Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influence of religion in the community
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Influence of religion in the community
An Outlier is considered to be an individual that stands out in society because they do things out of the ordinary or norm. They are considered to be successful or different in a positive way in society. For example, people with high IQs like Albert Einstein, famous musicians like Mozart, and etc. are considered to be Outliers The Roseto Mystery had to do with the mystery regarding why citizens of Roseto didn’t have any heart attacks or signs of heart disease. This was especially abnormal during the 1950s because of the epidemic plague of heart attacks in the United States. The epidemic affected men under sixty five years old and they were dying because of heart attacks. While, in Roseto no one under fifty-five had died of a heart attack or displayed signs of heart disease. Also, for men over sixty-five, the death rate of heart disease was around half of the United States entirely. The Rosetan’s secret to longevity was their culture. Originally, Dr. Stewart Wolf and Dr. John Bruhn believed their good health was due to their dietary practices, but they soon learned that this wasn’t the case. Their diet was very unhealthy and 41% of their calories came from fat. They ate biscotti and taralli all year around, even though it was …show more content…
traditionally eaten during Christmas. Also, they cooked with lard, instead of olive oil, which was much healthier and used in Italy. In Italy, pizza had a thin crust and a few ingredients like salt, oil, and maybe tomatoes, anchovies, or onions. While, pizza in Roseto consisted of bread dough, sausage, pepperoni, salami, ham, and maybe eggs. As well as that they didn’t exercise a lot. A majority of the people of Roseto were obese and smoked a lot. Regardless of their unhealthy diet and lack of exercise, they were just dying of old age. So, this led Dr. Stewart Wolf and Dr. John Bruhn to believe that genetics played a huge part in their success, which also turned out to not be the case. Afterwards, they believed the key to solving the mystery was the location (the foothills of eastern Pennsylvania). This theory was disproved after they looked into Bangor and Nazareth. Those towns were a few miles away and quite similar in size and surroundings. Yet, men over sixty-five suffered three times the amount of death from heart disease compared to Roseto. Eventually, after a lot of failed explanations for the Rosetan's immunity towards heart attacks, they came to the realization that the culture of Roseto people was the key to their success. Their culture brought on a feeling of community and unity. In addition, people actually interacted with one another by visiting each other, cooking for one another in their backyards, and talking to one another. Many homes had three generations living together and they went to mass at Our Lady of Mount Carmel together. During the 1800's, the Rosetans emigrated from Roseto Valfortore, which was one hundred miles southeast of Rome in the Apennine foothills concerning the Italian province of Foggia. The life for the townsfolk was difficult and hard. They had to work in the marble quarries or plow the fields, which was quite a distance away and tiring. They had to walk up the hill at night. So, when the townsfolk heard about the land of opportunity, they jumped at it. They didn't have anything to lose because for the most part, they were illiterate and poor. In January 1882, a group of Rosetans went to New York and slept in Manhattan's Little Italy. Eventually, they went to the town of Bangor, Pennsylvania. In that year, fifteen Rosetans abandoned Italy to go to America and so on. Many Rosetans heard about the promise of the New World and that ultimately made them leave their home country to go to America. The Rosetans started to purchase land on a rocky hillside near Bangor and began to build their own community. Their values could be considered traditional or orthodox. Unlike conventional society, they placed a higher emphasis on the value of grandparents and supporting one another. The wealthy didn’t brag about their wealth and those that needed help were helped. They had 22 civic organizations, three generations under one roof, and friends talking to each on the street. Their environment was peaceful and stress free. There was no suicide, addiction, welfare, crime, and peptic ulcers in Roseto. They went to church and practiced their religion together. Community and culture was especially important to them, which they brought from their home country. As well as that they incorporated their home country in their current country, which made Roseto completely insulated from the pressures of the modern world. They lived in their own “world”. The population of Roseto was less than 2,000, so in a sense Roseto was like their own little town. They kept to themselves and didn’t associate with other towns due to language barriers. Bangor was next to them and they spoke mainly Welsh and English. In the next town over, the people mainly spoke German. So, they interacted amongst themselves and spoke Foggian, a dialect from Italy. Dr. Stewart Wolf and Dr. John Bruhn discovered that the answer to the Roseto Mystery was Roseto itself. Their culture was the premise to their good health, which made doctors begin to view what contributed to heart disease differently. Doctors started to understand that in order to understand why someone was healthy or not, they needed to look beyond the individual. They had to look at an individual fully in terms of relationships, culture, background, and etc. because those attributes influence an individual to be who they are. They had many festivals to bring a sense of community and unity.
