Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strategic planning
As we have just hired 12 new associate attorneys, it is relevant to remind all of those qualified to practice law at Thesis Law firm of the strategies to improve business with clientele. Senior attorneys have become leaders at Thesis Law by proving their worth to our clients as associates, and now hold ownership interests in our firm. Bo Yancey, director of consultants with LexisNexis at Redwood Analytics said that, “Successful strategy execution starts by understanding and interpreting business insights and then translating those insights into actionable measures that can be used to manage a firm’s performance” (qtd. in Lazere 13). In this memo, we will be looking over strategies to keep our clientele consistent and increase business. An …show more content…
Thesis Law uses advertising strategies through the media to gain a reputation in the community. Court cases are often the topic of news articles, and we promote the journalists who write about ours. Doing well in court shows a range of potential clients what our firm has to offer. Once a potential client has initiated contact, it is important that the information they provide is properly interpreted- this will be useful when deciding on how to go ahead with their case. Part of building a better clientele means not accepting everyone who walks inside. Selecting Clientele The cases you choose to represent influence everyone at Thesis Law. In a recent My Case, blog the author advises, “Create a pre-qualifying process. Think about the bad clients you’ve represented in the past and make a list of the warning signs or red flags that arose during your first conversation or initial consultation. If you can recognize the warning signs in advance, you can stop bad clients before they enter your practice” (Black 2). Recognizing poor clients There are several signs that a client is more stressful to work with than they are worth to represent. You should not represent these clients, because they bring down the morale of our entire office. Black, analyzes some examples such as cases with a client
In the case of Schmidt v. Massapequa High School, the plaintiff, Schmidt, alleged negligent of the voluntary assistant coach and Massapequa UFSD (Union Free School District). On January 22, 2008, Vincent D’Agostino, who was a voluntary assistant coach at Massapequa High School, was allowed to participate in a wrestling practice by Massapequa UFSD. During the practice, D’Agostino picked the plaintiff up and threw him to the ground. While they were matching, D’Agostino’s body fell onto the body of the plaintiff, causing the plaintiff’s injury, fracture. Thus, the plaintiff, Schmidt, argued that Massapequa UFSD did not supervise D’Agostino correctly, and stated that the application of the doctrine of primary assumption is unwarranted. The plaintiff submits his own affidavit, his mother’s affidavit, and an affidavit of Steven Shettner. Since this case was submitted by the plaintiff, it is considered as a civil case. Shettner is an experienced wrestling coach. He states that there is risk of causing an injury in extracurricular sports; however, awareness of the risk assumed is to be assessed against the background of the skill and experience of the particular plaintiff.
Small law firms offer the paralegal a chance to work in many different areas of law and allow them to provide many different services while working on...
First, when removing a case to federal court, it must be considered if the federal court had original jurisdiction in the case which is exactly what Quincy alludes to when stating the federal court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.
In conclusion as we strive to stay current in this rapid changing and demanding legal field, we need to maintain focus on what is at stake here, the quality of service we demand from lawyers and their agents. Clients deserve to be assisted by the people who know their profession and so, we must be in favor of the legislative movement of the control of the paralegal profession.
Facts: Two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter a colored woman and Richard Loving a white man, got married in the District of Columbia. The Loving's returned to Virginia and established their marriage. The Caroline court issued an indictment charging the Loving's with violating Virginia's ban on interracial marriages. The state decides, who can and cannot get married. The Loving's were convicted of violating 20-55 of Virginia's code.
Although the legal profession is a single discourse community, it is made up of many smaller discourse communities. This is so because while all lawyers share the same broad goals of the legal profession and have a general knowledge and expertise in all areas of the law, most lawyers after graduating from law school and passing the bar exam specialize in a particular area of law. This specialization requires the lawyer to go beyond the broad concepts of law as a whole and to become knowledgeable and proficient in the sometimes minute details of a more specific area of law. Even then, some lawyers will go even further to focus on one aspect or another of that particular area of law. This results in most lawyers being members of many even smal...
A Client is someone who comes into a human service system with complicated things going on in their lives this can include psychological, cultural, financial, social, spiritual, and educational problems.
Throughout the years there has been limitless legal cases presented to the court systems. All cases are not the same. Some cases vary from decisions that are made by a single judge, while other cases decisions are made by a jury. As cases are presented they typically start off as disputes, misunderstandings, or failure to comply among other things. It is possible to settle some cases outside of the courts, but that does require understanding and cooperation by all parties involved. However, for those that are not so willing to settle out of court, they eventually visit the court system. The court system is not in existence to cause humiliation for anyone, but more so to offer a helping hand from a legal prospective. At the same time, the legal system is not to be abuse. or misused either.
Arthur, A., Thompson, Margaret, A., Peteraf, John, E. Gamble, A., J., Strickland III. (2014). Crafting & Executing Strategy: The Quest for Competitive Advantage 19e: Concepts & Cases. C6-C25.
Weiss, M. S. (2005). A Study of Public Defender Motivations. In Public Defenders: Pragmatic and Political Motivations to Represent the Indigent (pp. 1-10). [Ebscohost]. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/
Since 15th century, barristers have been split up into two professions in United Kingdom, Barristers and Barristers. Barristers have traditionally been the people who research cases, deal with clients directly, and Barristers have had the rights of advocate in courts. Hence, Barristers' ethical duties are very important to the court and the client, and this is an essay to discuss the duties to the court, clients and conflicts in between.
In this essay we will discuss the process of legal research, writing, and analysis. The subject matter will be presented in a clear, concise and objective manner. The textbook that we will be referencing is "Gilbert Law Summaries: Legal Research, Writing, and Analysis" 10th ed, BarBri Group, 2006.
Moot courts also teach professionalism and ethics to students of law, to apply law to fact, to structure and rank a legal argument by strength, and not to assert losing propositions. They provide law students opportunities to improve their legal writing, legal research, and oral advocacy in a competitive environment that prepares students for a competitive world. The moot court experience is perhaps the most important activity in law school. It is the activity that fully develops the skill every lawyer must possess: advocacy. Regardless of practice area, all lawyers must communicate in a way that advances their client’s interests, whether in a courtroom or boardroom. Most important, moot court builds character. Every student competitor “will be a better lawyer, and a better person, because of the moot court experience.”
Thompson, A. A., Strickland, A. J., & Gamble, J. E. (2008). Crafting & executing strategy: The quest for competitive advantage (16th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
-Customers: The company felt the importance of being customer-centric and innovate by adapting to customer