Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Economic and political philosophy of Karl Marx
Discuss the political and economic ideas of Karl Marx
Theory of history marx
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Economic and political philosophy of Karl Marx
In my essay, I will argue that the application of Marx's theory of the separation of town and country on the social and economical developments, which took place in Jabal Nablus during 17-19th century, confirm the existence of other factors, which cultivated overwhelming city's domination over hinterland. I claim that in addition to private property, growing trade with Europe also had a major impact on the conflict between city and country. In order to prove it, I will perform a critical analysis on Marx's methodology . I will next examine his concepts of productive forces, unequal distribution of labor, and conflict of interests in the society. In the end, I present comparative analysis of the social and economical features of Jabal Nablus in opposition to the claims of Carl Marx. The German Ideology starts off by illustrating the critique of the German idealists, while presenting Marx and Engels' alternative: materialistic view of history. According to Marx, the main reason for political and economical retrogression of Germany is its obsession with Hegel's view on history as a chain of phases or manifestations of World Spirit or Absolute Mind. It's possible to trace Marx's critique in three different perspectives. Initially, he directed his critique towards the very nature of Hegelian system, by stating its "contemplative" aspect. Secondly, he presented detailed analysis of discrepancies, regarding logical categories and religious conceptions, which rose between the Young and Old Hegelians. According to old Hegelians, the history was simply chronology of ideas, and the reason Germany was flourishing ,only because it was constructed on the best ideas. In the meantime, Young Hegelians adopted dialectics... ... middle of paper ... ...nto the farthest reaches of hinterland- undermined the constituent elements of peasant autonomy". p53 Finally, I'd like to point out that M had a narrowed vision of conquests or military campaigns, which according to him could only "take" or totally devastate old civilization by barbarians. p93 Moreover, he stated that feudalism was initially brought by Germans, in particular, by the application of martial organization of their army on the conquered productive forces, which in the end developed feudalism. However, he didn't examine influence of military campaigns within the country or empires like Ottoman. Doumani states that three military campaigns, which were carried out by Ottoman army, mutasallim of Acre, and Egypt governor Muhammad Ali, only increased domination of city over hinterland and launched process of political centralization on various levels.
The Songerweg emphasizes the particular model of history that Germany, unlike other Western countries, has gone through. Specifically, ‘proponents of this concept emphasize the peculiarities of German history, such as political institutions, social structures, or mentalities and experience, usually in comparison with other Western countries, to demonstrate the unique course of German history’ (Buse & Doerr, 1998, p. 934). Although initially the theory of Sonderweg viewed the characteristics of German historical development as positive, the situation has changed after the World War II. Specifically, in the 19th and early 20th centuries historians applied the Sonderweg model to stress a focus on the role of strong central state and military as the driving force of the development of the country (Buse & Doerr, 1998). In addition to this, historians regarded social reforms in Germany that were made from ‘above’ rather than being the outcomes of revolution to be a positive feature that depicted German state in a favorable way. Finally, the historical school viewed the course of German industrialization and culture as superior to similar processed in the rest of Western European
Philosophers believe that Hegel’s historicism has inherent conflicts that surprisingly fall in same dialectic argument that Hegel promotes, which somehow nullifies his philosophy. Originated and influenced by his Dialectic thought process of “thesis, antithesis, and synthesis”, Hegel believes that all societal and more importantly all human activities including culture, language, science, art, and even philosophy are defined by their past and the heart of these activities can be understood by studying their history. Hegel argues that the history of societal activity is a cumulative reaction to the events that has happened in the past. His famous “Philosophy is the history of philosophy" quote essentially summarizes his thoughts. Hegel believes history is a progressive and directional relation between human activities and society. He argues that in order to understand an individual, he must be studied in a society where in turn the same society can be understood by evaluating th...
Hegel proposed that we can better understand ourselves and the world by studying history. In his Philosophy...
To scrutinize Hegel is simply impossible without attending to his dialectical method resulting in Aufhebung of the oppositions. In the present context this attention should have political and ethical twist - to extract from Hegel's dialectical play some points that are relevant even nowadays (both in political and philosophical terms).
Due to the evidence with Marx and Engels against capitalism and thus the industrial revolution, this is the leading theme, an argument can be made that both men possible believe industrialization was a positive growth. Therefore, through Marx works and definition terms of using The Communist Manifesto, argues that the history of time existing society is where class struggles between the bourgeoisie and proletarians, with these arguments it possibly may be true. These philosophers have explained worlds in various ways by marking the move from theory into strategies and somewhat the action dated from a work written by Mark and Engels, known as the “The German Ideology”: What is really relevant, is to modify it.
