Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of the wife of bath's tale
Analysis of the wife of bath's tale
Analysis of the wife of bath's tale
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of the wife of bath's tale
The View of Marriage in The Wife of Bath
The Wife of Bath has her own perception of marriage, which Chaucer shows in both the
Wife of Bath's Prologue and Tale. Marriage itself was defined by Webster's Dictionary as the
state of being married, a wedding ceremony and attendant festivities, or a close union. Marry
or married is said to be joined as husband and wife according to law or custom, or to take as
husband or wife, says Webster's Dictionary. In both the Prologue and Tale of the Wife of Bath
we see the institution of marriage used as control over money and sexual powers. Chaucer's
Wife of Bath displays a complete sense of mockery toward marriage as a holy institution. The
Prologue and Tale of the Wife of Bath clearly show that the Wife of Bath sees marriage as a
woman's dominance over a man.
In the Prologue, the Wife of Bath starts to defend her actions of marrying five men. She
interprets from scripture:
All I know for sure is, God has plainly bidden us to increase and multiply a noble
text, and one I understand! And, as I'm well aware, He said my husband must
leave father and mother, cleave to me. But, as to number, did He specify? He
named no figure, neither two nor eight why should folk talk of it as a disgrace?
(219-20)
She uses her marriages as a sort of fulfillment of God's word. Using two specific examples
from scripture she explains why her marriages are justifiable by God:
For then, says the Apostle Paul, I'm free to wed, in God's name, where it pleases me. He
says to be married is no sin, better it is to marry than to burn. I know that Abraham was
a holy...
... middle of paper ...
...Bath wanted to have dominance over all males that is what she shows in her
own life, the Prologue, as well as in her Tale. The queen in the tale has the power to let her
husband behead the knight. The Wife of Bath herself held sexual deeds over her husbands in
exchange for money. She held power over their property and money. The women of this story
are portrayed as opposites of the way women were supposed to act in those times. These woman
were independent although still able to be put into their place by their husband. There is always
an alternative motive, which is the woman receives what she wants in the end. The Wife of Bath
is not a picture of chastity but she proves that there is nothing wrong with marrying more than
once because she waited for each to die before remarrying and in the bible the men say that it is
all right by the Lord to marry.
The wife of bath shows us greed throughout the whole play. She wants to gain sovereignty over her husbands. She believes a happy relationship is one where the wife
The use of euphemism and crudeness in “The Wife of Bath’s Prologue” is simultaneously unnerving and amusing, and begs the question of how a “wicked” woman like The Wife could ever actually progress in medieval society. Chaucer incorporates subtle allusions to female sexual organs and it is this bluntness (that would raise eyebrows even today) which establishes the Wife as such a powerfully outspoken character. Because courtship in Chaucer’s time was considered worthy of complete submission, the fact that the Wife places such emphasis on domination and even psychological power hints at her being an object of irony (and not a feminist figure “before her time”). It is for this reason that Chaucer’s delicate use of “queynte”- a term from which
The image of the woman in the Wife of Bath’s Prologue is depicted by Chaucer to be “barley wheat” in a town and civilization lusting for whole white wheat or virginity (Chaucer 1711). The woman has married many men and in doing so forgotten the true value of the Christian faith and now believes worldly influence can overpower the scriptures of the Bible, “can you show in plain words that Almighty God forbade us marriage? Or where did he command virginity?” (Chaucer 1709). Jackie Shead analyzes the prologue and states, “it begins by manipulating authoritative texts--a pre-emptive strike to justify the Wife's marital history and her single-minded pursuit of self-gratification” (Shead). The possibility of the Wife of B...
In the Geoffrey Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales, Chaucer illustrates the different perspective between men and women on the concept of marriage and love. In The Wife of Bath’s tale, it is shown the woman appreciating marriage and wanting to be able to love a man unconditionally as where in The Miller’s Tale, love isn’t anything, but sex with the man in the story. In accordance with Chaucer, the complication with marriage is that men are consumed by sexual desire and are easily abused by women like The Wife of Bath. As noticed, The Miller’s Tale is all about adultery. “Just like men, the wives have secrets, as does God”, says the Miller. Both have information that the other do not know about that are sacred and better left unsaid.
In the “Wife of Bath’s Prologue” and Margery Kempe women are empowered to make decisions regarding their own sexuality. This deviates from the gender constructs of the time period by allowing these women to dictate the course of their own lives: the Wife of Bath chooses to use her sexuality to acquire money and possessions, while Margery Kempe dedicates her sexuality to her spiritual beliefs. By working strategically to gain sexual independence both women move beyond the generally accepted position of a women at the time.
Chaucer, Geoffrey. “The Wife of Bath’s Prologue and Tale.” From The Riverside Chaucer, Third Edition. Ed. Larry D. Benson. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1987.
