Oryx and Crake: Individuality isn’t Originality How Symbolism is used to reinforce the theme of renaming In the futuristic novel, Oryx and Crake, Margaret Atwood uses symbolism effectively to shape and reinforce the theme of renaming. Atwood tells a story of a dystopian society in which the idea of renaming someone becomes a pivotal role in the aftermath of the story. Jimmy, the protagonist retells a story of how he got to where he is, a world full of humanoid robots and him possibly being the only man alive. Through the small yet significant changes Jimmy and his closest friend undergo throughout the story, it is transparent that although change can have a perfect root, static change is the most detestable trait one can have. Using the literary …show more content…
device of symbolism, Margaret Atwood reinforces the theme of renaming throughout the book by emphasizing how it can be a double edged sword.
People change for the better or the worse, but the smallest change in a person can have a butterfly effect on the character and logic of an individual. Glenn who later on becomes Crake clearly enforces this butterfly effect. When Jimmy asks about Glenn his mother would say “ “Your friend is intellectually honourable,” Jimmy’s mother would say. “He doesn’t lie to himself.” Then she’d gaze at Jimmy with that blue-eyed, wounded-by-him look he knew so well. If only he could be like that – intellectually honourable.” (Atwood 69) To Jimmy’s mother Glenn was a child any parent could ask for. A child who was intellectually smart and honest. Jimmy had gotten jealous of how his mother compared Crake to him. However, as the story develops and Glenn becomes Crake we see the horrific change that occurs. As Glenn and Jimmy continue to spend time together, they start playing a game called Extinctathon which requires a nickname to play. It is here when Glenn becomes Crake and the domino effect starts. When Crake’s mother passes a way, it is heavily implied that Crake was the one responsible for her death. “Jimmy didn’t understand how he …show more content…
could be so nil about it – it was horrible, the thought of Crake watching his own mother dissolve like that. (Atwood 177) Why was Crake so emotionless? To watch a very significant and important person in one’s life simply ‘dissolve’ must have been terrible and even to Jimmy it was quite unexpected that Crake acted this way. Towards the end, Jimmy witnesses his best friend become the horrific change that Atwood had been foreshadowing. This is shown with the demise of Oryx by the hands of Crake. As the worldwide pandemic breaks out, Jimmy finds shelter inside Paradice while Crake and Oryx are missing. Soon enough Crake shows up and Jimmy is shocked. To see his best friend and childhood friend become who is now it must have been nerve-racking. Atwood writes; “As Jimmy watched, frozen with disbelief, Crake let Oryx fall backwards, over his left arm. He looked at Jimmy, a direct look, unsmiling. “I’m counting on you,” he said. Then he slit her throat. Jimmy shot him.” (Atwood 329) Crake shows Jimmy how much he has changed by taking away his only source of love and fulfillment. Prior to this, Jimmy is always thinking about Oryx and wanting to fulfill his sexual desires and Crake realizes this because he knows how much Jimmy loves Oryx. Since childhood the two had fallen for her and now as adults the attraction and friendship that has been developed over the years has become so transparent that even Crake, whom Oryx originally loved, notices this and realizes that the only way for him to execute his plan is to get rid of all his emotions and feelings for Oryx and Jimmy so that he can satisfy his dream. As Crake lays dead, the reader and Jimmy truly come to realize that Glenn, who was once a honourable and great child that every parent wanted, has now become Crake, a mad scientist who's focused on one thing and one thing only, the extinction of the human race. As life progresses, it is indisputable that one should always stay true to oneself and and be who he/she wants to be, but this originality can also be a fatality.
