The Seizure of Trump's Jet

1428 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Role of community in society

The Seizure of Trump's Jet The question has been presented: "Would it be right for a government to impound and sell one of Donald Trump's many Learjets in order to pay for a life saving cancer treatment?" A restatement of this question may be : Would it be right for the government to seize the property of any man in order to benefit the society at large? The answer to this question is not a simple one. The inquiry immediately brings to light several layered questions concerning the matter. One might look first into the natural rights of man. What rights does man have according to nature? Secondly, one must consider the rights of a man as part of a society or one who has entered into a social contract. The third aspect up for observation is the code of the particular society of which that man is a part, in this case the United States of America. Each of these views compounded might yield an accurate picture on whether or not an action of the sort, seizure of private property for the public good, would be right, morals not taken into account. However, with morals taken into consideration, the complexity of attaining an answer may compound with every moral theory. Several people have attempted to answer the above questions among them Rousseau, the writers of French Revolutionary documents, the authors of the United States Declaration of Independence and Constitution, and Hume in the context of morality. All persons seem to agree that man is born with some semblance of "natural rights" though they disagree on exactly what these rights are and their relevance. They also see the need for society and social contracts, yet they argue the point on exactly what should be included in such contracts and their conditions. ... ... middle of paper ... ...ll as property (Enquiry, p28)." From this point of view, such actions would be wrong. Under natural law a person's property may be taken at any time, so he enters into a society and a social contract. As part of the social contract he makes his goods and services available to the society in return for the benefits of being a member of the society. This view is also reiterated in The Constitution of the United States, of which Donald Trump is a citizen. Probable cause is given to take some of his excessive property. This action is also supported by Hume, assuming that Trump was not singled out because he is rich. Returning to the specific question at hand, is it right for a government to seize a man's, Donald Trump's, private property to serve the public good, the answer is YES, according to natural right, societal right, United States law, and Hume's morals.

Show More
Related

  • Patterson, Foner, And King's Typological Analysis Of Freedom

    824 Words  | 2 Pages

    Foner argues four philosophies of freedom. He favors the term “rights” a well-recognized word by the nation’s leaders on the eve of the Civil War. The natural rights were rights or freedoms inherited within humanity. Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence regarded natural rights as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Civil rights can be defined as equality of management under the law, which is perceived as critical to the protection of natural rights. Political rights include the

    Read More

  • The Waco Incident

    4653 Words  | 10 Pages

    My name is Jim, just Jim it’s easier this way, and I was one of the nine survivors in the Waco compound standoff. Before I go into what I think went wrong to our religious sanctuary, let me tell you how I met David and a little about our great deciple.

    Read More

  • The Practicality of the Social Contract

    2194 Words  | 5 Pages

    Society’s structure has been debated and contested as far back as ancient Greece. Since then, man has developed social systems that greatly differ from anything the ancients had in mind. One such system is the social contract theory, which first came to prominence around the time of the enlightenment. Simplified, social contractarians argued that in order to achieve a balanced and stable society, all of its members must sacrifice certain liberties to a government or similar authority. As Rousseau explains, the contract begins when “Each of us places his person and all his power in common under the supreme direction of the general will” (148). Essentially, it is an agreement between the rulers and the ruled that produces a stable political state. John Locke’s The Second Treatise of Government and Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s The Social Contract are both enlightenment works that detail contractarianism, yet each has a unique and different way of considering the social contract. Although John Stuart Mill is also known for his work with Utilitarianism, his essay On Liberty considers consent and other issues relating to contract theory. These authors provide different insights into the social contract, and frequently one will reject another’s idea and offer a new solution. Even after this meshing of ideas and solutions, contract theory falls short of practicality. The idea is appealing, appearing on the surface as a fair and just way of governance. However, true liberty cannot arise from a contract, as man cannot be “forced to be free” (150). There are two fundamental flaws with contractarianism: it is not practical and it ignores human nature, and even if were possible to establish a true contract-based society, the citi...

    Read More

  • Hobbes Vs Rousseau Social Contract Essay

    572 Words  | 2 Pages

    39). This showing a slight similarity to the right of nature by Hobbes. That is, until man is forged into community and civilization. In which the matter of liberty forces certain individuals into chains. How individuals satisfied their state of nature during the development of communities changes to what he describes the descent from the State of Nature. Private property or slavery exemplifies that man surrenders not to the sovereign of one but that of the interest of General Will. As individuals become apart of the civil state liberty is determined by the agreement of laws under the social contract. By abiding by these common laws certain liberty is masked by obedience. While the sovereign suggests unity under General it reveals inequality that men have among each other.

    Read More

  • Locke and Rousseau

    1787 Words  | 4 Pages

    Locke and Rousseau present themselves as two very distinct thinkers. They both use similar terms, but conceptualize them differently to fulfill very different purposes. As such, one ought not be surprised that the two theorists do not understand liberty in the same way. Locke discusses liberty on an individual scale, with personal freedom being guaranteed by laws and institutions created in civil society. By comparison, Rousseau’s conception portrays liberty as an affair of the entire political community, and is best captured by the notion of self-rule. The distinctions, but also the similarities between Locke and Rousseau’s conceptions can be clarified by examining the role of liberty in each theorist’s proposed state of nature and civil society, the concepts with which each theorist associates liberty, and the means of ensuring and safeguarding liberty that each theorist devises.

