Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theories in sociology of health and illness
Theories in sociology of health and illness
Sociology of health and illness
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theories in sociology of health and illness
“I hate living up to other people’s expectations of what a healthy person should be. I hate living up to other people’s expectations of what being sick is” (Miserandino 2). This statement is from Christine Miserandino’s blog, where she writes about her 18+ years of living with lupus. The quote above is significant specifically because of the word ‘expectation’ and what it implies. The use of ‘expectation’ is powerful because it challenges several taken for granted notions, such as normality and what it means to be ‘sick’ or healthy. The expectations that society attaches to healthy and sick bodies is something Talcott Parson grappled with in 1951. By defining the sick role as “medically sanctioned deviant behavior” (Barker 148) that excuses …show more content…
By saying that something is socially constructed, sociologists are drawing attention to how culture, society, and dominant hegemonic ideas at the macro level influence how people experience illness at an individual level. The social constructionist perspective of illness is trying to challenge the idea that the illness experience is natural. The biggest evidence in support of this claim is the existence of contested illnesses. “Contested illnesses are conditions in which sufferers and their advocates struggle to have medically unexplainable symptoms recognized in orthodox biomedical terms, despite resistance from medical researchers, practitioners, and institutions” (Barker 153). Contested illnesses are very much tied into the idea that society and its dominant ideas and ways of understanding impact the illness experience. My aim in this paper is to prove that the social construction of illness by using Christine’s experience with Lupus as a way to explore the underlying social dynamics at play within a sociological framework of …show more content…
“Basically I hate letting people see the effects of my disease. I don’t care if they know that I’m sick, I just don’t want them to have to see it, or deal with it” (Miserandino, 3). Christine chooses to deal with her illness by adopting the persona of a healthy person, hiding behind her smile, her funny stories and her calculated sunny disposition. “The illusion started small like putting on extra blush to cover up when my Lupus rash showed. Then I learned how to put on fake eye lashes to fill in when my hair started falling out. A little extra lip gloss goes a long way” (Miserandino, 1). In order to keep up the façade, Christine created a very detailed plan of attack. Lupus can limit physical activity because of relentless pain and fatigue, so Christine’s first step before going out is to figure out her mode of transportation. She decides whether or not she should drive or get a ride. If she chooses to walk, she makes sure that she chooses the right shoes. In regards to her appearance, she decides whether or not to wear her hair down based on how much hair is falling out. She always carries a big pocketbook to hold her medication and emergency items. Nearly every time she plans to go out, she is late to the social function. When that happens, she makes up a lavish story instead of telling the truth. Of course, keeping up the illusion of health is very exhaustive. Christine talks
The essays, “On Being a Cripple”, by Nancy Mairs, and “Living Under Circe’s Spell”, by Matthew Soyster are both about how each author deals with multiple sclerosis in their life and their opinions on it. Mairs’ piece is a careful examination of her experience with MS and her perspective towards her future. In contrast, Soyster writes humorously of a particular incident he had with MS and artfully weaves his ideas about the disease in with his story. In both instances, the authors share the purpose of narrating their encounter with MS to the world to raise awareness. Both employ the rhetorical strategies of appeals to pathos and varying sentence structures to achieve this goal, some more effectively than others.
Her essay is arranged in such a way that her audience can understand her life - the positives and the negatives. She allows her audience to see both sides of her life, both the harsh realities that she must suffer as well as her average day-to-day life. According to Nancy, multiple sclerosis “...has opened and enriched my life enormously. This sense that my fragility and need must be mirrored in others, that in search for and shaping a stable core in a life wrenched by change and loss, change and loss, I must recognize the same process, under individual conditions, in the lives around me. I do not deprecate such knowledge” (Mairs, 37). Mairs big claim is that she has accepted herself and her condition for what is it, yet she refuses to allow her condition to define her. Through her particular diction, tone, satire, and rhetorical elements, Mairs paints a picture of her life and shows how being a cripple has not prevent her from living her life. She is not embarrassed nor ashamed of what she is, and accepts her condition by making the most of it and wearing the title with
For example, ‘“Sydelle Pulaski waved a gaily painted crutch in the air, tottered, and set it down quickly with another thump- ‘this crutch. Crutch. What a horrible word, but I guess I’ll have to get used to it.’ She pursed her bright red mouth, painted to a fullness beyond the narrow line of her lips, trying to suppress a smile of triumph. Everyone was staring; she knew they would notice”’ (Raskin 26). This shows that Sydelle seeked attention; she pretended to have to use crutches because of an incurable disease that she made up and wore bright lipstick in order to get others to notice her. “The secretary to the president of Schultz Sausages was back on the job. Her ankle mended, Sydelle Pulaski had discarded her crutches.” These lines show that Sydelle is not as attention-seeking as she was in the beginning since does not flaunt about her new inheritance and no longer uses the crutches to attract attention. In the end, Sydelle has changed from being an exaggerated drama queen to a modest and more thoughtful
At the beginning, she was trying to tell readers her stories during her medical school experiences and how she felt that due to her disability, how people weren’t giving her equal rights as others and how she overcame those obstacles. With Lisa I. Iezzoni’s reading, it showcases how disability is without a doubt attached to discrimination of disability by separation of identity, people. It adheres to the moral reflection that people need to garner which emphasizes “cultural perspectives on health and illness, social justice, and the moral dimensions of patient encounters.” (Jones, Wear, Friedman, 2014). In turn, health and illness as depicted in a narrative can uncover the truth and contentions of a phenomenon through repeated phrases, metaphors and perspectives as with the case of “Stand Out”.
