Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The use of violence in literary
The use of violence in literary
Essay on villains
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The use of violence in literary
Hero or villain? In Alistair MacLeod’s No Great Mischief, Calum commits violent crimes and by all accounts should be considered the antagonist. However, this is not the case. To outsiders he appears violent and rough, but within his clan he is the compass that guides all its members. An intrepid leader who falls victim to his own history, Calum lacked guidance as a young man and this contributed to his later struggles with the law. In fact, Calum’s greatest downfall comes from his goodness. He is stabbed in the back after blindly trusting a stranger on account of their shared lineage. Through anecdotes and flashbacks Calum is revealed to be a sympathetic and multifaceted character. In a novel where bloodlines are revered and respected and devotion …show more content…
Both Fern and Calum are the leaders of their respective groups and have the same responsibilities, yet while both are not afraid to let insults fly, Fern is constantly portrayed as the attacker while Calum is both the victim and the defender of the clan’s honor. Once again, perspective plays a significant role in the characterization of Calum and other key players in the story. One of the main ideas presented in No Great Mischief is that outside of a clan, one’s value rapidly diminishes. The narration never takes readers out of Clan Calum Ruadh, so Calum is never shown through the eyes of outsiders. In this respect, Alexander has painted Calum as a character to be pitied rather than judged because his most terrible and violent act is committed in self defense and is the result of a misunderstanding. Fern accuses the Macdonalds of stealing and of this Calum is completely innocent; the two men have both been deceived by the Californian Alexander, an outsider who does not understand their values. In reality, Calum and Fern have much more in common than Calum and his American cousin, but Calum deeply trusts in the common threads of fate that bind the two. Like any good leader, Calum “looks after his own blood” before he looks after “his” own blood, and this ultimately leads to his tragic
To try to satisfy his craving for power and jealousy, he spreads rumours about the cone-gatherers, and in particular Calum. Before he spoke to Effie Morton about the ‘sightings’, he debates whether he really should spread rumours about them. He does speak to Effie Morton, who is the cook-housekeeper of Lady Runcie-Campbell’s mansion. He tells her that Calum is a pervert who exposes himself in the forest for his own pleasure. An example of this found in chapter 4, “now when he was ...
Steinbeck shows Cals isolation from love and its aggressive results when Cal angrily throws stones at his mothers house. When Cal first learns of his supposedly dead mothers existence he is outraged and goes to seek her. When he is not allowed to see her he violently throws stones and yells "Why can’t a kid see his own mother?" and "Why cant I see my mother". This is the first of several violent actions taken by Cal in an effort to be redeemed by his parents affections. His actions, although violent, are a symbol of his not being loved and the isolation he feels towards his family. In the scene where Cal tries to confer with his mother it is also learned that his mother does not want to have any contact with her children.
The search for and importance of family and identity of the Calum Ruadh clan in Alistair MacLeod's No Great Mischief is significant to the concept of blood being thicker than water. The importance of family, as indicated in No Great Mischief, is very apparent in regards to the main point of prominence in this deeply emotional Gaelic- Canadian tale.
In No Great Mischief, Alistair MacLeod proves to the reader that it is impossible to talk about the Scottish-Canadian heritage without mentioning tradition, family and loyalty. MacLeod wrote this book about loyalty to family tradition. It is common to talk about these three things when one describes his family or his past in general, but in this book, MacLeod has included every single intricate detail about each one of the three aspects.
No Great Mischief champions the importance of a family’s loyalty and love for each other. This is shown through many acts of familial solidarity in the novel. However, the significance placed on the quote “no great mischief if they fall” and the meaning behind it create a warning. This quote, both in the title and the text, reference history repeating itself. It expresses a dichotomy of traditional values and modern society. It also warns against misguided loyalty, isolation, and correlating one’s self-worth with their proximity to clann Chalum Ruaidh.
And where there is no legal punishment for his father’s death, he must stoop, driven by the universal wrong, and “being thus be-netted round with villainies”, to revenge. He must share the corruption of others in spite of his nobility, and recognize in himself the common features, "we are arrant knaves all." (53)
Alistar Macleod’s “No Great Mischief” is a novel full of constant recollections of the Clann Calum Ruadh’s past and genealogy and relating it to the history of Canada; everything that happened in the family’s past effected the life they live currently. This is evident in the characters Alexander McDonald, his brother Calum, the different groups of people and all the connections they have with their family’s past and connections they have with the Clann Calum Ruadh. Alexander is the main character and is the one explaining the story of the past in a very short time period in the present and he connects the family lines throughout history. Calum, the older brother, was left to take care of himself and his siblings at a young age, which results in his drunkenness at the present. Included in the story, at many different time periods, are various groups of people, such as the French Canadians, the English, and the Migrant workers who make an impact on the characters of the story. The reoccurring phrase “Always look after your own blood” (14) was passed down the family line and is questioned and demonstrated by the characters.
