Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Characteristics of colonialism literature
The tempest of intertextuality
Native american views
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Characteristics of colonialism literature
Juan Gines de Sepulveda writes of an account that describes the reason that there is a just reason to start a war against the Indians. This perspective tells the reader about the Indians way of life and their beliefs. This is a story of colonialism as the Spaniards believe that their way of life is superior to the Indians and are trying to implement their beliefs upon these people as they enter the Indian’s land. This account by Juan Gines de Sepulveda can be related to a Shakespeare play written years before this event occurred. The Tempest has a theme that expresses aspects of colonialism through symbols. The play shows a natural order of rulership between slaves and their master. Also, the dehumanization of a character due to a lack of knowledge …show more content…
The Sepulveda text shows the dehumanization of the natives because they are thought to be savages and not human. The Spaniards believe themselves to be superior to the natives since they are human and contain virtues and wisdom. This account expresses that since the Indians eat human flesh they are barbaric and possess inhumane qualities. The Sepulveda text says, “On the contrary, in those same institutions there is proof of the coarseness, barbarism, and innate servility of these men” (13). The Indians acts and way of life is not considered to be humane and because of this the Spaniards believe that these people need their guidance. The Spaniards reemphasize that the Indians are innately servile because they are barbaric and savage. The colonialism text shows that the natives of the land are not human and by their way of life they deserve to be ruled over. In comparison, The Tempest has the native of the Island, Caliban, depicted as a monster and has non-human characteristics like the colonialism texts. Caliban is native to the island that Prospero rules over and is described as a monster. The play describes his features in the …show more content…
When thou didst not, savage,
Know thine own meaning, but wouldst gabble like
A thing most brutish, I endowed thy purposes
With words that made them known. But thy vile race,” (I:II 325-331).
Prospero explains that it took a lot of effort to teach Caliban language and that by Caliban learning language he will no longer be a vile race on the Island. Caliban has a different perspective on the value of learning language. Caliban says, “You taught me language, and my profit on ’t/Is I know how to curse. The red plague rid you/For learning me your language!”(I:II 333-335). He explains that by learning language he possessed nothing of value, but to be able to curse at his master, Prospero. The Tempest reemphasizes that the lack of education of an inferior race shows their innate servility to the beings that already harness knowledge and wisdom. All in all, The Tempest depicts aspects of colonialism through the symbols and acts of the characters throughout the play. The relationship between beings is predestined by the innate nature of the being to be a slave or a master is seen within both texts. The theme of the inhumane perspective of the natives of the travelers who believe themselves to be superior. Lastly, the aspect of believing the natives are uneducated and therefore need to be educated and deserve serve those who have knowledge and language. Shakespeare wrote a story that can be related to the account by Juan de Gines Sepulveda because of the sections
Of the text named Bartolome de las casas: In Defense of the Indians(c.1550) it covers what is to be the Spanish Conquistadores, and talks of the natives to which at the time seen by many are barbaric, ignorant, incapable of learning, just another group of people to be conquered. But to the Catholic missionaries they see the Natives as new people to influence and enlighten. But if at any time the person drops the belief of Christianity they would use deadly force against the person or family. Adding to that Hernán comments that their cities are “ worth of admiration because of its building, which are like those of Venice”(Poole 4). While the argument remain if really would the Natives had stood a chance what
Las Casas emphasizes on three main issues throughout his account. First, in almost each chapter, Las Casas writes about the luscious qualities of the land and the different indigenous peoples that inhabit them. Second, he explains and describes in detail how the natives were rapidly being massacred by the invading Christian Europeans. Finally, Las Casas discusses how God had brought justice to the Europeans for their diabolical acts upon the natives. Las Casas, a former slave owner himself, realized that those whom he previously enslaved were just as much human and capable of learning and practicing the Christian faith as he was. As a bishop, he realized he could do little for the Natives except document his experiences (in as much detail as possible) and hope that the royal administration would have sympathy for the Natives and establish laws to protect them from the Europeans.
shall firstly do a summery of the play and give a basic image of what
Cabeza de Vaca, like many other Spaniards, wanted to seek fortune in the new world, but things did not go as planned, and he eventually lost everything. Although he came to conquer in the name of Spain, he ended up living amongst the Native Americans in need for survival and became very close to them. Although originally the Spaniards were very narrow minded and believed the Indians were uncivilized and barbaric, Cabeza de Vaca shortly found out that they were not uncivilized, but quite the opposite. He saw that they were just as human as the Spaniards were and were no less than they were. His perception of humanity altered as a result of living with “the others.”
to justify his vision of the portrayal of natives by the Europeans. The literary fabrications of the
How important is an individual that most often than not authors focus on the growth of one over the growth of the many? Is it because the growth of one symbolizes the growth of all? Or is the focus on the individual due to the image it presents which is the growth in us? In any event, this outlook of individualism is widespread in literature and different genres and techniques excavate the development of the individual. Another factor that comes into play in the development of the character is the situation and the effects of the environment. Within William Shakespeare’s play The Tempest and Michael Cervantes Saavedra’s satire Don Quixote are two different characters molded and formed or in both cases malformed to incorporate their capsules which are the genres and settings that imprison them.
