Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How lobbying works in government
Globalization and multinational corporations note
Effects of capitalism and communism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How lobbying works in government
The Theory of Oppression states that the systematic mistreatment, exploitation, and lowering of the social status of groups of people by powerful institutions leads to the usurpation of resources for material gain by utilizing oppression over others to achieve resources. Furthermore, the significance of life has an importance to every living being, yet the evolution of humans has turned the world into a very expansive environment of oppression. While It's interwoven in human nature that humans have a natural need for things yet humans can do anything to obtain it, even if it means to oppress an entire country just to earn its resources. Additionally, practices of globalization and neo-imperialism are all interwoven into the ongoing oppression …show more content…
of humans. The U.S empire’s original goal is to exploit other countries to serve the demands given by the U.S government and corporations who exist under the capitalist system.
The capitalist system is known for its coercive and neo- imperialistic outlooks which have forever transformed politics into harsh institutions ever since its rise in society. The involvement of corporate power within government influences the decline of many economies within countries and that it halts economic and personal development, leading to developing capitalist economies in those nations that are enforced under the name of corporate democracy. Noam Chomsky, a political activist and author once said that “as long as the general population is passive, apathetic, and diverted towards consumerism or hatred of the vulnerable, then the powerful can do as the please, and those who survive will be left to contemplate the outcome.”
Ever since the rise of corporate capitalism, corporations have pushed towards to conform their interests in private property and towards the accumulation of wealth. The major corporations look towards privatizing certain industries in order to capitalize on their investments. The individual need to raise money became a priority for corporations, even if it calls to utilize the idea of narrow export economics and use neo-imperialism to inflict global capital domination. The global capital power of the United States has led to rapid modernization in most Third World Countries. As these countries are dependent on the
…show more content…
economic policies enforced by the U.S and heavily depend on structural adjustment programs constituted by the IMF and World Bank. “The World Bank is a capitalist international financial institution…. its official goal is to reduce poverty, and so most of its lending goes to developing countries. The loans are primarily aimed at economic development connected with trade and foreign investment, but it’s lending gives it influence over many developing countries financial policies (reader, 212).” The World Bank and IMF formed Structural Adjustment Programs to give out foreign aid to Third World countries. Furthermore, SAPs harm the economy by cutting social programs and food subsidies and imposing higher fees for state programs like health care and education. Selling state-owned industries and resources to business corporations which lead to privatization. Lastly, eliminating regulations on foreign ownership of resources and businesses by prioritizing the repayment of foreign debt. This allows the World Bank to have direct control over their economies and due to this corporations are the greatest benefactor of policy change that is instituted by the World Bank. This allows corporations to maximize on their profits in the third world due to low economic regulations. “Democratic policies have expanded within hierarchies, the corporate sphere has monetized and attenuated the market democracy of the network itself, handling its operations over to a set of competing monarchies (Textbook 828).” Corporations tend to operate without regulation and tend to exploit people for cheap labor abroad. This can be seen in many Third World countries, especially in China. “The mobility of corporate operations tends to reduce the effectiveness of regulations bases in a single hierarchy and to create incentives for those hierarchies to weaken their regulatory stance to [draw] more business. Only by joining international agreements regarding regulatory issues can hierarchies maintain some level of control over corporate “global citizenship”, as it were (textbook 826).” Furthermore, lobbyists that are hired by multinational corporations play a crucial role in influencing government decisions that are made by politicians.
These lobbyists tend to make up a large portion of the U.S government, having influence in some to all democratic decisions. The decisions made by policy makers tend to reflect the corporations own personal marketing agenda abroad and at home. In the supreme court case of Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission (U.S Supreme Court). The case argued that when corporations donate money to politicians’ campaigns it was considered under the 1st amendment as free speech. However, the ruling leaned in favor corporations allowing them to have control over politicians’ campaigns, even including the presidential election. “Citizen’s United has an annual budget of about $12 million. Most of its funds are from donations by individuals; but, in addition, it accepts a small portion of its funds from for- profit corporations (reader, 221). As corrupt corporations gain more freedom to push any policy they want, they tend to have an important influence in people’s everyday lives. “Unlike voters in U.S elections, corporations may be foreign controlled…. business corporations have been “effectively” delegated the responsibility for ensuring society’s economic welfare; they inescapably structure the life of every citizen (reader, 223).” This influence allows corporations to control and seize decisions about policy change and the push
towards expanding corporate democracy. There is a reason why corporations have a large influence over legislation regarding consumer choices and essentially “buying out” politicians. Overall, the corporate agenda to control governments, regulate the economic system, and society, through their money, power, lobbying and psychological manipulation. Have directly impacted the nation’s people as the government disregards the social contract it has with its constituents and promotes the corporation’s agenda instead. Regarding the case of Citizen’s United v Federal Elections Commission, it concludes that corporations have a large influence over the government and that this influence must be limited. The U.S government fails to comply with the social contract with the American people when it promotes corporate lobbying instead. With a nation, so dependent on money to influence elections, the term democracy is replaced with corporate democracy when corporations hire lobbyists to influence political elections. This can be seen throughout history, when Standard Oil, Carnegie Steele, and J.P Morgan Chase & Co influenced elections to elect William McKinley into office as he serve to promote their corporate agenda. This trend carries on as of today as Some major companies like Pepsico, Coca- Cola, Comcast, TimeWarner, Exon Mobile, and even some financial institutions like J.P Morgan Chase & Co all have lobbyists that push the corporations’ agenda towards politicians. In conclusion, the influence of corporate power is the greatest problem that this nation faces as it leads towards halting development in other nations and significantly increasing global security as long as consumerism and capitalism continue to flourish in the hearts of society.
