The Similarities Between Bismarck And Camillo Cavour

Otto von Bismarck and Camillo Cavour had the same goal: for their county to become the most powerful country in Europe. Bismarck, a military officer turned politician, was trying to unify Prussia, while Cavour, a newspaper editor turned prime minister, was trying to do the same to Italy. As great minds think alike, these men often times used similar tactics in different ways. As a result, these two men are credited with the unifications of their countries. Bismarck and Cavour both had motives behind their actions. Bismarck was inspired by the need for change when he saw the conflicts arising in the constitution of the German Confederation. He decided that the way to unification was in physical action, not speeches and treatises. Cavour had founded a movement called the Risorgimento, which means resurgence. This movement was created to bring the Italian nation back to glory. He became a prime minister of Sardinia-Piedmont in 1852 which gave him the opportunity to seek Italian unification. Otto von Bismarck had a strategy during

Both men were incredibly calculating and intelligence. Because of this, they both achieve their similar goal in different ways. The main difference between Bismarck and Cavour was the use of violence. Both men knew their limits. Bismarck was known to accomplish his goals by military terms through war. Cavour, too, took part in wars and battles, but not as often or as many as Bismarck. Cavour could not unify by means of force, so he found others ways, while Bismarck had access to a strong military and allies. Otto von Bismarck and Camillo de Cavour have influenced the world. Their methods and tactics have impacted military and political aspects of countries around the globe. Their different tactics show people that war and brute force alone does achieve goals. Both men will be remembered for their impeccable skills and ideas throughout