Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequences of revenge
Introduction on revenge
Critical analysis of revenge
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consequences of revenge
Kong Qiu once said "before you embark on a journey of revenge dig two graves". This represents how seeking revenge can cause detrimental damage to one's relationships. In the novel "other side of the bridge" by Mary Lawson the author demonstrates that betrayal motivates one to seek their Revenge; which in turn causes irreparable damage to one's relationships. Jake, Arthur and Ian encounters with Revenge help build up their character and furthermore obliterate their connections. Jake's cynical plot for Revenge leads him to destroy his relationships and further develop his character. Jake's response to Arthur reacting about Laura turned out to be a excellent opportunity for Jake to get his retribution for the episode on the bridge, which left …show more content…
As Jake and Arthur cross the bridge Jake alienates Arthur and further in lights Arthur's guilelessness. Arthur feels aggravated and disregards Jake's cry for help. This prompts Jake to injure his leg which haunts Arthur for the rest of his life. “‘Good’, Arthur said a word that would haunt him for the rest of his life” (Lawson,90). After Arthur's consistent disappointment in school and despondency at home he had enough and needed Jake to pay for all his mishap. This obliterated any limits Jake and Arthur had and furthermore opened the Pandora's box of issues between the siblings. After Ian educated Arthur of what he saw Jake do, Arthur at long last discharge all the outrage that had developed throughout the years. "Arthur reached out and took hold of the front of Jake's shirt with both hands and lifted into the air, right up into the air, and then slammed him against the car" (Lawson,342). Arthur at last renders his retribution by utilizing the one preferred standpoint over his sibling; his brawn. This situation shows Arthur's character as he releases all his emotions and at last ends his relationship with his brother. These occasions connect back to the thesis, as Arthur takes his reprisal it demonstrates his lack of innocence and prompts the end of his relationship with
The Other Side of the Bridge by Mary Lawson is a book that depicts two different people, that mainly focuses on jealousy, rivalry and the power of obsession over half a century. There are many characters in the novel and they build relationships with one another that eventually become intertwined. The relationships that are built end up having an effect on the character, and contributes something different to his understanding of himself and the decisions he makes. Ian in the novel is an example of that, where the relationships he builds with the others, helps him find who he is as a person and affects the decisions he makes. Specifically through the relationships with Pete, his father, and Jake, he gains something different from each character which proves to be vital to who he is. Without these characters, Ian would be very different, as each character contributed something to Ian’s ultimate understanding of himself.
Although Jake was spared his life in the great war, he lost another part of his life and future. Jack tries to compensate his lack of any real future with Brett or any other women with his passion for bullfighing and other frivalties. In John Steele Gordon’s article, “What We Lost in the Great War” Gordon laments the loss of hope and future the generation of the war felt. The characters of the novel, and especially Jake, exemplify the lack of direction felt after the war. Their aimless drinking, parties and participation in the fiesta is an example of the absence of focus in their life.
experiences with revenge what his actions caused. It shows that getting revenge is never the
Another part where Phoebe shows her influence on Holden is when Holden states, “… the kids were trying to grab for the gold ring, and so was old Phoebe, and I was sort of afraid she’d fall off the horse. The thing… is, if they want to grab for the gold ring, you have to let them do it…if they fall off, they fall off, but it’s bad if you say anything to them.” Holden feels that by letting Phoebe ride alone, he will make good for her, something that his parents did not give him. At the same time, Holden reveals his feelings towards his Allie, who he loves and takes care of.
In 'V for Vendetta' directed by the Wachowski brothers, and 'The Count of Monte Cristo' directed by Kevin Reynolds, there are two characters known as V and Edmund Dantes. These two characters are similar in that they are seeking revenge, but ultimately they are different. When looking into their paths of revenge, differences between the two are revealed. The first difference is why the two want their enemies to suffer. The second difference is the influences of the people close to them that affect the outcome of the paths of revenge. V and Edmund Dantes are different when looking into their paths of revenge, in that they seek the previous two points of difference.
Justice is part of revenge; as also for revenge is part of justice. “Justice” comes from a Latin word that means “straight, fair, equal”, it’s the quality of being righteous and loyal towards one’s state, although serves the interests of the stronger (Hourani, 1962), while revenge is the act of taking retaliation for injuries or wrongs. What ever the circumstances are being the individual who experiences a unjust act, results in the hunt for one of these two things: Justice or revenge. What are the key differences between the two? Justice can be defined as the concept of moral rightness, which is based on the rules of law, fairness, ethics, and equality among the governed citizens. Revenge, on the other hand, refers to an action taken by an individual as a response to an act of injustice. The principle of revenge is “an eye for an eye”…. Can revenge be justified and be as equally part of justice if they both seek retribution for a wrongdoing?