Calum’s fate has been crossed with that of the great-great-great grandfather from whom his name originates, the intrepid clan leader Calum Ruadh. Much like his ancestor who bravely led his family into the unknown, Calum acts as the modern day clan leader, guiding his family through negotiations and contracts with mining companies and essentially leading their mass exodus from Cape Breton. Grandfather describes Calum Ruadh as “... responsible for all the people clustered around him. He was… like the goose who points the V, and he temporarily wavered and lost courage” (MacLeod 25), and Alexander later uses this same analogy to describe Calum’s position as leader within their family unit. “When the Canada geese fly north in the spring,” he states “there is a leader at the apex of the V as the formation moves across the land. Those who follow must believe that the leader is doing the best he can, but there is no guarantee that all journeys will end in salvation for everyone involved” (MacLeod 260). This idea of salvation is also related to the difficulties and hardship experienced by both Calums in their respective new environments. At the end of the novel, Alexander makes the most profound connection between the two Calums. When his brother dies, Alexander echoes the carving on Calum Ruadh’s gravestone “Fois do t’anam. Peace to his soul” (Macleod 283) This symbolic act elevates Calum to a status equally
The proposition that “Macbeth is a villain in whom there is little to admire'; is an inadequate judgement of Macbeth’s character. Macbeth is not consciously and naturally malevolent, and there are many aspects of his character and his downfall which serve to support this. Macbeth was not only a victim of his own actions, but also of the human condition and the extremely powerful forces of both his wife and fate. Throughout the play the audience undoubtedly experiences feelings of horror at Macbeth, but we are also driven, through an understanding of his character, to admiration and sympathy. This would not be the case if Macbeth was a totally vile and reprehensible villain, and thus the tragedy of Shakespeare’s Macbeth is clear.
Throughout the play of Macbeth, by William Shakespeare, Macbeth is supposed to be a likeable character until he kills the king. By committing this heinous act, Macbeth instantly becomes a villain and continues to commit murderous acts, all stemming from his first terrible mistake. One of his motives consists of choosing power over integrity, therefore he kills the king. Another reason why Macbeth is a villain is because he continued to kill innocent people to hide his doings. Lastly, since Macbeth is a villain and murderer, he deserves to be condemned and disdained.
A tyrant is someone who does not take equity into account. His decisions are primarily based on self-satisfaction, rather than the wellbeing of others. The protagonist Macbeth, whom Shakespeare describes as a ‘valiant cousin’, has different phases of respectability, all molded by his inevitability of fate. As an audience, we interpret and form an opinion through Shakespeare’s use of psychological audience manipulation. Throughout the beginning of the play we are lead to believe he is a ‘noble warrior’, a loyal man to his administrator who represents that of the divine, Duncan.
Heroes come in all varieties and forms and are imperative to almost any story. A hero may not always be the leading man or powerful and prominent figure in a situation and in Shakespeare’s tragedy of Macbeth, the Scottish nobleman Macduff arises from the abundance of characters as a humble hero. Macduff begins as a silent, static character and develops from a less than glorious beginning to eventually help lead(motivate) an army and ultimately save Scotland by ridding the country of its’ apocryphal king. Through this, Macduff can be characterized as Macbeth’s honorable and brave opposition and the hero of the play.
Macbeth is a play revolving around many key ideas observed in Shakespeare’s time with various messages communicated to the audience successfully, despite the lack of the cinematic effects present in today’s literature entertainment. The interweaved themes of immoral ambition and corruption are displayed throughout the text, unveiling the corruptive nature of one’s excessive greed for supremacy, affecting both themselves and others. This idea in Macbeth is successfully conveyed to the audience in Shakespeare’s time through the literary devices of characterisation, soliloquy and plot.
Macbeth has a mixture of good and evil characteristics. Before he even makes his first appearance on stage, the audience already knows that Macbeth is a skilled warrior. He has been victorious in several battles, conquered the Norwegian army, and even captured the traitor Macdonwald, the thane of Cawdor. When describing Macbeth, Duncan, the king, exclaims "O valiant cousin! Worthy gentleman!" (Applebee 329). Macbeth starts out as a noble and heroic warrior. Unfortunately, he can also be arrogant and paranoid. On his way home from the battle, three witches predict that he will become thane of Cawdor, and king soon af...
In the famous play, MacBeth, by William Shakespeare, the main themes are abuse of power and bullying. Bullying is seen in MacBeth many times throughout. A bully is someone who is someone who takes advantage of others who the assume can be pertained as vulnerable, (Against Bullies). The MacBeths can be considered bullies because they take advantage of others using threats and harmful language. They abuse the little bit of power that they get to receive more by doing unrightful murders.