Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The battle of little bighorn
The battle of little bighorn
The battle of little bighorn
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The battle of little bighorn
There were many battles in the American-Indian War. The Sand Creek Massacre, Fetterman Massacre, The Red River War, The Battle of Little Bighorn, and the Battle of Wounded Knee were all a part of the Plains Indian Wars. These battles stretched from Northern Texas to Southern South Dakota. The five battles were fought for similar reasons. The U.S. continued to move West, and ignored traditional Native American heritage. The Native Americans became frustrated and attempted to reclaim their land. The Sand Creek Massacre and Fetterman Massacre showed the military power of the United States, and the Native American Tribes. The massacres are clear representations of how brutal the U.S. and Native Americans are during war. The Battle of …show more content…
Little Bighorn and the Battle of Wounded Knee were both fought with the same concept, and similar mistakes. The Red River War and the Plains Indian War had similar battles, and massacres. The Sand Creek Massacre and the Fetterman Massacre are both similar.
The massacres were both ambushes. John Chivington ambushed the Native Americans and massacred the Cheyenne tribe. The Native Americans ambushed William J. Fetterman's troops. While these were both ambushes, they have a large difference. John Chivington raided the camp and killed non-threatening Native Americans. John Chivington had a natural distrust against Native Americans because his parents were killed by a Native American tribe. The Fetterman massacre was led by Crazy Horse. Crazy Horse ambushed Fetterman’s troops, and eliminated his unit. John Chivington killed men, women, and children. Crazy Horse killed a hostile force in his region. John Chivington killed innocent civilians, while Crazy Horse killed his …show more content…
enemy. The Battle of Little Bighorn was a strategic mistake for General Custer. The Sioux and Cheyenne tribes numbered between 2000-3000. General Custer attacked with one column, and underestimated the number of Native Americans. General Custer and his one column were immediately and his other two columns had no leadership. This battle was a major victory for the Native Americans. The Battle of Wounded Knee was a major U.S. victory. Wounded Knee was the last major conflict in the Plains Indians War. The Sioux tribe believed the Ghost Dance made them immune to bullets, which also caused bad judgement among some of the tribe members. The Battle of Wounded Knee is much closer to a massacre, while the Battle of Little Bighorn was a battle. The Battle of Wounded Knee resulted in shooting unarmed Native Americans. The Battle of Little Bighorn was strategic mistake that resulted in a critical loss. The Red River War and the Plains Indian War were fought for the same reason.
The U.S. wanted control of the land, and the Native Americans on reservations. Both wars consisted of large battles. The Red River War mainly consisted of small raids, and on a few occasions a large battle would occur. The Red River War was also considered a campaign because of its length. The Red River War ended quickly, and the Native Americans in Northern Texas became wore down from small confrontations. This resulted in a U.S. victory, and tribes were moved to reservations. The Plains Indian Wars saw heavy resistance, and both the U.S. and Native Americans remained consistent in pride, and confidence. The Plains Indian Wars lasted very long. The first massacre in 1864, and last battle in 1890. Eventually the U.S. wore down the Native American in this region and moved them onto reservations. The U.S. used the same tactic in both wars. They wore down the Native Americans over time. The wars were extremely different in length, and the Red River War is sometimes considered a
campaign. All of the massacres, battles, and wars were fought for the same reason. The U.S. wanted control of Great Plains. The Native Americans wanted the U.S. to stop expanding on their land. The alternate viewpoints of the U.S. and Native Americans caused large wars in the Plains region. The battles were fought for similar reasons, and both sides made bad decisions. The Native Americans fought for their land, while the U.S. fought for new land.
Native Americans used various forms of Guerilla warfare such as tactics, weather, and terrain to their advantage when facing United States (U.S.) Military. Guerilla warfare is a form of tactics used by an adversary against prodigious conventional military force. The disadvantages in numbers, tactics, and weapons systems would encourage significant failures in facing such a powerful enemy in open battle. The U.S. Military after the civil war confronted this new way of fighting for the first time within the western territories. The uprising by the Indians indicated that the Military leadership viewed the Native Americans as savages and did not recognize the underlying culture differences of the Indians. Another contributing factor in a prolonged war understanding the weather and terrain and how their inadequate preparations to fight this new form of war against the Indians in battle. During the American Indian Wars, the United States military employed different strategies, weaponry, and additional forces appropriate to force the American Indians to negotiations. However, this did not end the war quickly but provided an advantage for Military forces in obtaining the upper hand over the Indian and their Guerilla tactics. The effects of culture, terrain, weather, and tactics encountered during the American Indian Wars hindered U.S. forces in defeating the American Indians.