In literature as in life, characters are multi-dimensional beings. They possess a wide variety of character traits that make them who they are. In the Tempest written by William Shakespeare, Prospero traits resemble those of the Europeans that came during the exploration of the Americas. Thus, Prospero’s treatment of Caliban is similar to the way Europeans treated the Native Americans.
During the era of maritime exploration and the discovery of the Americas, assumptions were made of the land likening it to not only a paradise, but one that was overrun with cannibalistic natives. These suppositions led to a desire to explore the lands and conquer the savages that posed a threat to man and civilization itself. The consequences of this mass colonization and dehumanization of the natives paved the way for literary pieces that pose as critiques of the era when viewed through a post-colonial lens. When looked at through a post-colonial perspective, a few common themes prevail amongst compared texts. Focusing on the theme of the journey, what it means, and what is at stake, Garcilaso de la Vega’s “The Story of Pedro Serrano” and Juan José Saer’s The Witness both touch on all these themes with great severity, dissecting the purpose of the journey and what it means to be a civilized man.
...ne else in the play the power of language to alter reality, and the issues of conscious or unconscious deceit.
Through The Tempest play, William Shakespeare weaves together a tale that is characterized by anti-colonialist sentiments. Prospero - the deposed Milan Duke - adopts a colonialist mentality by treating his colleagues as slaves who have no rights. Characters who suffer mistreatment under Prospero include: Ariel - the spirit creature; Ferdinand - the Naples Prince; and Caliban - Sycorax’s son. Prospero possesses much magical power which he uses to oppress his compatriots. Consequently, Prospero is portrayed as a colonial tyrant who abuses his immense power. Anti-colonialism feelings are especially evident through the actions, utterances and disposition and of Caliban, Miranda, Ferdinand and Ariel. To illustrate, Caliban berates Prospero for the former’s forced labor. Likewise, Ariel protests Prospero’s reluctance to release the former as earlier agreed. Miranda also expresses her dissatisfaction with Prospero’s unfair imprisonment of Ferdinand. Similarly, Ferdinand appears to challenge Prospero’s authority by briefly stopping dragging timber so as to flirt and chat with Miranda. The foregoing four characters exhibit conduct that highlights their displeasure with Prospero’s colonial-style authority over them. From the preceding expose, it can thus be concluded that Shakespeare’s The Tempest play is about anti-colonialism based on its depiction of Caliban, Miranda, Ferdinand and Ariel’s opposition to Prospero’s oppressive authority.
The Shakespearean play, The Tempest, is one of the most controversial in terms of relationships in the play. The play was written in 1611 soon after the English arrived in America in 1607, launching the colonial period. This was the beginning of colonization to America, which lead to the evolution of indentured servants into slaves. Many critics have stated that the relationship between Prospero and Caliban was that of a slave and master and a representation of how the English colonized foreign lands that belonged to the indigenous Americans. Each situation could be argued and validated according to the portion of the play being analyzed. Both roles are applicable and I will provide evidence of both to prove that they are synonymous in a sense.
The relationships and encounters made between the Europeans and the Indigenous peoples is explained through the use of anti-conquest love plots. Anti-conquest love plots are stories narrated not to be a story of colonization, but to be a story of survival containing messages about colonialism, race, and the culture of natives. In anti-conquest love plots, the narrator is present in the context of colonialism, but is characterized to be disinterested in colonizing the indigenous other. The narrator is more concerned with surviving during their dangerous adventures and with gaining understanding, knowledge, and a clearer sense of self from these adventures. Even though the narrator is set in a context of military invasions, colonization, or imminent colonization, he is uninvolved in these endeavors and instead learns to love the native people.
In the play he takes on the role of a character as well as taking on
...epresents every person that has been colonized by Europe, and their attempt to civilize the savages. Their method of civilizing and to maintain a firm grip on their savage labourers was language. It was their means to communicate and control the people who they didn’t consider as themselves and a means to discriminate against it. This is reason why Caliban resists and rebels against Prospero and disparage the language he has been taught. To him it is the loss of freedom and the agency through which he is being discriminated against.
The Tempest, by Shakespeare, offers the reader a variety of themes. The one theme that stands out the most is that of colonialism. During the time of Shakespeare, many European countries such as Spain, France, and England, were expanding their borders by taking over less developed countries, referred to as colonies. During this time of exploitation, there was skepticism concerning the possible success of the colonies. While some scholars believe that the play is about the Americas, I argue that the play reflects on colonialism in general and how it is destined for failure which is shown through the character’s relationships throughout the play.