The Rise And Fall Of Hannibal And Hannibal

1393 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: How carthage became equal with rome

In the accolades of history many great figures rise and fall, but few rival the great ascent and fall of Hannibal and his Carthage. Hannibal was a Carthaginian military commander who first-hand experienced the overwhelming tension between Carthage and Rome. Hannibal had a prime opportunity to defeat the seemingly invincible civilization of Rome, but failed to do so due to flawed execution of his original tactics. The impending downfall of Rome was spared due to no aid from allied nations or mother nation, flawed military decisions by Hannibal, and the inability of the Carthaginians to alter their battle tactics.
Although Hannibal committed grave errors, the triumph of Rome still could have been achieved had he received reinforcements when …show more content…

The Romans thought of an innovative idea following a loss at a recent battle versus Hannibal. The Romans decided to burn the anticipated path of the advancing army in an attempt to deprive them of any food. This way Hannibal not only struggled to find food, but the rate of his advance was decreased. Eventually his men would grow weary of consistently trying to find food. Hannibal’s inability to adapt to this left the resolve of his men weakened and the army’s willpower decreased. Furthermore, Hannibal was unable to respond to the battle tactics of the Romans. First, the Romans swiftly handled the Carthaginian cavalry which left Hannibal at a major advantage. After this, the war elephants were disoriented by the sounds of trumpets and the Romans flanked Hannibal from behind, one of Hannibal’s tactics. Hannibal was unable to adjust to these tactics and ended up losing in a crucial encounter, the Battle of Zama. Hannibal’s inability to respond to Rome’s adjusted tactics contributed to his downfall. Finally, Hannibal was too reliant on others. In other endeavours to weaken the Roman, he relied too much on his brother in Spain and his friend in Africa to stabilize the situation. He failed to adjust the situation in his inactions (i.e. appointing different military leaders). This proved to be fatal as forces originally intended for Hannibal were diverted to Spain because of the instability there. The outcome of the war could have been different if these forces could have reinforced Hannibal and given him the extra power to overcome the Romans. Essentially, Hannibal was continuously handcuffed because of the incompetence of his military comrades who were not on the same tactical level as he

Show More
Related

  • Caligula and his Tyrannous Reign

    969 Words  | 2 Pages

    The credit to his downfall goes to himself. He brought upon the fall of “Caligula and his Tyrannous Reign”.

    Read More

  • How Is Hannibal A Ethical Leader?

    1814 Words  | 4 Pages

    Although a genius on the battlefield, where he used surprise and maneuver to overcome the relatively small size of his force, I do not believe that Hannibal was an ethical leader. He did not always exhibit the essential intellectual traits of critical thinking, nor did he always enforce ethical standards. To clarify, Hannibal’s vision was for independence for territories. But based on some of his actions, the concept of ‘freedom for all’ was not a part of that vision. Hannibal exhibited the trait of intellectual hypocrisy; he didn’t hold himself to the same standards that he fought for when he was faced the ethical dilemma of feeding, equipping, and paying his troops for their service; or selling Roman captives into slavery. In an effort to take care of his men, he succumbed to the latter, after the failed attempt to negotiate a ransom with Rome. And so, Roman captives were sold to a local slave trader (Commire & Klezmer, 1994). Perhaps, he fell prey to ethical relativism, using this ethical trap as a way to justify the inconsistency between his thoughts and his actions. Or maybe he didn’t care; but we’ll never know. What we do know is that this lack of intellectual integrity is opposite of the behavior that is required of an ethical leader (CF03SG, 2013, p. 7). Most assuredly, his actions confused his team of warriors, and affected their view of his professional character, especially since non-Roman captives had been released to their respective countries.

    Read More

  • Brutus is a Good Leader in William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

    332 Words  | 1 Pages

    be better for Rome while the others just did not want him to become more powerful than

    Read More

  • How Did Hannibal Influence The Battle Of Carthage

    685 Words  | 2 Pages

    In his time Hannibal was a Carthaginian general revered for his prowess as a tactician and is still studied today. He learned to fight, outthink his enemies and garnered much of his animosity towards the Romans from his father Hamilcar Barca who fought against Rome in the First Punic War. After his father’s death, Hannibal succeeded him as general to the Carthaginian army at the age of 23. Hereafter he spent two years solidifying his position and gathering support before carrying out an assault on Sanguntum. He later came to be known as one of Rome’s greatest adversaries when he led a campaign against the Romans in 219 B.C.E.

    Read More

  • Linking the Punic Wars: The Role of Hannibal

    1073 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Romans would gain momentum on Hannibal by destroying some of its his ally towns and also his only hope for support: his brother Hasdrubal.

    Read More

  • Hannibal Lector Character Analysis

    467 Words  | 1 Pages

    “Psychopaths do not act like Hannibal Lector or Norman Bates. They come off like Hugh Grant, in his most adorable role.” Eric and Dylan are true psychopaths. Psychopaths develop in many different ways. Some hide their psychopathic ideals like Eric and Dylan.

