Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The nature of good and evil
What is the relationship between God and Evil
Good and evil in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The nature of good and evil
What does the story of Atlas Shrugged have to say about the relative powers of good and evil and the conditions under which one is victorious over the other?
The Sanction of the Victim and the Horror of Negation
“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” This oft-repeated paraphrase of a less-palatable line of Edmund Burke’s has made its way into the modern public vernacular as a call to vigilance against the eternal creep of evil. Yet the question remained: “What is the nature of this evil?” and “What action do good men take in order to prevent it?” In her 1957 Magnum Opus, Atlas Shrugged, the American novelist Ayn Rand put forward the next step in that line of thinking; “The evil of the world is made possible by nothing but the sanction you give it.” (Rand 1066). Through Hank Rearden’s familial relationships, his struggles against the government, and John Galt’s final exposition of his philosophical discoveries, Rand explains the nature of good and evil; good can only lose if it presents itself to be negated, and evil can only triumph with good’s willing consent.
Henry Rearden is the paragon of the American industrialist: a self-made millionaire, famous for the uncompromising integrity of his business deals and the physical properties of his steel (the cornerstone of his business). Externally, he appears to many to be a perfectly integrous being. Yet he bears the guilt of a great sin; contradiction. He refuses to employ in his interpersonal relationships the very same principles which permit him to excel in industry. As his friend-to-be Francisco D’Anconia inquires later: “You who won't allow one per cent of impurity into an alloy of metal—what have you allowed into your moral code?" (Rand 4...
... middle of paper ...
...Whenever evil wins, it is only by default: by the moral failure of those who evade the fact that there can be no compromise on basic principles." (Rand - Capitalism)
Bibliography
Burke, Edmund. “Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents.” 1770
Original quote: "when bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle."
Rand, Ayn. Atlas Shrugged. New York City, NY; Penguin Group Inc. 2005.
Rand, Ayn. Capitalism: The Unkown Ideal.
Works Cited
Burke, Edmund. “Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents.” 1770
Original quote: "when bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle."
Rand, Ayn. Atlas Shrugged. New York City, NY; Penguin Group Inc. 2005.
Rand, Ayn. Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal.
Quote 8: "Situations like these, I realized, were what turned people into hypocrites” (Walls 144).
Ayn Rand's classic story of one man's desire to become an individual in a nameless society presents a compelling refutation of collectivism in all forms. The hero, labeled "Equality 7-2521" by the State, chooses to challenge conventional authority as he learns the joys of experimentation and discovery, the ecstasy of human love, the challenge and fairness of liberty, and the happiness of self-interest. Equality 7-2521 writes three unique phrases in his journal: 1. "My happiness needs no higher aim to vindicate it. My happiness is not the means to an end. It is the end.", 2. "We know that we are evil, but there is no will in us and no power to resist it.", 3. "The word 'We' . . . must never be placed first within man's soul.". These phrases will be discussed individually in the remainder of this essay.
Quote: “‘Here’s me that used to give all my fights against the devil ‘cause I figgered the devil was the enemy. But they’s somepin worse’n the devil got hold a the country, an’ it ain’t gonna let go till it’s chopped loose.” (129)
Envision a world where evil has taken over, simply because decent people are willing to do nothing to oppose the evil that is taking over. The idea is not far off from reality, because many people believe evil is prevails when decent people do nothing. Among these people was Edmund Burke, who once said, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” He meant that injustice will continue to take place when good people don’t choose to fight against injustices. Many people agree with Burke, because true events have occurred that support Burke’s statement. Some people disagree, because they believe that even when righteous people intervene, evil will continue to prosper. However, Burke is correct in his statement
“I do know that for the sympathy of one living being, I would make peace with all. I have love in me the likes of which you can scarcely imagine and rage the likes of which you would not believe. If I cannot satisfy the one, I will indulge the other.”
So what does it all mean? Does good always triumph over evil? Will justice always prevail? Probably not, but it can’t hurt one’s chances, can it? Works Cited Stewart, Timothy.
“Foundly do we hope-fervently do we pray- that this might scourge of war may speedily pass away… With malice toward none; with charity for all; with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation’s wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan - to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace, among ourselves, and with all nations”
Witness this army of such mass and charge/ Led by a delicate and tender prince,/ Whose spirit with divine ambition puffed/ Makes mouths at the invisible event,/ Exposing what is mortal and unsure/ To all that fortune, death, and danger dare,/ Even for an eggshell. Rightly to be great/ Is not to stir without great argument,/ But greatly to find quarrel in a straw/ When honor’s at the stake. BLOCK QUOTATION
The thought of ‘we’ becoming the primary focus of a society, in Rand’s opinion, is one of the most dangerous ideas. In this, the progression of society is destroyed when all are viewed as equals. By advocating this idea it is evident the she is depicting a political system in which all preference outside the will of all men is strictly forbidden. This means that in order to make decisions about advancements must be unanimous; otherwise, you have disobeyed the law by showing a true opinion since it is “It is a sin to think words no others think” (XXXXXX). Rand believes that succumbing to the will of ‘we’ and suppressing the individuality that is naturally innate in man will trap the society in a dark age for ever. For instance, when Equality 7-2521 discusses with the World Council, they mention the difficulty of facilitating the candle into society. The struggle derives from the difficulty of making decisions through a unanimous system. However, when Equality 7-2521 commits the “great Transgression of Preference”, his entire perspective of how things should be begins a foundational shift.
He writes, “if any two men desire the same thing, which nevertheless they cannot both enjoy, they become enemies.” I do not agree with this argument. I think the conflict is a creation inside our minds not because we desire the same thing but because we desire what someone has or wants. How often do we want something because we see someone have it? Consider social media like Instagram. You see someone with thousands of likes on their posts compared to your measly four or five. There’s a desire to post something outrageous or provocative to get more likes. Is that something that you really wanted? Or is it because you see the attention the other person is
may lead to down fall. He explicitly states that the foe of man should fear is
too can be saved” (Atwood 26). This quote also shares the same aspect of both
from a Klansman Anarchist unnamed in the W.A.R. group. The quote is trying to recrute