The boundary between reality and fantasy can often become blurry at times in one's life. The answers to the questions what is human and what is not human becomes very complicated at times. Even more so, the morality of humans are called into question as well. This uncertainty of what makes us human is explored in Ridley Scott's classic science fiction film Blade Runner. Dr. Eldon Tyrell's Tyrell Corporation created the replicants to be sub-human servants that were clearly distinct from human beings; the replicants were intentionally designed to be unable to express emotions, particularly empathy, which are believed to be traits that only human beings can express. Human beings believe that the quintessential thing that makes them human and …show more content…
distinguishes them from other forms of life, including replicants, is that they have the ability to express emotions. As the film goes on, though, the replicants begin to show emotions and express humanlike qualities. As the once fine line between the humans and replicants starts to become blurry and fade away, the debate on whether the replicants are humans or vice-versa becomes a phenomenon throughout the film. Eventually, morality becomes a pivotal concept as well. Even though the replicants are developing humanlike qualities and becoming "more human", the real humans still treat them as inferior and oppress them. The question of whether or not it is morally acceptable to treat these genetically engineered human beings, who are almost identical to humans, as inferior emerges here. The blurring, ambiguous boundary between real human beings and the replicants results in questioning the morality behind the creation of synthetic human beings and the way they are treated by society. The character traits of Richard Deckard blur the line between what is a human or what is a replicant or in other words, what is real and what is fake. Deckard becomes tired of killing replicants and retires from the profession. Soon enough, he is forced back into the game and has takes the hunt up again. When Deckard becomes a blade runner again, he shows no respect for the repicants, murdering every one of them, except for Roy. It is obvious that Deckard does not express any feelings at all, which he should be doing considering he is human and that is one major distinction that separates humans from replicants. The confusion is that, at the beginning of the film, Deckard does not express any emotions, but now as he continues to hunt for replicants, he begins to demonstrate feelings towards others, specifically Rachel. Thus, the question of whether Deckard is a human or a replicant arises when he expresses to Rachel that he has feelings her when he asks her, "Do you have love me...and do you trust me" (Scott). After Rachel replies yes to, Deckard then demonstrates his love for Rachel and gives her an emotional kiss on the lips. Deckard has obviously fallen in love with Rachel and this just leads to more confusion regarding whether he is human and or not. A moral issue emerges here. While Deckard has fallen in love with Rachel, he is still forced to hunt her down and try to kill her. This goes to show that morality and ethics have been completely disregarded as Deckard still continues to hunt someone who he loves. As time goes on, though, Deckard begins to develop feelings and a sense of morality as he chooses not to kill Rachel, and instead runs away with her (Scott). Deckard's actions coincide with the actions of the replicants. When the replicants were first created, they did not display emotions, but as time goes on, the replicants became more complex and began to develop human like qualities. Similarly, Deckard has done the same thing in his lifetime and it leads one to question the possibility that he might be a replicant. The evidence regarding whether Deckard is a replicant is strong, but no one can guarantee that he is a replicant for sure. As this boundary between humans and the replicants starts to become unclear, no one is certain whether Deckard being a replicant is a reality or just a fantasy. This failed distinguished of reality and fantasy is thoroughly explained through the vague and troubled mind of Nathanael in Sandman. Nathanael fails to distinguish a boundary between truthful events and delusional ones. Proof of Nathanael's inability becomes clear when Clara writes back to him that, " I must honestly confess that, in my opinion, all the terrible things of which you speak occurred merely in your own mind, and had little to do with the actual external world" (Hofmann 5). Clara illustrates the disturbing discrepancy between the self and external world. This all goes back to the idea of boundaries between two realms blurring together and becoming ambiguous to understand. This creates a feeling of uncertainty and this uncertainty is frightening as it leads to the thought that people cannot be so sure to what makes us human and that we cannot even be so certain that we are even human ourselves. The replicants are treated as inferiors by the blade runners and face extreme oppression, which proposes another ethical issue.
