Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Do violent films cause violent behavior
Do violent films cause violent behavior
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
2. Aesthetic Brutality – The Role of Violence in Bonnie and Clyde and The Wild Bunch
This thesis chapter is devoted to the detailed analysis of some elements of the films Bonnie and Clyde and The Wild Bunch, in order to unfold their inherent aesthetics.
Through checking and examining a few scenes, the chapter aims to prove, that violence can usefully fit into the narrative, be stylishly composed and supported by other tools. In order to elaborate this topic connecting to Penn’s and Peckinpah’s films, the chapter will cover the violence depiction, the film techniques which were used to emphasise it, along with the main characters and themes. As both directors employed similar techniques, the movies will be inspected under the same subchapters
…show more content…
in parallel. The secondary literature, which has been already used for the first chapter, fulfils a supplementary function in the following subchapters. Within the three smaller topics, the featured citations from Harris, Prince, and Grønstad provide major guidelines. All things considered, this approach will hopefully shed a light on the meaning of ‘aesthetic violence’ considering the title movies. 2.1. The Vehicle of Skillful Depictions – Violence as Plot Device The movies of our topic contain some violent scenes, which are appealingly choreographed and supportive devices to the plot mechanism of the film.
Usually, it is highly arguable to state that a brutal and bloody movie or its scenes can be appraised as enjoyable and essential at the same time. However, the following scenes of the movies can be seen as stylish examples with narrative purpose.
In Bonnie and Clyde, as Mark Harris also states, the “skillful depiction of violence” prefigures the characters, the tone and the serious outcome (87). The couple’s criminal life is rather playful, especially at the beginning. From the excited gunplay of their first encounter (06:50 to 07:10), over their early failures at bank robbing (in a scene at 17:40–19:20), the film slowly reaches the point where the violence starts to escalate. This is a medium shot at 27:02 when Clyde kills a bank manager shooting him in the head through the car window.
Later, a strikingly eventful sequence is used as another clear turning point of the story: it becomes obvious that the golden, lucky days of the expanded gang are over. Close to the end of the movie, the Barrow gang is ambushed during one night. Clyde’s brother suffers a serious headwound at 1:18:28, others are also injured. At 1:21:16 the camera is in a
fixed
Bang! Pow! Bullets are raining down on the infamous Bonnie and Clyde. It is a standoff with the local police department. Bonnie and Clyde are in trouble again; robbing a liquor store of their cigarettes and their liquor. It seems as if Bonnie and Clyde were the greatest pair of criminals in history.
2. According to Sobchack, contemporary screen violence greatly differs than portrayals of violence in years past. Today, violent scenes are careless and lack significance because we as audiences have become calloused and desensitized to any acts of violence. She states that there is “no grace or benediction attached to violence. Indeed, its very intensity seems diminished” (Sobchack 432). Senseless violence, gruesome acts, and profound amounts of gore are prevalent in movies today, and because even this is not enough, it must be accompanied by loud blasts and noise, constantly moving scenes to keep audiences stimulated and large quantities of violence for viewers to enjoy what they are watching. Decades ago, it was the story that was engaging to audiences and filmmaking was an art.
...nd Clyde had been killed,they went a little frantic.The newspapers had made the couple out to be larger than life,but in death,they looked tiny and shattered.
Even as Clyde drove along the lane in Louisiana to his death, he carried a saxophone and reams of sheet music, as well as an arsenal of firearms. Clyde loved and named his guns, and regarded them as tokens of his power. At the age of sixteen, Clyde dropped out of school to work at Proctor and Gamble. Clyde’s crime streak started with helping his brother steal a small flock of turkeys and transporting them to Dallas to sell for Christmas money. Dallas officers saw the back seat full of live fowl, and pulled them over, arresting them both. His brother claimed full responsibility, and they let Clyde go since he was so small and innocent looking.
One could easily dismiss movies as superficial, unnecessarily violent spectacles, although such a viewpoint is distressingly pessimistic and myopic. In a given year, several films are released which have long-lasting effects on large numbers of individuals. These pictures speak
"Bonnie and Clyde (Page 3)." About.com 20th Century History. N.p., n.d. Web. 02 Dec. 2013.
Aside from its acting, the other major influence which Mean Streets had upon American film-makers was through it's use of a rock n' roll soundtrack (almost perfectly integrated with the images), and in its depiction of a new kind of screen violence. Unexpected, volatile, explosive and wholly senseless, yet, for all that, undeniably cinematic violence. The way in which Scorsese blends these two - the rock and roll and the violence - shows that he understood instinctively, better than anyone else until then, that cinema (or at least this kind of cinema, the kinetic, visceral kind) and rock n' roll are both expressions of revolutionary instincts, and that they are as inherently destructive as they are creative. This simple device - brutal outbreaks of violence combined with an upbeat soundtrack - has been taken up by both the mainstream cinema at large and by many individual `auteurs', all of whom are in Scorsese's debt - Stone and Tarantino coming at once to mind.