Oryx symbolizes individuality as she is the only one of the trio whose name never changes throughout the book. She is also the only one of the three who never had an original name enforces her personality as an ambiguous person. Over the course of the book, the reader never once can pinpoint who Oryx is truly in love with, at times she is falling for Jimmy and at other times Crake, this uncertainness reflects her ambiguous personality and since she chose one over the other, this fixed personality contributed to her downfall towards the end of the book. Her split personality between Jimmy and Crake is shown as she says "You can't buy it, but it has a price," said Oryx. "Everything has a price." (Atwood 139) Oryx realizes that everything can come at the cost of something else and she was not ready to invest in one over the other. If Oryx had simply broken out of her indecisive character,in other words rename her character , she could’ve chosen Jimmy over Crake and help prevent Crake from executing his corrupt schemes. Again it is evident that had Oryx simply rename herself, that is remake her character, she could have single handedly change the climax of the book. When Oryx and her brother were sold to Uncle En, Oryx described it “as evidence that her mother had loved her. She had no images of this love. She could
offer no anecdotes. It was a belief rather than a memory.” (Atwood 121) By being too optimistic she tried to hide the truth from herself and others around her. This quote describes her character as one who is constantly looking at the positives amongst all the negatives and because of this excessive use of optimism she ultimately didn’t realize what Crake was scheming. Being the optimistic person she is, she failed to realize what she was ultimately distributing was Crake’s pill of extinction. Had she have been less optimistic and perhaps more pessimistic, she could’ve ended the distribution before the worldwide pandemic. Finally, it is Oryx’s static character that caused her demise at the end of the book. Being the manipulable and naive person she is Crake uses this to his advantage to further advance his goals. When Crake first took her in as an employee, it was under the disguise of it being “triple the pay she’d been getting, with a lot of perks; but also she said the work intrigued her.” (Atwood 310) But under the table it was all planned so that Jimmy would do what Crake wanted him to do at the end which was to help stage Crake’s death. This is shown through the many eerie questions Crake would ask Jimmy after meeting Oryx. Crake would ask;“Would you kill someone you loved to spare them pain?” (Atwood 320) Referring to Crake stabbing Oryx and “If anything happens to me, I’m depending on you to look after the Paradice Project.” (Atwood 320) and finally foreshadowing the death of Oryx and Crake by stating “If I’m not around, Oryx won’t be either,” (Atwood 321). Had Oryx been more aware of Crake’s devious plot the worldwide pandemic would have been avoided along with her living instead of dying. But because of her static character and her never changing personality it ultimately caused all the major and plot advancing events that occurred in the entire book.
To conclude, in the poem “Changes” by D. Ginette Clarke, the use of repetition, word choice, and punctuation revealed the persona in a well-thought out and respectable manner. Clarke was very clever in the way that she had used these elements to not only reveal the persona, but also to make the poem as amazing as it is. The persona started off as a curious man, then came off as serious, only to turn out to be a demanding and vehement person; but in the end, the persona’s special characteristics were clear. Therefore, the use of repetition, word choice, and punctuation revealed and represented the persona and his curious, eager, and desperate personality.
People change everyday, whether it is from good to bad or for the better. People often say to themselves, maybe, if I didn't do “blank” this wouldn't have happened. However, the reality is, it happened, and there is no way to change that. Why go around throwing maybe’s around if you cannot change it? Authors purposefully make readers ask those questions. Authors love to create complex characters, characters that go through change. In Ellen Hopkins’ book, Crank, is the perfect example. Ellen Hopkins writes from her own daughter's perspective, Kristina, on how “the monster” changed her own life and her family's life.
The Changeable nature of life affects us all somehow. Whether it be moving to a new city, having children, or losing people that we love, it can affect people in many different ways. For example, in the novel, the main character Taylor Greer changes her name from Marietta and moves...
In The Shawl, Cynthia Ozick uses descriptive details to engage the reader. The story describes the horror of Nazism. The setting of the story is a concentration camp. The three main characters are Rosa, who was a mother of two daughters, Stella who was fourteen and Magda who was fifteen months. The plot of the story surrounds a magic shawl. The shawl is a major part of the complication, climax and resolution of the story. The magic shawl is the only thing the three starving women have keeping them alive and eventually leads to their demise. The plot of The Shawl ends with a camp guard tossing the infant Magda onto an electrified fence.
Symbolism In "The Things They Carried" In Tim O'Brien's story "The Things They Carried" we see how O'Brien uses symbolism in order to indirectly give us a message and help us to connect to what the soldiers are thinking and feeling. During a war, soldiers tend to take with them items from home, kind of as a security blanket. The items they normally take with them tend to reveal certain characteristics of their personality. Henry Dobbins is the guy who loves to eat, so he made sure he took some extra food. Ted Lavender was the scaredy cat of the group, so he carried tranquilizers with him.
Written by author Tim O’Brien after his own experience in Vietnam, “The Things They Carried” is a short story that introduces the reader to the experiences of soldiers away at war. O’Brien uses potent metaphors with a third person narrator to shape each character. In doing so, the reader is able to sympathize with the internal and external struggles the men endure. These symbolic comparisons often give even the smallest details great literary weight, due to their dual meanings. The symbolism in “The Things They Carried” guides the reader through the complex development of characters by establishing their humanity during the inhumane circumstance of war, articulating what the men need for emotional and spiritual survival, and by revealing the character’s psychological burdens.