The replicants are beginning to evolve and with each generation they are becoming more and more advanced. They are doing everything human beings do: eat, drink, love, and have feelings for others, etc. Thus, the replicants are almost identical replicas of human being but still treated as inferiors. Ever since the existence, replicants have been treated poorly. The reason behind Tyrell created them in the first place was greed. Tyrell has made a fortune off of selling the replicants as inexpensive labor in which they perform inhumane jobs that are too undesirable for real humans to do (Scott). In Sandman, Professor Spalanzani and Coppelius raise an ethical issue when they collaborate together and create the lifelike automaton Olimpia. Coppelius murders in a torturous way in which he viciously rips her eyes out (Hoffmann). While Olimpia can do many humanlike things, such as talk and sing, she is still treated as a substandard. Similarly, the replicants receive identical treatment. They are being hunted down and murdered by blade runners. Just like in Sandman, this inhumane treatment of the replicants becomes a moral issue. As the replicants become more sophisticated and begin to develop feelings, they come to realize the significance of their lives. The replicants feel they deserve to receive the basic human rights they have been ignored since their creation. Roy Batty demonstrates that his development when he says to Sebastian, "We're not computers, we're physical" (Scott). Roy Batty and Pris both believe them and their fellow replicants are simply no longer automatons with predetermined fates. The two replicants explain to Sebastian that they experience the same emotional sensations that he does and that they are very similar in nature. The replicants, in fact, have become so complex and humanlike that are tired of living in fear and
suffering from "accelerated decrepitude" (Scott). The predetermined lifespan brings anxiety as the replicants are afraid to die. It is obvious that the replicants have developed a survival instinct, in which they are looking for desperate measures to have their life spans extended. A survival instinct is something that is so closely associated with the nature of real humans and is an ability that every human exercises so that he can live longer. Thus, the boundary between human and replicant is nowhere to be found as the fear of death is arguably the closest thing someone or something can come to feeling actually "human". The replicants predetermine lifespan brings them anxiety suffering as they are forced to live with the fear of dying every day. The morality of this future society ceases to exist. The film Blade Runner brings light to that humans and replicants are not so different after all. The film points out the uncertainty of who is human and what makes us human. No one is sure whether what makes a human a human or a replicant a replicant. Rich Deckard seems to discover his humanity, which adds onto to the uncertainty of whether Deckard is a replicant or a human. This ideas all come together to blur the boundary between humans and replicants, or in other words reality or fantasy. All these concepts result in moral considerations and calls into the question how ethical society really is. While almost being identical to humans, the replicants receive underprivileged treatment. Society avoids morality and leads us to worry and question the actions of our fellow humans. We are uncertain to what makes us human yet we use our power to put down and oppress others who not appear to be us, even though they are almost identical. Fortunately, hope does lie in Richard Deckard's character as he finds his morality towards the end of film and leaves us the idea that maybe society can change and not be evil after all.
In conclusion, readers identify with the human form and use it as a vehicle for defamiliarization to show the mechanical functions they serve themselves and others. The characters in “Bloodchild” behave as part of a process and show a lack of respect for their human qualities. As they desensitize their bodies, they allow the Tlic to engage with them in an unbalanced power relationship. Then, the Tlic interact with them in a sheltering way and inhibit their thought process. Through this interaction chain, Butler effectively conveys that the way humans treat themselves will dictate how others treat them. As the afterword said, “Bloodchild” is not about slavery; it’s about the relationships humans take on because they allow themselves to be
Analysis of the Use of Mise en Scene in Blade Runner Early in the 21st century, the Tyrell Corporation, advanced robot
In the long history of the existence of fantasy literature, writers represent monsters as something opposite to the human being. The prior conflict of this genre is usually "man Vs monster." Several examples of science fiction seemingly portray antagonistic creatures yet they are depicted as being similar to humanity: the replicants in the film Bladerunner; the monster in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein; and the Borg in Star Trek. In each of these examples, the aforementioned "monster(s)" posses human-like characteristics (some, like the replicants in Bladerunner appear almost exactly human) yet are still "monsters," they are not quite human. Thus each of the human societies shuns and despises these creatures for what they are. The significance of the alignment of the monsters with ourselves is how the monsters are the personification of our ontology. The unconscious human mind is the content of what these works attempt to personify in the monster. As Donna Haraway said in her "Cyborg Manifesto," "we are all chimeras." The curious thing is that the protagonists in some of the works actually portray monster-like characteristics--a role reversal between the monster and the hero of the work: "We have found the enemy and he is us." The analogy of the monsters is actually depicted in each of the work's respective humans' thoughts and deeds. This also shows the authors' portrayal of the monster-like and thus human-like characteristics of the human unconscious and the conscious mind.
