Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dickens On The Industrial Revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dickens On The Industrial Revolution
Playing with Fire Motifs often play a major role in pieces of literature due to the wide variety of ideas they can be used to express. This is especially true for pieces that were written during or about a historically significant event, as the writer would often be trying to convey certain ideas without directly stating them. As a history major, I find it fascinating to discover the deeper meaning to the motifs in Hard Times, as it was written during the industrial revolution, one of the most significant turning points in English history. A notable recurring motif in Charles Dickens’ novel is that of fire. In Hard Times, Dickens uses the symbol of fire to convey messages of despair, wonder, fancy, and hope surrounding the main character, …show more content…
In this scene, she is discussing with her devious brother, Tom, what a marriage to Bounderby could mean. While speaking, Louisa does not lift her eyes from the fire. Tom even comments on her behavior, saying “You seem to find more to look at in [the fire] than ever I could find.” (Dickens 59) However, he simply dismisses it as one of the “advantages of being a girl” (Dickens 59). This scene illustrates the parallel between Louisa and her father, as they were both focused on a fire. The fire represents creativity, wonder, fancy, and all things apart from fact. The main difference between father and daughter, however, is that Louisa has always known that there is more to life than fact, while Mr. Gradgrind is just beginning to notice it. In the context of this scene, the fire that Louisa is gazing into symbolizes this creativity that she desperately wants to use and show, but due to her rigid position in society, she is only left to look and wonder from …show more content…
In this portion we finally catch sight of Gradgrind’s epiphany, realizing that his daughter is truly something special. In this scene, Louisa is confronting her father about all of the problems that he has brought about that have forced her into living a life that she does not desire. This is the first time we spot any trace of remorse in Gradgrind, and this has a snowball effect on his emotions. He finally recognizes the fire that we are so familiar with; as he is looking at his beloved daughter he sees “a wild dilating fire in the eyes that were steadfastly regarding him” (Dickens 221). This is the climax of the entire story: we view Gradgrind finally accepting into his heart that there are more truths than simple fact, that there is more to life than reason, and that a human needs something to cling onto that is hopeful. We note the regret that Gradgrind now harbors later on in the scene, when he sees “the pride of his heart and the triumph of his system lying, an insensible heap, at his feet.” He finally understands that his education system only does good for the industry system and that he is responsible for hundreds of student lives that are not being properly fulfilled because their heads are jammed up with useless information. All of the wonder and fascination and feelings are coming back to him in a rush, and his fire is finally
In the start of Fahrenheit 451, Montag’s thoughts are that fire is good for society. He burns books for a living, and never thought twice about doing his job. That is until he meets characters such as Clarisse, Beatty, and the academics. Montag’s understanding of the nature of fire changes as he becomes enlightened through his relationships.
Bradbury first depicted fire as a hurtful force through Montag, a fireman, who burn books. With the converted mentality of his culture, “it was [Montag’s] pleasure to burn. It was a special pleasure to see things eaten, to see things blackened and changed” (3). Montag’s culture sees burning as an enjoyment; however, the fire portrayed here demonstrates the destruction of knowledge and personality. While Montag’s profession brings him joy he does not understand that burning is the most permanent form of destruction. He is oblivious to his governments’ strong desire to eliminate the ideas and knowledge that books hold. In this society, where ignorance is bliss and their phobia of unhappiness controls all aspects of life, people believe that their destructive fire “is bright and…clean”, as it is used as a means to keep themselves oblivious and happy (60). In addition, Bradbury establishes the difference in the symbolisms of fire by naming part one of his novel “The Hearth and the Salamander”. The hearth is the fireplace of the home and is the most positive image of fire. This fire contributes warmth and restores relationships between people. The salamander, the symbol of the firemen, and who personify fire’s destruction is contrasted with the hearth, which represents restoration.
To support a major theme of this novel, scarecrows and birds of fine song and feather, wine and knitting, all represent the theme of man’s inhumanity toward his fellow man. The Revolution was a tragically devastating time full of senseless and meaningless violence, deception of neighbors as well as treason towards the government, and blissful ignorance of the surroundings. Many scenes and dialogue from this novel point out what contributed to make the revolution a period of intense political destruction. In A Tale of Two Cities, Charles Dickens includes many themes pertaining to the French Revolution and the moralities and immoralities that goes with violence, betrayal, and ignorance, by using many different types of symbolism.