In addition to the road to battle, it is important to know that historical accounts of what led to the battle and what transpired are in dispute. These are not disputes over minor items, such as the exact order of battle or a clear sequence of events in what was a confusing night and dawn battle. Accounts of what transpired are often fundamentally different, and it is clear that various actors suppressed or championed differing accounts for political or personal reasons. By some accounts, the battle began by accident as an Indian patrol sent to keep watch on the Americans drew fire from nervous American sentries, leading the Indians only a mile away at Prophetstown to attack. By other accounts, the Indians planned a deliberate attack in order to strike the American force before the Americans could strike the Indians. Harrison touted the battle as a decisive victory that broke up the Indian confederacy and many historians agreed. However, modern accounts argue that the battle actuall...
Many mini to huge and impactful battles took place to unite the country and to fulfill God’s will to take all the land. While trying to execute Manifest Destiny 16 Americans killed for the right but made a sacrifice to take dominance over Mexico. Americans crossed Mexican territory but did not fire at all but eventually had to face the weak, and
At the conclusion of the battle, the stories of the Indian savagery were used to demonize their culture and there were no survivors from the 7th cavalry to tell what really happened. The Strategic Setting In 1875, Custer had made a commitment to the Sioux (aka. Lakota) that he would no longer fight Native Americans. Custer's promise came as a U.S. Senate commission meeting was taking place with the Lakota in an effort to purchase the gold mining fields in the Black Hills (which Custer had discovered a year earlier). The Lakota rejected the Senate’s offer in favor of sticking with the 1868 treaty that promised protection of their lands.
On December 29, 1890, the army decided to take away all of the Sioux weapons because they weren’t sure if they could trust those indians. Some people think a deaf man did this, but one man shot his gun, while the tribe was surrendering. Studies think that he didn’t understand the Chiefs surrender. The army then opened fire at the Sioux. There was over 300 indians that died, and one of them was their chief named Bigfoot. This is an example of how we didn’t treat Native Americans fairly, because if it was a deaf man then we probably should of talked it out before we killed all those innocent
During the summer of 1874, the U. S. Army launched a campaign to remove the Comanche, Kiowa, Southern Cheyenne, and Arapaho Indian tribes from the Southern Plains and enforce their relocation to reservations in Indian Territory. The actions of 1874 were unlike any prior attempts by the Army to pacify this area of the western frontier. The Red River War led to the end of an entire way of life for the Southern Plains tribes and brought about a new chapter in Texas history.
One of the darkest times in American history was the conflict with the natives. A “war” fought with lies and brute force, the eviction and genocide of Native Americans still remains one of the most controversial topics when the subject of morality comes up. Perhaps one of the most egregious events to come of this atrocity was the Sand Creek Massacre. On the morning of November 29th, 1864, under the command of Colonel John Chivington, 700 members of the Colorado Volunteer Cavalry raped, looted, and killed the members of a Cheyenne tribe (Brown 86-94). Hearing the story of Sand Creek, one of the most horrific acts in American History, begs the question: Who were the savages?
The journey of exploration to the western territories brought the white man many great things, but they did face some opposition. The US government made plans to explore the Black Hills, after hearing of the gold it contained. This was not an easy task. The Sioux, with strong force, were not giving up their sacred land easily. The only way to gain the territory of the Black Hills was to wage war against the Sioux. The Battle of the Little Big Horn was one battle that the US will never forget. General George Custer led an army of men to take out the Sioux, one of the battalions was completely wiped out including Custer. The Sioux were very strong, but US had a lot more power and technology. Why did we get massacred? This question has been a mystery to many people throughout the years. Sergeant Windolph, of Benteen’s cavalry, and John F. Finerty, from General Crooks cavalry, bring us some personal accounts and memories of this tragedy.
