Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Female in society
With or without knowing, every single person in this world is born into a specific society. That person has no say in which society they are born into, or the beliefs, language or customs that they are taught from this society. And without knowing the long term effects, a society will shape a person’s personality and their actions. Society is a hard term to define but it does impact someone very much. Society is a theme that is constantly dissected in novels because they make a good platform to look into society and its effects on people. In the novels, Only in London by Hanan Al Shayek, NW by Zadie Smith, the women in the storylines are often stuck with a decision between two societies. Some of them are pulled one way because of their culture …show more content…
Al-Shaykh shows this through the sexualizing of the English language and the romanticizing of the Arabic language. When Lamis and Nicholas have sex for the first time, Lamis describes the English as a third member in the intimate act. “His English words were flowing into her ears. They broke up into separate letters and slid in, one by one, feeding the little hairs with delicious food so they demanded more,” (98). Her liberty and freedom that she has founded and pleaded for in London can also be equal to her want of a sexual liberation. A traditional Iraqi woman who openly desires sex is very taboo. This is written as a new and exciting thing to her but when writing about the Arabic language, it’s written as if it was an old romantic …show more content…
“The letter s was like a wave of the sea, a carnation flower, a bird’s wings…her heart pounded with affection for her language,” (124). This is a turning point for Lamis in her decision between two societies. She is between the new and sexy and what she knows to be real and true. Later, Lamis refuses to move in with Nicholas due to her complicated family life and her cultural ideals. She also refuses to let him meet her son. He then accuses her of only wanting a sexual relationship. Although this might be true about only wanting a sexual relationship, the biggest reason why they didn’t work at that time was she didn’t want to blend her two cultures together yet.
Eventually Lamis realizes all the things she still loves about her Iraqi culture and she stops thinking that “being Arab was an obstacle in her life,” (125). She eventually even thinks she is silly for trying to decided between two different cultures and two different societies, when she now knows she can blend the two. She realizes how severe it was to give up her culture, “Had she really once considered substituting these for others and doing away with her heritage, no longer seeing, hearing or speaking, and consequently ceasing to breathe?”
Elizabeth Fernea entered El Nahra, Iraq as an innocent bystander. However, through her stay in the small Muslim village, she gained cultural insight to be passed on about not only El Nahra, but all foreign culture. As Fernea entered the village, she was viewed with a critical eye, ?It seemed to me that many times the women were talking about me, and not in a particularly friendly manner'; (70). The women of El Nahra could not understand why she was not with her entire family, and just her husband Bob. The women did not recognize her American lifestyle as proper. Conversely, BJ, as named by the village, and Bob did not view the El Nahra lifestyle as particularly proper either. They were viewing each other through their own cultural lenses. However, through their constant interaction, both sides began to recognize some benefits each culture possessed. It takes time, immersed in a particular community to understand the cultural ethos and eventually the community as a whole. Through Elizabeth Fernea?s ethnography on Iraq?s El Nahra village, we learn that all cultures have unique and equally important aspects.
Before launching into the implications of these two novels, I believe a summary of the general human experience in each of the two societies is necessary. Brave New World illustrates a society in which science has been elevated to a god-like position. In this novel, human thoughts and actions are controlled by conditioning, which in turn is controlled by a select few members of the dominant caste. Depending on the caste they are bred for, individuals in Brave New World are developed differently. All humans are created in a laboratory and higher caste individuals are allowed to develop relatively free from any mutation. Lower caste citizens, however, are created in mass quantity and are conditioned even as fetuses to enjoy hard labor. After being born, a process referred to in the novel as decanting, children are raised in group homes. From infancy through adolescence, children are conditioned into their society's worldview: "Everyone belongs to everyone else." They are carefully conditioned to accept and reject things based on the society's best interests. While citizens in this world believe they have complete freedom, they are in reality unable to behave in any way other than how they have been conditioned. They date, but monogamy is out of the question. To grow...
Joyce, James. “Araby”. The Norton Anthology of Short Fiction. Eds. R.V. Cassill and Richard Bausch. Shorter Sixth Edition. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 2000. 427 - 431.
Romantic gestures have been seen as a useful motive to win hearts of women for centuries. However, as society constantly changes, the effectiveness of these chivalrous acts has diminished. In James Joyce’s “Araby” and John Updike’s “A&P”, this theory is explored, both telling the story of a boy whose efforts to impress the girl of their desires fail. As said by Well’s in his critical analysis of these stories, “Both the protagonists have come to realize that romantic gestures—in fact, that the whole chivalric view [sic] --- are, in modern times, counterproductive”. These stories, despite the differences between the two characters, clearly show that the character’s world is changing, with chivalry becoming more obsolete.
Renowned American music artist, Kanye West, has recently announced himself as a candidate to contest the 2020 election for President of the United States of America. West is “a proud non-reader of books” and for a man aiming to become one of the most powerful heads of state in the world, this is a horrendously ignorant view to have against books, which open questions and detail important knowledge. There is cause for concern, as his views regarding printed stories in general, alarmingly resonate with those depicted by society in Fahrenheit 451; a dystopian novel written by Ray Bradbury in 1953, which takes the reader into a world whereby firemen are employed to burn intellectual contraband we call books and technology dominates all aspects
I strongly agree with Fromm’s viewpoints and interpretations of Orwell’s 1984 text. He warns that the future federal powers will dehumanize society and leave everyone alienated. Thus, I agree with Fromm to the extent that he acknowledges the fact that humanity can indeed cease to exist as a result of our own self-destruction as well as the effect of our actions. Many of his opinions and warnings expressed by Orwell to an extent appear in contemporary society.