“I was crying and all, I don’t know why, but I guess it was because I was feeling so damn depressed and lonesome” (53), Holden says. As humans, we have a hard time belonging in society. This is the same case for Holden Caulfield, the main character from the Catcher in the Rye. The Catcher in the rye, a novel by J.D Salinger, is about Holden, a lost boy in desperate need of help. Throughout the novel, Holden seems to be excluded by the world around him. He continually attempts to try and belong in a world in which he is isolating from. In this novel, Salinger uses symbols such as the red hunting hat, the ducks and Allie’s glove to support the theme, belonging and isolation.
In the story “Ender's Game” many interesting actions and events happen. From wars to death, to games, that are not games anymore. This story is about a young boy that lives in a world that is constantly under attack from extraterrestrials called the Buggers. In the beginning, Ender is just a young boy constantly controlled and watched by the government (The IF). In the middle, he is taken to battle school and there the people realize that he is the best person for the job and will lead the human race to victory over the Buggers. Lastly, the IF puts Ender and his group together to beat the buggers in a final war. The book “Ender’s Game” written by Orson Scott Card is a fun and exciting science fiction book that leaves the reader at the edge of its seat. The symbolism and hidden messages in the book make the reader connect to the story. The title, the characters, and the setting all have something more to bring to the table and change
Innocence lies within everyone in at least one point in their lives, but as reality consumes them, that purity begins to vanish slowly as they learn new experiences. In the coming of age novel set in the nineteen-forties, J.D Salinger writes about a sixteen-year-old boy named Holden Caulfield who stands between a road that separates childhood from adulthood and is confused about which path to take. On a three-day trip in New York away from his family and fellow peers at school, Holden encounters many situations in which lead him to think twice about who he wants to become and how he wants to guide others who are in the same situation he is in. In The Catcher in the Rye, J.D Salinger utilizes symbolism, vivid imagery, and slangy diction to expose Holden’s struggle to preserve the innocence of the people that he loves while alienating himself from the adult world he calls “phony.”
In Oedipus at Colonus (OC), one sees the beginning of Creon's decline. Creon has now come to occupy the throne that once belonged to Oedipus. It soon becomes apparent that his vision of the proper role of a king has changed to accommodate his new-found position. The emphasis shifts from that of a king who must rule wisely to one who must rule unyieldingly. The kingship becomes a selfserving instrument for Creon in his attempt to secure the return of Oedipus and the good fortune prophesied to accompany him. Creon's notion of justice is severely distorted in OC. He becomes monomaniacal - conducting his affairs with tyranny and belligerence. For example, he threatens to harm Oedipus' daughters if the blind beggar does not return to Thebes. His view of rightness and fairness is no longer in line with that of his subjects.
Oryx and Crake, by Margaret Atwood is a novel that warns us of possible dangers in the future, such as the destruction of the human race and nature. Throughout the novel, Atwood uses examples of destruction as a way to convey the danger of greed when combined with science. There are many examples of destruction within the novel; however, every example of destruction displayed throughout the novel is ultimately caused by greed.
Symbolism plays an important role in the Scarlet Letter. The scarlet "A" is used to represent sin and anguish along with happiness. The "A" has different meanings to people other than what was originally intended. The scaffold is used as a place of repentance and judgment by God. Pearl is another major symbol used as a reminder of the scarlet letter.
The characters in the movie, Black Orpheus, are significantly altered from the Greek myth. In the myth, Orpheus and Eurydice are together from the beginning and are completely in love. Everyone is happy for their love and the only thing that stands in their way is death. In the movie, however, this is notably changed. Orpheus begins as a streetcar conductor that was engaged to Mira, giving the idea that Orpheus was in love with another woman. We quickly see that this is not the case as Orpheus is always very curt and rude with his fiancée. They are slated to get married, but there is an eerie feeling in the air that something is about to go wrong.
In William Golding's Lord of the Flies, the boys who are stranded on the island come in contact with many unique elements that symbolize ideas or concepts. Through the use of symbols such as the beast, the pig's head, and even Piggy's specs, Golding demonstrates that humans, when liberated from society's rules and taboos, allow their natural capacity for evil to dominate their existence.
In Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter, symbolsim is constantly present in the actual scarlet letter “A” as it is viewed as a symbol of sin and the gradally changes its meanign, guilt is also a mejore symbol, and Pearl’s role in this novel is symbolic as well. The Scarlet Letter includes many profound and crucial symbols. these devices of symbolism are best portayed in the novel, most noticably through the letter “A” best exemplifies the changes in the symbolic meaning throughout the novel.