Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Foreign intervention in Syria
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Freedom: something taken for granted by citizens all over the first world countries. The struggle for freedom all around the world is a very real one. Recently, the fight for freedom has taken the oppressed by storm. All over the globe, there have been many examples of people fed up with corruption and ready to take control of their lives and the lives of their children. This is evident through the struggles for freedom seen in Syria, Egypt, Tunisia, and most recently Ukraine. It’s 2014 and governments controlled by a central authority or dictator are still prevalent. Countries all over the world have been isolated and stripped of their individual voices. The struggle for freedom coexists with the struggle of finding a voice. A voice is what the Libyan people found in February of 2011 when they started protests against a regime that ruled for forty-two years in isolated dictatorship. Three years later, the very same voice that liberated them is one of the gigantic obstacles they’re facing in establishing a functioning government in the country. This emphatic voice that has been silenced for 42 years by an iron-fisted rule is now louder than ever. The consensus is that they want an operational democracy in place as soon as possible. But three years have passed, and the country is more restless than ever. The country is completely dysfunctional and there is no telling what the people will do next if a stable democratic constitution isn’t in place soon. They’ve just ousted their fourth prime minister in less than three years and casualties are increasing by the day. The current Libyan situation is widely attributed to the 2011 revolution. That being said, understanding how the 2011 revolution happened and why it unfolded the way it...
... middle of paper ...
..., town by town, to brutalize men, women and children, the world refused to stand idly by”. This refers to the notion that when one state is suffering, that is when international relations has to kick into gear and help out. But was there an incentive for the international system to help Libya(oil maybe?). Specifically a unipolar superpower like the US. They didn’t help in Tunisia or Egypt, why Libya in particular? During the revolution, NATO backed the Libyan rebels and cause them to win vey battles during the civil war. US made a promise to continue to help Libya in its’ pursuit of democracy, but it looks as though Libya is going to have to figure this part of it fate on its own as most countries are staying away at the moment. But when the economy is up and running, and oil production is back at its peaks, What will the international system look like for Libya then?
BACKGROUND: In March of 2011, the unrest in Syria was just beginning, with protests g...
In 1986, Reagan took violent action on his war against terrorism. Reagan started his presidency in 1981 beginning his war on terrorism. The United States has been struggling with having good relations with Libya, specifically relations with Muammar Gaddafi (El-Gadhafi, Quadaffi, Qadhafi). Gaddafi, the Libyan dictator first came to power in 1969. Over the past few decades, the United States tried to solve conflicts with Libya diplomatically (SOURCE). Once Reagan was elected president, he tried to continue the tradition of solving issues using diplomatic ways, however Gaddafi refused to take Reagan’s threats seriously. The conflict with Libya and the United States escalated when it was discovered that Gaddafi was behind the discotheque bombings in West Berlin on April 5th 1986. Gaddafi has violently attacked not only innocent civilians, but had planned assassination attempts on United States officials that were abroad (SOURCE). Gaddafi’s previous actions, led to the bombings in Libya on April 14th 1986, when Operation El Dorado Canyon took place. President Reagan later justified these bombings in his address to the nation the evening the bombings took place (SOURCE?).
Press, The Associated. “IEA Says Libyan Oil Exports Halted.” 15 March 2011. 25 March 2011
Who likes to be watched? “Until they become conscious they will never rebel, and until after they rebelled they cannot become conscious.” The party in 1984 is a system of spies who control everything in Oceania. Winston rebels for his desires. Julia rebels for her pleasure. O’brien rebels to gain trust and then betray. In George Orwell's book, 1984, he shows the importance of freedom, the pain of being controlled, and the hurt from being betrayed.
Throughout history freedom has had many different meanings and definitions; based on race, gender, and ethnicity. According to the dictionary freedom means the state of being free or at liberty rather than in confinement or under physical restraint (“freedom” def. 1). Freedom may seem like something given to everyone however it was something workers had to fight for. Not everyone believed that workers’ rights needed to be changed, which led to a long battle between workers, employers and the government. To the working class people freedom meant making higher wages, having regulated hours, workable conditions and the right to free speech.
Iraq’s history is one of both prosperity and violence, and dates back to the ancient civilizations of Mesopotamia. While dominated by a variety of civilizations, the region enjoyed a relatively stable society. Since the birth of Islam, the religion has been the dominant cultural belief of the region, and has made its way into the laws and ruling of the region. (InDepth Info, 2010)
In Tunisia, young people have taken control of a country that has been under the control of Zine El Abidine Ben Ali for the last 20 years. Tunisians could not get jobs without being extorted by local officials. They could not buy a house without bribing an official. Any activity involving government often required money to push the paperwork through. Tunisians who received coll...
