Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical issue of abortion
Social theory on abortion
Moral issue with abortion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical issue of abortion
Elizabeth Brundage’s The Doctor’s Wife is a novel focusing mainly on abortion and the moral implications that go along with the topic. In my opinion, Brundage captures the opinion of both the pro-life and pro-choice groups of people fairly accurately, and represents these opinions in the novel’s characters in a respectful manner. This novel delves into one of the more taboo topics that people tend to avoid when it comes to American politics. When permitted by local law, abortions are one of the safest procedures in medicine. The World Health Organization recommends safe and legal abortions be available to all women. Around 44 million abortions occur each year in the world, with a little under half done unsafely. Unsafe abortions could become a less prominent medical procedure in the United States if the laws were changed, allowing women to have abortions at a reputable clinic. However, many states in America have ruled that abortions are illegal, forcing women to find illegal and less safe places to obtain an abortion. Some women even attempt to cause themselves to miscarry, which can lead to very serious health problems. …show more content…
“The hanging fluorescent lights move in the wind, squealing slightly on their hinges. He knows he’s paranoid- Comes with the territory, they told him when he’d first started at the clinic, and he’d been more than willing to accept that…” (Brundage, 9). In the novel, Michael is abducted as he is coming out of the women’s clinic he works at. Many OB-GYNs sometimes perform abortions at Planned Parenthood clinics without asking for payment because they just want to help the women who truly need it. These doctors and nurses don’t deserve the group of protesters that chant outside of what is supposed to be a safe place for
Oddly, physicians brought abortion into the public’s eye. These physicians formed a pro-life movement arguing the moral knowledge that the public didn’t seem to have (12, Luker, Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood p. 000). According to the source, women didn’t understand that the embryo is a living being. With their lack of knowledge about things, they came “murderesses” and the only way this could be solved was to outlaw abortion. They kept the idea that abortion was murder, but, at the same time, they also said that only they could decide when an abortion should occur. With their accomplishment, in 1900, every state had a law that stated that abortion is illegal except for when the mother’s life is in danger. But the weakness of this was that the law didn’t specifically define the danger a mother should be in.
In the Judith Jarvis Thomson’s paper, “A Defense of Abortion”, the author argues that even though the fetus has a right to life, there are morally permissible reasons to have an abortion. Of course there are impermissible reasons to have an abortion, but she points out her reasoning why an abortion would be morally permissible. She believes that a woman should have control of her body and what is inside of her body. A person and a fetus’ right to life have a strong role in whether an abortion would be okay. Thomson continuously uses the story of a violinist to get the reader to understand her point of view.
In her essay “Abortion, Intimacy, and the Duty to Gestate,” Margaret Olivia Little examines whether it should be permissible for the state to force the intimacy of gestation on a woman against her consent. Little concludes that “mandating gestation against a woman’s consent is itself a harm - a liberty harm” (p. 303). She reaches this conclusion after examining the deficiencies in the current methods used to examine and evaluate the issues of abortion. Their focus on the definition of a “person” and the point in time when the fetus becomes a distinct person entitled to the benefits and protections of the law fails to capture “the subtleties and ambivalences that suffuse the issue” (p. 295). Public debate on the right to life and the right to choose has largely ignored the nature of the relationship between the mother and the fetus through the gestational period and a woman’s right to either accept or decline participation in this relationship.
The topic of my paper is abortion. In Judith Jarvis Thomson's paper, “A Defense of Abortion,” she presented a typical anti-abortion argument and tried to prove it false. I believe there is good reason to agree that the argument is sound and Thompson's criticisms of it are false.
In the article 'A Defense of Abortion' Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that abortion is morally permissible even if the fetus is considered a person. In this paper I will give a fairly detailed description of Thomson main arguments for abortion. In particular I will take a close look at her famous 'violinist' argument. Following will be objections to the argumentative story focused on the reasoning that one person's right to life outweighs another person's right to autonomy. Then appropriate responses to these objections. Concluding the paper I will argue that Thomson's 'violinist' argument supporting the idea of a mother's right to autonomy outweighing a fetus' right to life does not make abortion permissible.
Is an egg chicken or an egg? How many of you had asked this question when you were little?
It is estimated that half of all pregnancies in the United States are unplanned. Of those unplanned pregnancies, 4 out of 10 have been aborted (Abortions in America). The question of abortion has been heavily debated and argued throughout our country in politics, student classrooms, and even in the closest relationships. Undoubtedly, when abortion is an option for one party in a relationship, often times issues may arise or existing ones may be inflated. The short story, Hills like While Elephants, written by Ernest Hemingway creatively and accurately depicts problems that frequently surface when there is an unwanted, unborn child such as; failed communication, indecision, and relationship damage.
