The Seven Criterias Of Just War

106 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Wars throughout time

Dr. Land’s seven criteria of just war have proven themselves justifiable throughout history. Though these criteria are proven and researched, they still have not convinced everyone in the Christian community that there is such a thing as just war (Land). Some people will continually see war as a bad thing, no matter how dire the circumstances. Even though the return of Christ and the creation of a new heaven and new Earth will be the result of war, people fail to see its value in society. As long as there is sin, there will be war; as long as there is God, He will justify

Show More
Related

  • My Brother Sam Is Dead Character Analysis

    833 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the novel, My Brother Sam is Dead, by James and Christopher Collier, they teach that there are many other ways to solve conflict besides war. War is violent, disgusting, and gruesome and so many people die in war. Families separate in war because of how many people want to be in the thrill of the war and also how many innocent family members die in the midst of war. Lastly, war is worthless and it was caused by a disagreement over something little and the outcome of war is not worth the many lives, time, and money and there are other ways to solve conflict besides to fight. War causes so many negative outcomes on this world that it needs to be avoided at all costs.

    Read More

  • Christian Teachings on the Just War

    945 Words  | 2 Pages

    2) The cause must be just. This is jus ad bellum because you decide if

    Read More

  • Catch-22: “The Last Good War” in All Its Absurdity

    1012 Words  | 3 Pages

    Published in 1961, Joseph Heller’s Catch-22 is a satire of war with a twist. Heller wrote his narrative nonlinearly. Although certain critics described the novel as “disorganized, unreadable and crass”, the mismatched chronology complements Heller’s style of writing and draws the reader’s interest. One key point of Catch-22, the catch-22 paradox, makes use of the nonlinear structure to encircle the reader in the contradictions. In addition, Heller’s style of writing provides a point of viewing different from most novels. While the narrative may seem complex and overwhelming at first, the reader learns to appreciate the subtleties of Heller’s labyrinthine plot.

    Read More

  • Analysis of Karl Friday's Samurai, Warfare and the State in Early Medieval Japan

    1648 Words  | 4 Pages

    This takes us to the concept of just war. Aristotle saw just war as a means to a higher goal. You don't just fight the war to win the war there needs to be a purpose to fighting the war. He goes on to tell us how others view just war. The Romans said war was just only when conducted by the state, and only accompanied by a declaration of hostilities, meaning war had to be declared on someone. Rebellions and revolutions were not considered just wars. The Japanese did not define when war was just or proper. Early Christians rejected war; this came from the effort to be more Christ like, the Golden Rule, due unto others as you would have them do to you. Later the Christians could no longer be pacifists; they were going to have to go to war sometime after Constantine became emperor and declared Christianity as the main religion of the time.

    Read More

  • James Boswell On War Analysis

    380 Words  | 1 Pages

    Generally, war results from arguments between nations over things like land, power, money, or religion. War over religion contradicts religion itself. In the passage titled “On War”, James Boswell states, “That amiable religion which “proclaims peace on earth,” hath not as yet made war to cease.” If religion proclaims peace on earth, then war goes against those morals.

    Read More

  • An Analysis of the War Powers Act

    2205 Words  | 5 Pages

    “When war is thrust upon the nation, the President had not only the authority but the responsibility to ‘resist force by force.’” –U.S. Supreme Court ruling of the Prize Cases, 1862 (67 U.S. 6335).

    Read More

  • Christians' Justifications of Using Nuclear Weapons

    549 Words  | 2 Pages

    by God you will see that God was opposed to war, violence and any form

    Read More

  • Opposition to the Vietnam War

    2708 Words  | 6 Pages

    Many, including the Catholic Church, judge the justifications of a war based on several factors given in the “just war theory,” which is used to evaluate the war based on its causes and means. The first required factor is a just cause, meaning that a nation’s decision to begin a war must be due to “substantial aggression” brought about by the opposition which cannot be resolved through non-violent solutions without excessive cost whereas armed conflict is not hopeless or excessively costly (“Just War Theory”1). In most cases, wars are started for a reason; however, many of these reasons are for the benefit of the governments who start the wars. The just war theory is widely accepted as a way to determine the moral standing of the reasons. This part of the theory is to ensure that the objective of a war is a reasonable and moral one. It prevents the needless bloodshed and loss of human lives over petty disputes while still protecting the rights and lives of the innocent by acknowledging the necessity of war in dire situations.

