Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relevance of the united nations security council
Importance of the UN security council
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The relevance of the united nations security council
The world is at a point where people have to question if they feel safe, and if they do, why they feel safe? The answers will vary, but more than likely, the United States, not the United Nations, will be the answer. The Security Council was made to keep peace among the world, and the concept of it was a great idea in theory. The world needs protection from the horrors of genocide, the death from terrorists, and the corruption of governments that can create many issues. However, in recent years the United States has led the charge for the war on terror, while the U.N. Security Council has sat at a stalemate over the issue. Change is needed in the United Nations Security Council for it to return to the relevancy that it was always suppose to have and to move past the issue of personal problems.
When one of the P-5 or permanent members is not trying to control the situation, the council can normally agree to pass cease-fire directives (United Nations Department of Public Information, 2004). There are three other preventative ways the U.N. Security Council will try, to prevent a hostile conflict: preventative disarmament, preventative deployment, and preventative diplomacy. Preventative disarmament is when the U.N. goes into a country and lowers the number of weapons that nations has. The United Nations Department of Public Information (2004) went on to justify preventative disarmament by saying, “Destroying yesterday’s weapons prevents their being used in tomorrow’s wars” (pp. 71). Preventative deployment is when a peacekeeping force is sent to simply keep each side away from each other, a form of time out. The best example of preventative deployment is cited in an article from the Defense Department by Segal and Eyre (199...
... middle of paper ...
...dis Refuse U.N. Security Council Seat. International Herald Tribune . Retrieved February 28, 2014, from http://ezproxy.nicc.edu:2063
Moore, Jr., J. A., & Pubantz, J. (2002). Encyclopedia of the United Nations. New York: Facts On File.
Natsios, A. S. (2012). Sudan, South Sudan, and Darfur: what everyone needs to know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rigg, B. (2013, May 6). Chemical Weapons, the Middle East, the UN Security Council and Now, Syria.openDemocracy. Retrieved February 28, 2014, from http://ezproxy.nicc.edu:2063
U.N. Security Council Reform. (2005, February 4). Issues and Controversies on File. Retrieved March 8, 2014, from http://ezproxy.nicc.edu:2062/article/i10000
Veto Power in the United Nations Security Council (sidebar). (2014, April 5). Issues and Controversies on File. Retrieved March 8, 2014, from http://ezproxy.nicc.edu:2062/article/ib100053
Jouejati, Murhaf. “Syrian Motives for Its WMD Programs and What to Do about Them.” Middle
18 May 2006. . War Powers Resolution -. 15 May 2006. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 18 May 2006. .
Stefan A. Riesenfeld, “The Powers of Congress and the President in International Relations: Revisited”, California Law Review 75, no. 1 (January, 1987): 405-14, accessed May 21, 2014, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3480586.
The Darfur case however, revealed that both of these strategies are not effective. Responding to the genocide in Darfur, the US officials declared the label genocide to be occurring. Thereafter, a politically civil-society coalition emerged so as to lobby the administration. The net outcome of these two scenarios however was the same in the absence of effective policies that could halt the genocide. The Rwandan genocide has always acted as the point of reference for similar genocides taking place around the world. Since the 2003 crisis in Darfur, a lot of comparisons have been made to Rwandan genocide. Observers have likened the Darfur genocide to what happened in Rwanda and of course giving it two connotations. First, the violence in the western parts of Sudan has been referred to another Rwanda, by basing their arguments on the nature of the violence. Since whatever was happening in Darfur is similar t...
The system the UN currently has offers some perspective on the idea of conducting and participating in war. But...
Mingst, K. A. (2011). Essentials of international relations. (5th ed., p. 81). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
The United Nations. Resolution 36/103 of the UN General Assembly (1981). N.p.: n.p., n.d. Print.
Reeves, Eric, Massimo Calabresi, Sam Dealey, and Stephan Faris. “The Tragedy of Sudan.” Time. Time Inc, 4 Oct. 2004. Web and Print. 15 April 2014. .
...lecting convincing evidence that Syria has used Sarin gas in Ghouta, Syria. Currently, diplomacy has prevailed; the Security Council has shown rare unity on Syria by passing Resolution 2118 requiring Syria to destroy its current stockpile of chemical weapons and prohibits Syria from using, developing, stockpiling, or transferring any chemical weapons. Syria by not agreeing to these terms will face penalties under Chapter Seven of the United Nations Charter. Syrian government has yet to defy the resolution and the OPCW has declared they have successfully destroyed the sites used for production of the chemical weapons it remains to be seen whether the 2014 deadline for destroying Syria’s current stockpile of ammunition will be met in light of the ongoing destabilizing conditions. Despite this amount of progress fighting between the regime and rebels has continued on.
Tadesse, Debay. Post-independence South Sudan: the challenges ahead. ISPI-ISTITUTO PER GU STUDI DI POLITICA INTERNAZIONALE. February 2012.no.46.
14 UN Press Release SG/SM/7360, echoing Lloyd Axworthy, ‘Forward’ in David Cortright and George A. Lopez, The Sanctions Decade: Assessing UN Strategies in the 1990s (A Project of the International Peace Academy; Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2000)
Lawson, Fred H. "Syria." Politics & society in the contemporary Middle East. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2010. 411 - 434. Print.
Consequences of intervention can include the loss of lives from an otherwise uninvolved country, the spread of violence, and the possibility of inciting conflict over new problems, just to name a few (Lecture, 11/15/16). For example, John Mueller considers the potential negative consequences of intervention prove that they are insignificant to the cause of humanitarian intervention as a whole. Moreover, with intervention into ethnic conflicts, the outcome, no matter how positive, is overshadowed by a gross exaggeration of negative consequences (Mueller). In both Yugoslavia and Rwanda the solution, to Mueller appeared simple, a well ordered and structured militarized presence was all that was required to end the conflict (Mueller). If this is the case, when discussing whether or not intervention is necessary the political elite must not over-exaggerate the difficulty.
Australia in the United Security Council has shown in its commitments in enhancing the adherence of the international law to ensure there is no conflict and ensuring peace is maintained. This is evident from its continued support for the Internation...
Fifty-one countries established the United Nations also known as the UN on October 24, 1945 with the intentions of preserving peace through international cooperation and collective security. Over the years the UN has grown in numbers to include 185 countries, thus making the organization and its family of agencies the largest in an effort to promote world stability. Since 1954 the UN and its organizations have received the Nobel Peace Prize on 5 separate occasions. The first in 1954 awarded to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva, for its assistance to refugees, and finally in 1988 to the United Nations Peace-keeping Forces, for its peace-keeping operations. As you can see, the United Nations efforts have not gone without notice.