Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History of multicultural education essay
Multicultural societies
The brief introduction about canada multiculturalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History of multicultural education essay
What is Multiculturalism? How does one create or achieve a multicultural society? Most multicultural societies today have achieved the multicultural title by illustrating the history of their country. One of the most multicultural countries today would be Canada. Canada has been a multiculturalist country ever since the federal government, under the Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau had declared that a multicultural policy would be adopted into Canada. From then on, Canada was to recognize and also respect its own societies, religions, languages, customs, and so on. But, was this really the beginning of multiculturalism in Canada? In the past, Canada had already created a huge reputation of a blending of all kinds of different types of …show more content…
In many instances, many deferent types of culture and identity had been merged into Canada like a big boiling pot being filled with many different ingredients whether they work together or don’t. But, whether the different ingredients work together or not is not what matter, because the end result is what Canada’s identity will stay as and will forever be remembering as. Going back to whether Canada becoming multicultural in 1971, the facts would prove that this statement is untrue because Canada had already been inhabited by so many different types of people whether it be religion, culture or identity. Canadian identity is the topic of today and where a few of the different types of identities had come from to form into one to create a singular identity for Canadians and more importantly, Canada. The greatest contributor to Canada’s identity is it’s multiculturalism throughout its history since its creation. This essay will explore different historical events and quirky cultures that help to show how much Canadian multiculturalism is intertwined in its …show more content…
After the war, some 60 000 Americans had remained loyal to the crown and had seen their lands and goods confiscated by the republic. These Americans to Canada were known as the United Empire Loyalists. Coming to Nova Scotia, and Quebec, they received some assistance from the British government for compensation and to show the recognition that the loyalists had taken up arms in the defence of King George III and also the British interest. This had helped shape the theme of multiculturalism in the Canadian identity by forming the nucleus for two modern Canadian provinces which will be Ontario and New Brunswick. This had helped to create a more political, demographic and an economic influence on Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia and Quebec. The British of British North America were marked by the republicanism, and especially American republicanism, as a very distinctively identifiable cultural entity for many more generations to come. This distinctively identifiable culture is another crucial part for the Canadian theme of its multiculturalism while also adding to the Canadian
Although Quebec is in Canada, a majority of Quebecers do not identify with the national identity of Canada. Both societies create a sense of identity as well as nationalism (Hiller, 295). Hiller mentions two approaches to assessing Canadian identity; the unitary approach and the segmentalist approach (Hiller, 277). The unitary approach suggests that society consists of people who regardless of their ethnic back ground, identify as belonging to the national society, while the segmentalist approach concentrates on groups and communities that share racial, linguistic, occupational, or cultural similarities (Hiller, 28). While most Anglophones are more unitary or pan-Canadian, Quebec heavily identifies with the segmentalist approach. This dissimilarity of identity perspective may be problematic for the country, at the same time however, it can also be viewed as a struggle where contradictory parties find a way to compromise and reshape Canadian society together (Hiller, 277). Canada’s former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau made it his objective to unite Quebec with the rest of Canada. In 1969 Trudeau’s government implemented Bill C-120, otherwise known as the Official Language act, which made French an...
There was a notable divide between Canada’s French and English-speaking population in the 1960s, as they each presented contrasting views of the country’s national identity. As the federal government faced what seemed like two separate nations embodied within a single country, Prime Minister Lester B. Pearson assembled the Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism in July 1963. It was to evaluate the existing state of bilingualism and biculturalism and recommend the actions needed to alleviate the largely linguistic and cultural divides in Canada. Pearson’s directive was given at a time when Quebec was experiencing a period of great social and economic development through the Quiet Revolution, while English-Canada was grappling with the re-establishment of the country’s identity as the British definition of Canada was becoming increasingly rejected. This paper will assess bilingualism and biculturalism as it challenged national identity, seen through the Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism (RCBB) and the influence of the Quiet Revolution; which resulted in policy – the Official Languages Act in 1969 and the Official Multicultural Policy in 1971 – that ultimately shaped bilingualism and biculturalism within what became a multicultural framework in Canada.