Chaucer, Geoffrey (1987). “The Wife of Bath’s Prologue.” The Riverside Chaucer, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 105-116.
The first is the negative association of women and sex; the second was the structure of marriages hierarchy system which created both “master and slave” (Evans, Ruth, and Johnson 64) placing women at the bottom allowing men to be there dominate masters, while women were held as their compliant slaves; and the third was the physical and sexual violence men forced upon women. These are critical issues that were definitely not discussed by men publicly and without a doubt not by women. For the Wife of Bath to exhibit such weighty issues and an advocate for the benefaction of women in such a position was pioneering. “She views words, like sex and money, as strategic weapons in the war between the sexes” (Hansen 2). The Wife of Bath is slick in her delivery of speech in both the Prologue and Tale. Her Tale retells all of the subjects of sex, marriage, and violence that she first brought to light in her Prologue, and frames them with an entertaining style in order to make her message captivating to her audience, which at the time fundamentally male. It was very right-brained to construct these topics in such a suggestive way to bring
When reading the wife of Baths prologue and then her tale one can not help but to see the parallels present. The major parallel that exists is the subject of sovereignty. Who has it, which wants it, which deserves it and what will you do to get it? First we see that the Wife claims to have sovereignty over each of her husbands even though some were harder to gain dominance over than others. Then there is the tale where we find the answer to the question, “What do women want?”, sovereignty over their husbands. Finally we see the Wife’s idealized version of marriage in her tale. The hag gains control over the knight by forcing him to marry her, then giving him control to decide her loyalty, he cant chose so he gives up all control to her just like that and it’s over, the end, they live happily ever after.
Courtly love is extremely evident throughout “The Wife of Bath’s Tale” and allows the development of each character within the plot. Courtly love was believed to be originated in France during the 12th century and eventually spreading to other countries in Europe, influencing authors, such as Geoffrey Chaucer, throughout. English courts, which handled marriages, practiced the art of courtly love from the 12th century to the 14th century, during which marriages were pre-arranged and had little to do with love. A marriage was not based on love, rather on what each participant brought to his or her spouse and families. As love and romance was not a portion of marriage, it became an acceptable practice to seek another romancer outside of the marriage, as long as the spouse adhered to the strict rules of chastity and fidelity (http://www.middle-ages.org.uk/courtly-love.htm). Furthermore, courtly love was only practiced between a man and woman of some sort of noble status, typically between...
The Wife of Bath’s insecurity and cynicism are just two of the ways in which she fulfils negative stereotypes of women. She tries to separate herself from other women of her time by taking control of her life by means of sex, but if she were truly progressive, she would have found a way to elevate herself without using her body. Alisoun is exactly what men fear and dislike about women; she is promiscuously sneaky, and she takes advantage of men. This is why while trying to present herself as strong and independent, her actions ultimately confirm misogynistic stereotypes of women; in the end, she is even more digressive to the cause feminism than a normal woman would be.
“The Wife of Bath’s Tale” in The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer is a story about a widow who took a pilgrimage to the town of Canterbury with an array of dynamic characters whose diverse backgrounds allowed them to share their stories with one another to make the long journey more interesting. The widow named Alisoun in the “The Wife of Bath’s Tale” told the tale of her experiences with her five past husbands and a story about a knight and a witch. She truly believed that for a woman to have a happy life she would need to gain dominion over a man; however one could assume this was programmed into her by her influential mother and her own religious doctrines. Accordingly, Alisoun argued that the woman must control everything in order to have a happy marriage; however, her life experience and the story she shared should tell her otherwise.
The Wife of Bath is a complex character-she is different from the way she represents herself. Maybe not even what she herself thinks she is. On the surface, it seems as though she is a feminist, defending the rights and power of women over men. She also describes how she dominates her husband, playing on a fear that was common to men. From a point of view of a man during that time period, she seemed to illustrate all of the wrongs that men found in women. Such as a weak parody of what men, then saw as feminists. The Wife of Bath constantly emphasizes the negative implications of women throughout the ages. She describes women as greedy, controlling, and dishonest.
Olson, Glending. "The Marital Dilemma In The Wife Of Bath's Tale: An Unnoticed Analogue And Its Chaucerian Court Context."English Language Notes 33.(1995): 1-7. Humanities Source. Web. 15 Dec. 2013.
The world-renowned Canterbury Tales by the great Geoffrey Chaucer aims to magnify the controversial social injustices of gender roles in the medieval time period that consequently flow into today’s current modern society. One of the greatest social standing issues addressed throughout the poem includes the institution of marriage, and the particular viewpoint held by the character named the Wife of Bath. The Wife of Bath is notably shamed by her potential suitors and moralist peers, for her devious actions of taking advantage of her former husbands throughout her lengthy five marriages. However, Chaucer actually invites the audience to give a closer look at the overall flawed instuition of marriage