Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Exploring beliefs about family in general
Expectations in family dynamics
Expectations in family dynamics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Exploring beliefs about family in general
How individuals see others can also tell a lot about the person themselves. This is because people use many different things to judge others. For example people will use past experiences to make a judgment about how someone would act. This also shows who the person is by their judgement of someone. Other things that would show this is the assumptions individuals make and their family influences.
One major thing that affects how individuals see others is their past experiences. One great example of this is the fictional narrative "What, of This Goldfish, Would You Wish?" by Etgar Keret. This story is about a young boy named Yoni who "had a brilliant idea for a documentary" (Etgar 3). He took his camera and went up to people's houses asking
…show more content…
them if the had three wishes what would they wish for. He came across a man named Sergei who does not "much like strangers banging on his door" (Etgar 5). This is because he had past experiences with the KGB "knocking on his door" (Etgar 5). This causes Sergei to almost immediately dislike Yoni. The reader can also determine that Sergei is a good person by his past experience. For his two previous wishes Sergei used one when "they discovered a cancer in his sister" and had the goldfish get rid of it and the other when doctor's discovered his girlfriend's "son's head wasn't right" (Etgar 7) and used the wish to make him better. People's past experiences have a big impact how they perceive others and can be used to determine who the person is themselves because those experiences are what make up the person. Included in past experiences that also has a big impact on how we look at others is family influence. Family influence is a big factor that changes how individuals view others.
The newspaper editorial "American Flag Stands For Tolerance" by Ronald J. Allen shows why the Supreme Court made the right decision in the Texas v. Johnson court case. Whether people believe the correct decision was made could largely be influenced by family. If a person was raised in a family that was very patriotic or have family in the military, they may believe that the Supreme Court made the wrong decision. Others that were raised in a more open-minded or less patriotic family may believe that "the flag stands for free expression of ideas" (Allen 20) and believe that the court made the correct choice. According to Allen, "[t]he Supreme Court was not wrong" (18) so he most likely was raised in an open-minded way or with logic ruling over patriotism. Family is a major influence on how we view others but so is making …show more content…
assumptions. All people in this world make assumptions.
These assumptions change how we perceive others. The short story named "The Wife's Story" by Ursula K. Le Guin is a perfect example of this. It is a story about a family whose dad has a problem of turning into a monster "[a]lways … in the dark of the moon" (Le Guin 4). As the story goes on the reader makes an assumption the this is a story about a family of humans with a dad that is a werewolf. This shows that people will use past knowledge and experiences to make an educated guess even if they do not realize it. As they continue reading the story takes a turn and the reader find out that the family was actually a pack of wolves and the father turned into a human. The wolves in the story make an assumption and believe the father will kill all of them because he turned into a "hateful one" (Le Guin 7) and the other humans the wolves had seen tried to kill them. This caused the assumption that the father would attack the pack so the wolves attacked and killed him
first. People use all of these things to make judgements about people. Even though this has a negative connotation it is true. People can not help whether they make judgments about people but what they think and how they act on what they think shows more of the personality and who the person. How does what you think saw about you?
A very controversial court case in American history was Texas vs. Johnson (1984). In 1984, a man named Gregory Lee Johnson followed a group of anti – Reagan protesters to oppose the American exploitation of third world countries. This act of rebellion resulted in the burning of the American flag. Out of a total of approximately one hundred demonstrators who were involved in this ordeal, Johnson was solely charged with a crime. Johnson was arrested under Texas law, which made the burning of the United States or Texas flags crimes. Johnson was convicted and sentenced to one year in jail and fined two thousand dollars for his crime in restitution. Texas reasoned that the police were preventing the breach of peace; consider the flag a symbol of national unity. At Johnson's court trial, he was convicted of aiding, abetting and encouraging the burning of the Texan flag. This, in turn, made Johnson guilty under Texas state law.
An assumption is a thought or opinion that is accepted as being true, without enough or any proof. In The Scarlet Letter and The Minister’s Black Veil, this occurred a lot in their community. Both stories were solemly based on this theme. Judgment went along with assumption. The people of the community in The Scarlet Letter used assumption as a way to justify an excuse of judging Hester Prynne. The people of the community in The Minister’s Black Veil, used assumptions to think of ways to describe how minister, Mr. Hooper, has changed. Punishment leads to judgment, false facts, confrontation, and change.
Is the upholding of the American flag as a symbol of the United States more important than the freedom of speech provided by the First Amendment? Are there certain freedoms of expression that are not protected under the First Amendment and if so what qualifies as freedom of speech and expression and what does not? The Supreme Court case of Texas v. Johnson proves that the First Amendment and the freedom of speech are not limited to that of spoken and written word, but also extended to symbolic speech as well. Texas v. Johnson is a case in which the interpretation of the First Amendment rights is at the top of the argument. This case discusses the issue of flag burning as a desecration of national unity and that the flag of the United States should be protected under a law. Texas v. Johnson expanded the rights of symbolic speech and freedom of expression under the First Amendment and was presented as a precedence for future cases along with influencing the final decision on the revision of
Stripes and stars forever, right? Well, what exactly does that mean? The American Flag can be seen almost anywhere. From the high-school, to the ball park, and even in our homes, the American flag stands as a symbol of all that is good and true in America. When one thinks of the flag, they usually think of the blood that was shed for this country. It was shed so that we could have liberties, such as, freedom of speech and expression, which fall under the first amendment rights of the Constitution. However, when you think of a burning flag, what comes to mind? One might say it shows disrespect and hatred to a country that has given so much. In the case of Texas v. Johnson, Gregory Lee Johnson was accused of desecrating a sacred object, but, his actions were protected by the First Amendment. Although his actions may have been offensive, he did not utter fighting words. By burning the flag, Johnson did not infringe upon another's natural human rights. He was simply expressing his outrage towards the government, which is within the jurisdiction of the First Amendment.
