Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analyze Ethics in the Use of Information with the Edward Snowden Leak
Significance of the freedom of speech
Significance of the freedom of speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction
The WikiLeaks phenomenon has certainly appeared in the news many times over the last decade for a whole range of different reasons. The site now claims to host more than one million documents and a number of these have had many months of coverage. In this essay I will be taking a look at the effects felt from ethical, legal and social viewpoints.
Ethical
The WikiLeaks website says that it accepts "classified, censored or otherwise restricted material of political, diplomatic or ethical significance" but does not take "rumour, opinion or other kinds of first hand reporting or material that is already publicly available". But what are the ethical repercussions of whistle blowing on such a large scale?
Although there are accepted general concepts like privacy, anonymity and freedom of speech, for every new kind of phenomena we have to discuss its ethical aspects (Kizza, 2010)( Nadler and Schulman, 2006). I am going to look at three different approaches to ethics and apply them to the WikiLeaks phenomenon.
The Utilitarian Approach is focusing on how WikiLeaks affects the well-being, directly or indirectly, of various parties. On the one hand, the uncovering of misconduct and increasing the transparency of closed government doors are incredibly beneficial to society as a whole. It can often help make government decision much clear and alleviate public opinion. However it can also cause harm. Due the action of whistle blowing individuals or society can be exposed and put at risk and repercussions can include security measures such as censorship and technical restrictions actually providing the general public with less freedom.
An example of this is video foot WikiLeaks brought to light of a military operation in July 2007...
... middle of paper ...
...rethics, and Social Networking,” in Ethical and Social Issues in the Information Age. London: Springer London, ch. 11 221, pp. 221–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-038-0_11
Nadler J. and Schulman M. (2006) “Whistle Blowing in the Public Sector,” November http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/focusareas/Government_ethics/introduction/whistleblowing.html
Chris McGreal (2007), http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/apr/05/wikileaks-us-army-iraq-attack
Dunbar R. (1998), Grooming, Gossip, and the Evolution of Language, Harvard Univ. Press
Y.Benkler (2011), Free Irresponsible Press: Wikileaks and the Battle over the Soul of the Networked Fourth Estate
Joshua Keating, 2013, Why the Snowden Leaks Will Have a Bigger Impact Than WikiLeaks, http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_world_/2013/10/24/reports_of_nsa_spying_on_france_and_germany_why_the_snowden_leaks_will_have.html
McCraw, David, and Stephen Gikow. “The End to a Unspoken Bargain? National Security and Leaks in a Post-Pentagon Papers World.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 48.2 (2013): 473-509. Academic OneFile. Web. 5 Dec. 2013.
Glenn Greenwald, a talented and widely read columnist on civil liberties for the Guardian newspaper, failed in his attempt to alarm his readers to the flagrant and widespread violations of American privacy. Although his article was full of facts, documentation, and quotes from top rank officials, the article did not convey any sense of wrong doing or outrage. Rather it was dull, lacked passion and a sense of persuasion. In fact, the only attention grabbing part in the whole article is the title.
Cassidy, John. "Why Edward Snowden Is a Hero." The New Yorker. N.p., 10 June 2013. Web. 15 Feb.
Jeff Jarvis is a journalist, professor, and public speaker. In his book, “Public Parts”, Jarvis’s own opinions on “publicness” are stated plainly. He sees both social and personal benefits to living a totally public life on the internet. David Kirkpatrick is a technology journalist and author. He offers no opinion of his own on subject of total public disclosure. He has written two books on the social media giant Facebook. Kirkpatrick’s book “The Facebook Effect” was reviewed by David Pogue in The New York Times, Sunday Book Review. Pogue wrote, “You come away with a creepy new awareness of how a directory of college students is fast becoming a directory of all humanity — one that’s in the hands of a somewhat strange 26-year-old wearing a T-shirt and rubber Adidas sandals.” His book may leave readers more cautious than ever about what information they themselves are uploading to the
Edward Snowden. This is a name that will be in the history books for ages. He will be branded a traitor or a whistleblower depending on where you look. Many Americans feel that Edward Snowden is a traitor who sold the United States’ secrets aiming to harm the nation. Others believe that he was simply a citizen of the United States who exercised his right to expose the government for their unconstitutional actions. It is important to not only know the two sides to the argument of friend or foe, but to also know the facts as well. My goal in this paper is to present the facts without bias and to adequately portray the two sides of the argument.
Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency (N.S.A) subcontractor turned whistle-blower is nothing short of a hero. His controversial decision to release information detailing the highly illegal ‘data mining’ practices of the N.S.A have caused shockwaves throughout the world and have raised important questions concerning how much the government actually monitors its people without their consent or knowledge. Comparable to Mark Felt in the Watergate scandals, Daniel Ellsberg with the Pentagon Papers, Edward Snowden joins the rank of infamous whistleblowers who gave up their jobs, livelihood, and forever will live under scrutiny of the public all in the service to the American people. Edward Snowden released information detailing the extent of the N.S.A breaches of American privacy and in doing so, became ostracized by the media and barred from freely reentering America, his home country.
