Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of savings
Importance of savings
The importance of saving money
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of savings
Published on the cover of the May 2016 issue of The Atlantic is an article titled “The Secret Shame of Middle-Class Americans,” in which one journalist writes about his own financial struggles, the embarrassment of what he calls “financial impotence,” the “social suicide” of struggling financially, and the inability of 47% of middle class Americans to easily obtain $400 in an emergency (Gabler 2016). Of course, as with any touchy subject, this article had both its’ supports and its’ critics. Scott Winship’s response on nationalreview.com titled “The Middle Class is Doing Okay: No Need for Gloom and Doom” (2016) attacks Gabler’s idea that the odds are stacked against the middle class. Winship cites Gabler’s personal financial choices as the main reason for his financial plight, contradicts most of the statistics presented in the The Atlantic article, and instead advocates the benefits of frugality; insisting the economy is not, in fact, working against the middle class. I would disagree with Winship however, as would the countless studies by sociologists and economists alike. …show more content…
Incomes have largely been stagnant, while prices for crucial items, such as education, health care, and housing, have risen rapidly. Consequently, the middle class is increasingly anxious about its economic future” (Weller 2006:37). So what are some of the causes of this trend of economic inequality and dissatisfaction, and what can we do about it? You can take a peek into that conundrum by investigating Rana Foroohar’s May 2016 TIME magazine article “Saving Capitalism,” which is a brief overview of what she discusses in her new book, Makers and
In Confronting Inequality, Paul Krugman discusses the cost of inequality and possible solutions. Krugman argues to say that it is a fantasy to believe the rich live just like the middle class. Then, he goes into detail about how middle class families struggle to try to give their children a better life and how education plays a factor in children’s future lives. For example, children’s ability to move into higher education could be affected by their parents economic status. Also, He discusses how politicians play a role in the inequality, because most of politicians are in the upper economic class. Finally, Krugman says how we could possibly have solutions to these various inequalities, but how America won’t get
Smith, Noah. “How to Fix America's Wealth Inequality: Teach Americans to Be Cheap.” The Atlantic. Atlantic Pub., 12 March 2013. Web. 06 April 2014. .
The media portrays the upper class as something to strive for. Obtaining wealth and material possessions will bring you a happy life. The only way to get ahead is to emulate the rich and powerful and to live vicariously through them (Kendall 316). The media’s emphasis on the upper class takes away from people living life for themselves. Instead, they are persuaded to obtain a lifestyle that is realistically out of their means. Kendall states, “Largely through marketing and advertising, television promoted the myth of the classless society, offering on one hand the images of the American dream fulfilled wherein any and everyone can become rich and on the other suggesting that the lived experience of this lack of class hierarchy was expressed by our equal right to purchase anything we could afford”. Exaggerated views of the rich and successful in America are largely portrayed via television. Which gives a false idea of what happiness, wealth and material possessions can bring (Kendall 317). The poor and homeless are at the bottom of the class structure and are often overlooked, ignored and only portrayed as deserving of sympathy. They are stereotyped to be people who have problems such as drugs or alcohol (Kendall 318). Kendall goes on to explain that the middle class is considered the “working class” and are
The essay “RIP the Middle Class: 1946-2013” was written by Edward McClelland. Edward McClelland is an American journalist. In this essay, McClelland is trying to prove a point that at some point there wouldn’t be the middle class and there would only be the rich and the poor, unless the government intervenes to balance out the economy.
Taking Sides Summary-Analysis Form. Title and Author of Article: Christopher Jencks. Briefly state the main idea of this article: The main idea of this article is that economic inequality has steadily risen in the United States between the richest people and the poorest people. And this inequality affects the people in more ways than buying power; it also affects education, life expectancy, living conditions and possibly happiness.
Edward McClelland focuses his essay RIP, the Middle Class: 1946-2013 on how the middle class is no longer able to thrive if the actions of the government continue – or their nonexistent
the middle and upper class. The essay was first presented in the winter of 2006.
The concept of the "working poor" has gained prominence in the post-welfare reform era. As welfare rolls shrunk, the focus shifted from the dependent poor to the working poor. It was obvious that without substantial outside support, even families with full-time low-wage workers were still earning less than the official poverty line. And while American society purports that anyone can prosper if they work hard enough, it became apparent that with inadequate opportunity or bad luck, a growing number of families could not attain the American dream, or even break the cycle of poverty. The new challenge for American social policy is to help the working poor lift themselves out of poverty. That's why progressives who supported ending welfare as we know it have set a new goal -- the government should "make work pay" so that no one who works full time is poor.
