The Reliability Of The Dark Sucker Theory

The usage of vague and opinionated premises in the theory of the “Dark Sucker” causes some second guessing and misconstrues the reliability of the theory. In comparison to the standard “Photon Emitting” theory, the Dark sucker theory does not produce a clear explanation of why a light bulb should be considered a Dark Sucker. The Dark Sucker theory cannot be proven better than the scientific theory of the way that light is emitted and visual to human eyes. The Explanations that are given by the Dark Sucker theory can all be re-explained in vivid details, along with common scientific laws, such as its reason for the black smut, which can be re-explained through science as the residue left from the heated material as it is burnt during the transfer of kinetic energy from the atoms as they explode and transfer energy from one another. The Criteria of Adequacy can also further prove why

the standard theory is far more plausible than the Dark sucker theory.

According to the Criteria of Adequacy, the Photon Emitting theory does not interfere, or differ from things that are proven by scientist as laws, and valid theory’s that never fail to explain under any circumstance. Scientist have studied and tested the cause of light emission and energy through years of test and adequate trials, which is why much of the proven ideals become laws after many test, in which, the outcomes never change. Their studies allow them to produce artificial light creators through their knowledge and proven facts that photons emit light during the transfer kinetic energy. These theories are proven and because the dark sucker theory goes against proven theories it breaks the criteria of adequacy in terms of conservation. The

Photon emitting theory on the contrary used the proven theories, and also explained the phenomena with consistency to the proven theories. The dark sucking theory also provide many assumptions that had several explanations that could be proven wrong with a change of circumstances. For an example, the theory stated, “Dark has mass. When dark goes into a dark sucker, friction from the mass generates heat.” This explanation for heat cannot be applied equally to the entire theory because the laws of mass and gravity would cause other assumptions to falsify the laws. One could differ, or cause inconsistency by applying the laws of mass and gravity to the candle light, which according to the dark sucking theory, has the most mass of all human made light sources. The assumption made by that explanation can be proven wrong by showing that some burnt candles have a smaller mass than some light bulbs, which should not be possible according to the dark sucking theory.
The first theory is clearly the best theory to explain why light is emitted, and heat is produced from light sources. This theory supports its premises with proven theories and it stays consistent with valid scientific laws. The second theory goes against many theories and attempts to redefine laws to support its bad premises. The laws of gravity, mass, and energy are all proven and supported by well-defined theories. The criteria of adequacy proved that the dark sucker theory was wrong because there were contradictions to its premises, unnecessary assumptions, and the theory was rebellious to existing theories.