Today in the United States of America people are both privileged and oppressed based on their diversity markers and social locations. These advantages and disadvantages are put in place by the people whom are in power, or otherwise known as the government and other leading officials. This is a major issue in today’s society that often tends to be masked by the many other issues within the country as well as by the privileged people. Many people who experience privilege tend to believe that privilege and oppression do not exist and that everyone has equal opportunity, but that is not the case privilege and oppression does exist and it can be seen every day in society. After a careful review of Dena Samuel’s “Matrix Model of Oppression and Privilege” I identified myself as rather privileged due to my social and diversity locations on her model.
Oppression is not always brought on in a violent and oppositional way, it can take on a peaceful and silent form; however regardless of the way oppression is introduced, it maintains the same characteristics of “imposing belief systems, values, laws and ways of ...
Andrea Smith’s “Heteropatriarchy and the Three Pillars of White Supremacy” introduces an alternative framework for the organization of women and people of color (Smith 67). Such framework is non-singular, contrasting the previous which have proven to be limiting to these groups (Smith 67). Through the discussion of the three pillars which are separate, but interrelated and heteropatriarchy within society Smith provides a helpful starting point for organizers to break from systems of oppression and ultimately deconstruct White supremacy (Smith 73).
It was Emerson who said it best, “For nonconformity, the world whips you with its displeasure” (Porter 1155). With a detailed look of Amy Tan’s “Two Kinds” and John Updike’s “A&P,” you will find that this quote is entirely applicable in the context of oppressiveness and in the likeness of “coming of age.” These two stories document the different perspectives of two characters’ growing up and how the role of the invisible hand of oppression guides developing adolescents into mature adults; without prejudice or even forethought. The characters in question are: Sammy, an A&P store clerk whose time spent at work reveals how oppressed by society he is, and Jing-Mei, whose life and every move is dictated by the iron fist of her high-expectations Asian mother. In comparing these stories, you will find how two characters, with very different lives, are essentially affected by the same forces of humanity.
The author argues that in order for oppression to be vitally explored, the factors that create oppression must be realized. Oppression gives material advantage to the oppressor. "All social relations have material consequences". The author argues that all identities must be considered interconnected.
The way I have come to understand what the Matrix of Privilege and Oppression means, is that everyone everywhere feels both privilege and oppression at the same time, and how much they feel of it depends on where they are on the scale of oppression and what position in society that they are in. This could mean that a Black man whom is judged by his skin color every day and it heavily oppressed in many ways, ends up getting into a college over a white man because of the school wanting to be a more diverse campus. The white man does not get judged by his skin color on a regular basis, but it did not work out well for him while applying to schools.
THE WAYS OF MEETING OPPRESSION IS AN ESSAY WRITTEN BY MARTIN LUTHER KING JR., ADDRESSING SEGREGATION THAT IS SPECIFICALLY DIRECTED TOWARD THE AFRICAN AMERICAN AUDIENCE. King’s primary audience is the African Americans, but also he has secondary audiences that he addresses, which are a combination of Christians or those who know of, or believe in the Christian views, as well as people in the legal system. He gives examples through his text that will demonstrate how he addresses mostly the African Americans, but also the various other audiences he is trying to reach to through his memorable speech. In his writing, he tells of three ways that they deal with oppression, and based on these he sends out a message to all who have read or heard his words. This message states what has been done in the past, as well as what should be done based on these past experiences. King chooses to speak to certain people through certain contexts and key phrases. In choosing certain phrases and also on how he states his words, he is successful in influencing all his audiences that he intended to persuade. The words that he carefully chose will tell how and why he wanted to focus on the primary and secondary audiences of his choice.
