Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Collectivism in modern society
Holocaust and rwanda
Holocaust and rwanda
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Collectivism in modern society
In early April of 1994 the plane carrying the Rwandan and Burundian Presidents, was shot down. Right after a genocidal mass slaughter began in Rwanda. The Rwanda genocide was a genocidal mass slaughter of the Tutsi and the moderate Hutu. The attacks were organized and committed by members of the Hutu paramilitary organizations and by people who once had been the victim’s friends or neighbors. After the genocidal the Rwandan’s came together to solve their problems and which is a great example of a collectivist society. James Neuliep defines collectivism in his book Intercultural Communication as a “cultural orientation where the group is the primary unit of culture. Group goals take precedence over individual goals.” Through those three months
many Tutsi and moderate Hutus were killed by an extremist Hutu regime with a goal to wipe out the entire Tutsis. Immaculee Ilibagiza describes in her book “Left to Tell” the horrific things that happened and the brutal way her friends, neighbors and family were murdered. And yet, she as well as the rest Tutsi survivors forgave the murderers. The murderers were tried, sentenced and reintegrated back into the daily Rwandan life.
The Rwandan genocide occurred due to the extreme divide between two main groups that were prevalent in Rwanda, the Hutu and the Tutsi. When Rwanda was first settled, the term Tutsi was used to describe those people who owned the most livestock. After the Germans lost control over their colonies after World War I, the Belgians took over and the terms Hutu and Tutsi took on a racial role (Desforges). It soon became mandatory to have an identification card that specified whether or not an individual was a Hutu, Tutsi, or Twa (a minority group in Rwanda). The Tutsi soon gained power through the grant of leadership positions by the Belgians. Later on when Rwanda was tying to gain indepe...
A practicing sociologist has the gift of being able to recognize things that many people spend their entire life in ignorance of. These “things” are what construct an individual person’s sense of reality are ideas that very often differ culture to culture. To further explain this meaning, a person can consider the idea of thunder. In a Westernized culture, many people will hear the loud noise and automatically associate it with a storm. However, in other cultures some people may immediately think that their gods are angry with them and thus cause the sounds in a fit of rage. The interesting thing about this is that both ideas are a direct result of the culture and language in which the individual was raised or adapted into. Their individual
The genocides of the 20th century which occurred in Rwanda and Germany had striking similarities, something that should have alerted the world to stop them. At the core of these two massacres, patterns existed that outlined how similar thinking and reasoning could lead to something as horrible as these two events. One can see how both groups used their command of knowledge as a way to control the people, how the rest of the world refused to step up to stop the killings, and how the people were thought of as less than humans to provide a just cause for such terrible acts.
Many innocent lives were taken during the genocide in Rwanda in 1994. Philip Gourevitch’s “We Wish to Inform You That Tomorrow We Will Be Killed with Our Families,” explains why the genocide that occurred in Rwanda should not be written off in history as just another tribal disagreement. This book entails the stories of Gourevitch and the people he interviewed when he went to Rwanda. These stories express what people went through during the genocide, the loss they saw, the mass killings they tried to hide from, and the history of what led to the Rwandan genocide. Rwanda’s colonial past did influence the development of the genocide in Rwanda. The hatred between the Hutus and the Tutsis had been going on for many years before the genocide.
In the early 1990s, Rwanda had one of the highest population densities in Africa. The Rwandan population was comprised of Hutus, who made up 85% of the population while the Tutsis made up 14% of the population which “dominated the country,” (BBC , 2014). Before the Rwandan genocide the Hutus and the Tutsis ethnic groups got along with each other. They shared everything. They shared the same language, culture, and nationality. They were even intermarrying between the two groups. Most of the time they worked on farms together. The Hutus were usually in the field and the Tutsis were usually the landowners. When European colonists moved in they took the privileged and “educated intermediaries” and put them into two groups, governors and the governed.
Africa has been an interesting location of conflicts. From the conflict between Ethiopia and Eritrea to the revolutionary conflict in Libya and Egypt, one of the greatest conflicts is the Rwandan Genocide. The Rwandan Genocide included two tribes in Rwanda: Tutsis and Hutus. Upon revenge, the Hutus massacred many Tutsis and other Hutus that supported the Tutsis. This gruesome war lasted for a 100 days. Up to this date, there have been many devastating effects on Rwanda and the global community. In addition, many people have not had many acknowledgements for the genocide but from this genocide many lessons have been learned around the world.
When the Rwandan Hutu majority betrayed the Tutsi minority, a destructive mass murdering broke out where neighbor turned on neighbor and teachers killed their students; this was the start of a genocide. In this paper I will tell you about the horrors the people of Rwanda had to face while genocide destroyed their homes, and I will also tell you about the mental trauma they still face today.