    Read More

  • The First Punic War (264-241 BCE)

    912 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since the beginning of time, man has waged war on his neighbors, his friends and his enemies. In many cases these wars were caused by power-hungry nations that were in the process of expanding their empire and ended up stepping on the toes of another superpower or ally of a superpower. In the case of the first Punic War between Rome and Carthage, Carthage was extending its empire and they stepped on Rome’s toes. During the course of this war the winner was unclear but at times victory seemed eminent for both sides until Rome finally won. The Romans had control in the first part of the war but this would not last. After the Romans first win they decided that they needed a victory over the city of Carthage but this would turn the tides in favor of the Carthaginians. For some 15 years after this defeat of Rome the tides went back and forth between the two but would eventually lead to the Romans victory. After the victory, Rome made some very harsh demands and Carthage filled those demands even though some of them were very extreme.

    Read More

  • Hannibal

    1041 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... death and destruction for the Romans that Adolf Hitler would to our Civilization. Hannibal’s name became synonymous with the stereotype that Rome had of the Carthaginian perfidy. And it was this that Rome never wanted to see again; so to be a good Roman, one had to be taught what it was to be a "Hannibal" and how not to be a "Hannibal." In the end Rome was taught many valuable lessons and to the victor go the spoils; so it is a measure of the fear Hannibal’s name instilled, that long after he was dead and gone, parents would scold naughty children with the warning that if they weren't good, Hannibal would come to get them in the night.

    Read More

  • Hannibal vs. Rome

    792 Words  | 2 Pages

    even today for his campaign, the hatred Hannibal felt for Rome was clearly seen on the

    Read More

  • A Comparison of Things Fall Apart and Julius Caesar

    883 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ad done nothing at all and Brutus killed him because he believed that the general would change into a tyrannical ruler. Caesar's ambition could have destroyed Rome if it wasn't for the noble actions of Brutus.

    Read More

  • Comparative Study: Assassinations of Caesar and Lincoln

    1141 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this case, the rise of Caesar’s power was considered by some as disregard and disrespect of authority, tradition, and Roman rules. Caesar on many occasions challenged Roman commander Pompey and his main opponent, thus leading to many civil wars. Additionally, his decision to cross Rubicon was contrary to the Roman law that restricted him to enter Rome because he was a governor of Gaul at the time. Additionally, following Pompey’s death, Caesar conferred more powers to himself by diluting the Senate’s reaches and powers (Alvin 82). One major flaw that Caesar possessed was his strong ambition. This made him overconfident and thought he had become invincible both in Rome and battle. Because his soldiers respected and loved him, Caesar thought that he would pursue whatever he desired. This is what led to his

    Read More

  • Julius Caesar Death Essay

    1082 Words  | 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar is remembered as one of the greatest military minds in history and credited with arranging the basis for the Roman Empire. Caesar’s military brilliance bought Rome more land and more power, which led into the increase of size and strength of Rome. Caesar’s dictatorship helped the strength in Rome. Julius Caesar was assassinated which lead to a monarchy that was ruled by Octavin. Caesar’s death caused an effect to the collapse of the Roman Empire. Many people today in the 21st century try and follow the greatness of Julius Caesar. The assassination of Julius Caesar was a tragedy with the contributions Caesar made to strengthen Rome’s success.

    Read More

  • Hannibal Barca

    791 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even before the war started, Hannibal knew what he was going to do. Since Carthage had no navy, there was no hope of going directly from Carthage to Italy over the Mediterranean Sea. Hannibal thought up a dangerous but ingenious plan. In order to get to Italy over land, Hannibal and his army would have to travel from Carthage-controlled Spain across the Alps and into the heart of the enemy. Hannibal left in the cold winter of 218 B.C. with 50,000 infantry, 9,000 cavalry, and 37 war elephants. While crossing the Alps, “Hannibal’s force suffered greatly from the elements and the hostility of the local tribesmen” (Beshara, 3). By the time they reached Italy, after only fourteen days, over 9,000 men had perished along with most of the elephants, but this number was soon replenished after 14,000 northern Gaul rebels joined Hannibal’s army. This group of 60,000 men proved superior to the Roman forces, and after at least three recorded major victories, the Roman senate was exasperated. An army of 80,000 Roman soldiers was sent to stop Hannibal’s army of now 50,000 once and for all. In July of 216 B.C., the Romans engaged the Carthaginians in “the neighborhood of Cannae on the Italian east coast” (Lendering, 2). Greatly outnumbered, Hannibal realized that he would have to win by strategy, and that is exactly what he did. As the two lines met, Hannibal’s cavalry gained the flanks and, moving up the sides, attacked the rear of the Roman line.

    Read More

  • The Expansion of the Roman Empire

    1426 Words  | 3 Pages

    Another sizeable contributing factor to the expansion of the Roman Empire was the sacking of Rome by the Gauls in 390 B.C.. “The Romans were completely dumbfounded by the wild and undisciplined charge of the howling Gauls. The Roman’s tightly packed phalanx, a military formation they had adopted from the Greeks of southern Italy, collapsed, and the Romans fled” (Kidner, 129). The sacking left the Romans determined to prevent and avoid any similar outcomes in the future.

    Read More

  • The Fall of The Roman Republic

    878 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Roman Republic ultimately failed due to the lack of large-scale wars and other crises that had united the Roman populous early in the history of the Roman Republic. Roman leadership and honor became compromised. In the absence of war and crisis, Rome’s leaders failed to develop the honor and leadership necessary to maintain the Republic.

    Read More

More about The Rise And Fall Of Hannibal And Hannibal

Open Document