The mention of the abolition of multiculturalism for a “new” post-multiculturalist approach becomes difficult to understand. It claims, “to avoid the ‘excesses’ of multiculturalism” (47), however where does this notable governmental and social switch take place? How is the term coined, and how is it understood in theory versus in practice? How is it different from its predecessor? Even the classification of history struggles to define what is considered to be modern, let alone post-modern, and yet the term suggests a positive approach to alleviating difficult assimilation projects similar to those faced elsewhere (47). This notion may developed on the grounds of “someone else’s problems” ¬– in regards to its Canadian context – as a means to label, or justify, miscellaneous aspects of multiculturalism. However, with the government-wide commitment to policies and programs, in conjunction with social understanding, it naturally becomes subject to a wide array of differing opinions. As both immigration and citizenship policies change, its public reception often shifts as well. Especially since the channels referred to within the ‘multiculturalism...
Lister Sinclair’s pamphlet Change Comes to Canada was distributed at the Canadian Government Pavilion during Expo 67. Sinclair looks at the meaning of the name Canada. She analyses common points in people’s daily lives such as the meaning of ‘our home and native land,’ Canadian history, Canadian resources, transportation, climate and culture that tie each Canadian together. She claims that “every Canadian who thinks about Canada has his own idea about the meaning of that dream.” She argues that there is no actual national identity but individual identities that made up our national identity. She challenges the questions related to a national identity. It is interesting that something that questions the national identity would be distributed at Expo 67; but, it provides in...
35 Fleras, Augie, and Jean Leonard Elliott. Engaging Diversity: Multiculturalism in Canada. Toronto: Nelson, 2002: 164.
Do you know that despite Canada being called multicultural and accepting, Canada’s history reveals many secrets that contradicts this statement? Such an example are Canadian aboriginals, who have faced many struggles by Canadian society; losing their rights, freedoms and almost, their culture. However, Native people still made many contributions to Canadian society. Despite the efforts being made to recognize aboriginals in the present day; the attitudes of European Canadians, acts of discrimination from the government, and the effects caused by the past still seen today have proven that Canadians should not be proud of Canada’s history with respect to human rights since 1914.
Canadians have come along way in their culture and identity. Canadians have participated in multiple wars and battles that have shaped our country and the people that live in this country. But it’s not just the violence what shaped our country but the people and traditions that originated outside of Canada and was brought here. European, British and French cultures and tradition have all influenced Canada’s culture and identity. (Blattberg, C. 13, January 02). Immigrants from all over the world have in the passed contributed to the way we view Canada and because of that we live in a safe, mosaic, multicultural country. (Blattberg, C. 13, January 02).There have also been the First Nations people who started Canada’s good reputation and because of them we have accomplished everything that we have done today. (Blattberg, C. 13, January 02).
Multiculturalism policy was first adopted in Canada in 1971, which reaffirms the dignity and value of all its citizens regardless of ethnic origins, race, religious affiliations, or language. Part of this policy, Canada confirms the rights of all the aboriginals along with the recognition of two official languages. Indeed, multiculturalism has great importance since its main purpose is to give equal treatment to all the citizens (Daniel, 2010). It ensures that all individual citizens could still maintain their identities, and have pride with their ancestry. Through this initiative, the Canadian government was able to give their citizens a feeling of self-confidence, making them more open to their diverse cultures. The multiculturalism policy
Multiculturalism" is the existence of a culturally diversified society where people from different backgrounds and races come and live together. However an insight of this integrated society reveals that everyone seems to have a different opinion on the issue of how this diverse community should operate. One of the countries of North America called "the mosaic" is Canada. It has earned this distinct name because of the mix of races, cultures and ethnicities residing in it. Canada's geographical features and its harsh climate became a disadvantage to its population growth many years ago. Compared to its size, the population of Canada was not sufficient a few decades ago. However, when immigrants wandered about searching for a better lifestyle, Canada's population naturally increased and became more diverse when large groups of people from different parts of the world began to settle in the region. Since than the great debate of multiculturism has been going on. Some of the vital issues are states’ political policies, attitudes of canadian’s towards these policies, immigration, global ...
