Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short note on utilitarianism
Ethical theories in philosophy
Short note on utilitarianism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Theory of Utility teaches that we make our decisions in life based on the basic principle of maximizing happiness – which can be measured in pleasure and pain. Morality can also be defined as that which brings about the largest amount of happiness, and the least pain. Unlike other theories, however, Utility states the happiness of all is to be considered over the happiness of one. When faced with a choice, one must choose the option that will cause the greatest pleasure and the least pain. Applying this part of the Utilitarian argument to the supplied scenario, it would seem that Utility would say stealing the ice cream and breaking the law are the morally right course of action. However, Utility continues on in its teaching stating that …show more content…
In the case of the overweight child, he is not only robbed, but he is also judged and discriminated against based on looks. Legality aside, not only is this child robbed of his property, he is also robbed of the character growth he would have received if he had been educated and taught to share. By being taught to share he is not only learning how to treat everyone as equals, but also that true pleasure is the lasting pleasure one receives in sharing happiness with others, and not the momentary pleasure of having all the happiness for oneself. This child is also being subjected to judgement based on looks. The ice cream thief looks at this child and assumes that he is overweight because he eats too much and therefore won’t miss another snack. There are multiple factors that can cause childhood obesity, and none of them are healthy. Can one always tell why someone is overweight just by looking at them? Overeating and lack of exercise are factors. There are also medical, socioeconomical, or psychological factors involved. This overweight child could be just as poor and malnourished as the three waifs. Poverty and obesity of this kind are known to have negative psychological effects, especially in children. If a child was singled out, judged based on looks and had their food stolen in school it would be called bullying. Depending on the mental state …show more content…
Whether it was stolen or shared, the result is the same: the waifs receive the ice cream. However, through Utility we understand the deeper aspects. If the ice cream was shared, the generosity and kindness would have added to the pleasure of the ice cream itself. These waifs would learn the lasting pleasure that comes from sharing, compassion, and being treated as equals. And these pleasures can be maximized by sharing them. However, according to the example, the ice cream was stolen and given to them. What these three waifs have learned is that it is ok to steal whatever one wants. This was not stolen to stave off death. These envious waifs coveted the rare delicacy, someone comes along and steals it for them. They have learned to steal for pleasure. Not even for necessity, but purely for pleasure. And they have also learned to judge others based on looks. Steal from others because they appear to have, so they must be able to get
ice cream. While he should have gotten a few hours of community service, he got
In Utilitarianism, J.S. Mill gives an account for the reasons one must abide by the principles of Utilitarianism. Also referred to as the Greatest-happiness Principle, this doctrine promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest amount of people. More specifically, Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism, holding that the right act is that which yields the greatest net utility, or "the total amount of pleasure minus the total amount of pain", for all individuals affected by said act (Joyce, lecture notes from 03/30).
In utilitarianism the common goal is to create the most happiness for the most amount of people. Mills definition of the Greatest Happiness Principle “holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (540) If this principle is the case then as a utilitarian your actions of good should promote the most happiness. This way of thinking can really produce some wrong answers and actions to moral questions. For example, say you and your family are starving and in need of food. The only possible way to get food would be to steal it. In general society finds it morally wrong to steal under any circumstances. But as utilitarian you have to ask, would my actions of stealing food promote the most happiness for the most people. You need to take into account the people you are making happy and the people you are hurting. On one hand, you would be promoting happiness for you and your and entire family, and on the other hand, you would be hurting the storeowner by stealing some of his revenue. Utilitarian ideas tell you that you should steal the food because your actions are promoting happiness and the absence of pain for the least amount of people. There are other examples I found when doing some research like doctors going against morals to save more sick people by letting one healthy person die
The aim of utilitarianism in general is optimal happiness, which is the only intrinsic good according to Mill. More specifically, act and rule utilitarianism differ in the manner in which they asses what will yield the greatest amount of happiness. Often, one of the objections to utilitarianism is that it is overly demanding. However, this objection that the utilitarian view is too demanding is fitting for both forms of utilitarianism, according to the Fundamentals of Ethics. In the following, I will address why utilitarianism is habitually seen as overly demanding, and I will provide a defense of utilitarianism contrary to these objections.
It is morally permissible to do an illegal act if the action is morally right and good. An action could be morally right and illegal at the same time, when it represents the lesser of two evils, or when the intentions of the person performing it are noble and have for goal to achieve his duty. An action can be morally right, but still illegal because in a situation where there is no good option, the lesser of two evils is the morally best option to do, even if it is illegal (Thomson 39). For example, in Dallas Buyers Club, Ron Woodroof acted rightly by choosing the lesser of two evils: sell illegal drugs to help AIDS patients feel better and live longer, instead of letting them suffer and die (Dallas Buyers Club). If he would have chosen to obey the law, a great number of AIDS patient would have suffered more and died of their illness, and he would have been guilty of not helping them according to the Harming by Omission Thesis (HOT) and the Equivalence of Evil Thesis (EET) (Mieth 17). These thesis affirm that omitting to help someone in need would be as bad as hurting the person directly. Thus, Woodroof acted in a morally permissible way even if he broke the law because he chose the lesser of two evils (Matheny 16). Also, someone can act justly e...
