The Sweet Hereafter is a Canadian film that is an adaptation of the novel that is also called The Sweet Hereafter that was written by Russell Banks. The sweet Hereafter the Canadian film was written and directed by Aton Egoyan in 1997. Aton gained a lot of attention at the Sundance Film Festival for his earliest works. A few years later he broke out into the public with one of his most famous works, Exotica that was made in 1994. Later in 1997 is when The Sweet Hereafter got him major attention and received two academy award nominations. The Sweet Hereafter was the shift he said he needed from original film making to adapted screenplays because it allowed him escape form the thematic deadlock that he obsessed over. The Sweet Hereafter was a change of pace for Egoyan that made him an even more incredible producer and writer.
I think one of the most interesting things about films is how a director comes up with idea for the film. In “The Sweet Hereafter’s” case, Atom Egoyan got the idea when his wife Arsinée Khanjan bought him the novel “The sweet Hereafter” by Russell Banks as a birthday present. In an interview Egoyan said “The moment I read it, I knew that there was something really powerful in this story.” This is when and how Atom got the idea that he wanted to write and produce the film “The Sweet Hereafter.” Being that this was a novel written by someone else Atom had to ask permission and get the rights to the work. Russell Banks is the Author of the novel “The Sweet Hereafter” which the film with the same title is based on. While in an interview Banks talked about how he got the idea to write the original novel from an article in the New York Times. The article was about a bus crash in 1989 in a small Mexican America...
... middle of paper ...
...ainst each other as well as to want to start lawsuits. Another theme and meaning that Egoyan talked about was how Nichole is dealing with her father molesting her and how he takes advantage of her. Atom talks about how at the end of the film Nichole gains the power to overcome her father control as well as bring the parents and community back together by stopping the lawsuit that was originally created by Banks in his novel.
The Sweet Hereafter was a great movie and it was very interesting to research deeper into the making of the film as well as the meaning of some of the themes of the film. Russell Banks and Atom Egoyan made a great team in the making of the novel written by Banks and then the adaptation that was written and directed by Atom Egoyan to show the story of a devastating real life accident that banks heard about and then eventually wrote about.
In the film industry, there are directors who merely take someone else’s vision and express it in their own way on film, then there are those who take their own visions and use any means necessary to express their visions on film. The latter of these two types of directors are called auteurs. Not only do auteurs write the scripts from elements that they know and love in life, but they direct, produce, and sometimes act in their films as well. Three prime examples of these auteurs are: Kevin Smith, Spike Lee and Alfred Hitchcock.
In the book Storming Heaven by Denise Giardina, education, and the lack there of, plays one of the largest roles in the character's lives. At this time in West Virginia, where the book is set, many children had to leave school and actually go into the coalmines, as Rondal Lloyd did, or work on the family farm. Racial ignorance is also a key element Giardina confronts in the novel. The characters, chief and secondary, equally cultural and racially bland, pass on their beliefs and therefore help to maintain the continuous circle of inequality that carries on even today. Political knowledge, at least on the national and state level, is also lacking within the little town of Annadel. With this knowledge coupled with her own experiences from growing up as an immigrants daughter in the same coalfields as her novels characters, Denise Giardina tries to explain the function of education and ignorance in not only the coalfields of West Virginia, but throughout the entire world.
Déjà vu, a French term that means, “Already seen” is a common societal phenomenon. Many people have described it as having an experience that they have done previously without actually doing the event prior. Déjà vu is a complex phenomenon that is highly debated among the scientific community because of its complexity and evidence to support theories. Heart of Darkness written by Joseph Conrad and the film Apocalypse Now directed by Francis Ford Coppola’s have a similar feeling to Déjà vu. Though the two works have a similar story line they have different characters, timelines, and locations. Even with their differences which set them apart from each other, the two works almost one in the same. There are many similarities which make them seem like they are the same work and makes it easy to compare and contrast events that take place in both works. Conrad and Coppola’s works create a Déjà vu experience by creating a similar atmosphere of events. An event that would make both of the works unique and prevent Apocalypse Now from being called Heart of Darkness would be the death of Kurtz in both works.
In the novel More Joy in Heaven, written by Morley Callaghan, Kip Caley has a quest for a new life after prison. As he gets used to being a freeman he learns more about what he really wants in life. When Kip finds out what it is that he is searching for in his new life, like in all tragedies, it is too late. Because he is not sure if Julie, the girl, or the parole board is what he wants, he spends too much time trying to find out and when he knows it is too late. In his search for a new life Kip knows that he is a free man and wants to show it to the people while he says that he does not want to be viewed constantly by the public.
A Comparison of Two Accounts of Life After Death Materialism is the view that the body and mind are inseparable, and for there to be life after death then the body must be resurrected. This is much like the Christian view of life after death. John Hick was a materialist and he argued that, in certain circumstances, it would be possible that the dead could exist as themselves after death, if an exact replica were to appear. Hick uses thought experiments to show the person who dies in this world is the same person who is resurrected in the next. He uses examples of using a character named John Smith.