    Read More

  • Exploring Rousseau's Discourse on Natural Humanity

    1559 Words  | 4 Pages

    In his book A Discourse on Inequality, Jean- Jacques Rousseau turns to the state of nature in search of the real “essence” of man. What made humans to be humans? Rousseau is trying to determine the prodigious events, such as the acquisition of knowledge and errors, the mutations that took place in the constitution of the body, and the constant impact of the passions that eventually led to the separation of man between the state of nature and society (67). He describes how as time change, humanity change as well. He figures that if by first looking into the origin of man, it can lead to the “source of inequality among men” and the unnatural ways man has evolved to become (67).

    Read More

  • The Philosophy of John Locke

    1503 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Locke’s state of nature, men exist in a “state of perfect freedom” over their actions, possessions, and persons, within the law of nature (Locke 269). They do not depend on other men for anything. This complete intellectual and physical freedom is a natural state, but is not a perfect state. Locke acknowledges that full freedom, without a government to moderate it, doe...

    Read More

  • Social Contract Theory: Natural Rights and Personhood Within Democracy

    1397 Words  | 3 Pages

    Following the disambiguation of this term and identifying its necessary characteristics, it will be essential to discuss how and why these characteristics can fail to be instantiated to the full extent within man’s physical form. While it is possible that all men are born with the seeds of these characteristics from a divine creator; there remains the fact that it is possible for them to be taken away or separated from the physical form of a man. Therefore, it seems to follow that some environments, or societal systems, are favorable for the development of these characteristics of personhood, and by extension natural rights. For many reasons, which will be discussed in greater depth, democracy as it is implemented within the United States is the system that is best equipped t...

    Read More

  • Locke and the Legitimacy of the State: Right vs. Good

    704 Words  | 2 Pages

    Consequently, since all human beings have certain moral rights to health, liberty, and possessions; they also have the right to enforce the protection of those rights by way of punishing violators. And it is in this maintaining of ones own rights that it is necessary for man to initially come together and form a social contract. By forming a social contract they are agreeing to sustain from living purely in a state of nature. According to Locke, living in such a state of nature is ‘inconvienent’, for there is no common ground by which to appropriately judge an individual who infringes upon another person natural rights (Christman 43). Therefore, one can not ‘effectively enjoy’ their own rights until they join under a ‘common political authority’ (44).

    Read More

  • Rousseau's Theory Of Alienation

    1222 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rousseau’s version of the social contract depends on his characteristics of “the state of nature”. Rousseau once said “Man is born

    Read More

  • Difference Between John Locke And Rousseau

    1750 Words  | 4 Pages

    In The Social Contract philosophers John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau discuss their differences on human beings’ place of freedom in political societies. Locke’s theory is when human beings enter society we tend to give up our natural freedom, whereas Rousseau believes we gain civil freedom when entering society. Even in modern times we must give up our natural freedom in order to enforce protection from those who are immoral and unjust.

    Read More

  • Rights-Based Ethics In Health And Social Care

    490 Words  | 1 Pages

    Rights-based ethics says that every individual should be given certain entitlements, liberties and protections. There are two major divisions that are natural and conventional as well as positive and negative. Natural rights relate to humanity and is considered moral rights. Conventional rights are related to specific social context and are created by humans. Positive rights (benefit rights) relate to duties of assistance as it is a person’s right to receive welfare. Negative rights (liberty rights) relate duties of non-interference of others as it is a right for a person not to be killed. It can be seen that benefit rights impose a cost on others such an obligation to do something whereas liberty rights do not impose a cost on others and choices must be respected. A rights-based approach says that certain acts are always wrong regardless of the benefits. It would be wrong to kill one person in order to save the lives of several more.

    Read More

  • Edmund Burke's Notion Of Natural Rights

    730 Words  | 2 Pages

    Edmund Burke rejects the notion of natural rights because, as described in Reflections on the Revolution in France, he finds a lack of concrete basis to support their existence. That is, Burke analyses where rights are derived from, and finds no objective origin to the natural rights proposed by the likes of John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Burke directly juxtaposes this against the clear basis for legal rights, as legal rights are given power by legal declaration distilled from the wisdom of the ages. The – at his time – relatively new notions of natural rights, however, lacked any such clear basis for existence, and thus Burke thought to question why they should be treated to exist at all and to discuss the potentially dangerous – to

    Read More

  • Liberal Democracy Essay

    1667 Words  | 4 Pages

    ” (Hernandez 2013b, 16) In Locke’s words, he says that all men are created equal by God and have natural rights to life, liberty and property, including their body nature and for its purpose of self-preservation. Once the societies are formed, men will no longer able to take control in their hands because the purpose of the government is to protect each individual’s natural right and also to provide for the common good. Liberty means as an individual we have the freedom that we can take our responsibility in matters in our hands. It is relevant to us as a human being to have rights of our own than to have the government making decision for us. The challenge of balancing the government needs for individual freedom and legitimacy is the people feel that they have the rights to speak and take priority into their

    Read More

  • The Notion of Human Rights

    1083 Words  | 3 Pages

    The 18th century Enlightenment influenced change in the notion of human rights through the rising belief of reason which allowed conflicts between humans to be resolved (“Human Rights”). John Locke, an English philosopher, was an essential advocate of that belief and demonstrated the notion of rights which was obligated to every person (“Human Rights”). He believed in many human rights including those of life, liberty, and property (“Human Rights”). Furthermore, he stated that people should follow society's laws while upholding their individual rights (“Human Rights”). Lastly, Locke believed that if society fails to protect the person's rights, the people are able to establish a revolution that will protect those rights (“Human Rights”).

    Read More

More about The Seizure of Trump's Jet

Open Document