Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
King lear comparing king lear and gloucester
King lear comparing king lear and gloucester
Blindness serves as a metaphor in the play King Lear
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: King lear comparing king lear and gloucester
Williams Shakespeare’s tragedy, King Lear, presents the importance of clear vision and insight, or the lack there of, as a significant theme throughout the play. This theme is rendered through Gloucester’s character once he becomes physically blind. Without doubt, Act 4, Scene 6, also known as the Dover Cliff scene, is a pivotal event within the play that offers this theme to be true. Within the act, we recognize the humiliation of the recently blinded Gloucester at the hands of his supposedly loving son, Edmund, as a turning point and transformation for Gloucester’s future. Oddly enough, Gloucester is incapable of seeing the vengeance of his son, Edmund, until after he is blinded. Furthermore, as the scene opens, we understand that Edgar, who is disguised as a peasant, leads Gloucester to the place where Gloucester intends to commit suicide by jumping off of Dover Cliff. In order to convince his father, Edgar describes the cliff in fear-provoking terms just before stepping away from his father, whose attempt to jump off of a cliff only result in a simple fall to the ground. Although Edgar says that the humiliation of his father is an attempt to cure him of his misery, it is clear that for Gloucester, the picture is much bigger. Although the gouges of eyeballs seems gruesome and horrific, the knowledge and understanding Gloucester gains to achieve clear vision and insight on new life, and as a result is directed towards a future to see unquestionably by the means of the heart and mind to see as a replacement for the absence of his eyes.
In a metaphorical sense, Gloucester’s loss of sight allows him to finally see what is happening around him. After Cornwall plucks out his eyes, Gloucester’s vision becomes clear for the remaind...
... middle of paper ...
...play, Gloucester’s poor judgment and false beliefs show that it is evident that we need to look beyond what we see through our eyes and pay more attention to what is really being presented to us. We must avoid the inevitable, that is, seeing what we should not see, and not seeing what we should see. While going through the play before the loss of his vision, Gloucester was heavily blinded by his son Edmund’s lies and failed to see the goodness within his other son, Edgar. It is only until Gloucester loses his eye sight that his insight increased as he began to realize the mistakes he has made and the fact that he took his son, Edgar, for granted. As shown throughout the play and within the two adaptations presented, Gloucester, with the help of Edgar, takes on a new understanding of the world at large by the means of the heart and mind, rather than through the eye.
Shakespeare creates a tragic tone through characterization and juxtaposition. He defines natural law and sets it apart from social law, but Edmund mistakes one for the other and falls from power, revealing his hamartia. Shakespeare establishes Edmund’s motives by highlighting his bastardy. Both of Gloucester’s sons are his by nature, but society has made the difference between the two.
In Aldous Huxley’s Brave New world and William Shakespeare's King Lear, the reader will find that both works use similar motifs that mirror each other to increase further the similarities and
Much of the imagery in King Lear's first scene presages what is to come in the play. Often characters refer to senses, particularly sight, whether as a comment on the necessity of sensing consequences before acting (as Lear does not), or as yet another of Shakespeare's comments (most apparent in Hamlet) on "seeming." The destruction of Gloucester's eyes and his subsequent musings ("I stumbled when I saw" (IV.i.19) etc.) are a more graphical presentation of this basic theme which originally appears in Lear's first scene. Goneril declares Lear is "dearer than eyesight" (I.i.56) to her (though she is the one who later suggests putting Gloucester's eyes out for his "treachery"). Regan goes further, proclaiming "I profess / Myself an enemy to all other joys / Which the most precious square of sense possesses" (I.i. 72-74). Crossed in his wrath by Kent, Lear cries "Out of my sight!" (I.i.157), only to be reproved with Kent's "See better, Lear, and let me still remain / The true blank of thine eye." (I.i.158-9).
Shakespeare illustrates the innocent and naïve nature of Gloucester who unfortunately receives an untimely death due to the suffering he had to endure. His suffering did not fit his crime, something which Nemesis was never known to do. He was deceived by his son Edmund, his title was given away, and worst of all, his own two eyes were plucked out of their sockets, all because of a crime that he did not commit. Gloucester had admitted to Kent that Edmund was his illegitimate son, but he did not “love him any more than [he] love [his] bastard” (I.i.20-21). Edmund admitted his plan to the audience, but Gloucester was innocent in this whole ordeal. As a father and out of curiosity, Gloucester asked to see the letter that Edmund had with him at
In Chapter 4 of a book titled Escape from Freedom, the famous American psychologist Erich Fromm wrote that "Greed is a bottomless pit which exhausts the person in an endless effort to satisfy the need without ever reaching satisfaction" (Fromm 98). Fromm realized that avarice is one of the most powerful emotions that a person can feel, but, by its very nature, is an emotion or driving force that can never be satisfied. For, once someone obtains a certain goal, that person is not satisfied and continues to strive for more and more until that quest leads to their ultimate destruction. For this reason, authors have embraced the idea of greed in the creation of hundreds of characters in thousands of novels. Almost every author has written a work centered around a character full of avarice. Ian Fleming's Mr. Goldfinger, Charles Dickens' Scrooge, and Thomas Hardy's John D'Urberville are only a few examples of this attraction. But, perhaps one of the best examples of this is found in William Shakespeare's King Lear. Edmund, through his speech, actions, and relationships with other characters, becomes a character consumed with greed to the point that nothing else matters except for the never-ending quest for status and material possessions.