In 1994 the people of Rwanda went through a horrific experience when one of the major ethnic groups known as the Hutus, slaughtered hundreds and thousands of the second major ethnic groups known as the Tutsis over the course of 100 horrific days. The genocide resulted in the loss of almost one million lives, partly due to a lack of outside intervention, but also the surprising unification of the Hutus & Tutsis. At the same time, it influenced the way the world (more specifically the UN) handles situations like the Rwandan Genocide.
“Beginning on April 6, 1994, Hutus began slaughtering the Tutsis in the African country of Rwanda. As the brutal killings continued, the world stood idly by and just watched the slaughter. Lasting 100 days, the Rwanda genocide left approximately 800,000 Tutsis and Hutu sympathizers dead” (Rosenberg 1). When Rwanda’s President, Habyrimana, was killed in a plane crash, turmoil and massacres began. A series of events escalated violence until two ethic groups were engaged in bloody battle: The Hutus and the Tutsis. Throughout the Rwandan Genocide, the Tutsis were targeted because the death of President Habyrimana and problems in social and economic life was blamed in them, thus resulting in the 100-day genocide.
In the film The Blind Side (2009), the society is depicted into very classist categories. There is a clear distinction between the rich and the poor, as it can be seen when comparing Michael to MJ and Collins. Looking distinctly at their education, a difference in quality based on their class is very clear. When Coach Cotton discusses Michael’s transition into the elite school he states, “he’s a brave kid for wanting to come here, for wanting a quality education, an education denied to him by the poor quality of school he attended” (2009). Right from the beginning of the film, this sets the tone of the difference between the upper and lower class and establishes the way the society is categorized. Through
Setting the scene of a country whose social and political institutions are rapidly deteriorating, the platform of the People’s Party calls for vast social reform. The People’s Party claims that the government’s corruption, the people’s demoralization, and the degradation of the media are all the result of the rich and powerful taking control of the nation’s institutions and using them for their own gain. The transition from the usage of gold and silver to paper currencies, lorded as a “vast conspiracy against mankind” (p. 75), along with institutions such as the Pinkerton system are used to illustrate the height of corruption found within the government. The solution to this problem, the People’s Party postulates, is to return powers of the
Hotel Rwanda was a 2h and 2 min movie released to the public eye on December 22, 2004. This filmed showed viewers a sociological problem dealing with racism within groups that lived, eat, breath and bathed on the same land. The move featured cruel and punishable by death actions involving two groups. One being of peace and willful kindness, another whose minds are shaped into hate and carrying out acts of genocide. Outside allied forces joined in to keep what little peace the country has had, however good news and bad blend so well in this movie it is hard at first to see a silver lining.
Genocide, destruction, poor infrastructure, Rwanda a recovering country that cannot shed it’s bad reputation. Before Belgium colonized Rwanda there were Hutu’s and Twa’s, later on in the 1300’s the Tutsi’s migrated over. When these ethnic groups met they created a common culture and language, they were equals. However the ethnic divisions perpetuated by Belgium resulted in a Genocide that tarnished Rwanda’s global image. People can note that Belgiums reign created chaos and terror, in addition politic issues regarding government power and the treatment of it’s people shaped modern day Rwanda.
The process of globalization has converted this world into a global village resulting in mass movement of people for education, employment, and residence turning the countries into borderless nations. This has resulted in mixture of culture with different people expressing their view about the national and international policies formulated by the domestic and international bodies. Citizens attitude are the elements which create a political culture that play major role in the behavior and actions of persons. Various cultures across countries provide sociological account of political cultures within each country. According to Kegley and Blanton (2010) world’s political realities may be built on illusions and misconceptions and it is necessary to recognize changes in the world as the worlds future will be determined not only by the changes in the objective ‘facts’ of world politics but also by the meaning that people ascribe to those facts, the assumptions on which people base their interpretations, and the actions that flow from these assumptions and interpretations.
Culture consists of the beliefs, behaviors, objects, and other characteristics common to the members of a particular group or society. Through culture, people and groups define themselves, conform to society's shared values, and contribute to society. Thus, culture includes many societal aspects: language, customs, values, norms, mores, rules, tools, technologies, products, organizations, and institutions. Sociologists define society as the people who interact in such a way as to share a common culture. The term society can also have a geographic meaning and refer to people who share a common culture in a particular location. For example, people living in arctic climates developed different cultures from those living in desert cultures.Culture and society are intricately related. A culture consists of the “objects” of a society, whereas a society consists of the people who share a common culture.