Have you ever heard the term, “Don’t drink the Kool-Aid?” or “You have drank the Kool-Aid.”? Well, ”Drinking the Kool-Aid” means you have done something that others have told you to do or did yourself. This saying comes from the cult society led by Reverend Jim Jones, named Jonestown. Jonestown was a small community in the jungle of Guyana, South America. After getting word of people coming to investigate the society, Jones had committed a mass suicide by poisoning Kool-Aid and giving it to the people of Jonestown.
On March 5, 1770 a fight broke out in the streets of Boston, Massachusetts between a patriot mob and British soldiers. Citizens attacked a squad of soldiers by throwing snowballs, stones and sticks. British Army soldiers in turn killed five civilians and injured six others. The presence of British troops had been stationed in Boston, the capital of Province of Massachusetts Bay since 17681. The British existence was increasingly unwelcome. The British troops were sent to Boston in order to protect and support the crown-appointed colonial officials attempting to enforce unpopular Parliamentary legislation.
Chief Crazy Horse and Sitting Bull of the Sioux tribes knew of the plan and set a trap for the army regiment and killed all of them. This battle was one of the greatest victories for the Native American’s.
With buffalo numbers decreasing fast, Native American tribes faced starvation and desperation. There were many different actions the Americans did to destroy the land of the Native Americans. Western expansion caused a shift in the lives of Native Americans because many tribes, including women and kids, were being murdered by the new settlers. S.G. Colley, a U.S. Indian Agent, writes in a Report for the Committee on the Conduct of War, “That notwithstanding his knowledge of the facts as above set forth, he is informed that Colonel Chivington did, on the morning of the 29th of November last, surprise and attack said camp of friendly Indians and massacre a large number of them, (mostly women and children,) and did allow the troops of his command to mangle and mutilate them in the most horrible manner” (Colley, 1865). This quote shows the Americans were exterminating innocent American Indians for no justifiable reason.
The Boston Massacre was and is still a debatable Massacre. The event occurred on March 5, 1776. It involved the rope workers of the colonial Boston and two British regiments, the twenty-ninth and the fourteenth regiments. Eleven people were shot in the incident; five people were killed and the other six were merely wounded. The soldiers and the captain, Thomas Preston, were all put on trial. All were acquitted of charges of murder, however the two soldiers who fired first, Private Mathew Killroy, and Private William Montgomery, the two soldiers were guilty of manslaughter. The causes were numerous for this event. There had been a nation wide long-term dislike towards the British, and a growing hatred towards them by the people of Boston. Even before the two regiments were sent in to monitor Boston there was a growing feud before the two sides.
Beginning in the 1860s and lasting until the late 1780s, government policy towards Native Americans was aggressive and expressed zero tolerance for their presence in the West. In the last 1850s, tribal leaders and Americans were briefly able to compromise on living situations and land arrangements. Noncompliance by Americans, however, resumed conflict. The beginning of what would be called the "Indian Wars" started in Minnesota in 1862. Sioux, angered by the loss of much of their land, killed 5 white Americans. What resulted was over 1,000 deaths, of white and Native Americans. From that point on, American policy was to force Indians off of their land. American troops would force Indian tribe leaders to accept treaties taking their land from them. Protests or resistance by the Indians would result in fighting. On occasion, military troops would even lash out against peaceful Indians. Their aggression became out of control.
Throughout history, events are sparked by something, which causes emotions to rise and tensions to come to a breaking point. The Boston Massacre was no exception; America was feeling the pressure of the British and was ready to break away from the rule. However, this separation between these two parties would not come without bloodshed on both sides. The British did not feel the American had the right to separate them from under British rule, but the Americans were tired of their taxes and rules being placed upon them and wanted to succeed from their political tyrants. The Boston Massacre would be the vocal point in what would be recognized, as the Revolutionary War in American history and the first place lives would be lost for the cost of liberty. Even though the lives were lost that day, eight British soldiers were mendaciously accused of murder when it was clearly self-defense. People who are placed in a situation where their lives are threatened have the right to defend themselves. History does not have the right to accuse any one event those history may have considered the enemy guilty when they are fighting for their lives.