In 1896, a young priest named Father Pasquale de Nisco gained control of Our Lady of Mount Carmel. He created spiritual societies and created festivals. He motivated the people to clear the land and plant onions, beans, potatoes, melons, and fruit trees. He distributed seeds and bulbs, which lead the town to come to life. The people of Roseto started to raise pigs in their backyards and grow grapes to make wine. Eventually, schools, a park, a convent, and a cemetery was created. Near Garibaldi Avenue, small shops and bakeries and restaurants and bars were built. Basically, the festivals helped the Rosetans create their own self-sufficient world in their little
town. Malcolm Gladwell is trying to argue that you must look at the whole picture of Outliers to understand why certain people become Outliers. You have to take into consideration why and how such a transition occurs for Outliers, since Outliers aren't necessarily born as Outliers. They weren't ordained to be successful, but became successful because they were able to take advantage of opportunities given to them and to utilize their learned skills. Therefore, in order to fully comprehend what leads an individual to become an Outlier, we have to look into factors beyond innate talent. There are reasons why Outliers are Outliers and those reasons aren’t something that was especially forsaken to them. They weren’t born a certain way in which they were bound to fulfill such a prophecy. In order to understand Outliers, we have to look at where they grew up, their background, their culture, and other influential factors on the condition of an individual. For instance, the citizens of Roseto were different because of their culture.
In Outliers Malcolm Gladwell calculates success. Through the repeated praxis of shattering the reader’s idea that masters in a particular field achieve their success through individual talent he unravels how their given circumstances was what truly led them to what they became. Example after example he proves how conditions as simple as the year they were born led to their later achievement; the author even demonstrated how a person’s culture can later affect their job performance. CoCo Chanel, arguably the most famed and inspirational fashion
The author writes, “In my real life I have been known to eat organic goat’s milk yoghurt sprinkled with wheat germ for breakfast” (Gilbert 177). Gilbert clearly cared about her health while she was living in the real world. The way she describes her choice in breakfast makes it clear that this was a dietary, health related choice, not one she made because she liked goat yoghurt. It implies that she was concerned with her weight, not only for the sake of her self-perception, but because she was worried about what others think about her appearance. Gilbert writes. “I am doing such rude things to my body here in Italy, taking in such ghastly amounts of cheese and pasta and bread and wine and chocolate and pizza dough” (177). This paints a picture that contrasts sharply with her pre-Naples diet.. Clearly, something has changed for the author, allowing her to guiltlessly eat anything she wants. This is one of the signs that her self-perception has changed radically from what it used to
“A statistical observation that is markedly different in value from the others of the sample” (Gladwell 3) or in other words an outlier. In the novel Outliers: The Story of Success, author Malcolm Gladwell holds one of the many secrets to life, the secret to success. Gladwell takes one’s thoughts on an astonishing journey to reveal the keys to success, their patterns, and how to achieve it.
He claims that a better diet requires spending more time and resources on food, just like the people of the past did. Pollan attributes their surpassing health to this practice, but in his article “How Junk Food Can End Obesity”, David Freedman paints a different story. Freedman describes how examinations of ancient non-Western remains revealed “hardened arteries, suggesting that pre-industrial diets…may not have been the epitome of healthy eating” (514). This discovery seriously undermines Pollan’s assumption that we should follow the lead of our ancestors because even though they spent a greater amount of resources on food and ate absolutely no processed foods, they still suffered from some of the same diseases which Pollan claims his eating habits will curb. As an opponent of processed foods, or “foodlike products” (Pollan 426), Pollan advocates eating whole foods. As many people have a similar opinion, he is not alone in this, but he is misinformed. Freedman reveals that after examining the nutrition labels on various unprocessed, whole foods, he found that many contained more fat, sugar, and sodium than processed foods (512). If unprocessed foods underwent the same scrutiny as processed foods, perhaps this common misconception could be prevented. The basic premise of Pollan’s essay is that a better diet will lead to better health. While we could all benefit from a better diet, “findings linking food type and health are considered highly unreliable (Freedman 518). Freedman discusses the multitude of nondietary factors such as air quality and exercise that render such studies untrustworthy. Pollan might be a well-respected author of nutrition books, but this does not mean that his theories are free of
Next, consider the text trying to express her frustration with life: “She wants to live for once. But doesn’t quite know what that means. Wonders if she has ever done it. If she ever will.” (1130) You can sense her need and wanting to be independent of everything and everyone, to be truly a woman on her own free of any shackles of burden that this life has thrown upon her. Also, there is an impression that her family does not really care that she is leaving from her sisters to her disinterested father. “Roselily”, the name is quite perplexing considering a rose stands for passion, love, life; while the lily has associations with death, and purity. Still at the same time the name aptly applies to her because the reader knows she is ultimately doomed to wilt away in a loveless marriage in Chicago. Even though she is convincing herself that she loves things about him it is all just a ploy to trick herself into believing that this marriage could be the answer to all her problems. Now on to the men of Roselily’s past most of which are dead- beat dads that could not care about what happens to their children, or where they go.
