The perpetuation of the Lost Cause myth

785 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Lost cause myths

After the Civil War ended many southerners were devastated, families lost fathers and sons, farms were destroyed, and the pride of the being southern had taken a serious blow. To bring back a pride of what it means to southern many groups arose to help shift the blame of why the war was lost. One of the most prominent groups was the United Daughters of the Confederacy (UDC), who were founded in 1890. With the founding of the group the UDC had one purpose in mind “… the desire to educate the young with proper histories lest they forget the sacrifices of their fathers, and mothers,…”. This was done through numerous conduits, the first being influencing the reading material children had access to. Books that were not seen to agree with the UDC version of history were removed from libraries because they did not present a “true history for children of the South”. The books that remained in small town southern libraries reinforced the tenets of the Lost Cause, along with the removal of books the UDC also authored an answer booklet called “U.D.C. Catechism for Children”. This booklet contained a series of questions and pro-south answers. In Major Problems in the History of the American South a copy that was published in 1912 contains passages like “What causes led to the war between the States, from 1861 to 1865? The disregard, on the part of the States of the North, for the rights of the Southern or slave-holding states How were the slaves treated? With great kindness and care in nearly all cases, a cruel master being rare, and lost the respect of his neighbours if he treated his salves badly. Self-interest would have prompted good treatment if a higher feeling of humanity had not. What purposes have the Daughters of the Confederac... ... middle of paper ... ...s the way to achieve the goal and the goal itself also helped continue the myth of the Lost Cause. If whites are superior to the blacks this means slavery was a good institution and the natural order of things. These white supremacists sought to make the freed black man as a beast, who was unsuitable for society without slavery. “It has been the regret of my life that I did not make record of his many expressions in grandiloquent language of his own coinage.” This quote from a Confederate Veteran magazine story shows how the black man was seen as this type of dumb fool. He’s speaking a language that he made up on his own, almost as if he has the same intelligence of a child. More works were published to show the blacks of the South as unintelligent, including books containing racist pictures displaying blacks as more closely related to apes than to the white man.

Show More
Related

  • Paul Finkelman Defending Slavery Summary

    1545 Words  | 4 Pages

    The North had a very different opinion of the American way and made it exceedingly clear with the formation of numerous abolition societies, effectively abolishing slavery across the northern region and allowing blacks to live as productive members society, rather than its the property. Even one of the most prominent slave holders of that time was forced to rethink the legitimacy of slavery. “Seeing free black soldiers in action undermined [George] Washington’s racial prejudice and ultimately his support for slavery itself” (Finkelman 18). The productivity, societal and political benefits, and military empowerment made available by freed slaves challenged the South’s sense of racial supremacy, thus they began to establish a defense against the complete abolition of

    Read More

  • Apostles of Disunion by Charles B. Dew

    961 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the book, Apostles of Disunion, author Charles B. Dew opens the first chapter with a question the Immigration and Naturalization service has on an exam they administer to prospective new American citizens: “The Civil War was fought over what important issue”(4). Dew respond by noting that “according to the INS, you are correct if you offer either of the following answers: ‘slavery or states’ rights’” (4). Although this book provides more evidence and documentation that slavery was the cause of the Civil War, there are a few places where states’ rights are specifically noted. In presenting the findings of his extensive research, Dew provides compelling documentation that would allow the reader to conclude that slavery was indeed the cause for both secession and the Civil War.

    Read More

  • The Central Theme of Southern History by Ulrich B. Phillips

    1616 Words  | 4 Pages

    Imagine a historian, author of an award-winning dissertation and several books. He is an experienced lecturer and respected scholar; he is at the forefront of his field. His research methodology sets the bar for other academicians. He is so highly esteemed, in fact, that an article he has prepared is to be presented to and discussed by the United States’ oldest and largest society of professional historians. These are precisely the circumstances in which Ulrich B. Phillips wrote his 1928 essay, “The Central Theme of Southern History.” In this treatise he set forth a thesis which on its face is not revolutionary: that the cause behind which the South stood unified was not slavery, as such, but white supremacy. Over the course of fourteen elegantly written pages, Phillips advances his thesis with evidence from a variety of primary sources gleaned from his years of research. All of his reasoning and experience add weight to his distillation of Southern history into this one fairly simple idea, an idea so deceptively simple that it invites further study.

