More handpicked essays just for you.
American same sex marriage law
Discrimination against homosexual marriage
How does immigration affect family essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: American same sex marriage law
I asked for her opinion on the rights and responsibilities, I asked them in the order of the sheet, for the first one the right to vote. She agreed voting should be a right and you should always be allowed to vote for even the smallest things however she doesn't believe It should be compulsory. When it comes to voting for the priminister she thinks you shouldn't have to vote but it should be a choice. The next thing I asked about was obeying the law, she said yes you should obey the laws because they are there to help you except Some laws are wrong for example gay marriage is illegal in Australia. After that I asked about the next right it was the right to register your children as Australian, if they were born overseas and their parents are
The validity of British’s occupation of Australia has been fundamentally shaken. The decision protected Aboriginal people’s cultures and lifestyles to a certain degree. Moreover, it guaranteed that some of the lands they live will not be developed. There were five key issues of importance to legal precedent in the Mabo decision for the recognition of Indigenous peoples’ rights in Australia (Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, 2017). For example, it helps to promote the idea of non-discrimination. From then on, a series of laws had been introduced to help safeguard their standard legal rights and
When I first asked her if she saw coming out as a political statement she didn’t she to understand but after explaining to her she agreed saying that “ you have ...
Australians by not clarifying it’s stance on it’s international obligations to Indigenous Australians or reflecting it’s international rhetoric and signature on UN conventions by implementing some in domestic law. This inadequacy in the development of Indigenous Peoples Land Rights in Australia has been declared by the Working Group on Indigenous Populations in July 1997, and highlights the Australian government policy regarding Indigenous Peoples Land Rights and may be argued as a denial of justice for Indigenous People by the Australian legal system. Australia can be said to be ineffective in achieving justice for Indigenous People due to it’s failure to recognise Indigenous Australians rights to land domestically by failing the Human Rights standards contained in international initiatives to which it is a signatory.
A Constitution is a set of rules put in place to govern a country, by which the parliament, executive and judiciary must abide by in law making and administering justice. In many countries, these laws are easily changed, while in Australia, a referendum process must take place to alter the wording of the Constitution (Commonwealth of Australia, date unknown, South Australian Schools Constitutional Convention Committee 2001). Since the introduction of the Australian Constitution in January 1901, there have been sufficient proposals to alter and insert sections within the body to reflect the societal values of the day, ensuring the Constitution remains relevant to the Australian people. Although Constitutional reform can be made on a arrangement of matters, the latest protests on Indigenous recognition and racial references within the body of the Constitution has called into question the validity of racial inclusion, and whether amendments should be made to allow for recognition. This essay will focus on the necessity of these amendments and evaluate the likelihood of change through the process of referenda.
Jane Addams thinks women should have the right to vote to be more successful in properly running their households duties. She believes since society is constantly changing, the role of the women should expand in an effort to keep up with the societal changes around them. She wants the women to follow in the footsteps of the British women and to get liberated from the old beliefs that kept them restricted to operate only from the inside of their homes. She wants the women to be active members in the board of education in order to be active participants in the educational decision making of their own children. She
Since the turn of the twenty first century, in Canada voter turnout has made a significant and consecutive decline. In the last five federal elections on average only sixty-one per cent of eligible voters voted. If each eligible citizen voted in an election the government would be on par with the primary interests of the people. The easiest way to achieve this objective is by implementing a compulsory voting system. Mandatory voting systems are appealing because all citizens are affected by decisions made by the government, so it makes sense to have all those affected apart of the election process. As a result, the voting results would be more representative of the country and that would lead to an increase of stability and legitimacy. It would also be beneficial to Canadians because would cause political parties to address and focus on the needs of every socio-economic level. However, one of biggest problems that accompanies mandatory voting laws is that the choice to exercise the right to vote is taken away. Another primary concern about compulsory voting is that a large number of uninterested and uninformed voters are brought to the polls. Conversely, uninformed voters will become familiar with and learn the polling procedures and electoral system over time and uninterested voters are not forced to mark a name on the ballot. Compulsory voting laws would only make registration and attendance at the polls mandatory, not voting itself. Therefore the freedom to exercise the right to vote or not is still intact. A greater emphasis on alternate voting practices may be established such as electronic or online voting. Positive changes would not only be evident in the policies of political parties but also in the voting procedure. Th...