As stated by Franklin D. Roosevelt, “the test of our progression is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little.” Many people may agree with this statement considering that the United States is such a wealthy country and in 2012, 46.5 million people were living in poverty in the United States and 15% of all Americans and 21.8% of children under age eighteen were in poverty.The honest truth is that many people do not know the conditions this group of people must live in on a daily basis because of the small number of people who realize the struggle there is not a great amount of service. In the article Too stressed for Success, the author Kevin Clarke asks the question “What is the cost of being poor in America?” and follows the question by explaining the great deals of problems the community of poverty goes through daily by saying, “Researchers have long known that because of a broad reduction in retail and other consumer choices experienced by America's poor, it is often simply more expensive to be poor in the United States.
The United States, a place where anyone can “pick themselves up by the bootstraps” and realize the American dream of a comfortable lifestyle. Well, for over 30 million Americans this is no longer possible. Though we live in the richest and most powerful country in the world there are many who are living under or at the precipice of the poverty level, “While the United States has enjoyed unprecedented affluence, low-wage employees have been testing the American doctrine that hard work cures poverty” (The Working Poor, 4). This translates to families of four making around 18,850$ a year. And as soon as they find work or move just slightly above that 18,850$ a year (which is still a meager and deprived way to live) they are cut off from welfare checks and other “benefits”, “they [working poor] lose other supports designed to help them such as food stamps and health insurance, leaving them no better off-and sometimes worse off-than when they were not working” (The Working Poor, 40). The working poor find themselves in a trap of dead-end, minimum wage jobs, and complicated, under funded government programs.
In the United States there are four social classes : the upper class, the middle class, the working class, and the lower class. Of these four classes the most inequality exists between the upper class and the lower class. This inequality can be seen in the incomes that the two classes earn. During the period 1979 through the present , the growth in income has disproportionately grown.The bottom sixty percent of the US population actually saw their real income decrease in 1990 dollars. The next 20% saw medium gains. The top twenty percent saw their income increase 18%. The wealthiest one percent saw their incomes rise drastically over 80%. As reported in the 1997 Center on Budget's analysis , the wealthiest one percent of Americans ( 2.6 million people) received as much after-tax income in 1994 as the bottom 35 percent of the population combined (88 million people). But in 1977 the bottom 35 percent had about twice as much after tax income as the top one percent. These statistics further show the disproportional income growth among the social classes. The gr...
While the the 1%, are secured, no one is addressing the rest of the people. As the economy flourishes, housing, higher education and health care, and child care increases with it to the point where 30 percent of a person’s income goes towards housing. People are finding it impossible to purchase a house with their middle class incomes. People begin to fall out of the once stable middle class because too much is needed to be sacrificed in order to live in a stable home. In the shrinking middle class, “40% or more of the residents live below the poverty
The most often cited cause of the decline of the middle class in the United States is stagnant wages. Between 1955 and 1970, real wages adjusted and inflation rose by an average of 2.5 percent per year. Between 1971 and 1994, the average growth of real wages was 0.3 percent a year. The stagnation of wages has been especially noticeable to middle-class people, who rely very much on the money they make at their jobs. Recessions seem to hit higher income households much harder, which sends them down to the middle class. Middle-income households may or may not be more likely than higher-income households to qualify for unemployment compensation when jobs are scarce. But those who do are more likely than high-income households to receive benefits that replace a greater share of their regular wages, which helps them maintai...
In Paul Krugman’s, Confronting Inequality, he illustrates how economic inequality affects America, as well as identifies steps to resolve the gap between the upper elite and lower class. He claims that economic growth has gone to the wealthy minority; meanwhile, there is a lack of economic growth for lower and middle-class families. The upper elite can afford to stay a night at a luxury hotel with an eleven thousand dollar per night rate, while middle class families are buying homes they cannot afford, so their children can be placed in good schools.
However, in recent years, the share of income possessed by the middle class has fallen to a historically low level. Fairchild states, "The middle 60 percent of households earned 53.2 percent of national income in 1968. That number has fallen to just 45.7 percent (¶2)." Interestingly enough, another figure that fell at the same rate was union membership. Because of laws limiting Union power, membership had fallen to an all time low in recent years with 11.3 percent. There are many reasons that these two might correlate. First, unions insured access to a livable minimum wage. This increased income along with health benefits and pension plans makes for a vibrant middle class (Fairchild ¶1-3). Not only do the members of unions benefit, but the presence of unions also raises pay for non-union workers in the same industries. Unions not only raise the floor on wages, but it also lowers the ceiling on the richest of our country. Because of union 's bargaining powers, the compensation of executives at those firms are moderated. It goes without saying, the middle class is at its strongest with unions. If unions continue to lose members and if unions continue to lose their bargaining power, the economic inequality will continue to