    Read More

  • Carl Schurz's Report On The Condition Of The South

    967 Words  | 2 Pages

    2- Carl Schurz wrote reports called Reports on the Condition of the South, in 1865 in which he investigated the sentiments of leaders and ordinary people, whites and blacks, from the defeated South. He describes that was not safe to wear the federal uniform on the streets and soldiers of the Union were considered intruders, Republicans were considered enemies. But, even worse was the situation of freedmen in which were expected to behave as slaves for white Southerners. Schurz heard the same phrase, “You cannot make the negro work, without physical compulsion,” (Schurz) from so many different people that he concluded that this sentiment was rooted among the southern people. He related this case of a former slaveholder that suggested blacks were unfitted for freedom, “I heard a Georgia planter argue most seriously that one of his negroes had shown himself certainly unfit for freedom because he impudently refused to submit to a whipping.”

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Richard Pratt: Kill The Indian And Save The Man

    1072 Words  | 3 Pages

    As I read through the excerpt Richard Pratt states that we as Americans “have not yet learned our lesson.” After many years of oppressing the black man, mistreating them, beating them, seeing the black race as something less of a human being, was highly hypocritical coming from Americans whom wrote in the doctrine of our Declaration that “ all men are created free and equal” and of the clause in our Constitution that forbade “any abridgment on the right of citizens on account of race, color, or previous condition.” African Americans were not offered schooling programs; they were separated from their family, sold to work as a slave for the

    Read More

  • Constitutional and Social Issues From 1860 to 1877

    977 Words  | 2 Pages

    A controversial issue during 1860 to 1877 was state’s rights and federal power. The North and South were divided over this issue. The North composed of free states and an industrial economy while the South was made up of slave states and an agricultural economy. The South did not like federal authority over the issue of slavery; therefore, they supported the radical state rights’ ideology. South Carolina seceded from the Union because it believed that since states made up the Union, it could leave when it chooses to. The government argued against the South saying that they had no right to leave the Union because the Union was not made up of just states but people. However, the South counteracted this argument with the case that the 10th amendment “declared that the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by its states, were reserved to the states.” (Doc A) However, the government still believed that secession from the Union was unjust and decided that a new change surrounding state’s rights was necessary. As a result, when the Union won in the Civil War, a resolution was made, where the state’s lost their power and the federal government gained power. U...

    Read More

  • Analysis of Thomas Jefferson's From Notes on the State of Virginia

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    In “From Notes on the State of Virginia,” Thomas Jefferson includes some proposed alterations to the Virginia Laws and discusses some differences between blacks and whites. First, he describes one of the proposed revisions regarding slavery: All slaves born after the enactment of the alteration will be freed; they will live with their parents till a certain age, then be nurtured at public disbursement and sent out of state to form their own colonies such that intermarrying and conflicts can be avoided between blacks and whites. Next, Jefferson indicates some physical differences between blacks and whites, including skin color, hair, amount of exudates secreted by kidneys and glands, level of transpiration, structure in the pulmonary organ, amount of sleep, and calmness when facing dangers. As he notes, these differences point out that blacks are inferior to whites in terms of their bodies. In addition, Jefferson also asserts that the blacks’ reasoning and imagination are much inferior to the whites’ after he observes some of the art work and writings from the blacks. As a result, based on his observation, he draws a conclusion that whites are superior to blacks in terms of both body and mind. However, Jefferson’s use of hasty generalization, begging the question, and insulting language in his analysis is a huge flaw which ruins the credibility of his argument and offenses his readers.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of What They Fought For

    1044 Words  | 3 Pages

    More confederates than unions were illiterate due to the fact that most held professional or white-collard jobs (36). To make the Union soldiers sample fair sense most blacks couldn’t read or write, 2 who could were included in the sample (36). The levels of patriotism differed from the upper and lower south given to the fact that the upper south were mainly cotton states. The confederates felt as if it was a “rich mans woar but the poor man has to do the fifting” (16). The confederates were mainly fighting for “independence, property and way of life” (27). Some characteristics the soldiers had in common were McPherson’s calculations for the Union. He came to seeing that out of 562 Union soldier’s letters read only 67 percent voice strong patriotic motives. This is the same as the two-thirds of Confederates. As a result from reading McPherson’s book, research showed that the Union and Confederate soldiers expressed about the same degree of patriotic and ideological convictions. Even though they both had different reasons for fighting the levels of sincerity and dedication in their notes were

    Read More

  • Differences Between the North and South that Led to the Civil War

    1460 Words  | 3 Pages

    After the American Revolution, slavery began to decrease in the North, just as it was becoming more popular in the South. By the turn of the century, seven of the most Northern states had abolished slavery. During this time, a surge of democratic reform swept the North to the West, and there were demands for political equality, economic and social advances for all Americans. Northerners said that slavery revoked the human right of being a free person and when new territories became available i...

