control over their assigned gender, but everyone has a gender identity, which is one’s internal sense of being male or female. From a sociocultural perspective, gender roles have the greatest influence on gender as a social construction. Gender roles are the attitudes, behaviors, rights, and responsibilities that particular cultural groups associate with each sex. In regards to gender, the social construction theory acknowledges the connection the topic has with power and meaning, and states that social interaction, or “language” controls how these things are portrayed to individuals. Similarly, sexuality is socially constructed in a sense that, one’s sexual orientation depends on what they are taught to be “socially acceptable”. For example, a person who is raised by homophobic parents would most likely be taught that every aspect of homosexuality is wrong, and therefore they would be influenced to be heterosexual. While many would like to believe that people are born with their sexual orientation, that is far from the truth. All in all, when looking at the big picture, it is clear that race, gender,
The world today is surrounded with many controversial issues. One such issue would be the topic of gay marriage. This country has grown around one major tradition, being the definition of marriage. It’s more-less looked at as a religious or legal commitment between a women and man, to express their love and compassion towards one another, being the last and final step there is to take with that significant other. Homosexual relationships are rapidly gaining acceptance in this country. However, the Defensive of Marriage Act, that former president Clinton signed in 1996, is holding many back from being able to marry what could be the significant other of their dreams. Homosexuality effects from 8% to 15% of all males, as well as females being slightly less than the male population. To put this in a more familiar context, there are as many gays and lesbians in America today as there are unemployed citizens. There are a few states which formed a type of commitment called a "civil union", which basically is marriage without using the word "marriage." Gay couples are denied significant rights when they are not allowed to marry, and these result in injustices within society. Most carry the burden of hiding their sexual identity for fear of being disrespected or mistreated by the general population who remain ignorant to the causes and circumstances of homosexuality. This puzzles many due to the excess amount of investigative work that has been done on the phenomenon, as well as puzzling the church as to who would want to look into the concept in such a sinful matter.
Within this type of system, sexual characteristics as genitalia are given very little or even no significance and gender does not exist. This was a very new type of equality for me that I had never thought of before since it wasn’t suggesting that males, females, and other genders have to strive for complete equality. Instead, it suggested that the classifications of male, female, and other genders should instead be abolished so that everyone can be treated with the same sense of “sameness.” This type of perspective was one that made me very conflicted since one hand I did believe it to be ingenious, but on the other hand I disagreed with it since, to me, it seemed as if it was taking away a portion of an individual’s
Redlingshafer, JoEllen. "The LGBT Movement Must Look Past Gay Marriage." Policymic. Policymic, 2013. Web. 23 Sept. 2013.
Stoddard, T, Fein, B, (Jan. 1990) Gay Marriage, Personal relationships, Marriage, Legislation, Homosexuality, American Bar Association, (Pages 42, 42)
In the world today, men and women are supposed to be equal in terms of rights and duties to the country but the tradition that in a married household, a woman should be the one to stay home to do chores and look after the children still stands rigid. Perhaps, certain principles are meant to be strict rather than be a little more accepting. In this generation, it is normal to have tattoos and piercings as people can now casually call them body art , whereas a couple of decades back, tattoos were completely discouraged as people were keen on appearance and preserving one’s body in its natural state. Another issue which has kept people on their feet is the issue on interracial relationships. Although this seems to be normal now, people may still find it hard to come to terms with, as the world is rapidly blending.
In order to address this issue, one must first define the concept or meaning of marriage. However, this is a rather subjective approach, because the way we define marriage depends on our own views and interpretations.
In conclusion I argue that banning same-sex marriage is discriminatory. It is discriminatory because it denies homosexuals the many benefits received by heterosexual couples. The right to marriage in the United States has little to do with the religious and spiritual meaning of marriage. It has a lot to do with social justice, extending a civil right to a minority group. This is why I argue for same-sex marriage. The freedom to marry regardless of gender preference should be allowed.