Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on bigfoot
Cryptids
A Cryptid is a creature or even a plant that’s existence has been suggested but has not been discovered or documented by the scientific community (Wikipedia.com). Cryptids are known to be part of legends, old wise tales, and mythology. Cryptozoology is a pseudoscience that involves the search for animals whose existence has not yet been proven. This kind of search includes searching for animals that are said to already be extinct. Cryptids was term made by John Wall in 1983 who sent a letter to the International Society of Cryptozoology. The prefix of “crypt- is Greek and means “hidden”(Wikipedia.com) The stories of these animals that I will be talking about include Bigfoot.
The science community has separated themselves for cryptozoology do to the fact that the evidence that is provided is weak, and wouldn’t hold up against the scientific research. Still some scientists can’t completely dismiss the claims that there are animals that there are specific cases of animals that have gone unrecognized by science (Wikipedia.com). There is a classification system that George M. Eberhart part of the American Library Association, who has written for the Journal of Scientific Exploration. This written piece for the journal discussed how difficult it was to categorize the media materials about fringe science. The classification system that Eberhart came up with has 10 types of mystery animals under the crytozoological umbrella (Wikipedia.com). The classifications are as followed and are found in his book called Mysterious Creatures. 1. Distribution anomalies, animals known as animals reported outside their normal range. 2. Undescribed, unusual, or outsized variations of know species. 3. Survivals of recently extinct species. 4 Su...
... middle of paper ...
...his evidence could be man-made and a hoax (animalplanet.com).
Bibliography
BFRO Database History and Report Classification System. (n.d.). BFRO Database History and
Report Classification System. Retrieved May 4, 2014, from http://www.bfro.net/GDB/classify.asp Cryptid. (2014, July 5). Wikipedia. Retrieved May 7, 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptid Eberhart, G. (n.d.). Mysterious Creatues: A Guide To Cryptozoology. Beast of Bala. Retrieved
May 1, 2014, from http://www.beastofbala.com/files/25.pdf
Harris, T. (2001, May 30). How Bigfoot Works. HowStuffWorks. Retrieved May 1, 2014, from http://science.howstuffworks.com/science-vs-myth/strange-creatures/bigfoot.htm The Evidence For Bigfoot: Animal Planet. (n.d.). Animal Planet. Retrieved May 1, 2014, from
http://www.animalplanet.com/tv-shows/finding-bigfoot/lists/bigfoot-evidence.htm
While many theories exist trying to disprove the existence of this elusive beast, many also exist proving its existence. The first reported sighting made by St. Columba, an Irish missionary, in the a.d. 500s. He was from Scotland and came to spread Christianity. He saw the beast attacking a man and saved him by making a cross and ordering the beast to be gone. The Loch Ness Monster is not just a beast from the Medieval mythology. Many people have reported sightings of a creature matching the description “of an ‘extinct’ dinosaur called the Plesiosaur”(“Myths and Legends of the World”). There have been many attempts to find this elusive creature ,but all have turned up unsuccessful neither proving nor disproving the existence of the Loch Ness Monster.
“Cryptid Hunters” by Roland Smith is the first novel in the “Cryptid Hunters” series and was released in 2004. After Grace and Marty 's parents die, they move in with their Uncle Wolfe, who they did not know even existed before. The man, who they find to be intimidating, is an anthropologist that has spent his entire life looking for creatures that are believed to be extinct (mysterious, cryptid creatures) for a long time or creatures that have not even been confirmed to actually exist.
One of the most well-known urban legends told is the story of Bigfoot. Much of the research has shown that there are several names assigned to the mammoth ape. According to Napier (1973), Bigfoot would be the creature found mostly in Northwest America, Sasquatch would be a creature named in British Colombia, the 49th parallel in the north-west states of America and Northern California, and the Abominable Snowman, or the Yeti would be the creature named in the Himalayas. Of course, “Wild Man” and “Savage” have also been names used to identify the creature. There’s been thousands of sightings across the world, but there have also been many misidentifications where those who think they have seen Bigfoot have really just seen an ordinary animal or person. Arment (2006) states an individual’s perception may color the eyewitness account. Such misidentifications include: hermits, fugitives, refugees, bears, gorillas, and simply people making up stories or rumors. In addition to sightings, there have been photos, videos, movies, and TV shows that strongly indicates the possibility of the existence of this creature. Though there is much evidence from sightings, myths, and recordings that Bigfoot exists, there is also much proof that it could all be a hoax. Incorrect sightings have led skeptics to argue over the existence of this being stating Bigfoot is really just a fable. So one has to ask oneself, does Bigfoot really exist or is it just another urban legend?
... are minds are playing tricks on us and that we assume were seeing the creature. But, the funny thing is that years before her article came out Radford wrote one on Bigfoot too. It also states in the article that throughout the world there hasn’t been any blood, bones, or bodies ever found.
