Thomas Pownall: The Cause Of The Civil War

1449 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Economic, political and social differences the north and south that lead to the civil war

Thomas Pownall was a man of high status who had a huge influence in British politics. With a resume of governing the Province of Massachusetts Bay, to serving in British parliament, one could say that Pownall was a huge advocate of British practices. Although a supporter of the colonies, Pownall confidently spoke of the impossibility of Independence America faced. He was not alone in this idea, and was supported by other people and situations that made his statement a reality. There were examples from 1600-1763 that support Pownall’s implications; however, through great perseverance and help, the colonies were able to support themselves long enough to build a flourishing America. Once separated from the British rule, the American colonies …show more content…

The cause of the Civil War has been debated among historians for years; however, slavery seemed to be the main issue. The Northern side wanted to abolish slavery and the Southern side wanted to keep slavery and expand it. Due to this ideology, the United States was a separated collection of states. That is why America was seen as an “are”. There was no unification, and no unified idea that led these states to agree. The change for “are” to “is” came after the Civil War, but it was definitely divided before the War. An issue that divided the nation was slavery and the constitution. This issue divided the nation along sectional lines. In order to insure the nations population southern voters agreed on the three-fifths clause. The three-fifths clause allowed three-fifths of slaves to be counted for as a representation in selecting a president. (Norton, A People and a Nation, 172). With the clause, the Constitution was able to get rid of future slave rebellions and riots. Slavery was the very thing that shaped the South’s social structure. It was the reason for economic growth, and was the main topic of political issues. If they gave too much freedom to slaves by being represented in the clause, there would be much needed focus on making sure a rebellion didn’t happen. Because of the Constitution, many argued that having slaves was a right to property. In the end, the Constitution was used in many arguments to support and oppose slavery at the same

Show More
Related

  • Causes of the Deterioration of British-Colonial Relations

    784 Words  | 2 Pages

    The beginning of 1763 marked one of the major events that would contribute to the end of British colonial relations. On February 3, 1763 the French and Indian War finally ended in British victory, but while the British celebrated the French’s defeat, colonists feared the oncoming reverberations the war would have on them. The main motive behind the war was for possession over the French fur trade territory in North America. To the colonists, the war was being fought by and for Britain not the colonies. The benefits of the victory only pertained to Britain. The after effect of the war for the colonies was the trampling on their need for expansion. During the war, Native Americans had fought with the French because of how well they treated them. Britain was notorious for abusing the Native Americans, therefore once the French were defeated; they began attacking western settlements of colonists. To avoid confrontation, the Proclamation of 1763 was passed by Parliament. The Proclamation established a limit to the greatly needed colonial expansion. Specifically, the Proclamation forbid settlement beyond the Appalachian Mountains. The passing of the Proclamation of 1763 infuriated colonists ...

    Read More

  • Sectionalism Versus Nationalism and the Era of Good Feelings

    627 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States began to dissatisfy some of its citizens and so the concerns of sectionalism, or the split of the country began to arise. There was a continuous riff between the south and the north over a few issues, a major one being slavery. The south argued that the slaves were necessary to support the southern economy. According to document A, the south were angry that the north was creating taxes that hurt the southern economy, thus increasing the need for slavery since they had to make up for the expense of the taxes. The south felt that the north was able...

    Read More

  • The Making Of A Patriot Sparknotes

    1181 Words  | 3 Pages

    Eliga H. Gould, The Persistence of Empire: British Political Culture in the Age of the American Revolution (North Carolina: Omohundro Institute, 2000),

    Read More

  • Sectionalism And The Breakup Of The U.s

    1030 Words  | 3 Pages

    slave-states in the south as far as representation in the government was concerned. concerned. I am not a & nbsp;& nbsp;& nbsp;& nbsp;& nbsp;Another part of the slavery controversy was the moral issue and weather... ... middle of paper ... ...political parties.

    Read More

  • The Pro-slavery Constitution

    612 Words  | 2 Pages

    The two factors that shape the Constitution as being pro-slavery: the necessity of the slaveholders to protect their private property by the means of the law and the limited support of the North for the abolition at the time of the drafting of the Constituti...

    Read More

  • Civil War Sectionalism

    1604 Words  | 4 Pages

    North and South The United States of America, the great democratic experiment, was just that. Not since the great Greek culture had a government of, for, and by the people existed. The entire world felt, that on a large scale, democracy would inevitably lead to anarchy; our founding fathers were determined to prove them wrong. But as the political stand off with the British became a secession issue, a great issue split the future nation. Slavery, a southern necessity, both social and economic, threatened the unity of our nation. A nation that would one day be the greatest the world had ever known. During the development of the thirteen colonies, diversity set in early. In the south the temperate climate made the growth of tobacco a suitable and very profitable business. Cultivation of this crop required a lot of land, and therefore settlers lived far apart. Northern Colonies, though, were much more dependent on small farms, with closely knit communities. These differences were the seed of a sectional division that would plague the nation for a century. During the late seventeenth century, this fissure in the ideals of the colonies became apparent. Following the constant political irreverence from Britain, a majority of colonial representatives felt the need for independence. The Declaration of Independence was the document written to do this. It called for an abolition of slavery as well as freedom from British rule. Unfortunately, the South would hear nothing of it. Being strong defenders of states rights, most of the Southern states adhered to their believe in a government less like a supreme authority and more like a dominion of independent states. They would rather stay loyal to their oppressive government than participate in one that shunned their way of life. In order to keep their dreams of independence, they North was forced to make the one cession they did not wish to make. In order to keep a unified nation, the slavery issue was deliberately absent from the Declaration. Some of the Northern delegates were outraged, but none more than John Adams. A renowned proponent of equal rights, he was one of few that saw the irony in establishing a free society without freeing those in bondage. John Adams seems now more like Nostrodamus when he voiced his concern about the slavery issue for future generations. He did not know it, but the couldn’t have been more right.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Confederation Vs America Compromise

