Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of chekhov
Analysis of chekhov
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Uskov family in Anton Chekov's "A Problem" is in a dilemma. This is due to Sasha Uskov illegally obtaining a sum of money. As a result, the Uskovs are deciding whether to pay off his debt, or turn him over to the authorities. Personally, I would have had Sasha arrested and put to trial. There are two advocates for these contrasting ideas. They are Sasha's uncle Markovitch, and the Colonel, who respectively represent fighting for Sasha's innocence and discipline. Naturally, uncle Markovitch would like to defend his nephew from being incarcerated, despite there being substantial evidence against him. The Colonel however, being in the Military, instinctively attempts to put Sasha through trial as compensation for his theft. I agree with
the Colonel, because I believe that justice comes before family, especially in situations like these. It was said in the story that Sasha has committed this crime in the past, but has never been reprimanded for it, meaning that he already had a second, maybe a third chance to change. Even after all uncle Markovitch has done to defend Sasha, he still had the audacity to steal from him. “Uncle, I entreat you, give me a hundred rubles…Now I see that I am a criminal; yes, I am a criminal” (pg 73-74). Being in a wealthy family is not enough to excuse someone from receiving a well-deserved punishment.
A sportsman sketches, by Ivan Turgenev, tells several short stories about himself traveling around Russia. In some of these short stories, he writes about the treatment of the serfs. In the short story called The Agent, Turgenev tells us about an acquaintance of his named Arkady Pavlitch Pyenotchkin. A landowner and retired officer of the Guards, Arkady like many nobles of the time spends his life looking after his estate. In the treatment of his peasants he considers himself harsh but just, believing that peasants behave like children and need a good beating once in a while. He cultivates many French goods and speaks some French phrases but has a dislike for German philosophy. Turgenev prefers not to get involved with the man and only visits the area for the quality of the game to hunt. One night he was forced to stay at Arkady Pavlitch estate while traveling to Ryabovo. While their Arkady asks to accompany
Rubashov is guilty for the expulsion of many innocent Party members, but ultimately for the sacrifice of the knowledge of his identity for the Party system. Upon his arrest, he has felt his subconscious attempt to reach him through toothache and shivers. These physical manifestations of his guilt allow him to become fully conscious of his guilt and, consequently, the fallibility of the Party's beliefs and methods. Rubashov is also subconsciously aware that he must pay for his guilt. There is no method for redemption, save for dying in silence. Rubashov's resignation to silence during his public trial is his expression of individuality, his complete divergence from Party principle in the suppression of the individual.
During the Civil War, there were people who were extremely prejudiced against the 54th regiment because the soldiers were all different colored skin and the people where used to the idea that different color skinned people worked as slaves. In “Glory,“ Colonel Montgomery, the Sargent that trained and prepared them for war, and the colonel that was in charge of distributing necessities, served as the people who discriminated the African American soldiers. When he was teaching the soldiers how to march, some of them couldn’t tell the difference between left and right. He acted as if all African Americans were uneducated and they were hopeless to teach. Shoes were an essential part of training. Many of the African American soldiers didn‘t even have decent shoes when they enrolled for the war. Naturally, after all the training, their shoes wore down. If the 54th regiment were composed of white soldiers, the department that passed out shoes would already have prepared extra shoes for them. But since the 54th regiment was composed of all African Americans, the regiment was discriminated and there were no extra shoes for them. The other white generals thought the 54th regiment would never go on a battlefield and even if they did, they probably would all die. Therefore there were no extra resources for them. Another fact that there were some racist sentiments was that the African American soldiers only got a $10 pay while the white soldiers got $13.
The young boy Called Colonel Sartoris Snopes or Sarty was living with his family which included his father, Abner Snopes, which believed heavily in Blood Loyalty. Abner Snopes thinks of his family as himself and everyone else as “they.” In the Story Abner is blamed with burning down the barn of his landlord. The reader can easily see at the beginning of the story that Sarty is not okay with his father’s actions at the first trial, and he is uneasy about lying for his family. This uneasiness and the judge saying someone with the name Colonel Sartoris Snopes couldn’t be lying foreshadowed that his loyalty was to be tested again.
I chose to analyze the The Family, 1941 portray and The Family, 1975 portray, both from Romare Bearden, for this essay because they are very similar paintings but at the same time very different. To write a critical analyzes it was necessary to choose two different paintings that had similar characteristics. The text about critical comparison said that to compare things they have to be similar, yet different, and that’s what these paintings look to me. As I had already written an analysis of The Family, 1941 portray I chose to analyze and compare The Family, 1975 this time. Both works have a lot of color in it and through the people’s faces in the pictures we can feel the different emotions that the paintings are conveying.