Human history is pock-marked with innumerable wars and revolutions. The cause for most of the revolutions has been the choice of freedom. The opportunity to live a life without physical, mental or emotional restrictions has been and still is of supreme importance to man. This has resulted in the most widely followed discipline of political governance: Democracy.
As the Arab Spring enters its second year, major uprisings and revolts have occurred all over the Middle East, pushing for an end to the corrupt autocratic rule and an expansion of civil liberties and political rights. Most recently, images from Syria have emerged, depicting the government’s use of force to suppress the voice of its people. One might ask, “Is this the beginning of a revolution? Is the country on the path to democracy?” To assess this question and examine the future trends in the region, one must look back on the country’s somewhat tumultuous history, the relationship between the citizens and the state, and the political economy.
In March 2011 Syria’s government, led by Pres. Bashar al-Assad, faced an unprecedented challenge to its authority when pro-democracy protests erupted throughout the country. Protesters demanded an end to the authoritarian practices of the Assad regime, in place since Assad’s father, Ḥafiz al-Assad, became president in 1971. The Syrian government used violence to suppress demonstrations, making extensive use of police, military, and paramilitary forces. Opposition militias began to form in 2011, and by 2012 the conflict had expanded into a full-fledged civil war.
The cornerstone of John Locke’s political theory stands on the basis of consent between the people and the ruling government, for without consent society reverts to a state of perpetual chaos much like the Egyptian Revolution of 2011. On January 25, 2011, the people of Egypt felt that Hosni Mubarak—the president of Egypt at the time—did not have the country’s best interests at heart and in a long overdue decision, decided to overthrow his regime. One could not say they did not see it coming as all the signs were there—police brutality, poverty and corruption were only a few of the many reasons behind the upheaval. The people wanted a democracy, for the government at the time did not maintain their natural rights; life, liberty and property. This goes in hand with John Locke’s belief that a rebellion will occur once a government infringes an individual’s rights. Locke said that “Men being, as has been said, by Nature, all free, equal and independent, no one can be put out of this Estate, and subjected to the Political Power of another, without his own Consent.” In this case, Hosni Muburak lost the required consent once the residents of Egypt felt that they were experiencing a lifestyle riddled with infringed
The no-fly zone and naval blockade of Libya pressured Gaddafi to offer free elections in a cease-fire agreement, which was rejected by NATO and the NTC, and followed by NATO bombarding Tripoli (Carey). While the intervention was morally justified, it’s not clear that the humanitarian intervention was completely successful, as Libya is currently in another civil war (“National Post View”). The efforts of NATO and the United Nations helped bring peace to Libya for two years before another civil war broke out, so perhaps the intervention was partially successful. In the end, what needs to be considered in any intervention is whether or not there is a plan for how to change the country in the right direction, as well as making sure that foreign powers is not the only component holding the country
Western nations are increasingly sensitized to the human suffering of others, but this sense of compassion nurture by the media is very selective in its response to human suffering. The media spotlight ensures that governments directed their humanitarian energies to the crises in northern Iraq, Somalia, and Bosnia, while at the same time millions perished in the brutal civil wars in Angola, Liberia, and the DRC. The examples of Somalia, and perhaps Kosovo demonstrate that interventions which begin with humanitarian credentials can all too easily degenerate into “a range of policies and activities which go beyond, or even conflict with, the label “humanitarian”‟ (Roberts 1993: 448). So each case has to be judged on its merit. A further fundamental and principal problem with the strategy of forced humanitarian intervention concerns the so-called `body-bag' factor.
Libya is located in Northern Africa along the Mediterranean Sea which provides a northern coastal border. On the east Libya borders Egypt and Sudan and on the west Libya borders Tunisia and Algeria. To the south Libya has Chad and Niger as neighboring countries. One may ask what type of relations that Libya has with these bordering countries. Libya occupies a very interesting position. Libya has a long history of great trade relations with these other countries. Trade between these countries has depended on two types of routes which are the “western” route and the “commercial” route. The commercial route is used every season and leads to Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
Being safe and free are two natural instincts of animals and human beings. Even though we are born with these innate characteristics there is a huge difference between the development of the two over the course of history.