How your culture had shaped who I am today? I was born and raised in China for at least 8 year, and my parents’ culture have once deeply influence my choice of the future and limit my vision. As everyone know, China is once a communist country, similar to old Russia (USSR). People are not allow to be wealthier and education are limited. In Chinese culture, it is necessary to subject one’s own desire for a greater value to the family. If I don’t follow my parents order, it will brings shame to the family. There were moment in my life where I would follow the tradition and culture as a nice son, but I am tired of following the tradition. Sometimes, we have no clue that we live under the internalized oppression from culture and elder. Internalized
Oppression; something that has been around since the beginning of time; Mesopotamia. It is a cruel trait that takes advantage of others for the advantage to conquer and attain a goal in one’s life. From one of the first known literary works “The Epic of Gilgamesh” to William Shakespeare’s “The Tempest” Acts 1 and 2, the theme of oppression has been playing out in societies. In relating to these two stories through postcolonial theory we will look at different aspect of oppression. Oppression has shown it is one of a self-sustaining system of power that is used to dis-empower, disregard, silence, enslave and eventually could lead to death.
Policies meant to make the market more competitive have turned into means for the Global North countries to flood the markets with their own subsidized goods (Roy 463). Through her article, Roy argues that development in the presence of capitalism is simply a means of expanding the exploitation that exists in the already “developed” countries. This idea is further supported by the work of LaDuke, who argues that the nature of capitalism denies the equality of all persons (LaDuke 197) because there is a discord between the way capitalists live and the natural law that exists which prevents capitalists from asking the fundamental questions (LaDuke 195-197). However, as LaDuke argues, without these fundamental questions we fail to see the big picture, and without the big picture, we fail to “deal with questions of race, sexual orientation, class, geography, or privilege” (LaDuke
Oppression is this and so much more than what Ben Harper wrote in his song. Oppression is an unjust or cruel exercise or action of power. Everyone experiences oppression at least once in his or her lives. We have only recently begun to fight the effects of oppression, to gain freedom in our world. Oppression divides us to keep us from maintaining our freedom, what little of it we have. Oppression is completely based on hatred and preys on you when you sleep, or when you are at your lowest point. It kicks you when you are down, and pushes you further down the rabbit’s hole. It forces you to fight when you are the weakest and will take your very last breath. It takes one problem and snowballs until you can not take it anymore. We can learn to fight oppression, if we only make ourselves aware.
“There is no perfect relationship. The idea that there is gets us into so much trouble.”-Maggie Reyes. Kate Chopin reacts to this certain idea that relationships in a marriage during the late 1800’s were a prison for women. Through the main protagonist of her story, Mrs. Mallard, the audience clearly exemplifies with what feelings she had during the process of her husbands assumed death. Chopin demonstrates in “The Story of an Hour” the oppression that women faced in marriage through the understandings of: forbidden joy of independence, the inherent burdens of marriage between men and women and how these two points help the audience to further understand the norms of this time.
The book Pedagogy of the Oppressed by Paulo Freire discusses many ways in which people are oppressed and how many oppressors dehumanize people. One way Freire describes oppression is the fear of freedom. Freire defines fear of freedom as:
Discrimination. Intersecting identities. Domination. In today’s society, people are criticized in others of their race, gender, abilities, age, etc., as those certain people are trying to destroy our humanity. Creating this problem in the society, will affect the social, political, and economic factors for many countries, also starting a war between different race or ethnicity. The role of being diversity in modern society, gives people to communicate better and have more confidence to express our opinions or beliefs. Intersectionality, is a study of meeting different groups with similar aspects/appearances, but they’re consider as inequality in the society or had faced discrimination; it relates to my privileged life by being
Globalization is a term that is difficult to define, as it covers many broad topics in the global arena. However, it can typically be attributed to the advancement of economic, social, and cultural interactions among the companies, citizens, organizations, and governments of nations; globalization also focuses on the interactions and integration of countries (The Levin Institute 2012). Many in the Western world promote globalization as a positive concept that allows growth and participation in a global community. Conversely, the negative aspects rarely receive the same level of attention. Globalization appears to be advantageous for the privileged few, but the benefits are unevenly distributed. For example, the three richest people in the world possess assets that exceed the Gross National Product of all of the least developed countries and their 600 million citizens combined (Shawki and D’Amato 2000). Although globalization can provide positive results to some, it can also be a high price to pay for others. Furthermore, for all of those who profit or advance from the actions related to globalization, there are countless others who endure severe adverse effects.