a human being has been contemplated for centuries. Numerous philosophers have read and debated this significant question and it is still reflected upon today. Frankenstein, written by Mary Shelley plumbs the depth of this question with the example of a creature who is spurned by humanity despite being human in character. The discernment of creature from man is still misconstrued as shown in this tale, but its importance lies in the message Frankenstein that appearances matter very little when it comes to being human. The creature’s human qualities of its emotions, desire for companionship, and intelligence set it apart as uniquely human from simply a base and barbaric monster
Warren begins her argument by explicitly defining a human person as someone who is a “full-fledged member of the moral community” (Timmons 385). Warren believes that this community consists of all and only people that possess the ability to express the five qualities that were previously mentioned as opposed to all human beings that possess the genetic code of humanity. Being a member of this community entitles a person to have full moral rights, including the rights of life and happiness, which must be respected. Warren justifies that the five qualities are sufficient criteria of determining the apparent “personhood” of a being by stating that such principles of humanity would be used when attempting to study alien life forms on distant planets. Despite discernable differences in physiological and (potentially) cultural development, these alien beings may demonstrate enoug...
At first sight, there may not seem to be any similarities between the contemporary novel Never Let Me Go and the time-worn classic Frankenstein; but while Mary Shelly chooses to highlight the consequences of impetuous action in a harrowing tale about a hideous monster, Kazuo Ishiguro exemplifies the same principles in a heart wrenching tale about human clones. As a result of advancing societies, there is a common drive to create the “next best thing” whether it be monsters or clones; but the issue with this does not lie in the fact that scientists are pushing harder; but, that often there is little to no forethought regarding the consequences of creating a living thing, especially if it is created to be as human-like as possible. And, to worsen
Like Sisyphus and his rock, humans carry their flaws in an infinite limbo, searching for what it means to be human. In both Ishiguro’s novel Never Let Me Go, and Ridley Scott’s film Blade Runner, humans have become desensitized to their own identity. They are blunt, cruel, and selfish. While these are basic human traits but when these humans create clones to benefit themselves and their own survival they are taught what it truly means to be human. Through the human's interactions with the clones, the clones awareness of death, and their ultimate fear of it, humans eventually find their identity.
Androids and humans are being contrasted in the novel; Humans are only aware of the desire they long for, humans and androids feel an urge to belong, humans can see the deeper meaning to almost everything in life yet androids see situations very literal. Both the humans and the androids are in search for empathy, to be able to feel and relate to one another. In the novel, Garland says “ I think you’re right; It would seem we lack a specific talent you humans posses. I believe it’s called empathy”(Dick 124). This quote demonstrates that the android believe that they cannot relate to the humans. Yet they fail to understand the bigger picture. That the humans are very much disconnected with themselves and that around them. The humans do not know what it means to experience a feeling, the majority of their feelings come from the empathy box. Philip K. Dick view of human nature inherently is overall viewed in a negative
Upon making an honest and accurate assessment of his character, it seems evident that man is not such a creature divinely set apart from the trappings of selfishness and immorality. Rather than put man at either extreme, it seems more accurate to describe man as a creature whose tendency is to look out for himself first, as a means of survival. It is true that on many levels humans act in a cooperative way to benefit all -- but does that warrant a claim that man is genetically altruistic? Perhaps the reasoning behind his actions would lead to another view? As Ridley examines man's dependency upon others in his species, it becomes apparent that man is not necessarily a savage beast out to do everyone in, but rather a lone creature trying to ensure his survival.