Does it even exist? These are the questions many cryptozoologists ask on a daily basis. Cryptozoology is the search for and study of animals whose existence is disputed. While many disregard cryptids, the term for these mysterious animals, there are scientists committed to finding the truth. Though there are many fascinating creatures in this field, the three most news-worthy are the Loch
Over the past century and a half, the spur of Bigfoots existence has questioned many researchers and non-believers alike. Extensive research and findings have sparked many to seek out if there is another creature amongst our woods. Bigfoots existence is limited to substantial evidence such as sightings, footprints, and somatogenic traces. Ben Radford the author of “Bigfoot at 50 Evaluating a Half-Century of Bigfoot Evidence” explains effectively of the possible existence through extensive evidence and theories whether the beast actually resides among us.
There are many facts out there to prove that it is real, the stories themselves prove it, now it is time to convince everyone why they should believe in this furless beast. In order to prove to everyone this creature is real, stories should be told in order to persuade them. The first sightings of this creature started around 1995, when a man noticed his animals acting strange on his farm in Puerto Rico. He really didn’t understand why they were acting strange that night, although they seemed very afraid of something. The next morning he woke up to find his two goats dead, and the next couple nights he began his search for what had happened.
...vided in this research presented evidence that brought the conclusion to Bigfoot does not exist. In the first account, the claimant tries to proves that Bigfoot is real, yet there was no adequate information. In the second account, the claimant thinks she saw a Bigfoot from 50 feet away, and she was blind by the sun while she was looking. It makes the account inadequate. In the third account, the claimant also thinks he saw Bigfoot while walking his dog. The information is inadequate because he had no actual evidence to show. All the accounts contained inadequate information, and did not contain any factual information. Although the accounts had a lot of evidence, there was nothing to support the claim of the existence of Bigfoot. None of the accounts were believable or replicable. Summarizing everything up, Bigfoot is just a mythical creature that does not exist.
The "White-Tailed Deer." Ccontario.org. Cornell University, 2001. http://www.cnu.edu/item/cnu Web. The Web.
For over a 150 years man has been troubled by one great mystery, a mystery that has baffled all who have witnessed it and all who have tried to solve it. This mystery is commonly known as Bigfoot, a tall hairy man/ape who lurks in the woods in almost every country on this planet. Some say it is just an ape, some believe it is a man in costume, and others are true believers of this hairy phenomenon. For more than a decade and a half this creature of myth has caused enormous contradictions in the field of science, bringing about one question. Does Bigfoot exist?
Animals that are commonly known as pets like dogs, and cats altogether account for less than 0.2% of research animals. Most of the research and experiments are done on mice, rats, fish, and birds animals that are not commonly known as pets. Animals usually end up killing more animals every week than what the tests and experiments kill every year.
This paper explores deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) collection and its relationship to solving crimes. The collection of DNA is one of the most important steps in identifying a suspect in a crime. DNA evidence can either convict or exonerate an individual of a crime. Furthermore, the accuracy of forensic identification of evidence has the possibility of leaving biased effects on a juror (Carrell, Krauss, Liberman, Miethe, 2008). This paper examines Carrells et al’s research along with three other research articles to review how DNA is collected, the effects that is has on a juror and the pros and cons of DNA collection in the Forensic Science and Criminal Justice community.
For more than 400 years people have reported seeing large, hair-covered, man-like animals in the wilderness.Misidentification, hoax, or the real thing these sightings still continue today. In 2007 the Bigfoot Field Researches Organization or the BFRO put some photos out were they thought was a juvenile Bigfoot, others thought the photos were a bear with mange, and other people thought the creature was a chimpanzee. Many misidentifications happen and many hoax also happen to. Hoaxes happen many times, in July 2008 these two guys posted a video on youtube claiming they had discovered a dead Bigfoot in a forest. An investigator was called to investigate the body and the two guys received $50,000 as a reward. Soon after a meeting the dead Bigfoot body was delivered in a block of ice. When the body was thawed out they found out that the whole Bigfoot was fake. The two admitted that it was a hoax. Now if you try pulling one of the hoax remember that it could be dangerous. In August 2012 a man in Montana was pretending to be a Bigfoot using a suit and got hit by a
The Fear of Science To live in the today's world is to be surrounded by the products of science. For it is science that gave our society color television, the bottle of aspirin, and the polyester shirt. Thus, science has greatly enhanced our society; yet, our society is still afraid of the effects of science. This fear of science can be traced back to the nineteenth century, where scientists had to be secretive in experimenting with science. Although science did wonders in the nineteenth century, many people feared science and its effects because of the uncertainty of the results of science.
There are many factors to take in when deciding weather to believe or not. The stories are generally not written and their history is not generally documented, they are kept in the memories of people who have either experienced an encounter first hand or people who have heard the story. This leaves a lot of room for a tale to be misinterpreted and have its original version lost over time. The story of the Kraken is a great example. For years tales of an enormous sea creature capable of breaking in half and sinking ships with its tentacles. In 1857, Danish explorer Japetus Steenstrup set out and expedition in search of the Kraken. His findings were remarkable, Steenstrup was able to close the story of the kraken with his discovery of giant squids off the coasts of Norway and Greenland. The squids he found reached 15 to 18 meters in length, right around the size Kraken were said to have been. Early explorers encountered these giant squid and believed them to be monsters. They spread the stories of these giants squids through communities warning others of this monster, which were then passed on again creating the folktale of the