This essay examines and critiques Judith Jarvis Thomson’s, A Defense of Abortion (1971). Thomson sets out to show that the foetus does not have a right to the mother’s body and that it would not be unjust to perform an abortion when the mother’s life is not threatened. For the sake of the argument, Thomson adopts the conservative view that the foetus is a person from the moment of conception. The conservative argument asserts that every person has a right to life. The foetus has a right to life.
Modern medicine still does not alert women to fatal or painful birth defects such as Walker-Warburg syndrome, until late second or early third trimester—or, in less clinical terms, only after months of anticipation from the excited expectant parent(s), friends, and family. Indeed, one of the greatest services that the film provides is showing that these cases are the majority of those who seek late-term abortion. The testimonials of couples who, in addition to spending money on nurseries and baby toys, have traveled great distances to do what they feel is right for their unborn child, are emotionally harrowing. (One of the clinics also offers memorial services for their clients, openly acknowledging the sad fact that the first time one of these mothers holds her baby is also the
Abortion may be one of the most controversial topics in America today. Abortion is defined as “the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus” (cite dictionary). There are really only two sides on people’s opinion on abortion; pro-life which means abortion should be outlawed and pro-choice which means a woman should be able to decide whether she wants to keep her baby. Thousands of protests and riots have begun due to the fact pro-life activists believe abortion should become illegal. Both sides bring valid points to support their decision that could sway any person’s thoughts. The Roe v. Wade law has allowed abortion to be legal in the U.S since 1973 (Chittom & Newton, 2015). The law “gives women total control over first trimester abortions and grants state legislative control over second and third trimester abortions” (Chittom & Newton, 2015). Ever since the law was put in place, millions of people have tried to overturn it and still
The scene at issue in my mind right now is one where a fourteen-year-old girl comes to the orphanage which is the setting for part of the movie. This girl came to the orphanage because it was known in the region as a place that performed abortions. She had had a crude abortion performed in such a way that she had been severely injured (her uterus was punctured by a crochet hook, and, not being a sterile instrument, this caused an infection of the uterine lining, eventually killing her). The resident doctor is disgusted by this, and uses the girl's injury as an example explaining why he performs abortions. The doctor's argument is fairly simple. If the girl had come to him, rather than the ignorant abortionist she chose, she would likely have survived. In addition, he claims that potential parents have a right to choose to be parents or to not be parents. The doctor, a seeming proponent of utilitarianism, says that this demonstrates a duty to perform abortions.
According to the Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System issued by the CDC, “the number of reported pregnancy-related deaths in the United States steadily increased from 7.2 deaths per 100,000 live births in 1987 to a high of 17.8 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2009 and 2011.” The CDC Abortion Surveillance System, found that the mortality rate for women who had abortions was 0.7 deaths per 100,000 procedures. This shows how safe legal abortions can be when done professionally. When the procedure is done by someone who is not a trained professional then it becomes detrimental to women. If abortion was illegal more of these procedures would occur and can possibly risk more lives. It’s better for it to be legal and safely done than illegal and done
To clarify, by providing a patient a pill dosage, with the intent to cause an abortion, a person is “performing” an abortion. By enforcing that abortions must be performed by a licensed physician, clinics like Planned Parenthood are not able to legally perform any kind of abortion (“Should I Get”). By doing this, the possibility of a woman receiving an abortion decreases. Even though their hospital may offer the service, it would be more expensive than receiving the pill at a clinic and 42 states allow hospitals to refuse to perform abortions (“An Overview”) so a women could end up having no options to receive an abortion that are safe, affordable and legal. These articles show how laws that restrict abortion are leading women to seek out methods that are possibly unsafe for their bodies or even in their day to day
Expecting to completely eliminate abortions from the face of the earth by making them illegal and getting rid of the facilities that provide them is an awfully absurd idea due to the fact that abortions will never cease to exist. Induced abortions have taken place all over the world, and “societies have [been struggling with] the issue of abortion for millennia” (Abortion). Within countries where abortions are essentially illegal, many turn to unsafe abortion methods, usually performed by unskilled practitioners (Chapter 5). These procedures are “often unsanitary… and [result] in the death or mutilation of many women” (Abortion). In areas where these services are not attainable, many women are prompted to seek out specialists to assist them in dangerous and surreptitious methods of abortion such as repeated blows to the stomach and the insertion of bizarre objects in the vagina and cervix. However, abortion-related deaths are usually quite rare in developed countries where the service is both legal and accessible. It is estimated...
The majority of women choose to have an abortion because it is a last resort, and not just some form of extreme contraception. Getting contraception in many states is very restricted, in some instance, the only way to get proper contraception, away from condoms, a female require a doctor’s prescription, (Guttmacher Institute). In most cases, pregnancy among American women or women in general is unintended.