Throughout history, revenge, or vengeance, has been altered by several cultures and even the American culture. This is shown throughout many ancient greek epics. Throughout these two epics, what is just revenge and what the action of revenge is are much different than what Revenge is seen through today’s society. Revenge is the main theme in The Iliad, with Achilles’ revenge on Agamemnon and Hector, and in The Odyssey, with Poseidon’s revenge on Odysseus and Odysseus’s revenge on the Suitors, and these epics define how revenge was seen in the ancient Greek world.
(Jake is trying to build his credibility with his audience by stating his experience of getting bullied as a child and by informing his audience that he is advocating to make the anti-bullying law more prominent in the nation. By doing so, the audience is able to rely on him because his intentions are to help victims of bullying.)
It is the idea of revenge that sends a cool shiver down the spines of justly men when they begin to question as to why someone would stoop to such a level. But yet it is still more than an idea for revenge has been carried out in various forms along all the eras of history side-by-side of that of novels and tragedies. Even so, revenge is still a dark scheme; an evil plague of the mind per se. It is such a plague that will turn even the greatest persons of the brightest, optimistically capable of minds into lowly, as well as lonely, individuals. Thus, revenge will, and can, only end in despair and agony of the mind. Therefore, provided that all that has been said is true, revenge would appear quite unseemly to the observant onlooker. However, taking an in-depth insight into revenge you can uncover quite a compelling feature, which is best summed up into one word. Pride. Pride is the one clear motivational proprietor needed to push a protagonist into the downward spiral of personal vendetta. Without pride, revenge is no more than a mindless massacre of flesh and bone ending in the obliteration of any hope for reconciliation.
The major act of revenge within the play that affects people the most, is when Abigail Williams accuses multiple people of witchcraft. Her accusations is an act of revenge because she had a love affair with John Proctor during the time she worked at his house, John’s wife found out and fired her immediately. Even though the situation happened a while ago, Abigail still felt bitter towards the Proctors and wants to get John back into her life but when she realizes that she won’t be able to do that she decides to seek vengeance on the people that broke her heart. Her solution to the issue is that she will accuse people within the town of witchcraft, a crime punishable by death. When Abigail first accuses John, everybody is shocked and surprised
“If you seek revenge, dig two graves.” This ancient Chinese proverb explains the mood in Hamlet, a play, written by Shakespeare. The theme of revenge is seen throughout the play as each character extracts one form or another of revenge from a person who has wronged them. In the play the characters Hamlet, Laertes, and Fortinbras all desire revenge for a lost father; however, their motivations for murder differ.
In Hamlet, William Shakespeare uses themes such as revenge to show how madness and confusion lead to tragedy. One of the main revenge plots within the play is Hamlet’s desire to avenge his father’s death by killing his uncle Claudius who is now the King of Denmark. What makes hamlet angrier is knowing that his mother married his uncle only two months after his father’s death. “Not only the characters but the whole state of Denmark, with King Claudius at the head, are out of balance” (Shakespeare). Hamlet is motivated by the ghost to seek revenge on his uncle, who married his mother and murderer his father King Hamlet.
He decides to fight crime as a hero and he wants to help as much people as he can handle at a time . To start his first battle to fight against crime he decides to watch the news immediately and find the worst crime that they can find that usually does a crime daily . They waited about five hours and they found their target. They found their gang name and it's called the Dragons . The reason why they picked the Dragons is because they just did a raid on the new York capital bank , and they usually do a robbery daily . Jake tries to find out where their next attack is gonna be . To find where they attack, he decides to ask random other good local gangs that are able to tell him where their next robbery is gonna be . Jake soonly findes where their next robbery s gonna be , the gangs tell him that's it's gonna be located at a five star hotel in New york, new York and they're gona try to steal all their money into the safe from their collection from the gambling from youngsters and elderly people . The next day later they decide that he's gonna stay a night before at the hotel to see his surroundings and probably test his luck at the slot machine and see how much money he's gonna make and he also wants to have as much fun as he can before his big night tomorrow . so Jack tries to have as much fun with his Sunday before the dangerous Monday . After the night Jake
Taking revenge is a bitter sweet thing. I have always thought that people should always get what they desire, whether it be a grade, a smile and hug or in some cases, revenge. When I was in high school there seemed to be someone always trying to get me in trouble, they would say things that wouldn’t be true or do things to make me look bad. The fact that I never seemed to do anything to them would make me mad and wonder what I could do to get them back. Revenge would usually come in some sort of verbal put down or I would try to physically hurt them. It always seemed when I would get the revenge right away I would feel really good but as I thought about what I did, and what they did to me I would always feel guilty or wish I would have never done anything to them in return.
William Shakespeare’s original play Hamlet sinfully mirrors how our society acts today. A dark tale of revenge peppered with violence and murder can be used to summarise the main theme of Hamlet. Hamlets loyalty to his farther to “Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder,” results in not only Hamlet’s madness but also a mass-murdering spree. This revenge filled violence is relevant in today’s society of mass media.