Karl Marx was born on May 5, 1818, in the city of Trier in the
Marx especially, shares many of the same views with Hegel although they do differ on certain issues. “Despite Marx’s never-ending attack on Hegel, the Marxian conception of history is Hegelian through and through.”1 Hegel’s philosophy is focused on the criticism of Kant and Fichte, two other German philosophers. Engels once wrote “We German socialists are proud that we trace our descent not only from Saint Simon, Fourier, and Owen, but also from Kant, Fichte, and Hegel.”2 To this list one must also add Ludwig Feuerbach who Engels wrote about later in life. These philosophers had the most influence on Marx and Engels. Their philosophies are all interrelated. In fact many of their works either criticize or build upon one of the others previous works.
What Marx claimed as Hegel`s inner core was his work on the spirit, while his compromises where, among others, his views on the supremacy of the Prussian state, religion as well as labour and as a result, on these aspects, Marx depart from Hegel. However what was an essential concept Marx took on from Hegel was `the Spirit` (since Marx where more strictly materialistic I will refer to his version of the spirit as mind to underline the distinction from Hegel`s spirit) and with the mind came also the fundamental aspects of recognition and alienation. Here is also where my personal critique of Marx`s work can be found, in his use of the mind. Even with his focus on excluding metaphysical aspects and being strictly materialistic, the mind functions in a peculiar way with
Analysis of the Main Strengths and Weaknesses of Marx’s Sociological Thought “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles” Marx and Engels (1967, p.67) Born in 1818, Karl Marx, using his philosophical and socialist ideas, attempted to show how conflict and struggle in social development were important in the development of a society. The works of Marx were influenced by three distinct intellectual traditions: German idealist philosophy, French socialism and British political economy. German idealist philosophy is an approach based on the thesis that only the mind and its content really exist. This philosophy maintains that it is through the advance of human reason that human beings progress. French socialism is a political doctrine that emerged during the French Revolution and emphasised social progress led by a new industrial class.
“A Critique of The German Ideology.” A Critique of The German Ideology, PROGRESS PUBLISHERS, 1968, 1932. Hegelian in all his critics he has an idea of the religious history which composed of the elucidations of Christianity, he claims human interpretation of Christianity as compared to what the theologians say are different. “Substance” and Consciousness play a very important role in human life hence our imagination has a key role in our materialistic method. He was able to create different types of premises which can be verified in a purely empirical way . He said the first premise of all human history is, of course the existence of living individuals.The first fact to be established is how one can organize
At a certain stage of development, material productive forces in society come in conflict with the existing relations of production. Consciousness is explained through the contradictions of material life: from the occurring struggle between the social productive forces and the relations of production. Social order does not vanish before the productive forces. New, higher relations of production never precede the material conditions of their existence that have been cultivated from the original society. Marx’s position was illustrated in The German Ideology:
In his Introduction to the Philosophy of History Hegel confronts the reader with a new way of understanding history. According to this infamous philosopher, there are three methods of dealing with history: original, reflective, and philosophic. The approach taken by Hegel is the philosophical approach to history, which is the foundation of his work. In order to understand this approach, Hegel introduces the reader to his understanding of what history is.
Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. "The German Ideology." The Marx-Engels Reader. Ed. Robert C. Tucker. New York: Norton, 1978. 146-200. Print
When we first hear the word “human history”, we immediately think of the basics and the phases of human development from the very beginning of life until now. It is obvious that human history went through many political, economic and social changes that led into better life styles. Marx’s theory about human society is described as the relationships which people have with each other in order to fulfill basic needs. In this essay I will talk about the stages that Karl Marx came up with in order to describe human history. The stages were primitive communism, slave society, feudalism, capitalism, and finally mature communism. Also, I will explain the changes that Lenin did in Marx’s theory of human history. Besides, there were some weakness points about Marx’s theory of human history which I will also illustrate.
When an object is seen as a value in use, it could be appreciated for its properties capable of satisfying human wants, produced by the human labour by changing its natural form into a useful shape. However, when the object becomes a commodity, a price is attached to the object; similarly when human labour is seen as a commodity, then a price is attached to the labour.