In Act 3, Scene 4, Edgar takes on the roles of a madman, and a spirit. In counterfeiting madness, he not only hides from an unjust death, but also serves as a character that resembles King Lear: (1) Both are deceived by family; (2) Both are outcasts of Gloucester's castle; (3) Both are threatened with death; and (4) Both enter into a form of madness. But, whereas King Lear actually becomes mad, Edgar only feigns madness. As Edgar takes the role of a "spirit" (3.4.39), he reveals: (1) Edmund's moral condition, by prescribing moral laws that he will break (3.4.80-83); and (2) that Gloucester will be blinded by Edmund (3.4.117). This essay will begin by examining how Edgar's role, as an outcast feigning madness, resembles the life and fate of King Lear, and then will show how his role as a spirit, reveals future events that will come to pass.
Despite its undeniable greatness, throughout the last four centuries King Lear has left audiences, readers and critics alike emotionally exhausted and mentally unsatisfied by its conclusion. Shakespeare seems to have created a world too cruel and unmerciful to be true to life and too filled with horror and unrelieved suffering to be true to the art of tragedy. These divergent impressions arise from the fact that of all Shakespeare's works, King Lear expresses human existence in its most universal aspect and in its profoundest depths. A psychological analysis of the characters such as Bradley undertook cannot by itself resolve or place in proper perspective all the elements which contribute to these impressions because there is much here beyond the normal scope of psychology and the conscious or unconscious motivations in men.
At the very outset of the play, readers are presented with the power-hungry, self-loathing Duke of Gloucester, defined by his thirst for vengeance and power and by his uncanny ability to manipulate the minds of the people around him. Richard appeals to the audience’s sympathies in his self-deprecating description, when he declares that he is deformed, unfinished, and so hideous and unfashionable that dogs bark at him as he passes by. The imagery he utilizes throughout the opening soliloquy also evokes a feeling of opposition and juxtaposition which speaks to the duality of his nature.The juxtapositions he employs are more than rhetorical devices, as ...
These classic tropes are inverted in King Lear, producing a situation in which those with healthy eyes are ignorant of what is going on around them, and those without vision appear to "see" the clearest. While Lear's "blindness" is one which is metaphorical, the blindness of Gloucester, who carries the parallel plot of the play, is literal. Nevertheless, both characters suffer from an inability to see the true nature of their children, an ability only gained once the two patriarchs have plummeted to the utter depths of depravity. Through a close reading of the text, I will argue that Shakespeare employs the plot of Gloucester to explicate Lear's plot, and, in effect, contextualizes Lear's metaphorical blindness with Gloucester's physical loss of vision.
In Shakespeare's classic tragedy, King Lear, the issue of sight and its relevance to clear vision is a recurring theme. Shakespeare's principal means of portraying this theme is through the characters of Lear and Gloucester. Although Lear can physically see, he is blind in the sense that he lacks insight, understanding, and direction. In contrast, Gloucester becomes physically blind but gains the type of vision that Lear lacks. It is evident from these two characters that clear vision is not derived solely from physical sight. Lear's failure to understand this is the principal cause of his demise, while Gloucester learns to achieve clear vision, and consequently avoids a fate similar to Lear's.
This is a comparison and contrast of two different views of the character, Gloucester in the play King Lear. It will show the different ways that Gloucester has his eyes ripped out. It will also show the different ways the lighting is used and what kind of scenery. It will also show the difference in the ages of the character. Let’s not leave out the wardrobe and the difference between both productions. It will show how Gloucester ages and has similar problems as that of the King.
Another reason for the eye-gouging scene is to emphasize the theme of sight vs. blindness. Throughout the tragedy the characters unquestionably believe what they see, and are completely blind towards reason, instinct, and emotions. For example, after Lear banishes Kent for standing up for Cordelia, Kent returns in disguise. This disguise consists of changed clothes and a faked accent, and Lear cannot recognize him.
It is for this reason, that Lear and Gloucester are considered as fools for their actions as instead of taking responsibility for their actions, they absolve their guilt by viewing the Gods as omniscient figures who “kill [them] for sport”. By referring to his downfall as a “sport”, Gloucester conveys that the Gods view the downfall of man as entertainment and that man is powerless against all Gods as if they are “flies to wanton boys”. The theme of Materialism vs Spirituality also appears to be presented in The Bloody Chamber story, especially through the intriguing character of the Marquis and his contrast with Jean-Yves in the eyes of the female narrator. Carter appears to use this contrast on order to convey the notion that wealth and materialistic possessions can easily corrupt. Whilst the Marquis is presented as significantly wealthier that Jean-Yves and the wealthiest character in the story, he is simultaneously presented as the most distorted character in the story. The female narrator seems to acknowledge this, believing that he was in “despair” when he discovers her betrayal and also highlights his “atrocious loneliness”; thus portraying that even the
In Shakespeare's classic tragedy, King Lear, there are several characters who do not see the reality of their situation. Two such characters are Lear and Gloucester. Both characters exhibit a blindness to the world around them. Lear does not see clearly the truth of his daughters mentions, while Gloucester is also blinded by Edmond's treachery. This failure to see reality leads to Lear's intellectual blindness, which is his insanity, and Gloucester's physical blindness that leads to his trusting tendencies. Each character achieves inner awareness at the end as their surreal blindness is lifted and they realize the truth. Both Lear and Gloucester are characters used by Shakespeare to show the relevance of having a clear vision in life.
King Lear gives the reader a bleak and lonely impression. People suffer unjustly and are killed by heartbreak. Albany points out that if left alone by the gods, "Humanity must perforce prey on itself / like monsters of the deep," expressing that justice and humanity do not house comfortably together. And how can there be meaning or purpose in life if there is no justice? Lear himself alludes poetically to this when upon Cordelia's death he asks, "Why should a dog, a horse, a rat have life / And thou no breath at all?" He also realizes that "I am a man more sinned against than sinning" when it is made obvious that the punishment for his mistake in scene one is harsher than it should be, making it unjust...