The films protagonists Kit Caruthers (Martin Sheen) and Holly (Sissy Spacek) are loosely based on the real life adolescent criminals Charles Starkweather and his girlfriend Caril Ann Fugate. Starkweather and Fugate become infamous after their murder spree through Nebraska and Wyoming in the 1950’s, however the story of two young fugitives in love is not one that is unfamiliar with audiences; the most notable is Arthur Penn’s Bonnie and Clyde (1967). The character of Kit also bears a resemblance to Jim Stark, James Dean’s character i...
“By 1930, Clyde was incarcerated in the Eastham Prison farm on a 14-year term for automobile theft and robbery. Known as the “Murder House” or “the Bloody Ham,” Eastham was notorious for its tough working and living conditions, as well as guards who would beat inmates with trace chains and perform random spot killings, all of which was substantiated by the Texas state legislatures and the Osborne Association on U.S. Prisons which ranked the Texas prison system as the most worst in the nation in 1935. During his time at Eastham, Clyde transformed from petty criminal to emotionless killer when he murdered Ed Crowder, a man who had been sexually assaulting himself since he entered the prison. Clyde’s drive in life wasn't to become a famous bank robber, as he sometimes labeled, it was to take revenge on Eastham.” (80 Years Later, Retracing the Real Life of Bonnie and Clyde) This shows Clyde’s character and the kind of experience he's had to become the criminal he was. Clyde had only killed the man and committed all the bank robberies for revenge, more than using the money for his own pleasure. Another evidence that Bonnie and Clyde were good people, was how “Bonnie had never shot anyone but herself, though injured and wounded several times by officers, during her two year run with Clyde.” This clearly shows Bonnie’s
Bonnie and Clyde held the attention of the American public. Their lives brought forth a story of romance, action and adventure during the 1920s and the Great Depression. They are known as legends, their lives caught the attention of the American people in a way that had never happened before, from the time they met, to when they became the felons they are known for being and even in their deaths they were always in the eyes of the people. They brought to light a new kind of criminal. Bonnie and Clyde’s lifestyle was greatly influenced by the 1920s and the Great Depression.
In the 1967 Warner Bros. film Bonnie and Clyde, there are two very important shots and scenes which lead to the resolution at the very end of the film (Bonnie and Clyde’s ultimate death). These two shots and scenes mainly serve as foreshadowing of this untimely end to the movie’s two main characters (not necessarily protagonists).
The violence in Bonnie and Clyde was gruesome. Bank tellers were shown to get shot in the head from point blank. Police officers were shot at and shown to not be the hero. Then the final scene, which today is still one of the most violent endings to a film, Bonnie and Clyde were gunned down by a multitude of police officer’s unarmed. Bullet holes were shown all over both of their bodies and all over the vehicle they were driving. Violence was never displayed so bloody and not much today can match what was seen in Bonnie and
In the film, “Bonnie and Clyde” it evinces “equal doses of hopelessness and romanticism.” This paper will tell you how it does with evidence to support it. This movie takes place during the Great Depression; which is around 1929 to 1939. Bonnie and Clyde was seen as a movie that sent tremors through the industry in 1967. (pg 15). Bonnie Parker (Faye Dunaway) meets Clyde Barrow (Warren Beatty) as he is about to steal her mother’s car. This happened after Clyde was released from prison for armed robbery. Bonnie ends up going with Clyde; after he holds up a store at gunpoint. Which was to impress her. After several funny, and random hold-ups, Bonnie and Clyde meet C.W. Moss (Michael J. Pollard), a car gas station attendant, and let him into their
In the presented essay I will compare the style of work of selected artists in the montage of the film. I will try to point out some general regularities and features of Soviet cinema. At the same time I will try to capture especially what is common in their systems and similar or conversely what differ. For my analysis, I will draw on the feature films of the Soviet avantgarde, namely these are the movies - The Battleship Potemkin (S. Eisenstein, 1925), Mother (V. Pudovkin, 1926) and The Man with a movie camera (D. Vertov, 1929).
During the course of this essay it is my intention to discuss the differences between Classical Hollywood and post-Classical Hollywood. Although these terms refer to theoretical movements of which they are not definitive it is my goal to show that they are applicable in a broad way to a cinema tradition that dominated Hollywood production between 1916 and 1960 and which also pervaded Western Mainstream Cinema (Classical Hollywood or Classic Narrative Cinema) and to the movement and changes that came about following this time period (Post-Classical or New Hollywood). I intend to do this by first analysing and defining aspects of Classical Hollywood and having done that, examining post classical at which time the relationship between them will become evident. It is my intention to reference films from both movements and also published texts relative to the subject matter. In order to illustrate the structures involved I will be writing about the subjects of genre and genre transformation, the representation of gender, postmodernism and the relationship between style, form and content.