Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Lack of individuality in the giver
How does the giver portray lack of freedom
Lack of individuality in the giver
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Lack of individuality in the giver
In the novel The Giver, the community Jonas lives in benefits from not having to make choices. Since the Community is devoid of comprehensive reasoning, they have no context on questioning, inquisitive thought or argumentative negotiation. As the Government has complete control over the citizens, the citizens themselves are mentally sound and content; they have no need to choose or pick. As a result of not having the ability to choose, the Community will never (unless a drastic change happens) have to use conscious reasoning, making their life easier. For example, in today's world, it is an everyday struggle to make choices. One can feel massive pressure on what to eat, what to wear, even what to think. Sometimes, one can make the wrong choices, some with awful outcomes. Since the Community in The Giver has the benefit of not having the capability to make decisions, they live like robots, droning along and obeying all the rules. This makes life much easier and livable because no choice equals no conflict. Since they have no reason to act out, they can live peaceful lives. In the novel, there are few mentions of people making “transgressions”. The Government in The Giver tries its hardest to keep the people under control. If citizens do have a reason to act out, then the Government is not doing its job. For example, the man who made two transgressions in the novel was “frightening” to Jonas’ mother. This shows how unnerved the Government in The Giver can get when someone acts out, leading to the conclusion that the people in The Giver’s Community are not to have power because large numbers of rebellious citizens can create chaos in their small
Imagine a community that you live took away your personal rights; the things that you know and even the way that you think. This is happening to a boy named Jonas not only him but also the inhabitants of Jonas’s community. In the book The Giver Jonas and his community is living with no personal rights. I believe that the inhabitants of Jonas’s community and Jonas should be given personal rights. The community should be given personal rights because they can learn from their mistakes, to have memory and to have emotions.
“The Giver shrugged. “Our people made that choice, the choice to sameness”. This quote supports my thesis because what the Giver meant by “Our people” was the committee of elders and how they chose sameness. If the committee of elders chose that then the people in Jonas’ community didn't have a choice, they don't even know. This also proves that people choose wrong when they have
Even though both the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry and modern society are both unique in their own ways, our society is a better society to live in. Our society gives us more freedom to choose for our own benefits and
“How could someone not fit in? The community was so meticulously ordered, the choices so carefully made.” (Lowry, 48) In Lowry’s novel, The Giver, eliminating choices and feelings caused their society to be worse than our society today because you don’t have any choices and you don’t get to experience the feeling of joy and happiness.
“I knew that there had been times in the past-terrible times-when people had destroyed others in haste, in fear, and had brought about their own destruction” (48). In the old days, when people in Jonas’s community valued individual needs, there were lots of terrible happenings: violence; and then the society ended up with general welfare and safety. It is difficult for us to think of a world without color, freedom, music and love, but in The Giver, the society denounces these things in order to make room for peace and safety. In The Giver, by having a society based on general welfare they gave safety to their people. No violence, no criminal activities, nor homicides.
The Giver was an example of a dystopian society. In this community citizen doesn`t had any freedom. It had a lots of information about why it was dystopian, but today I will talk about few thing. First reason was the natural world was banished and distrusted. Second was information, independent thought, and freedom were restricted. The last was they had fear of the out side world.
Citizens are engineered to never be alone, which removes responsibility and the need for family bonds, showing that independent thinking is replaced with the ideology of world leaders. Since technology has removed the ability to reproduce for citizens, this removes responsibility, allowing a person to act impulsively and create meaningless relationships which leads to unethical decisions. Likewise, in the Giver family units are preplanned and are limited to two children by the elders of society. When Jonas asks his father if he loved him, the father replies, saying, "I enjoy you. " The society is very structured and strict which shows that the bonds with family are insignificant as they have to speak with restrictions and not allowed to freely express any emotions.
It is one of the few brave books that exposes the horrors of humanity and serves as a cautionary tale for us all. Even in a “paradise” like Jonas' community, people still try to control others in order to keep the world pure, innocent, and shaped in their image, while they are ignorant of the past, of history, and their abilities to harm others even when they have good intentions. The Giver is a vital piece of literature for society today; its lessons of the horrors that can occur in society and the beauty that humanity offers are invaluable to us all. Freedom and choice are vital to a successful and fulfilled society. A world without freedom and choice “is a frightening world. Let’s work hard to keep it from truly happening.”