...remonde bloodline, most of which is innocent, must be exterminated to compensate for the deaths of her two siblings. The distinctions between the two women are especially evident when they engage in battle over the Evremonde family because they are speaking in different languages. Neither can understand the other linguistically, nor on a moral level. The message Dickens is attempting to convey through these characters is that of the many applications of passion, such zeal is best employed “with the vigorous tenacity of love [because it is] always so much stronger than hate” (365). In a decision between using one’s energy for love or hate, it is more productive and personally satisfying to choose the path of love because it is able to overcome that of hate.
Lastly and most importantly would be Lucie’s elaborate expression of sentimentality in her constant fainting at the least sign of distress. However unbearable it might have seemed, the reader could not fully appreciate the significance of her character and why she was loved by so many equally sentimental; characters in the novel. When Lucie early on testifies at Darnay’s trial in the English court, she says, “He was kind, and good, and useful to my father. I hope,” and here she bursts into tears, “ I may not repay him by doing him harm here today.” Her deep sensitivity and generous nature shines through. And remember, when Lucie stands forlornly and devotedly at a place near the Paris prison in order for her husband, Darnay, to glimpse her and their child, it is clear that Dickens wanted to portray her as a loving, faithful, and sympathetic person.
In conclusion, the central motifs of fire and ice that shape the story, are introduced to the reader early in the play, through this passage. This gives real insight into the character of Jane Eyre and her passionate nature, which is one of her natural strengths. This passion shapes many of her actions throughout the novel. The other characters who seek to dominate Jane respond to this by efforts to control her with their emotional coldness. Jane will not be controlled by anything that would seek to suppress her fire.
Emily was kept confined from all that surrounded her. Her father had given the town folks a large amount of money which caused Emily and her father to feel superior to others. “Grierson’s held themselves a little too high for what they really were” (Faulkner). Emily’s attitude had developed as a stuck-up and stubborn girl and her father was to blame for this attitude. Emily was a normal girl with aspirations of growing up and finding a mate that she could soon marry and start a family, but this was all impossible because of her father. The father believed that, “none of the younger man were quite good enough for Miss Emily,” because of this Miss Emily was alone. Emily was in her father’s shadow for a very long time. She lived her li...
Dickenson’s use of diction creates figurative imagery that further reveals the manner in which the speaker’s attitude evolves. The word choice not only allows readers to mentally visualize the events but also to easily understand the speaker’s feelings that change throughout the poem. Although the word “infinite” (16) describes the speaker’s jealousy toward the woman, it also refers to the divine creator and His place of eternal happiness. The connotation associated with the word shows that the speaker believes in life after death, which clarifies why jealousy arose within her in the fourth stanza. She experiences a conflicting response because the woman grows closer to every believer’s ultimate goal: heaven. Moreover, the personification,
Throughout the novel, Dickens employs imagery to make the readers pity the peasants, have compassion for the innocent nobles being punished, and even better understand the antagonist and her motives. His use of personified hunger and description of the poor’s straits made the reader pity them for the situation caused by the overlord nobles. However, Dickens then uses the same literary device to alight sympathy for the nobles, albeit the innocent ones! Then, he uses imagery to make the reader better understand and perhaps even feel empathy for Madame Defarge, the book’s murderous villainess. Through skillful but swaying use of imagery, Dickens truly affects the readers’ sympathies.
The novel, Hard Times by Charles Dickens revolves around the central idea of English society, including the social, economical, and political issues during the mid 19th century. Fact superior to imagination is one of the main themes of this novel, apparent mainly in book one. Mr. Gradgrind raises his children to ignore their imaginations and anything that is not cold hard fact. For example, Louisa, his daughter, in particular tends to question this rationalism with her curiosity about the circus. There are countless examples in which Mr. Gradgrind bestows his “wisdom” on both his children, and students in the education system located in Coketown. The way Mr. and Mrs. Gradgrind raised their children, described by Dickens, parallels the way in which John Stuart Mill was raised by his own parents in London during the 19th century. John, similarly to Louisa, was educated with the idea that any of his own imagination or creativity was wrong. His parents would burn toys in front of him, emulating the idea that any object or concept that brings happiness is simply wrong. His father, Sir James Stuart Mill, also had a major impact on Mill’s childhood and even manhood. The majority of his infancy was centered on education, and the thought that hard-core knowledge was the solution to any conflict. During this time, his father would make him read Greek and Latin classics to ensure that he were prepared for disciplinary jobs in the future. Through this childhood of fact, and purely fact, along with a lack of moral influences instituted in his life, constituted Mill to become an advocate for utilitarianism. This theory was proposed by Jeremy Bentham who was indeed Mill’s family friend and tutor, emphasizing the idea of maximizing happiness and ...