    Read More

  • Just War Theory Essay

    763 Words  | 2 Pages

    The just war theory is described by Thomas Massaro in his book Living Justice as the “principle that warfare might be justified under certain conditions” (108). The complexities involved with international relations makes determining a just war very difficult. Even though historically pacifism hasn’t gained much traction within Catholic circles, it currently is gaining popularity with many mainstream Catholics. With so many differing views on military action, one might ask, “What determines a just war? How can we balance the need for peace with self-defense?” An examination of criteria for a just war and critiques written on this topic might shed light on these two questions.

    Read More

  • Analysis of Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations

    1192 Words  | 3 Pages

    part in official argument about war" (Walzer XI). He proceeds to discuss in a greater

    Read More

  • The necessity of moral suspension in times of war

    817 Words  | 2 Pages

    War is on some level a game. Usually there is two sides, making moves and taking turns. The only difference is, there are no rules in war. War is a game without rules, without mercy, without emotion. Although certain situations require human emotion and interaction, war is most productive when all emotion is removed and as humans we just perform. Emotionless, robotic, cold, ruthless, and morally indestructible; these are the traits of the ultimate war culture. War on any level is impossible without first burying personal principals and destroying the moral compass.

    Read More

  • War in Christianity and Islam

    622 Words  | 2 Pages

    Does such a combination of words as "a war in the name of God" make sense? The main principles, which underlie Christianity and Islam, are those of goodness, kindness, lack of aggression and respecting certain moral laws. Christianity and Islam provide human society with a code of ethics, which totally rejects war because it is something violent, inhumane and cruel. Still, over the course of human history many wars have been justified with religion and with imposing the "right faith". Because of misunderstanding of certain parts of religion or deliberate misuse of it European and Islamic states have often used violence to fulfill their goals.

    Read More

  • Grotius Standards For Just War Summary

    720 Words  | 2 Pages

    Summarize Grotius’ standards for just war. Grotius was quick to explain that a nation must have a just cause prior to initiating hostilities. The nation considering armed conflict must have identified an injury received that can only be redressed with war. Just cause not only encompasses violations to a state or its population by an opposing state but also those inflicted by the ruler to its own population (Christopher, 2004). Grotius writes that when a ruler “inflicts upon his subjects such treatments as no one is warranted in inflicting” (Grotius, 1962) a just cause for war has been established.

    Read More

  • Ethics in War Are Necessary

    815 Words  | 2 Pages

    War has always been, and will always be, a necessary action perpetrated by man. There are many reasons for war: rage, passion, greed, defense, and religion to name a few. When differences cannot be solved or compromised through mediation with an opposing party, war is the last remaining option. Muslim historian Ibn Khaldun wrote in fourteenth-century Spain, that “War is a universal and inevitable aspect of life, ordained by God to the same extent as the sky and the earth, the heat and the cold. The question of whether to fright is not a significant moral question because fighting is constant; the minor decision not to fight this war will be made only in the context of knowing that another war will present itself soon enough because it is simply always there.” (Peter S. Themes. The Just War)

    Read More

  • The Moral and Legal Obligations of Battlefield Neutrality

    1819 Words  | 4 Pages

    “If a body of enemy troops is repulsed, give to the wounded the same care as you would give your own men; treat them all the forbearance due to the one who is stricken…After the battle, restrain the fury of your troops; spare the vanquished…People should say of you: they fought courageously when they had to, but remained generous and humane throughout.” –General Guillaume Henri Dufour (Moorehead, 1998)

    Read More

More about The Seven Criterias Of Just War

Open Document