Theories Of Deductive Reasoning

983 Words2 Pages

Is human reasoning rational? Draw on theories of deductive reasoning and your own experience with Sudoku puzzles.
Reasoning can be defined as the problems that differ from other kinds of problems in that they often owe their origins to formal systems of logic (Eysenck and Keane (2005). Deductive reasoning is a type of reasoning that leads to conclusions that are definitely true given that statements the conclusion is based on are true.
Rationality is the quality or state of being reasonable, based on facts or reason. Rationality implies the conformity of one 's beliefs with one 's reasons to believe, or of one 's actions with one 's reasons for action. Rational psychology offers a number of practical benefits. The first of these is that of formal, precise statements of artificial intelligence problems, theories, and techniques.
Deductive reasoning is a concept focused on logical arguments. It uses arguments that conclusions’ typically follow from a premise. To draw a correct conclusion, the individual must assume the premises to be true without the use of previously learned knowledge to reason on the premises at hand. The individual will then declare a valid conclusion, which has to be logically correct, based on the truth of the premises. However, conclusions can still be incorrectly stated if a …show more content…

Syllogisms are deductive reasoning problems that involve two premises and a conclusion, for example: “Some burglars are bankers; No bankers are policemen; so I can conclude that some burglars are not policemen.” An individual can logically arrive at a valid conclusion that explains the relationship between a premises end term in a way that would theoretically be correct. Conversely, statements that are simply consistent with the premises, but not dictated by them, are invalid. In human reasoning, it is imperative that the individual produce’s a logical conclusion from the provided

Open Document