With the topic of moral corruption comes evil; everyone is innately evil. Dr. Jekyll’s innate evil was hidden for many years until he performed his experiments and transformed into Hyde. Jekyll states that as Hyde he, “...could walk steadfastly and securely on his upward path doing the good things in which he found his pleasure and no longer exposed to disgrace and penitence by the hands of this extraneous evil”(43). Jekyll is morally corrupt, for he is able to carry out all of his hidden dark desires as Hyde, and not be accounted for any of it. For example, after Hyde murdered well-known politician Sir Danvers, he was able to avoid prosecution by remaining as Jekyll. In the case of Rappaccini’s Daughter, Signor Rappaccini is corrupt because he risks the lives of others for his experiments without a single tinge of remorse. Signor Baglioni states that Rappaccini, “...would sacrifice human life...or whatever else was dearest to him, for the sake of adding so much as a grain of mustard-seed to the great heap of his accumulated knowledge”(4). Rappaccini would willingly risk any life in the name of science; he purposely poisoned his daughter as an infant, regardless of any peril it entailed. The two texts also include the theme of limits on scientific experimentation; both Jekyll and Rappaccini are condemned by fellow men of science for their unconventional
She watches the movie with Sonmi and it makes them question about their restricted lifestyle and break free from their enslaved minds. Inspired by the movie, Yoona fights back against a customer that was mistreating her. She recites the line, “I will not be subjected to criminal abuse!” before attempting to escape from restaurant. Sonmi finds out later that the clones are murdered and recycled after several years of living as a slave. The criminal abuse in this era refers to the fact that clones are treated as mindless slaves every day when they are just as human as “purebloods,” and how they get murdered without the knowledge of what it means to experience life. After realizing about the criminal abuse clones were receiving, Sonmi takes a stand and sacrifices herself by broadcasting her Manifesto for the world to know the
Ambrose Bierce’s short story, “Moxon’s Master,” and John Steinbeck’s novel The Grapes of Wrath offer an examination of what distinguishes the essence of being human. Although the works share some components in their respective conclusions regarding what the essence of humanity is, each work possesses its own motive for contrasting the essence of humanity with an increasingly more convincing doppelganger of humanity, the man-made machine. “Moxon’s Master” offers a definition of the essence of man through a philosophic argument, and warns its reader of the dangerous implications regarding the seeming tendency for the man-made machine to meld more closely with that definition. The Grapes of Wrath defines the essence of humanity with the allegory of Manself, while discussing the consequences of blending man with machine as being dehumanizing and resulting in the creation of monsters beyond the control of man.
He constantly makes remarks about wanting to own a real animal that can love him in return. Furthermore, Deckard is so determined to own a real animal that he becomes selfish and lacks the trait of collectivism that along with empathy defines humanity. Milburn and Bruce argue that Deckard can accept and is able to complete his job as a bounty hunter due to the fact that he believes that androids lack emotions, and the human community needs to be protected from them (619). In the novel, humans are the only ones who have empathy for each other, which is what allows them to live together and
In society humanity or the act of being humane is evident in some way. Humanity is behavior that reflects compassion, sympathy, and generosity. Society is a collection of people who generally work together for a common good and stable environment. Humanity needs to be present to create and strengthen people’s investment in their society. Inhumane acts that are sadistic and lack compassion become prevalent when society is fragile and braking apart. The Road by Cormac McCarthy demonstrates both humane and inhumane acts throughout the novel.
With roughly 7 billion humans on Earth, every human is born different physically, but internally possess the qualities that form the foundation of humanity, compassion and sympathy. However, the corruption of an individual’s morals and character is brought about as a result of the way in which they were fostered and the situations in which they were placed. In Frankenstein, Victor endlessly pursued the acquisition of knowledge. He created a creature abundantly filled with tenderness and kindness, but one constantly alone and repeatedly abhorred by all mankind. Although the creature was repeatedly placed into situations that eventually brought about his physical destruction, his innate foundation consistently reverted back to the search for