Journalist or Terrorist Julian Assange, an Australian editor, activist, journalist and publisher, launched the WikiLeaks website in the year 2006. From that moment, the site spiraled rapidly into the limelight all over the world. It then came to be known as the most powerful whistle-blowing and also the most scandalous “media” in the online world. WikiLeaks profans and violates the right of privacy, right of accountability and confidentiality among Information and data sharing also it has a negative impact on governments, private sectors or businesses and also individuals, there is also a big question of accountability. Right of privacy, right of accountability and confidentiality are some of the rights that you acquire being a citizen of the country and when these rights are violated it is an offence.
Keck writes about how Snowden’s manner was wrong to reach out to the public in order to reveal the information from the NSA. Keck argues that Snowden should have first discussed with his co-workers in the NSA because they could have been seeing this spying on the people. The author writes, “In my view, a true whistleblower would have first pursued legal avenues for reining in the NSA, such as seeking out sympathetic members of congress. The American people, after all, elect people to serve in congress”
Sandler, Ronald L. Ethics and Emerging Technologies. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press, 2013. Print.
The National Security Agency (NSA) was in the spotlight across the whole world after Edward Snowden leaked documents pertaining to them spying on the American citizens and other countries. However, was his action serve as beneficial for everyone? Utilitarian’s argue that, “what makes a morality be true or justifiable is its positive contribution to human”. If a Utilitarian were to analyze Snowden’s action, they would deem it as unethical under their theory. The results of his actions to release classified documents not only caused damages to U.S relations with other countries but also a constraint in the surveillance of terrorist groups to protect the citizens from future attacks.
James Madison once said “Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.” To gain a better understanding of a society, one must gain knowledge of the needs and wants the citizens’ demand from the country’s representatives. In every country the needed to protect its citizens is the same. In some nations, security is a higher priority which causes sacrifices to be made to obtain an indefinite protection against all rivals. In Peter Singer’s essay titled “Visible Man: Ethics in a World without Secrets” he states that there is a way that governments can collect information by using technology; to allow more ‘openness’ and exposure as an increase of unknown surveillance that the public is not aware of. Singer’s essay also talks about how also with the rise of secrecy within politics; organizations such as ‘WikiLeaks’ and ‘Anonymous’ reveal to the world what is really going on within their privacy. Benefits come from both sides in a world where surveillance exists to the highest priority with or without privacy.
It is reasonable to argue that, governmental institutions or people with authority are subject to withhold a great deal of information from society. Many may argue that secrets are kept to ensure the safety of the nation. Thus, upholding the governmental duty of protecting the nation against possible threats. On the other hand, many believe that secrets may exist which violate our constitutional rights. Over the last year, Edward Snowden, has made headline news for leaking sensitive governmental information to the press. Edward Snowden is a 29-year-old high school drop-out, who was a tech specialist for the National Security Association. Snowden had discovered and later exposed the NSA for monitoring the nations e-mails, phone calls, and internet searches. As the allegations spread like wild fire, Edward Snowden sought asylum in Russia for one year. Snowden had a valid and justifiable reason to expose the NSA to the world because they were in violation of our fourth Amendment rights to unreasonable searches and seizures. The government called him a traitor, while others viewed him as a hero for exposing the government. Edward Snowden is a whistle blower because he felt that it is up to society to decide if governmental practices are just or unjust. Snowden does “express the highest respect for the law”, and he wanted to protect the right of privacy for American citizens.
In 2013, Edward Snowden, former IT intelligence worker for the CIA, Booz Allen and the NSA, became a household name and the most wanted man in the world. A whistle-blower in today’s society, Snowden released a number of classified documents belonging to the NSA: in the process, revealing the governments surveillance security program PRISM; a program which allows access to widespread materials such as emails, chat messages, search histories and live webcams. Seeking Asylum in Moscow, he has been labelled many things, but what is questionable is whether the actions made are ethically justified. Applying the following philosophical models: Utilitarianism, Kantian’s Categorical Imperative, Objectivism and the Social Contract Theory; his actions
In the word of Edward Snowden, “I don’t see myself as a hero because what I’m doing is self-interested: I don’t want to live in world where there’s no privacy and therefore no room for intellectual exploration and creativity” (Brainy Quotes). Many people and even universities have studied this case so much to where it has divided a lot of people including in the House of Senates. After reading this case several times I’ve developed my own decision that Edward Snowden is a hero in my eyes. My purpose in this paper is to inform you about facts the case showed and allow you to make your own decision rather Edward Snowden is a Whistleblower or a Traitor. To explain my position I will base my essay in three section. The first is basically Edward Snowden background information, the second is the steps he took to get the information and his purpose of releasing the documents, and finally I will give my reasons with help from others on why we support him.
Security is a vital asset for the advancement and stability of any country. Today exists a world where protection and security are getting progressively more necessary for the strength of a nation. It is believed the advances of technology allow boundless possibilities of protection, which has kept the United States safe for several years. With the media becoming more prevalent in today’s society, we as citizens know much more about threats to our nation than we had in previous years. A prime example of this knowledge is fairly due to a man named Edward Snowden. Snowden is a former National Security Agency (NSA) member who made headlines