Utilitarianism is zdefined, as the right way to act is one that maximizes your happiness, (pleasure and happiness is the absence of pain) while the wrong way is one that produces the opposite i.e. pain. Unhappiness here is defined as pain or the opposite of happiness. This is the basis of utilitarianism or what Mill calls the “greatest happiness principle” and it is the best ethical theory by which humans should follow. The argument for the above is as follows
There are many essays, papers and books written on the concept of right and wrong. Philosophers have theorized about moral actions for eons, one such philosopher is John Stuart Mill. In his book Utilitarianism he tries to improve on the theories of utilitarianism from previous philosophers, as he is a strong believer himself in the theory. In Mill's book he presents the ideology that there is another branch on the utilitarian tree. This branch being called rule-utilitarianism. Mill makes a distinction between two different types of utilitarianism; act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism. Rule-utilitarianism seems like a major advance over the simple theory of act-utilitarianism. But for all its added complexity, it may not actually be a significant improvement. This is proven when looking at the flaws in act-utilitarianism and relating them to the ways in which rule-utilitarianism tries to overcome them. As well one must look at the obstacles that rule-utilitarianism has on it's own as a theory. The problems of both act and rule utilitarianism consist of being too permissive and being able to justify any crime, not being able to predict the outcomes of one's actions, non-universality and the lose of freewill.
The most important question of all is what should one do since the ultimate purpose of answering questions is either to satisfy curiosity or to decide which action to take. Complicated analysis is often required to answer that question. Beyond ordinary analysis, one must also have a system of values, and the correct system of values is utilitarianism.
A common philosophical problem that has raised many questions is the issue of whether it is justifiable or not to steal. For an object to be considered stolen it must be worth value to another person, taken without consent, and taken without anything in return. From a merely legal perspective, theft is crime that is punishable because it is a criminal offense and is against the civic and natural law. From a moral perspective, Aristotle and Locke would both argue stealing is not permissible because it is not generous, virtuous or good. A thief is driven to provide for himself from other sources, which makes him wasteful. Thus, theft should not be permitted nor be considered an acceptable action, only with the exception of severe starvation.
In the movie daddy 's little girl, it shows three young girls that are taken away from their father. They moved with their mother which sells drugs with her boyfriend. In the movie not only did I see them assaulting their employees are, but there was child abuse as well. The little girl was crying because she wanted to live with her father, so the boyfriend didn 't like that and then proceeded to hit the child until she stopped crying. The mother and not caring that her boyfriend was hitting her children she actually encouraged it because of the crying. She thought it was a sign of them showing weakness so she wanted to make them stronger by abusing them. They also made the children watch while they beat their employees so they know how to act. The awesome made the oldest daughter sell drugs at school
In consequentialist theories of John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham, the act of stealing of food for a hungry child could be consider as moral or ethical. Under the theory of Ethical Egoism it state that "an action is morally right if the consequences of that action are more favorable than unfavorable only to the agent." Meaning, stealing of food for a starving child could be favorable either to a person who perform the act of stealing or to the child. It is favorable to the theft because it satisfied his desire to help and save the child from hunger.
. . . As I had claimed before, these children are being forced by severe beatings and
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory proposed by Jeremy Bentham and defended by James Mill. The theory says, that all the activities should be directed towards the accomplishment of the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarianism is impractical and very unrealistic because, it refuses to focus on the individuals values, morals, and happiness. Utilitarianism endorse risking ones life for the sake of other is not and in fact it rewards such behavior. Utilitarianism mentions that if the outcome of the one persons death saves many lives then therefore it is obligated to do so.
As mentioned earlier, those people lost their human’s attitudes, and besides succeeded in developing a fear among these kids to scare them to death. It made me think about the child labor laws today. There are certain places in the world where children still work in order to survive. For example, in my country Vietnam, many children do not know who are their parents and they are harassed to work to gain money for the child abuse. Even the government issues many laws to protect the children; however, no one can stay up to protect the right of those poor children.
Those women who are normal and live everyday lives also acquire attention as well. There are many risk factors that cause women to be the main victims of exploitation. “Being female, absence of parents, and being the oldest child….mental manipulation or exploitation. (Flowers 56) There is not only a certain race of women and children that are being exploite...