A woman’s color of clothing that she wears reflects her social class status and what she is capable of. If a woman is able to have sex freely, or at all, is also dependent on her class. A women’s role in the dystopian society is also based on her class. Both of these factors reflect her power and privileges.
Both el Saadawi and Al-Shaykh both show how perception and expression are both affected within the confines of politics, social opportunities, and male privilege depicted in their stories. Whether the reader is a follower of the feminist movement or not, it is very clear and easy to see that these women are not being treated with the respect that any human being deserves. The misogynistic stranglehold on society, especially in this part of the world, is excessive and avoidable in today’s world but it is very likely that the traditional, conservative ways of the past will continue to control and inhibit women from being able to be fully treated as equals for many years to come, perhaps even after this generation has
...a world and society which influences the members to change the way they live like, just to fit into the rest of the society, making them to be better suited. It is clear that the author has a view on that society has an immense impact on members and their actions. Like stated earlier, Louise has to deal with both external and internal problems; Louise’s personal conflicts within her are changed by a few other individual’s minds. This is relevant because it is true that the society that an individual belongs to portrays a major role in shaping another person’s behaviors and thoughts, as with what Louise has dealt with in this story. People sometimes take in what others think of them and on the most hand, most teens take that to the head and want to change whatever it was they said, just because it will satisfy the other person, but sometimes that person themselves.
As humans whether we may realize it or not we may feel as though we
The main type of language Al-Maria utilizes to describe culture in Qatar is imagery. Sophia is attracted to her lab partner in physics, Suhail. Al-Maria writes, “His presence was like a burning ember right next to me, and as I warmed myself in his aura, I also noticed things: his big white teeth as perfect as Chiclets, the moustache bristling his boyish face . . . and I yearned, which was a new feeling.” The vivid description
...ller” not only takes a lot of courage in the Arab society while being a woman, but portrays the mentally strong character, in this case, Firdaus.
“Marrakech” written by George Orwell has many impacts towards how poverty and discrimination reflected the society during World War II. World War II was an event that involved the conflict of several disputes between nations and a massive racism from the Europeans towards the Jews that Adolf Hitler made. They believed that Jews were inferior in the human race and were just like a plague. “Marrakech” is a narrative that takes place in Morocco where Orwell describes the deficiency and misery the Jews and the Black people suffer during a period of an eminent discrimination. Women also underwent the experience of discrimination by men. Orwell talks about the immense poverty, which is the lowest social class that several Europeans, Jews, Arabs, and black people experienced. The definition of discrimination is very objective. Discrimination is when a person or a large group of people judge people in an appalling way just because they are from a different color, ethics, physical attributes, beliefs, etc. Poverty is another key concept that is managed throughout “Marrakech”. Poverty is the despising misery that a human can be subjected to. Orwell reaches its effectiveness in his essay in a manner that he makes the reader know about his main purpose of how society reflected the misery of the human being during a time where equality did not really exist. Coming further, poverty and discrimination during the society where Orwell lived and perceived will be explained in detail. The efficiency of Orwell’s essay will be justified in a clear way.
In the story “Araby”, by James Joyce the narrator talks about life on North Richmond Street. The narrator lives with his aunt and uncle in an apartment that a former priest, who had died, had lived in. The priest left behind many books and the boy would often go and read them. The boy (narrator) became friends with a boy named Mangan, and develops a crush on his sister. He watches her almost every day. “Every morning I lay on the floor in the front parlor watching her door.” (Page 1137) He had never spoken to this girl until one day she approached him. She asked him if he is going to the Araby. She explains to the boy how she cannot go and he assures her that he will go and bring her back something. However through a series of events the boy is late to the bazaar and realizes his pocket change falls short. The boy in James Joyce’s “Araby” learns that life throws us curves, day dreams are much more pleasant than harsh reality, and he forever will remain a prisoner of his modest means and his city.
Does society influence us or do we influence it? The thought of whether the society shapes us or individuals shape our behaviors and culture is extremely dubious and won't be replied whatsoever, possibly since it goes both ways. We have all been brought up in a society around individuals who impart to us bunches of characters and statuses or else we couldn't have been conveying like now and imparting thoughts and that answers and clarifies whether it is nature or nurture. It's a reality that what has formed our dispositions and who we are currently is a mixture of interior and outer compels, for example, socialization, education, and drives of all sorts. These interior and outer impacts have even been demonstrated and delineated by numerous sociologists- Jean Piaget, Sigmund Freud, Herbert Mead. One of the stars that I truly acknowledge is Ahmed Zaki, the Egyptian actor. He had dependably been imaginative in all his works and had been conveying significant messages and showing lessons in life that have been once in a while known around individuals and passed on to the general population. I accept that Zaki came to be as innovative and of service as he is to the society because of how he was socialized. When he understood that he ended up in educating individuals by his movies and plays and acknowledged those morals and ethics he chose to work by them. Socialization is essentially the predominant outside compel that influences an individual's perspective to the planet. While very nearly all individuals are occupied to adapt up to the quickly progressing life and its profits, I accept he is one of the few actors who showed his own perspectives fearlessly without dread or shame. He called for the equity and fairness to all individual...