The Sweet Hereafter has quite the unique narrative structure, that completely differs from the repeated styles of Hollywood storytelling. Contrast to an average storyline with a rising action, climax, and falling action, the film constructs its scenes with skewed notions on the basic fundamentals of chronological order. This forces the audience to pay close attention to the different time zones throughout the movie, to understand how they relate to the current events that foreshadow what’s next in the film. For example, the climax of the bus crash that kills many of the towns children, is revealed relatively early on in the film, immediately building suspense and making you wonder what could be next for the rising action if I already know what happened.
Everyone has a different idea about what Heaven is like, but who knows the true state of Heaven? No one can really know, because no one on earth has ever seen Heaven; though, many scholars have come up with different takes on what the believe Heaven to be. In Dante’s Paradise, he explains his conception of Heaven by explaining the physical appearance of it, the separate levels within Paradise, and the actual souls residing there. However, Dante’s conception of Heaven contradicts what Baptist believes it to be like.
1 Is there life after death? In Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour,” Mrs. Mallard “is drinking the elixir of life through her open window.” It is possible that this very elixir provides Mrs. Mallard with her freedom through eternal life. Through Chopin’s use of characterization, conflict, and symbols, the author reveals the theme that like Mrs. Mallard, some people can achieve freedom through eternal life. [Does "eternal life" here mean life after death, or, as in "Dr. Heidegger's Experiment," life without death? The basic problem with this essay is that it overlooks the primary point of the story -- Louise glimpses freedom as a result of the death of her husband, and then loses that freedom with the realization that he is still alive. It is a story of "an hour" because Louise has only an hour of freedom. Although the writer of this essay makes a valiant attempt to support the thesis, there really is not enough religious (or moral) symbolism, etc. to support it.]
One of the greatest and oldest human mysteries on Earth is death, and the fate that lies beyond it. The curious minds of human beings constantly wonder about the events that occur after death. No person truly knows what happens after a person ceases to live in the world, except for the people themselves who have passed away. As a result, over the course of history, people of various backgrounds, ethnicities, and religions have speculated and believed in numerous different possibilities for the destiny that awaits them beyond the world of the living. The great ambiguity of the afterlife is extremely ancient that many different beliefs about it have been dated back to several centuries ago. These beliefs go as far back to the beliefs of Ancient Egyptians, which outline the journey that the dead travels to the land of Osiris; and the belief of Ancient Greeks that all souls eventually find themselves in Hades’ realm, the Underworld. Throughout history, views and beliefs from emerging religions continue to develop as the human conscience persists in finding answers to this ancient, unresolved mystery. Prime examples of the various and separate beliefs regarding death and the afterlife are found in the diverse faiths of Roman Catholicism, Islam, and Buddhism.
This essay will argue that the eschatology of the Book of Revelation forms an integral part of John’s attempt within the pages of his book to form a literary world in which the forms, figures, and forces of the earthly realm are critiqued and unmasked through the re-focalization of existence from the perspective of heaven. It will attempt to show that, in response to the social, political, religious, and economic circumstances of his readers, the Book of Revelation forms a counter imaginative reality. Through drawing upon an inaugurated sense of eschatology and evocative imagery, John is able to pull the reader in and show them the true face of the imperial world and consequences of its ideology, forcing the reader allegiance to fall with either ‘Babylon’ or the New Jerusalem.
“The Sweet Hereafter” is a film about relationships, whether between father and child, husband and wife, or between neighbors. It is these relationships that shape the outcomes and motives of all those affected by the accident.
Why are we allowed to be more humane to our pets than our parents? Physician-assisted suicide is a voluntary termination of one’s own life by administration of a lethal substance with direct or indirect assistance of a physician. Euthanasia is another term for this practice it provides a competent patient with a prescription for the patient to use with the primary intention of ending his or her own life. Compassion and Choices or Death with Dignity are names of supporters that promote euthanasia, also referred to as physician-assisted suicide, and believe that it is just as humane for terminally ill animals as it is for people. I too agree that it should be legally and morally open for choice to anyone suffering from a terminal diagnoses that includes impending pain physically, psychologically, and financially.
Baz Luhrmann has done this film in a unique and brilliant way, with help of the above, and of course a great loved story as a base.
What is going to happen to us when we will die? Some people never considered what it could happen to them after life. For many people, death is a redoubtable event because they do not know what to expect after their death. However, other persons, such as religious people are conscious of what to expect after their death because of their beliefs. Each religion has different ideas and different ways of looking life. Death, therefore, is viewed by different religions in many ways. Although, different religions have a distinct conception of death, they all have something in common: they all give hope to people. Among all different religions in the world, four of the most common ones - Catholic, Jewish, Islamic, and Hindu- view death in different ways.
Heaven and Hell, two contradictory destinations of the afterlife, where the first is filled with everlasting rewards and joy, while the latter encompasses eternal doom and torment. A person’s actions and behavior on Earth determine the fate of their soul’s destination after death, meaning that one must live a just and righteous life in order to enter Heaven. On the contrary, living a worthless life full of sin and wrongdoing will result in going to Hell as punishment. However, different worldly religions have differing views and interpretations of life after death, and no one can be sure of what to expect. These religious notions of the afterlife have become so engrained into the society and culture of the world, with expressions like “I feel like I have died and gone to Heaven” included in everyday dialogue. One recent popular television series provides insight of a particular analysis of what the afterlife is like, and that is The Good Place, starring Kristen Bell. This