“Life is 10% what happens to you and 90% how you react to it,” says Charles R. Swindoll. This statement, although seemingly inaccurate, is brought to life by the testimony of Nancy Mairs. After being diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Mairs had every reason to give up on life, but in “On Being a Cripple” she shows her audience that pushing forward was worth the challenge. Her life as a cripple isn’t easy, but through her writing, Mairs hopes to explain and create awareness about her life living with MS. Through her personal experience and positive attitude, Mairs shows her audience that not only is she a source that others can trust but that life is exactly what you make it, no matter what cards you are dealt.
"On Being a Cripple" is an autobiographical essay by Nancy Mairs. The author was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis in her late twenties, and has since then lost full use of several limbs. Despite the stigma around the use of the word, Mairs refers to herself as a "cripple". With the use of this word she attempts to accept the reality of her situation without feeling sorry for herself. The author also demands the same of her readers and the people that she meets in her life. Mairs writes to those who wish to learn more about what it is like to live with this debilitating disease and how people react to it. She uses this essay to make a point about how society labels people while telling her story in a manner which cites examples from her life. She describes her life through everyday situations that occur when living with MS. Mairs does not have the same physical abilities that most of us don't think twice about, but she carries on with her life without the need for pity or a new vocabulary that attempts to make her condition seem less severe.
Outlined within this essay are two sociological theories which have been investigated this will be in conjunction with a contemporary health issue. This then will be related to how the individual’s lifestyle and social class to give the reader a better understanding of this health issue.
Caroline is an interesting character because of an illness that she has had since birth. Her identity has been influenced by her kidney disease as she hasn’t known anything else. It has made her a strong, fearless, yet vulnerable person that has stopped caring about life. Carolines societal impact has also been influenced due to her inability to go to school after her illness worsened. This essay will discuss how Caroline’s societal impact and identity are affected by her disease, social media, as well as, how they were changed by her relationship with Anthony.
The sickness is not something that affects the human body but it is the poverty, violence, unaffordable healthcare, housing crises, food scarcity, and health stigma that has become normal in society. By placing a high value on health and healthcare, the patriarchal society we live in has been able to set a value on people. Thus those which are considered inferior to begin with, such as racial minorities, women or queer people, have a bigger disadvantage. The persons worth is then measured in the ability to sell labor, mediated by identity, and defines our access to the basic needs of life, those who are sick are seen as expendable in exchange of the interest of those who are "well". Hedva states, "To stay alive, capitalism cannot be responsible for our care… its logic of exploitation requires that some of us die” (2015).
The biomedical model of health has been criticised because it fails to include the psychological and social causes relating to an individual’s medical illness or health, looking only at the biological causes (Giddens and Sutton, 2013). Therefore, sociologists being aware of the impacts of social structure and lifestyle on health have put in various efforts to place the study of ‘the social’ at the core of health and healthcare examination.
Health as a Social Construction In my essay, I aim to find out why social construction affects the health of our society. Ill health may be defined as 'a bodily or mental state that is deemed undesirable'. This means that health is the condition of the body both physically and mentally. Social construction of health refers to the way health varies from one society to another.
In conclusion, this critique has critically examined the view that medicine is a form of social control. Discussing the views of theorists such as Talcott Parsons, Ivan Illich, Narvarro, Irving Zola and Foucault. These theorists have views about how dominating medicine can be in society, the power of the professionals and medicalisation how it refers social problems into medical problems. Throughout this critique, it has been made clear that medicine is a form of social control.
Kevin White pp: 5-8k introduction to sociology of health and illness second edition books.goole.co.uk accessed 11-04-2014
According to World Health Organization health is defined as “‘state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease and infirmity’”. The terminology of “sick” and “well” is socially constructed from the community, family, friends, and work. Health is viewed differently on the demographic map, and communities. Gaining brighter insight into the use of health, we begin to understand the sociological perspectives. Functionalist believe that sick role is “societal expectations about the attitude and behavior of a person viewed being ill”. Early influential functionalist emphasis medicine’s role to maintain or even cure a ‘”normal”’ functioning individuals of society. In simple words, the patient or individual would be seeking to get well. It was also understood functionalist believe even disabled people were classified as sick. The downfall with functionalism is they confuse impairment and disability with the “sick role”. Talcott Parson, who is well known for his contribution to functionalism theory, outlined the behavior required of people who are considered sick. In summary he believed they are exempted from their normal, day-to-day activities. Yet they are
However, the importance of social class is increasingly diminishing with proliferate of democracy and human rights. Initially, there was a general notion that some illnesses belonged to certain social ...