To begin, one of the major reasons that make people who they are is self-image.
Bordo and Berger put us in the position to realize we actually do make assumption of thing based off prior knowledge. Both authors argues that we make learning assumption towards images taken away from its originality, but this is because we allow ourselves to do so. This is not something we take the time out and think about; as a result, when viewing an image people might stop and actually question themselves.
To this day, Americans have many rights and privileges. Rights stated in the United States constitution may be simple and to the point, but the rights Americans have may cause debate to whether or not something that happens in society, is completely reasonable. The Texas v. Johnson case created much debate due to a burning of the American Flag. One may say the burning of the flag was tolerable because of the rights citizens of the United States have, another may say it was not acceptable due to what the American flag symbolizes for America. (Brennan and Stevens 1). Johnson was outside of his First Amendment rights, and the burning of the American flag was unjust due to what the flag means to America.
As a result of my childhood experiences with my grandmother, I became aware and have observed the way people treat and respond to each other based on their appearances, such...
Assumptions influence our perceptions because when assumptions are made, it is often the case that there is not enough information for the assumptions to be accurate. Dillard gives an example that relates to this in her essay when she says, “[We] see what [we] expect” (Dillard 20). When an assumption is formed about a person or situation, then things that agree with that assumption is what is looked for, so that is what will be perceived. This may create inaccurate impressions. Another problem with making assumptions is that it is assumed that there is consistency to others’ behavior and often the focus on negative things about others. When it is assumed that there is consistency to others’ behavior, it is assumed that after seeing them act one way once or twice, they will always act like that. (Beebe 77). These examples relate to another idea that Dillard talks about in her essay. Dillard says, “Peeping through my keyhole I see within the range of only about thirty percent of light that comes from the sun…” (21). This agrees with an idea that people tend to ignore information when making perceptions and only looking at a small portion of the big picture and make perceptions based off of that. An example that relates to all of these would be if someone expects a person to be rude, then whenever those two people interact, rude behavior will be all that is looked for and all that is given any thought. People often form perceptions off of assumptions and small pieces of the big picture which oftentimes makes those perceptions that a person might have
The Supreme Court had to find if Johnson's conviction of burning of the flag and breaking a Texas law was consistent with the First Amendment. In a 5-4 decision, the court found that it was not consistent with the First Amendment and that Johnson's conviction under Texas law was unconstitutional. Justice Brennan delivered the opinion of the court. In order to convict Johnson, the state asserted two interests: preserving the flag as a symbol of national unity and preventing the breaches of the peace.
The dissenting opinion to the previous idea is that the government's legitimate interest in preserving the symbolic value of the flag is, however, essentially the same that may have motivated a particular act of flag burning. The flag uniquely symbolizes the ideas of liberty, equality, and tolerance -- ideas that Americans have passionately defended and debated throughout our history. The flag embodies the spirit of our national commitment to those ideals. To the world, the flag is our promise that we will continue to strive for these ideals. To us, the flag is a reminder both that the struggle for li...
There are several difference between the tones in the Texas V.S. Johnson story and the American Flag stands for Tolerance story. First, the Texas V.S.Johnson story was written in legal writing form, and the story, American Flag stands for tolerance
In the quote Barbara Jordan states, “We, as human beings , must be willing to accept people are different from ourselves” is the quote that I will be connecting this to two different story to show how many people discriminate other because they have a different outlook on this topic . In the story Texas v. Johnson Majority Opinion “We decline, therefore, to create for the flag an exception to the joust of principles protected by the first amendment”. Which in my opinion is showing that there are abusing the first amendment because if people have the freedom of speech then why are they ignored just for saying what they believe in if you have freedom of speech. And in the story American Flag Stands for Tolerance Ronald J. Allen states, “The
First impressions are created by a composite of signals given off by a new experience (Flora, 2004). The judgment of these impressions depends on the observer and the person being observed (Flora, 2004). When you meet someone for the first time it takes about three seconds to be evaluated by the observer (Mind Tools, 1996-2011,). During this time the person forms an opinion about you based on your appearance, your body language, your demeanor, and how you dress (Mind Tools, 2996-2011,). Impressions are important to us because they are impossible to be reserved and the set the tone for all the relationships that follow (Mind Tools, 1996-2011).
According to the Merriam -Webster Online Dictionary an assumption is a belief that something is true or a fact or statement that is taken for granted. Susan Glaspell wrote "Trifles" to demonstrate the male assumption that women are insignificant members in a male dominated society. Because the men underestimate them, the women are able to prove they are not insignificant. The improper assumptions by men toward women can have dire consequences, as demonstrated in Glaspell's world. Combating these narcissistic assumptions displayed by men can result in a unity among women that can overcome any male caused disrespect and oppression.