    617 Words  | 2 Pages

    Slavery was a critical problem when it came to deciding if slaves should be accounted for in Congress. Slavery in the north was minimal compared to the slavery in the south, because of this the southern states thought that slaves should be included in deciding how many seats the southern states obtained in Congress, contrary to the north's opinion of the matter. Due to this debate, the three-fifths compromise was decided on. The compromise stated that every three out of five slaves would be accounted for when it came to taxation and legislative representation. This agreement was necessary and unavoidable due to the southern states threatening to repeal the

    Read More

  • Comparing The Mayflower Enact And William Penn

    608 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the beginning of the American Experiment, the Mayflower compact and William Penn’s governorship heavily embrace independency from the King and, more importantly, the British Government. These writings thrive on the ideas of the consent of men, the rule of good men and, most importantly, the grace of God. As such, they pose the greatest threat to the British rule in North America.

    Read More

  • The 1860 Presidential Election

    1204 Words  | 3 Pages

    The presidential elections of 1860 was one of the nation’s most memorable one. The north and the south sections of country had a completely different vision of how they envision their home land. What made this worst was that their view was completely opposite of each other. The north, mostly republican supporters, want America to be free; free of slaves and free from bondages. While on the other hand, the south supporters, mostly democratic states, wanted slavery in the country, because this is what they earned their daily living and profit from.

    Read More

  • The Creation Of The Constitution

    1073 Words  | 3 Pages

    Furthermore, the creation of The Constitution caused much debate between the elite and democratic states because they thought that if the Government got all of the power, they would lose their rights. The conflict between the North and South played a major role in the development of this document. The North felt that representation in Congress should be based on the number of total people and South felt that it should be based on number of whites. However, The Three Fifths Compromise settled this when it was said a slave will count as 3/5 of a free person of representatives and taxation. Article one section two of the Constitution defines how the population will be counted, obviously there was a strong opposition to this by Southern states like Virginia because their economy was based on slave labor and they had a bigger population because of it.

    Read More

  • What Were the Key Issues Leading To the Civil War?

    2033 Words  | 5 Pages

    Since the beginning of their new nation, the United States had many differences between the Northern and Southern states. During the Constitutional Convention they disagreed on how to determine their representation in the house based on population; the Southerners wanted to count their slaves and the Northerners did not, which lead to the three-fifths compromise. Later in the Convention there were concessions given to the South, which left the Northerners feeling uneasy, such as: a guarantee that the slave trade would not be interfered with by Congress until 1808 and slave owners were given the right to recover refugee slaves from anywhere in the United States. While many Northern delegates were disappointed with the rights given to the South, they felt it was necessary for the good of the Nation. This was necessary to form a strong central government and union between the states.

    Read More

  • The Arguments of Thomas Paine and James Chalmers Over the Revolutionary War

    735 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Revolutionary War was one of America’s earliest battles and one of many. Although, many came to America to gain independence from Great Britain many still had loyalty for the King and their laws. Others believed that America needs to be separated from Great Britain and control their own fate and government. I will analyze the arguments of Thomas Paine and James Chalmers. Should America be sustained by Great Britain or find their own passage?

    Read More

  • Slavery In The United States During The Civil War

    339 Words  | 1 Pages

    Before the Civil War, the country was divided between North and South. Issues included States Rights and disagreements over tariffs but the greatest divide was on the issue of slavery, which was legal in the South but had gradually been banned by states north of the Mason-Dixon line. This led to fighting and argument with in the states. While the united states were conquering or gaining land towards the

    Read More

  • Uncle Tom's Cabin Abolition

    936 Words  | 2 Pages

    The U.S. Constitution was written with great vision to create a strong nation. The Bill of Rights was written to provide all humans with unalienable rights. Thomas Jefferson wrote himself “all men are created equal” but he owned slaves. Despite that, the Southern States believed the federal government should not intervene with the issue of slavery because slavery was a state issue. Slavery had an immense effect on our country. Slavery, then went on to cause the War between the North and the South known as the “Civil War.” Despite that slavery was generally accepted by the majority in some societies, Harriet Beecher Stowe’s novel, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, depicts the religious component of anti-slavery and abolition to argue that slavery is evil and intolerable in a civil society.

    Read More

  • Why Is Slavery Wrong

    495 Words  | 1 Pages

    Slavery was a very controversial subject during the early years of the United States of America. The founding fathers took different points of view on slavery and the solution to “peculiar institution.” Some ways that the government dealt with the issue of slavery were, George Washington refusing to participate in slave trade, Benjamin Franklin insisting that the House abolish slavery, and James Madison making certain slavery was kept out of federal control.

    Read More

More about Thomas Pownall: The Cause Of The Civil War

Open Document