Today in Canada it is not uncommon to see people of various races, ethnic backgrounds or cultural groups living within a mutual society; commonly known as multiculturalism. Multiculturalism refers to the presence of, or support for the presence of several distinct cultural or ethnic groups within a society. As the topic becomes more more popular due to news events and social media debates, multiculturalism gets twisted and misunderstood. In essence, multiculturalism is not about dwelling on about our differences, it is about emphasizing our commonality. Diversity of the human race has the power to unify society and make it stronger. Firstly, innovation
“ Canada 's national obsession seems to be its own identity.” For many years Canada has feared the increasing influence of its North American neighbors on its culture - the United States . It has become a matter of growing concern for the people of power and influence in Canada to maintain their separate cultural identity and to promote their own cultural norms. Gaetan Tremblay presents his views on this topic and does this from the perspective of a person living and working in Quebec.
Canada has long been called "The Mosaic", due to the fact that it is made up of a varied mix of races, cultures and ethnicities. As more and more immigrants come to Canada searching for a better life, the population naturally becomes more diverse. This has, in turn, spun a great debate over multiculturalism. Some of the issues under fire are the political state's policies concerning multiculturalism, the attitudes of Canadians around these policies, immigration, the global market, and a central point is the education and how to present the material in a way so as to offend the least amount of people. There are many variations on these themes as will be discussed in this paper.
However, Canada’s Aboriginal minority had the most patriotic reasons for involvement that showed loyalty to Canada, in comparison to the African Canadians and French Canadians. Their patriotism represented Canada as a country, and Canada’s loyalty to Britain. Though many Aboriginals enlisted in Canada’s military services to escape reserve life, most enlisted to exploit their talents to assist Canada’s military in its fight during the war, such as how Private Rod Cameron enlisted to benefit Canada’s military with his scouting and sniping abilities. Also, many enlisted to prove their loyalty to Britain’s King during the war, as he descended from Queen Victoria, whom the Aboriginals signed treaties with in the past. The Aboriginals desired to honour their longstanding relationship with the British monarchy, demonstrating their loyalty. The Aboriginal motives for involvement including inclinations to use their abilities to benefit Canada’s military in its fight, and desires to honour loyalty to Britain illustrate their patriotic standpoint. However, the African Canadian minority’s reasons for military involvement are perceived as less patriotic, and more for their personal benefits, as their motives were predominantly to eliminate African Canadian minority issues. The minority was subject to racism and segregation in the era of the war, thus members of
The Second World War was the most important event that shaped Canada today. During the war, not only the English and Frenches people contributed themselves to the war, the minorities groups who despite begin treated with disrespect and contempt also contributed themselves. Their action has brought recognition and equality for themselves and advanced the idea of multicultural in Canada. Since WWII, Canada had changed in various ways towards immigration and different cultural groups. Injustice action and laws against racial groups such as the Head Tax are eliminated and apologized by the government. Although small prejudice and discrimination are yet a slight concern. Overall, Canada and its people have revolutionized the country in a more multicultural
The idea of multiculturalism is that there are many different cultures in Canada that somehow manage to live in harmony. This movie depicts a variety of different cultures all coming together in one of the most nationalist cities in Quebec, and eventually getting along. It is important to see that though there are different cultures there is still love between individuals of these cultures, stereotypes that are in common, and humour to be made out of the differences, which are all larger than any territorial and linguistic boundaries. This movie also shows the issue with bilingualism which is another important part of Canada’s heritage but encourages the idea that bilingualism policies could create a more unified Canada. In a course on multiculturalism it is important to understand the ideology of these policies and how they work in practice which this movie depicts really