Gladwell, Malcolm. Outliers: the story of success. 2011. Reprint. New York: Back Bay Books / Little, Brown and Co., 2008. Print.
Wiedman, D. (2005). American indian diets and nutritional research: Implications of the strong heart dietary study, phase ii, for cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105(12), 1874–1880. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.10.016
The ideas presented in Outliers are surprisingly aligned with my own. It makes sense to me that a person’s success isn’t all about ability and his or her individual merit. In the past I have reflected upon my successes to find that I was not alone while achieving them. I have been given tremendous opportunities in life. I have always challenged my own definitions, and I like the spin Malcolm Gladwell puts on his.
The rose at that point of history was an inn on the same road as the
As talked about in Outliers, there are many factors that go into creating and building someone out of the norm of society. As Gladwell fraises it, ““Superstar lawyers and math whizzes and software entrepreneurs appear at first blush to lie outside ordinary experience. But they don't. They are products of history and community, of opportunity and legacy. Their success is not exceptional or mysterious. It is grounded in a web of advantages and inheritances, some deserved, some not, some earned, some just plain lucky - but all critical to making them who they are. The outlier, in the end, is not an outlier at all” (Gladwell 285.) Oprah is an outlier in the sense that she worked for what she’s accomplished but had unforeseen forces working in her favor that even she didn’t realize until she looked back on her journey to success.
Outlier. An outlier is someone who is not considered to be a normal person within society. They have qualities that most people do not obtain. They are the most successful of individuals and many aspire to be them. Michael Jackson is the epitome of what I believe is a true outlier. In his best-selling novel, Malcolm Gladwell stated that we tend to spend more time looking at individuals success rather than looking at things that ultimately contributed to that success, such as their family, birthplace, and even birth date.
Outliers are extraordinary individuals who didn’t need college to be successful in the first place. In the past it was an honor to go to college, and only the wealthy families were able to send their kids. There is a saying by one of our most famous president William Jefferson aka Bill Clinton “When we make college more affordable we make the american dream achievable” (Clinton). Most of the american kids are not cut out for college.
What is deviance? What does it mean? What determines a behavior as deviant? Deviance is anything that violates a social norm. For example, when a child burps at the supper table but doesn’t excuse himself. Who we socialize and spend time with will determine what we deem as deviant behavior. There are many types of deviant behaviors, some of these behaviors may not be considered deviant to one culture but to another they are.
To begin with, when I was younger I would have considered myself an outsider because when I first started school, I didn’t have the characteristics to fit in and felt like I would not blend into the people I was surrounded by. Also, I have met many people who have presented experiences from their past when they had felt like they didn’t fit in because they couldn’t keep up the standards to be popular. In social media, there are many guidelines that people feel the need to meet in order to feel like you belong and some who don’t match up can feel like outsiders, and that happens to many. Furthermore, in today’s society people feel the need to be popular or to fit in, and if they can’t meet the expectations they are considered an outsider and that happens universally. Others may suggest that just because someone doesn’t fit in a group doesn’t mean they are considered an outsider, they are just someone who doesn’t meet certain expectations. However, many others would disagree and would label someone an outsider when they don’t fit in or don’t meet expectations of society because that makes them think they don’t
To be considered normal or abnormal has been just a label society places on you to explain individuality. When we are younger, we were given a mixed message that being different and unique is acceptable, however growing up in a society that wants you to blend in and adhere to the norms and usual customs of that culture is difficult. Being dissimilar often leads you to be judged and considered deviant. What you perceive not only defines your idiosyncratic judgment, so does your culture, prejudices, upbringing and generation you belong to. In our modern day society a universal normal has not, nor ever will exist. We think, look and all act differently and the reality of it is, no one is normal.