    Read More

  • Of Booker T Washington And Others Summary

    804 Words  | 2 Pages

    Washington 's programme naturally takes an economic cast” (Du Bois). Du Bois believed that Washington’s theory was a gospel of Work and Money that ultimately overshadowed the higher aims of life” Later he makes another statement so powerful that should have made all African Americans want to stand up and fight for a better social status and rights for both the South and North. He goes on stating “The growing spirit of kindliness and reconciliation between the North and South after the frightful differences of a generation ago ought to be a source of deep congratulation to all, and especially to those whose mistreatment caused the war; but if that reconciliation is to be marked by the industrial slavery and civic death of those same black men, with permanent legislation into a position of inferiority, then those black men, if they are really men, are called upon by every consideration of patriotism and loyalty to oppose such a course by all civilized methods, even though such opposition involves disagreement with Mr. Booker T. Washington.” (Du

    Read More

  • The Nullification Crisis

    822 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nullification is a precursor to secession in the United States as it is also for civil wars. However, in contrast, the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions did not suggest that states should secede from the union. Under the direct vigilance and radical views of Calhoun, he suggested that states should and could secede from the union if they deem a law was unconstitutional. Calhoun’s reputation as a “Cast Iron” proved fittingly as compromises were reached for the proposed Tariffs. The southern states contribution to the financial welfare of the union as a result of slavery was undoubtedly substantial, but as history unfolded, it was not a just means to financial stability. His views of constitutional propriety was for the “privileges of minority” rather than for the “rights of the minority.” [2]

    Read More

  • The 1860 Presidential Election

    1204 Words  | 3 Pages

    The presidential elections of 1860 was one of the nation’s most memorable one. The north and the south sections of country had a completely different vision of how they envision their home land. What made this worst was that their view was completely opposite of each other. The north, mostly republican supporters, want America to be free; free of slaves and free from bondages. While on the other hand, the south supporters, mostly democratic states, wanted slavery in the country, because this is what they earned their daily living and profit from.

    Read More

  • King Cotton Dbq

    986 Words  | 2 Pages

    1777 - , During the time of sectionalism and the Civil War, states rights vs federal rights was a very common dispute between many Southern states and the government of America. The states in the south declared they had a right to preserve slavery and that federal law may not infringe upon their constitutional right. This issue is what ultimately caused the South to divide from the North and ignite the beginning of the Civil

    Read More

  • Ethnic Studies

    1038 Words  | 3 Pages

    The structure of a society is based on the concept of superiority and power which both “allocates resources and creates boundaries” between factors such as class, race, and gender (Mendes, Lecture, 09/28/11). This social structure can be seen in Andrea Smith’s framework of the “Three Pillars of White Supremacy.” The first pillar of white supremacy is the logic of slavery and capitalism. In a capitalist system of slavery, “one’s own person becomes a commodity that one must sell in the labor market while the profits of one’s work are taken by someone else” (Smith 67). From this idea of viewing slavery as a means of capitalism, Blacks were subjected to the bottom of a racial hierarchy and were treated nothing more than a property and commodity that is used for someone else’s benefit. The second pillar involves the logic of genocide and colonialism. With genocide, “Non-Native peoples th...

    Read More

  • Essay On Georgia Secession

    468 Words  | 1 Pages

    The tensions developed over the interpretations of state versus federal powers as enumerated by the U.S. Constitution and the crisis over slavery are the reasons for people of Georgia secession. The people of Georgia decided to secede as a result of political close down with the Government of United States for many reasons. For a decade people of Georgia have had numerous and serious causes of complaint against their non-slave-holding confederate States with reference to the subject of African slavery. The people of Georgia complaint that the Non-slave-holding Confederate States have tried to weaken their security, to disturb their domestic peace and tranquility, and persistently refused to comply with their express constitutional obligations to them in reference to that property, and by the use of their power in the Federal Government have striven to deprive them of an equal enjoyment of the common Territories of

    Read More

More about The perpetuation of the Lost Cause myth

Open Document