Despite serving No 1 now, compassion and understanding did not disappear completely in Ivanov. He refrains from using physical violence against Rubashov; instead, through the twisted and complex logic of the Party, he tries to “recall him to his former acceptance of party discipline”, and persuade him, that he has erred. However, in the eyes of No 1, Ivanov has treated Rubashov too kindly, and he himself is later
For example, Annette makes the comment that Benjamin was in the right to smack Henry because he was defending himself from Henry’s assault of insults to which Alan agrees with immediately. Veronica and Michaels sense of righteousness involves other people, Veronica especially believing everyone needs to uphold a standard morality. For example, the idea of bringing Benjamin over. Veronica and Michael want to make sure Benjamin understands his implications so this situation won’t happen again. Veronica worries about their children having morals while Alan and Annette don’t care much for that. When arguing about whether or not Benjamin disfigured Henry, Alan shrugs off the fact that his son just smacked another kid in the face. He instead diminishes Benjamin’s injury saying how it’ll go away and he’ll chip in on the costs of the dentist. He’s not interested in the same sense of morality that Veronica is. These contrasting views come from how Alan and Annette are able to get away with more that Veronica and Michael. For the Novaks there are consequences to their actions, while in Alan’s case with the pharmaceutical companies he gets rewarded for defending
The Romanov family story is one that ends in tragedy and mystery. The Romanov dynasty ruled Russia for over 300 years coming to an end with Nicholas II. The book The Family Romanov: Murder, Rebellion, & The Fall of Imperial Russia, written by Candace Fleming, tells the story of Tsar Nicholas II of how he came to become the Tsar and fell trying to protect his family. Fleming tells the story of young Nicholas coming to power when his father, Alexander III, died and how ill-prepared Nicholas was to rule due to his father’s inferior teaching skills. The story goes on to Nicholas meeting his future wife, Alexandra, and how they had four daughters, Olga, Tatiana, Marie and Anastasia. With each daughter came a disappointment of not having an heir
The question of how we determine what is right and what is wrong has been one that has plagued humankind for centuries. Although many have tried to answer this question there is still no definite answer. Adam Smith believes morals are grounded in sympathy and experience. Immanuel Kant however, is certain that morals should not be derived from experience but from pure reason. I for one believe that neither of these men are entirely correct. Both of their theories on morality are flawed in that one does not account for the human experience and the other takes the human experience too much into account. With this being said the only logical thing to believe is that morals should be derived from both reason and sympathy.
The 20th century has been a rough time for Soviet-American relations. Since its post-World War 2 enactment, The Cold War did more damage than previously thought. While not a single shell was fired during the war, the cultural embargo that was in effect ravaged each country. The effects of which are still felt in today’s modern society. Now, nearly 20 years after the ending of the Cold War, American and Russian cultural exchanges have started taking shape. While each culture is beginning to share and draw off one another, problems still exist. The problems of translating the language barrier in a post propagandized world have taken their full effect, and are playing heavily on the remnants of Cold War ideologies. By highlighting some problems
A Comparative Analysis of the Novels We by E. Zamyatin and One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich by A. Solzhenitsyn
Growing up in poverty stricken Russia, Anton Chekhov was forced provide for his family at an early age by writing short stories for various Russian periodicals while simultaneously attending medical school. Although his life was rather stressful at times, Chekhov still enjoyed visiting with family and friends both in Russia and abroad. He obtained a life long habit of having numerous affairs until he settled down in Yalta and married his wife Olga. It is said in a biography that his travels and personal experiences inspired many of his later stories such as "The Darling" and "The Lady with the Dog" (Silet 3). In these stories full of love and despair, Chekhov demonstrates a similar theme of emptiness in marriage, the struggles of Russian women in society, and the writing style of realism.
“To live anyhow is better than not at all” (Chekhov 1) , the short story, The Bet commenced with the conflict when the person had no choice but to choose between the death penalty or life in prison. The Bet was originally written by Anton Chekhov, a profound Russian short-story writer who concentrated a lot on human values and the reflection of the extravagantly selfish Russian nobility. And through The Bet he was able to express all those ideas in two sides, the banker and the lawyer with the conflict along the story line.
“Mother” is a masterpiece of Maxim Gorky where he depicts a revolution against the bourgeois society. Being greatly influenced by the thoughts and philosophy of Lenin, Maxim Gorky is greatly shocked and frustrated by the ignorance, poverty and sufferings of his country people. He wants to establish the equal rights of the people in the society. In this novel Pavel is a character portrayed with a revolutionary spirit and Maxim Gorky shows his philosophy and dreams through the character of Pavel in this novel.
In Fyodor Dostoevsky’s drama, Crime and Punishment Rodion Romanovich Raskonlnikov exclaims, “I didn’t kill a human being, but a principle!” (Dostoevsky, 409). This occurs in part III, chapter VI of the novel when he’s battling with the confession of his murder he committed. In the beginning, Raskonlnikov, the protagonist of the novel, was a former student, struggling to get his life in order. He contemplates on whether he wants to assassinate his old land lady, Alyona Ivanovna, because he believes she was the cause for his debt. He finally slaughters her, and ends up slaughtering her sister, too, when she walked in on the murder. Afterwards, the crime he committed began to carp at his conscious psychologically. In a key passage of Crime and Punishment on page 409 , Fydodor Dostoevsky uses major themes, irony, language, symbols, and foreshadowing to emphasize the psychological effects that Raskonlnikov is struggling with before he confesses his murder.