The story in The Giver by Lois Lowry takes place in a community that is not normal. People cannot see color, it is an offense for somebody to touch others, and the community assigns people jobs and children. This unnamed community shown through Jonas’ eye, the main character in this novel, is a perfect society. There is no war, crime, and hunger. Most readers might take it for granted that the community in The Giver differs from the real society. However, there are several affinities between the society in present day and that in this fiction: estrangement of elderly people, suffering of surrogate mothers, and wanting of euthanasia.
For instance, the narrator says when talking about Jonas, “He had been trained since earliest childhood, since his earliest learning of language, never to lie,” (page one hundred eighty-two on the digital version). This is example of conformity is shown by how obedient the citizens in The Giver are to this rule. This blind obedience covers up the possibility to be an individual by eliminating the freedom to say whatever one would like and letting it represent themselves, whether it be negative or positive. Another thing noticed is in chapter one when the narrator mentions the telling of feelings, which is when every family member has to explain how they It is at this time when everyone is behaving the same way that there is no room for differences in behavior (individuality). It is possible for a person to show who they are without telling their feelings, but when they do this, they become like everyone else and lose their uniquity. In conclusion, the ability to express one’s self is removed when rules involving behavior are put in
Loss of Freedom in The Giver The Giver, a book written by Lois Lowry, questioned my ideas, thoughts and beliefs. The novel describes an ideal society, in which everything is supposed to be perfect, with all life’s problems solved. It is all about being happy with what the people have and not questioning their lifestyles because they did not know the difference between good and bad. The people are denied of their preferable way of life without their knowledge of how the real world is supposed to be. In the I can. However, the citizens of this society are not able to control their life; for example their choice of clothing, choice of loving and having feelings, or choice of family members. From all existing creatures, we humans differ because we are able to use our brain to make decisions. In the novel, the people of the given society have authority figures that show them how to live their life. “Katya, became a Nine and removed her hair ribbons and got her bicycle” (P The rules start with small things like what age one starts to ride a bike, which age group wears certain types of jackets, the clothing one wears each day, and even what to eat. In the real world, we humans make similar decisions for ourselves without thinking about it. People need guidance in their life to the right way of living but not a book of instructions. Many of us live each day dreaming of our future family and all the happiness we may get from that. I cannot imagine how it feels not to have freedom to feel and love. “Jonas, she said with a smile, the feeling you described as wanting? It was your the opposite sex. Beginning from early age, children are controlled not to feel or appreciate his/her opposite sex. The adults are made to take the pills to annihilate their sexual desires. When the children grow up and become adults, more decisions are made for them. When one is old enough to get married, the superior power chooses a mate for the person and is wedded. This is when I question the meaning of marriage. a future together, not a partnership that you deal with like a business. Although many cultures have different say in this sacred ceremony, most have similar ideas. To many people, love is affection based on admiration or common interests and warm attachment, enthusiasm or devotion. How can one live happy in life without the experience of such feelings? These individuals in the novel did not know better, if they knew how good it is to feel love or even know a good taste when it is good, then they would not be happy with the way of life in their community. “J What if they were allowed to choose their own mate?
The book The Giver is a dystopian book because you don’t get to make any of your own decisions. You would never know the truth about release. You would never experience life how you should experience it. The world may seem perfect from someone’s view inside the community, but from the outside it is harsh and horrible. Their world could be turned into a utopia eventually, but as of right know it is a
Imagine a world with no color, weather, or sunshine. The Giver is a book by Lois Lowry and is based on a utopia where no one makes choices, feels pain, or has emotions. The book takes place in a community where all of this is true. The story is about an 11-year old soon to be 12 year-old named Jonas who is unsure of which job he will get when he is 12. Jonas changes throughout The Giver and as a result, tries to change the community.
Jonas’ community chooses Sameness rather than valuing individual expression. Although the possibility of individual choice sometimes involves risk, it also exposes Jonas to a wide range of joyful experiences from which his community has been shut away. Sameness may not be the best thing in the community because Jonas expresses how much he feels like Sameness is not right and wants there to be more individuality. Giver leads him to understand both the advantages and the disadvantages of personal choice, and in the end, he considers the risks worth the benefits. “Memories are forever.”
The Giver, by Lois Lowry, is a dystopian novel that depicts our future if our desire for an impeccable society becomes a reality. The book tells about a society where genetic science has gotten to its forefront and scientists are able to change things such as how people perceive light, pain, and various other things. Another thing that is taken away is the permission to make choices, even the most basic such as choosing their clothes in the morning, their occupation, and even their spouse. The people of the community should be allowed to choose because they need to learn from their failures, and having choice is an essential aspect of being an individual human being. People need to learn from their failures and make better choices in the future.