Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Observation about small claims court
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Observation about small claims court
The Small Claims Procedure
The small claims procedure is regulated by RSA 503 in 1973. It is a
simple, speedy, and informal method by which an individual appears
before a judge of the district or municipal court, presents his or her
claim, and explains why another person or business owes money to him
or her. Small Claims Court can award up to $5000 in damages (larger
claims can be heard, but the maximum that can be awarded is $5000).
Although not required in Small Claims Court, any persons or businesses
involved in the proceedings may be represented by a lawyer if they
wish. Another aspect of a small claims proceeding is that a judge may
ask to hear any evidence deemed relevant and proper, since the
technical rules of evidence do not apply in a small claims proceeding.
If the small claim exceeds $1500, the person or business being sued
has a right to a jury trial. The defendant must file a written request
for a jury trial within five business days of the filing of the small
claim, unless the municipal or district court grants more time where
the defendant has shown good cause. The small claim will then be
transferred to the Superior Court for resolution.
Disadvantages of small claims
There are long standing concerns about the small claims procedure,
which have not been tackled by the 1999 reforms. Small claims are not
necessarily simple claims; they may involve complex and unusual points
of law. The procedure is not simple enough. The consumers' Association
reported in 2000 that the process was still 'quite an ordeal' and the
level of formality varied widely. The submissions of both the National
Consumer Council and the Na...
... middle of paper ...
...raise to an appeal.
The procedure is quick, simpler and cheaper than the full county court
process, which is helpful to both litigants and the over worked court
system. It gives individuals and small businesses a useful lever
against creditors or for consumer complaints. Without it, threats to
sue over small amounts would b ignored on the basis that going to
court would cost more than the value of the debt or compensation
claimed. Public confidence is also increased, by proving that the
legal system is not only accessible to the rich and powerful.
References:
Law for AQA A-level textbook
As Brian heap
A2 2001
Catherine Elliot and Frances Quinn Seventh edition
First published 2001
A-level textbook GCSE Law
Brian Heap Jacqueline Martin
2001 2001
Seventh edition Second edition
There is one appellant and three respondents involved in these proceedings. Equuscorp Pty Ltd (referred to as “Equuscorp”) is the appellant. Ian Haxton, Robert Bassat and Cunningham’s Warehouse Sales Pty Ltd (referred to as “the respondents”) are the respondents. This matter was heard in the High Court of Australia in front of Chief Justice French and Judges Gummow, Heydon, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell.
The decision of the House of Lords in City of London Building Society v Flegg marks a key stage in how the balance is drawn between occupiers and creditors in priority disputes; the seeds of which were originally planted in the Law of Property Act 1925. It posed a serious challenge to the conventional understanding of overreaching and the machinery of conveyancing.Ref ?
9. Woodgate, R., Black, A., Biggs, J., Owens, D. (2003). Legal Studies for Queensland, Volume 1, ForthEdition, Legal Eagle Publications: Queensland. 10. Woodgate, R., Black, A., Biggs, J., Owens, D. (2003).
Throughout the years there has been limitless legal cases presented to the court systems. All cases are not the same. Some cases vary from decisions that are made by a single judge, while other cases decisions are made by a jury. As cases are presented they typically start off as disputes, misunderstandings, or failure to comply among other things. It is possible to settle some cases outside of the courts, but that does require understanding and cooperation by all parties involved. However, for those that are not so willing to settle out of court, they eventually visit the court system. The court system is not in existence to cause humiliation for anyone, but more so to offer a helping hand from a legal prospective. At the same time, the legal system is not to be abuse. or misused either.
The claimant is a 6 year-old, Armenian female who arrived on time for her evaluation with the mother.
Andrews N, Strangers to Justice No Longer: The Reversal of the Privity Rule under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 (2001) 60 The Cambridge Law Journal 353
and remedies applied by courts of law in civil proceedings giving the plaintiff or claimant relief
A Civil Action The movie A Civil Action brings up an interesting idea that many people in the public don't see or hear about very often. The idea that the big corporations often don't take into account the safety of the people that work for them or the people that live around the factories. These big corporations are run entirely by money and the idea of what things will cost and how much money they can possibly make. Too many times money is more important than the lives of human beings and the people that run these places only see in dollars and cents. The moral issues that this dilemma brings up are immense. This has been happening for centuries since the industrial revolution. Workers were subjected too harsh conditions and unsafe factories so that more goods could be produced. They had children as young as seven and eight years old working 15 hour days. In our modern times, toxic waste now plays a big part in the safety of people. The waste that these companies produce and dump under our noses don't seem to bother them in the least. The way microeconomics effects this must be fully explored to realize the way the corporate world thinks and acts. The goal of any corporation is to make the maximum profit that they can providing a good or service to the community while doing it as inexpensively as possible to them. Too many times producing these goods, toxic by-products are also produced.
A fundamental principle of the Queensland’s Court system is the successful delivering of just outcomes for all stakeholders in any trial. The law has been an integral part of society and continues to be the foundation of a civilian community, where, when applied correctly, many disputes can be resolved in a just manner. This report explores the issue of whether courts are intimidating and out of touch, and if presented so, what improvements have been made to these factors to remain valideffective in the delivering of just outcomes. The information in this report was generated based on thorough online research along with information gathered from a visit to the Queensland Courts.
This essay will examine the main cause of the demise of the derivative claim which is the possibility of pursuing a corporate relief and even costs via an unfair prejudice petition, a relief and order that was initially only available via derivative action. Further this essay will discuss as to how the boundaries between the statutory derivative action and the unfair prejudice should be drawn and what restrictions should be added to the unfair prejudice remedy under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 so that the significance of the statutory derivative action can be reinstated.
The case of R v Hughes will be used throughout this essay to supplement ...
In Krell v. Henry {1903} a plea of frustration succeeded because the court held that the common purpose for which the contact was entered into, could no longer be carried out. But in the same year for similar set of facts, the Court of Appeal decided in Herne Bay v. Hutton [1903] that the contract had not been frustrated because the "common formation of the contract" had not changed. It clearly was a policy decision which shows the reluctance of the courts to provide an escape route for a party for whom the contract ha...
WE can however, accommodate mechanisms which operate as additional or subsidiary processes in the discharge of sovereign responsibility. These enable the court system to devote its precious time and resources to the more solemn task of administering justice in the name of sovereign." Street, The language of alternative dispute resolution' (1992) 66 Australian Law Journal, 1994.
The courts access these previous judgements through the system of Law reporting. The system of precedents could not work without a precise and comprehensive compilation of the key decisions of superior courts readily available to all who need them. Authoritative reports compiled by legally qualified law reporters are formed prima...
The courts of England and Wales acknowledge that the above must be something of value, in order to amount to consideration. A valuable consideration in the perspective of the English La...