...tefulness. And all of the qualities represented by and portrayed by the characters in the novel are what make the story so strong and relatable to the reader. It gives one insight on how the character of an individual and their nature affects their emotions and actions, and how that in turn affects others around them. Evidently, Charles Dickens cleverly incorporates different symbols into his novel, “Great Expectations.” They are essential in the plot as well as conveying those pieces of human nature and how everyone has these aspects in them. How one acts based on those aspects is what determines them as a person and also how they are perceived from an outside standpoint. So the symbols used in Charles Dickens’s novel have a very important effect on the novel as a whole and the reader as well, and make for a very interesting and thought-provoking piece overall. …
Dickens, Charles. Hard Times: An Authority Text, Background, Sources, And Contemporary Reactions Criticism. NewYork: W.W. Norton & Company. 2,1990. Ch.1: 1, ch.7: 203, ch.8: 210 & 211, ch.9: 218.
The beginning of the Nineteenth Century yielded many technological advances that took their toll on the world. Great Britain’s economy began to thrive with these advances that led to efficient production lines, railways, and, most importantly, the ability to make better technology. Though at the time these advances seemed to improve many aspects of daily life, Charles Dickens only saw the negative effects that this new way of life imposed upon unsuspecting families. As a victim of the Industrial Revolution, which left many of the working class, including his own family, in a horrible state of living, Dickens grew up in a wretched environment brought on by an advancing society. His early life led to his ambitions of escaping the poverty that gripped his family. His talent for writing proved to be his escape, and he quickly became “a titan of literature.” Dickens constantly used details from his own life to create characters and settings. It is said that “Dickens was himself a Dickens character, bursting with an inordinate and fantastic vitality” (Johnson VII). In his two stories, “The Chimes” and “Going into Society”, Dickens pulls pictures from his past to give the reader a vivid view of the gloomy reality that occurred in everyday life for the working class. As his main principle in helping the poor, Dickens often included the Christmas theory in his works, which he uses to combat Individualism in England’s society. Charles Dickens’s entire writing career was devoted to fighting society’s oppressive treatment of the lower class by applying the Christmas theory of charity to everyday life.
“Now, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else” (Dickens 5). So says Mr. Thomas Gradgrind, the proponent of a Utilitarian educational philosophy in Charles Dickens’ Hard Times. Cold, hard facts are what Mr. Thomas Gradgrind’s philosophy consists of, and cold hard facts are exactly what Tom and Louisa Gradgrind are raised on. They are taught by their father and by society to live their lives based on these facts. They are instructed to conduct themselves in accordance to them and nothing else. As stated by Taylor Stoehr, “Tom and Louisa Gradgrind are products of the Gradgrindian system, raised in Stone Lodge, taught in the school of hard facts, model grindings off the parent stone” (Stoehr 171). As a result of being raised in the loveless atmosphere of Stone Lodge and in accordance with the strictly enforced rules of the Gradgrindian system, Tom and Louisa are deprived of opportunities to cultivate imagination, emotions, and “fancy” (Dickens 5). The children are themselves fragmented and insufficient fragments who have been formed by a hard system of hard facts. By blocking every available outlet for the interplay of fantasy and emotion, Mr. Gradgrind unintentionally generates two extreme outcomes for his children. Even though the Gradgrind philosophy has completely different effects on Tom and Louisa Gradgrind, it ultimately deprives them both of the happiness that only a balance between the wisdom of the Head and the wisdom of the Heart can create.
Set in the ever changing world of the Industrial Revolution, Charles Dickens’ novel Hard Times begins with a description of a utilitarian paradise, a world that follows a prescribed set of logically laid-out facts, created by the illustrious and "eminently practical" Mr. Gradgrind. However, one soon realizes that Gradgrind's utopia is only a simulacrum, belied by the devastation of lives devoid of elements that "feed the heart and soul," as well as the mind. As the years fly by, the weaknesses of Gradgrind's carefully constructed system become painfully apparent, especially in the lives of his children Louisa and Tom, as well as in the poor workers employed by one Mr. Josiah Bounderby, a wealthy factory owner and a subscriber to Gradgrind's system. Dickens, through the shattering of Gradgrind's utilitarian world, tells us that no methods, not even constant oppression and abuse, can defeat and overcome two basic needs of humans, our fundamental needs for emotion and imagination.