"There is a reason for the country to embrace mandatory voting, and it may be the most compelling: democracy cannot be strong if citizenship is weak," _William A. Galtson_. Mandatory voting, or compulsory voting, is a law wherein citizens are required to vote, or suffer the consequence. Australia has had compulsory voting since putting it into effect in 1924. "The turnout of Australian elections has never fallen below 90 percent since the introduction of compulsory voting in 1924," _Australian Electoral Commission_. Achieving over 90 percent of the citizens voting for nearly a century shows that mandatory voting is working in regard to getting people to vote. Governments should have mandatory voting because the people will educate themselves
Literary Focus Statement: In Susan B. Anthony’s zealous speech “On Women’s Right to Right to Vote”, she
Among the many ways Americans can participate in politics, voting is considered one of the most common and important ways for Americans to get involved. The outcome of any election, especially at the national level, determines who will be making and enforcing the laws that all Americans must abide by. With this in mind one might assume that all Americans are active voters, but studies show the voter turnout is actually astonishingly low. With this unsettling trend it is important to know what statistics say about voter turnout as was as the four major factors that influence participation: Socioeconomic status, education, political environment, and state electoral laws, in order to help boost turnout in future elections.
... Vote, supports women’s suffrage. The document states, “Give mother the vote… our food our health our play our homes our school our work are ruled by men’s votes”. The babies in this poster are saying that many topics that are being voted upon are those that women know the most about, and men know the least about. Therefore women should be able to vote. On the other hand, document H, Ladies Trousers makes fun of women for wanting the same freedoms that men have from birth. This document declares, “My dear Susan, would you please keep your trousers on your side of closet”. This document is not a reason for why women should not get the right to vote. Women should not have been classified as only mothers and wives, incapable of having any type of say in the society. Document G, better shows why women having a say in the community would benefit the society as a whole.
The rights and freedoms achieved in Australia in the 20th and 21st century can be described as discriminating, dehumanising and unfair against the Indigenous Australians. Indigenous Australians have achieved rights and freedoms in their country since the invasion of the English Monarch in 1788 through the exploration and development of laws, referendums and processes. Firstly, this essay will discuss the effects of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on the Indigenous Australians through dehumanising and discriminating against them. Secondly, this essay will discuss how Indigenous Australians gained citizenship and voting
Overall Australia’s human rights record is of high-quality but is blemished by few human rights violations. Australia has freedom of speech, a corruption-free legal system, legal protection against discrimination, access to secondary education, the right to vote in elections, access to clean water, privacy protection, freedo...
In April of 1873, Susan B. Anthony gave a speech that offered many different insights on how the voting rights of women were being inflicted and without the right to vote, women in this time were utterly powerless. Anthony uses multiple aspects of the Declaration of Independence to aid her with examples and ideas that conclude to this unjust act. Prior to giving her speech, Susan B. Anthony was arrested for simply acting on her Constitutional right as a U.S citizen and voting in the 1872 election. Though it was illegal for women to vote at this time, Anthony willingly expressed her right of the Fourteenth Amendment, which guaranteed all U.S citizens the right to a vote. She stated, in context of the Constitution, “It was we the people-not we
It is the right of every Canadian citizen to vote, and this right should not exclude prisoners.
Kirby, M. 1997, ‘Bill of Rights for Australia – But do we need it?’, viewed 30 March 2014, < http://www.lawfoundation.net.au/ljf/app/&id=/A60DA51D4C6B0A51CA2571A7002069A0>